
\documentclass[twoside]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
\pagestyle{myheadings}

\markboth{\hfil Nonlocal quasilinear damped differential inclusions \hfil
EJDE--2002/07} {EJDE--2002/07\hfil M. Benchohra, E. P. Gatsori \& S. 
K. Ntouyas \hfil}
\begin{document}
\title{\vspace{-1in}\parbox{\linewidth}{\footnotesize\noindent
{\sc  Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. {\bf 2002}(2002), No. 07, pp. 1--14. \newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp  ejde.math.swt.edu  (login: ftp)}
  \vspace{\bigskipamount} \\
  %
   Nonlocal  quasilinear damped differential inclusions
  %
\thanks{ {\em Mathematics Subject Classifications:} 34A60, 34G20, 35R10, 47D03.
\hfil\break\indent
{\em Key words:} Initial value problems,  multivalued map, damped equations,
  mild solution, \hfil\break\indent
  evolution inclusion, nonlocal condition, fixed point.
\hfil\break\indent
\copyright 2002 Southwest Texas State University. \hfil\break\indent
Submitted December 18, 2001. Published Janaury 15, 2002.} }
\date{}
%
\author{Mouffak Benchohra, Efrosini P. Gatsori \& Sotiris K. Ntouyas}
\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
   In this paper we investigate the existence of mild
   solutions to second order initial value problems for
   a class of damped differential inclusions with nonlocal
   conditions.  By using suitable fixed point theorems,
   we study the case when the multivalued map has convex
   and nonconvex values.
\end{abstract}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}[section]
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}[section]
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}[section]
%\newtheorem{example}{Example}[section]
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
\catcode`@=11
\@addtoreset{equation}{section}
\catcode`@=12

\def\R{\mathbb{R}}
\def\N{\mathbb{N}}

\section{Introduction}

The study of the dynamical buckling of the hinged
extensible beam which is
either stretched or compressed by
axial force in a Hilbert space,  can be modelled by the
hyperbolic equation
\begin{equation}
\frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial
t^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4}u}{\partial
x^{4}}-\Big(\alpha+\beta\int_{0}^{L}\big|
\frac{\partial u}{\partial
t}(\xi,t)\big|^{2}
d\xi\Big)\frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial
x^{2}}+g\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial
t}\right)=0,\label{E}
\end{equation}
where $\alpha, \beta, L>0$,  $u(t,x)$ is the
deflection of the point $x$ of
the beam at the time $t$, $g$ is a
nondecreasing numerical function, and $L$ is the
length of the beam.

Equation (\ref{E}) has its analogue in $\R^{n}$ and can be
included in a general mathematical model
\begin{equation}
u''+A^{2}u+M(\|A^{1/2} u\|^{2}_{H})Au+g(u')=0,\label{E1}
\end{equation}
where $A$ is a linear operator in a Hilbert space $H$
and $M$, $g$ are real functions.
Equation (\ref{E}) was studied by Patcheu \cite{P} and
(\ref{E1}) was studied by Matos and Pereira \cite{MP}.
These equations are  special cases of the following
second order damped nonlinear differential equation in an
abstract space
\begin{gather*}
u''+Au+Bu'=f(t,u),\\
u(0)=u_{0}, \quad  u'(0)=u_1,
\end{gather*}
where $A$ and $B$ are linear operators.

  In this paper, we study the existence of mild
solutions,  defined on a compact real interval
$J$,  for second order Initial Value Problems (IVP),
for  damped differential inclusions, with
  nonlocal conditions, of the form
\begin{gather}\label{e1}
y''-Ay\in By'+ F(t,y), \quad t\in J:=[0,b],\\
\label{e2}
y(0)+f(y)=y_{0}, \quad y'(0)=\eta,
\end{gather}
where $  F:J\times E\to   {\mathcal P}(E)$
is a multivalued map, $f\in C(C(J,E), E)$,    $A$ is the
infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous
cosine family
$\{C(t): t\in\R \}$ in a Banach space
$E=(E,\|\cdot\|)$, $B$ is a
bounded linear operator  on $E$ and $y_{0}, \eta\in E$.

The study of IVP with nonlocal conditions is of
significance since they have applications in problems
in physics and other areas of applied
mathematics. Some authors have paid attention
to the research of IVP with nonlocal
conditions, in the few past years. We refer to
  Balachandran and
Chandrasekaran  \cite{BaCh2}, Byszewski \cite{Bys},
\cite{Bys1}, Ntouyas \cite{Nto}, and Ntouyas and
Tsamatos \cite{NtTs},
\cite{NtTs1}.
IVP ,for second order semilinear equations with
nonlocal conditions, was studied by
Ntouyas and Tsamatos \cite{NtTs1}, and Ntouyas
\cite{Nto}.

Here, we study existence results on compact intervals,
when the multivalued $F$ has convex or nonconvex
values. In the first case, a fixed point theorem
due to Martelli \cite{Mar} is used
and, in the later,  a fixed point theorem  for
contraction multivalued
maps due to Covitz and Nadler \cite{CoNa} is applied.

\section {Preliminaries}

In this section, we introduce notations, definitions,
and preliminary facts
from multivalued analysis which are used throughout
this paper.

$C(J,E)$ is the Banach space of continuous functions
from $J$ into $E$ normed by
$$
\|y\|_{\infty}=\sup\{\|y(t)\|: t\in J\},$$
and $B(E)$ denotes the Banach space of bounded linear
operators from $E$ into $E$.

A measurable function $y:J\to  E$ is
Bochner integrable
if and only if $\|y\|$ is Lebesgue integrable. (For
properties of the Bochner
integral see Yosida \cite{Yos}).

$L^{1}(J,E)$ denotes the linear space of equivalence
classes of measurable functions  $y: J\to  E$  such that
$\int_{0}^{b} \|y(s)\|\, ds<\infty$.

Let $(X, \|\cdot\|)$ be a Banach space. A multivalued
map
$G:X\to {\mathcal P}(E)$
is convex
(closed) valued if
$G(x)$ is  convex (closed)
for all $x\in X.$ $G$ is bounded on bounded sets if
$G(B)=\cup_{x\in
B}G(x)$
is bounded
in $X$ for any bounded set $B$ of $X$ (i.e.
$\sup_{x\in
B}\{\sup\{\|y\|:
y\in G(x) \}\}<\infty)$.

$G$ is called upper semicontinuous (u.s.c.) on $X$ if
for each
$x_{0}\in X$ the set $G(x_{0})$ is a nonempty, closed
subset
of $X$, and if for each open set $B$ of $X$ containing
$G(x_{0})$,
there
exists an open neighbourhood $U$ of $x_{0}$ such that
$G(U)\subseteq
B.$ $G$ is  said to be completely semicontinuous if
$G(B)$ is relatively
compact
for every bounded subset $B\subseteq X$. If the
multivalued map $G$ is
completely semicontinuous with nonempty
compact values, then $G$ is u.s.c. if and  only if $G$
has a closed graph
(i.e. $x_{n}\to  x_{*}, \
y_{n}\to  y_{*}, \
y_{n}\in G(x_{n})$ imply $y_{*}\in G(x_{*})$). $G$ has
a fixed point if
there is $x\in X$ such that  $x\in G(x)$.
\begin{gather*}
P(X)=\{Y\in {\mathcal P}(X): Y\not=\emptyset\},
\quad
P_{cl}(X)=\{Y\in P(X): Y \mbox{ closed}\},\\
P_{b}(X)=\{Y\in P(X): Y \mbox{ bounded}\}, \quad
P_{c}(X)=\{Y\in P(X): Y \mbox{ convex}\}.
\end{gather*}
A multivalued map $G:J\to  P_{cl}(X)$  is
  said to be  {\em measurable} if for
each $x\in X$  the function
$Y:J\to \R$, defined by
$$
Y(t)=d(x,G(t))=\inf\{|x-z|: z\in G(t)\},$$
is measurable. Other equivalent  definitions of the
measurability for
multivalued maps can be found in \cite{HuPa}. For more
details on
multivalued
maps and for the proofs of the known results cited in
this section we refer
the interesting reader to the books  of Deimling
\cite{Dei} and Hu and Papageorgiou \cite{HuPa}.

An upper semicontinuous map $G:X\to {\mathcal P}(E)$ is
said to be
condensing if for any subset $B\subseteq X$ with
$\alpha(B)\not=0$, we have
$\alpha(G(B))<\alpha(B)$,
where $\alpha$ denotes the Kuratowski measure of
noncompacteness. For
properties of the Kuratowski measure, we refer to
the book of Banas and Goebel
\cite{BaGo}. We remark that a completely
semicontinuous multivalued map is the
easiest
example of a condensing map. For more details on
multivalued maps we
refer to the
books of Deimling \cite{Dei}, Gorniewicz \cite{Gor}
and Hu and Papageorgiou
\cite{HuPa}.

We say that a family $\{C(t): t\in\R \}$ of operators
in $B(E)$ is a
strongly
continuous cosine family if: \begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] $C(0)=I \quad  (I$ is the identity operator in $E$)
\item[(ii)] $C(t+s)+C(t-s)=2C(t)C(s)$ for all $s, t\in \R$
\item[(iii)] the map $t\mapsto C(t)y$ is strongly
continuous for each $y\in E$
\end{enumerate}
The strongly continuous sine family  $\{S(t): t\in\R\}$, associated to
the given strongly continuous cosine family $\{C(t): t\in\R \}$, is
defined by
$$
S(t)y=\int_{0}^{t}C(s)yds, \ \ y\in E, \ t\in\R.$$
The infinitesimal generator $A:E\to  E$ of
a cosine family
$\{C(t): t\in\R \}$ is defined by
$$
Ay=\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}C(t)y\Big|_{t=0}.$$
It is known \cite{TrWe1} that if $A$ is the
infinitesimal generator of a
strongly continuous cosine family $C(t),t\in \R$, of bounded linear
operators, then there exist constants $M\ge 1$ and
$\omega\ge 0$ such that
$$\|C(t)\|\le Me^{\omega |t|}, t\in \R \quad
\mbox{and}\quad
\|S(t_1)-S(t_2)\|\le M\left|\int_{t_2}^{t_1}
e^{\omega |s|}\,\, ds\right|, t_1, t_2\in \R.$$
  For a strongly continuous cosine family  if $X=\{x\in
E:   C(t)x$ is once
continuously differentiable on $\R\}$, then
$S(t)E\subset X$ for $t\in \R$, $S(t)X\subset D(A)$
for $t\in \R$, $(d/dt)
C(t)x=AS(t)x$ for $x\in X$ and $t\in \R$,
and $(d^{2}/dt^{2}) C(t)x=AC(t)x=C(t)Ax$ for $x\in D(A)$
and $t\in \R$.

  For more details on strongly continuous cosine and
sine families, we refer the reader to the book of Goldstein \cite{Gol},
Heikkila and
Lakshmikantham \cite{HeLa},  Fattorini \cite{Fat},
and to the papers of
Travis and Webb \cite{TrWe}, \cite{TrWe1}.

\section{Existence result: The convex case}

Assume in this section that  $F: J\times E\to
{\mathcal P}(E)$ is a
bounded,
closed
and convex valued multivalued map.

\begin{definition} \rm
A  function $y\in C(J,E)$ is called a mild solution of
(\ref{e1})--(\ref{e2})  if there exists a
function $v\in L^{1}(J,E)$ such that $v(t)\in
F(t,y(t))$ a.e. on J,
$y(0)+f(y)=y_{0},  y'(0)=\eta$ and
\begin{eqnarray*}
y(t) &=& (C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)v(s)ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{definition}

We will need  the following assumptions:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H1)] $A$ is the infinitesimal generator of a
given strongly continuous and bounded cosine family
$\{C(t): t\in J \}$,  and $M=\sup\{\|C(t)\|; t\in J \}$;

\item[(H2)] $F:J\times E\to  BCC(E);(t,y)\mapsto F(t,y)$ is
  measurable with
respect to $t$ for each $y\in E$, u.s.c. with respect
to $y$ for each
$t\in J$, and for each fixed  $y\in C(J,E)$ the set
$$
S_{F,y}=\Bigl\{g\in L^{1}(J,E): \ g(t)\in F(t,y(t)) \
\hbox {for a.e. } t\in J \Bigr\}$$
is nonempty;

\item[(H3)]  there exists a constant $Q$,  with
$QM(1+b\|B\|)<1$, such that
$$
\|f(y)\|\leq Q\|y\| \quad \mbox{for each } y\in C(J,E);$$

\item[(H4)]  $\|F(t,y)\|:=\sup\{\|v\|\in F(t,y) \}\leq
p(t)\psi(\|y\|)$ for almost all $t\in J$
and all $y \in E$, where $p\in L^{1}(J,\R_{+})$ and
$\psi:\R_{+}\to (0,\infty)$ is
continuous and increasing  with
$$
\int_{0}^{b}{\widehat
m}(s)ds<\int_{c}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s+\psi(s)}, $$
where
$$c=\frac{1}{1-QM(1+b\|B\|)}[M(1+b\|B\|)\|y_{0}\|+bM\|\eta\|]$$
  and
$ {\widehat m}(t)=\max\{M\|B\|, bMp(t)\}$;

\item[(H5)] for each bounded set $B\subset C(J,E)$
and $t\in J$
the set
\begin{multline*}
\Bigl\{(C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds\\
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g(s)ds: g\in S_{F,B} \Bigr\}
\end{multline*}
is relatively compact in $E$, where
$S_{F,B}=\cup\{S_{F,y}: y\in B \}$.
\end{itemize}

\begin{remark} \rm \begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] If $\dim E<\infty$ then, for
each $y\in C(J,E)$, $S_{F,y}\neq \emptyset$ (see Lasota
and Opial \cite{LaOp}).
\item[(ii)]  If $\dim E=\infty$ then $S_{F,y}$ is nonempty  if
and only if  the function $Y:J\to  \R$, defined by
$$
Y(t):=\inf\{\|v\|: v\in F(t,y) \},$$
belongs to $L^{1}(J,\R)$ (see Hu and Papageorgiou
\cite{HuPa}). \\
  Also, if $\dim E=\infty$,  in order to get meausurable
selections for the multifunction $t\mapsto F(t,y(t))$, we can suppose that
$F$ is measurable with respect to
${\mathcal L}\otimes{\mathcal B}$, where
  ${\mathcal L}$ and ${\mathcal B}$ are the Lebesque
and Borel
$\sigma$-fields on J and $E$
respectively.
\item[(iii)] Assumption (H4) is satisfied for example if $F$
satisfies the
standard  domination
  $$\|F(t,y)\|\le p(t)(1+\|y\|), \quad p\in L^{1}, \,\,
t\in J,\,\, y\in
E.$$
\item[(iv)] If we assume that $C(t), \ t\in J$ is completely
continuous then (H5) is satisfied.
\end{enumerate}
\end{remark}

The following lemmas are crucial in the proof of our
main theorem.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{LaOp}] \label{l1}
  Let $I$ be a compact real interval and $X$
be a Banach space. Moreover, let $F$ be a
multivalued map satisfying (H2) and let $\Gamma$ be a
linear continuous mapping from $L^{1}(I,X)$ to $C(I,X)$.
Then the operator
$$
\Gamma \circ S_{F}:C(I,X)\to  BCC(C(I,X)),
\ y\mapsto(\Gamma \circ S_{F})(y):=\Gamma(S_{F,y}),
$$
is a closed graph operator in $C(I,X)\times C(I,X)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}[\cite{Mar}]\label{l2}
   Let $X$ be a Banach space and
$N:X\to  BCC(X)$ be an upper semicontinuous
and condensing
map. If
the set
$$
\Omega:=\{y\in X: \lambda y\in N(y) \  \hbox{for
some} \  \lambda >1 \}$$
is bounded, then $N$ has a fixed point.
\end{lemma}

The following theorem is   our main result in this
article.

\begin{theorem}
Let $f$ be a continuous and convex function. Assume
that  (H1)-(H5) hold.
Then the IVP (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}) has at least one mild solution.
\end{theorem}
%
{\bf Proof.}  We transform (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}) into a
fixed point problem.
Consider the multivalued map $N:C(J,E)\to \mathcal{P}(C(J,E))$,
defined by
\begin{eqnarray*}
N(y)&:=&\Bigl\{ h\in C(J,E) :
h(t) =(C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds +\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g(s)ds
\;\; g\in S_{F,y} \Bigr\},
\end{eqnarray*}
where
$S_{F,y}=\bigl\{g\in L^{1}(J,E) : g(t)\in F(t,y(t))
\hbox{ for a.e. } t\in J \bigr\}$.

\begin{remark} \rm
  It is clear that the fixed points of
$N$ are mild solutions to IVP (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}).
\end{remark}

We shall show that $N$ is completely semicontinuous
with bounded, closed, convex
values and it is upper semicontinuous. The proof will
be given in several steps.

\paragraph{Step 1:}  $N(y)$ is convex for each $y\in C(J,E)$.\\
Indeed, if $h_1,\ h_2$ belong to $Ny$ then there
exist $g_1,
g_2\in S_{F,y}$ such that,  for each $t\in J$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
h_i(t)&=& (C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g_{i}(s)ds,
\quad i=1,2.
\end{eqnarray*}
Let $0\leq \alpha\leq 1$. Then for each $t\in J$ we
have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lefteqn{(\alpha h_1+(1-\alpha)h_2)(t)}\\
&=&(C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta
+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s) By(s)ds\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)[\alpha g_1(s)+(1-\alpha)g_2(s)]ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
Since $S_{F,y}$ is convex (because $F$ has convex
values) it follows that
$\alpha h_1+(1-\alpha)h_2\in N(y)$.

\paragraph{Step 2:}  $N$ is bounded on bounded sets of $C(J,E)$.\\
Indeed, it is enough to show that for each $r>0$ there
exists a positive constant $\ell$ such that for each $h\in Ny, y \in
B_{r}:=\{y\in C(J,E): \|y\|_{\infty}\leq r \}$, one has
$\|h\|_{\infty}\leq \ell$.
If $h\in N(y)$ then there exists $g\in S_{F,y}$ such
that, for each $t\in J$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
h(t) &=& (C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g(s)ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
By (H3)  and (H4), we have, for each $t\in J$, that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|h(t)\|&\leq&(\|C(t)\|+\|S(t)\| \|B\|)(
\|y_{0}\|+Q\|y(t)\|)+\|S(t)\|
\|\eta\|\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}\|C(t-s)\|\|B\|
\|y(s)\|ds+\int_{0}^{t}\|S(t-s)g(s)\|ds
\\
&\leq& (M+bM\|B\|)(\|y_{0}\|+Qr)+
bM\|\eta\|\\
&&+M\|B\|br+ bM\cdot\sup_{y\in
[0,r]}\psi(y)\Bigl(\int_{0}^{t}p(s)ds\Bigr).
\end{eqnarray*}
Then for each $h\in N(B_{r})$ we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|h\|_{\infty} &\leq & (M+\|bM\|B\|)(\|y_{0}\|+Qr)+ bM\|\eta\|\\
&&+M\|B\|br+ bM\sup_ {t\in
J}\Bigl(\int_{0}^{t}p(s)ds\Bigr)\max_{y\in B_{r}}\sup_{y\in
[0,r]}\psi(y):=\ell.
\end{eqnarray*}

\paragraph{Step 3:} $N$ sends bounded sets of $C(J,E)$ into
equicontinuous sets.\\
Let $t_1, t_2\in J, t_1<t_2$ and
$B_{r}$ be as before.
For each $y\in B_{r}$ and $h\in Ny$, there exists
$g\in S_{F,y}$ such
that
\begin{eqnarray*}
h(t) &=& (C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g(s)ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
Thus
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lefteqn{\|h(t_2)-h(t_1)\|}\\
&\leq&
\|C(t_2)-C(t_1)\|\|y_{0}-f(y)\|+\|S(t_2)B-S(t_1)B\| \|y_{0}-f(y)\|\\
  &&+\|S(t_2)-S(t_1)\| \|\eta\|
+ \Bigl\|\int_{0}^{t_1}[C(t_2-s)By(s)-C(t_1-s)By(s)]ds\Bigr\|\\
&& +\Bigl\|\int_{t_1}^{t_2}C(t_2-s)By(s)ds\Bigr\|
  +\Bigl\|\int_{0}^{t_1}[S(t_2-s)-S(t_1-s)]g(s)ds\Bigr\|\\
&& +\Bigl\|\int_{t_1}^{t_2}S(t_2-s)g(s)ds\Bigr\| \\
&\le&
\|C(t_2)-C(t_1)\|\|y_{0}-f(y)\|+\|S(t_2)B-S(t_1)B\|
  \|y_{0}-f(y)\| \\
&&+\|S(t_2)-S(t_1)\| \|\eta\|
+\Bigl\|\int_{0}^{t_1}[C(t_2-s)By(s)-C(t_1-s)By(s)]ds\Bigr\| \\
&&+\Bigl\|\int_{t_1}^{t_2}C(t_2-s)By(s)ds\Bigr\|\\
&&+\sup_{t\in J}p(t)\sup_{y\in[0,r]}
\psi(y)\Bigl\|\int_{0}^{t_1}[S(t_2-s)-S(t_1-s)]g(s)ds\Bigr\|\\
&&+
Mb(t_2-t_1)\sup_{y\in[0,r]}\psi(y)\Big(\int_{0}^{t}p(s)ds\Big).
  \end{eqnarray*}
The right-hand side  tends  to zero as $t_2-t_1\to 0$.
As a consequence of Step 2, Step 3 and (H5), together
with the Ascoli-Arzel\'{a} theorem, we conclude
that $N$ is completely continuous and, therefore, a condensing map.

\paragraph{Step 4:}  $N$ has a closed graph.\\
Let $y_{n}\to  y^{*}$, $h_{n}\in Ny_{n}$,  and  $h_{n} \to  h^{*}$.
We shall prove that $h^{*}\in Ny^{*}$.
The formula $h_{n}\in N(y_{n})$ means that there exists $g_{n}\in
S_{F,y_{n}}$ such
that
\begin{eqnarray*}
h_{n}(t) &=& (C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y_{n}))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By_{n}(s)ds+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g_{n}(s)ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
We have to  prove that there exists $g^{*}\in S_{F,y^{*}}$ such that
\begin{eqnarray*}
h^{*}(t) &=&(C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y^{*}))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By^{*}(s)ds+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g^{*}(s)ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
Consider the linear bounded operator
$\Gamma:L^{1}(J,E)\to  C(J,E)$, defined by
$$(\Gamma g)(t):=\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g(s)ds.$$
Clearly we have that
\begin{multline*}
\Big\|\Big(h_{n}-[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y_{n})-S(t)\eta)-\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By
_{n}(s)\Big)\\
\Big(h^{*}-[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y^{*})-S(t)\eta)-\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By^
{*}(s)\Big)\Big\|\to 0,
\end{multline*}
as $n\to \infty$.
  From Lemma \ref{l1}, it follows that $\Gamma\circ S_{F}$ is a closed
graph operator. Since $y_{n}\to  y^{*}$, it follows, from
Lemma \ref{l1}, that
\begin{multline*}
h^{*}-[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y^{*})-S(t)\eta)-\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By^{*}(s)\\
= \int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g^{*}(s)ds
\end{multline*}
for some $g^{*}\in S_{F,y^{*}}$.

\paragraph{Step 5:}  The set
$\Omega:=\{y\in C(J, E): \lambda y\in N(y), \hbox{ for some }\lambda>1 \}$
is bounded. \\
Let $y\in \Omega$. Then $\lambda y\in N(y)$ for some
$\lambda>1$. Thus, there exists
$g\in S_{F,y}$ such that
\begin{eqnarray*}
y(t)&=& \lambda^{-1}(C(t)-S(t)B)(y_{0}-f(y))+\lambda^{-1}S(t)\eta\\
&&+\lambda^{-1}\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)ds+\lambda^{-1}\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g(s)ds,
\; t\in J.
\end{eqnarray*}
The above formula implies (by  (H3) and (H4)) that, for each $t\in
J$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|y(t)\|&\leq&
(M+bM\|B\|)(\|y_{0}\|+Q\|y(t)\|)+bM\|\eta\|\\
  &&+M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|y(s)\|ds+
Mb\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi(\|y(s)\|)ds,
\end{eqnarray*}
or
\begin{eqnarray*}
[1-QM(1+b\|B\|)]\|y(t)\| &\leq&
(M+bM\|B\|)\|y_{0}\|+bM\|\eta\|\\
&& +M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|y(s)\|ds+
Mb\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi(\|y(s)\|)ds,
\end{eqnarray*}
and
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|y(t)\|&\leq&
\frac{1}{1-QM(1+b\|B\|)}\Bigl\{(M+bM\|B\|)\|y_{0}\|+bM\|\eta\|\\
  &&+M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|y(s)\|ds+
Mb\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi(\|y(s)\|)ds\Bigr\}, \quad t\in J.
\end{eqnarray*}
Let us denote  the right-hand side of the above
inequality as $v(t)$. Then we have
\begin{gather*}
v(0)=\frac{1}{1-QM(1+b\|B\|)}[M(1+b\|B\|)\|y_{0}\|+bM\|\eta\|], \\
  \|y(t)\|\leq v(t),\quad t\in J,
\end{gather*}
and
$v'(t)=M\|B\|\|y(t)\|+bMp(t)\psi(\|y(t)\|)$, $t\in J$.
Using the increasing character of $\psi$ we get
$$
v'(t)\leq M\|B\|v(t)+bMp(t)\psi(v(t))\le \widehat{m}(t)[v(t)+\psi(v(t))],
\quad t\in J.$$
The above inequality implies,  for each $t\in J$, that
$$
\int_{v(0)}^{v(t)}\frac{ds}{s+\psi(s)}\leq
\int_{0}^{b}{\widehat
m}(s)ds<
\int_{v(0)}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s+\psi(s)}.$$
Consequently, there exists a constant $d$ such that
$v(t)\leq d$, $t\in J$, and hence $\|y\|_{\infty}\leq d$, where $d$ depends
only on the functions $p$ and $\psi$. This shows that $\Omega$ is bounded.

Set $X:=C(J,E)$. As a consequence of Lemma 3.2 we
deduce that $N$ has a fixed point which is a mild solution of
(\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}). \hfill$\diamondsuit$


\section{Existence Result: The nonconvex case}
In this section  we consider problem (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2})
with a nonconvex valued right hand side.

Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space induced from the normed
space $(X,\|\cdot\|)$.
Consider $H_{d}:P(X)\times P(X)\to \R_{+}\cup\{\infty\}$, given by
$$
H_{d}(A,B)=\max\Big\{\sup_{a\in A}d(a,B),\sup_{b\in
B}d(A,b)\Big\},$$
where $d(A,b)=\inf_{a\in A}d(a,b)$,  $d(a,B)=\inf_{b\in B}d(a,b)$.
Then $(P_{b,cl}(X),H_{d})$ is a metric space and
$(P_{cl}(X),H_{d})$ is a generalized metric space.

\begin{definition}\rm
  A multivalued operator $N:X\to P_{cl}(X)$ is called:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[a)] $\gamma$-Lipschitz if and only if there
exists $\gamma>0$ such that
$$
H_{d}(N(x),N(y))\leq \gamma d(x,y) \quad \hbox{for
each}
\ x,\ y\in X,$$
\item[b)] contraction if and only if it is
$\gamma$-Lipschitz with
$\gamma<1$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, $N$ has {\em a fixed point} if
there is $x\in X$ such that
$x\in N(x).$  The fixed point set of the multivalued
operator $N$ will be denoted by $\mathop{\rm Fix} N$.
\end{definition}

Our considerations are based on the following fixed
point theorem for contraction multivalued operators, given by Covitz and
Nadler in 1970
\cite{CoNa} (see also Deimling \cite[Thm. 11.1]{Dei}).

\begin{lemma}\label{l3}  Let $(X,d)$ be a complete
metric space. If $N:X\to P_{cl}(X)$ is a contraction,
then $\mathop{\rm Fix}N\not=\emptyset$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{theorem}  \label{t1} Assume that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(A1)] $A$ is an infinitesimal generator of a
given strongly continuous and bounded cosine family $\{C(t):
t\in J \}$ with $\|C(t)\|_{B(E)}\leq  M;$

\item[(A2)] $F:J\times E\to P_{cl}(E)$
has the property that $F(\cdot,u): J\to P_{cl}(E)$
is measurable for each $u\in E$;

\item[(A3)] there exists $l\in L^{1}(J,\R)$ such that
$$H_{d}(F(t,u),F(t,\overline u))\leq
l(t)\|u-\overline u\|, \ \quad \mbox{for
ea}\,\,\ t\in J\quad\mbox{and}\,\,\, u,\overline u\in E,$$
and
$$d(0,F(t,0))\le l(t),\quad\mbox{for almost each}
\quad t\in J.$$

\item[(A4)] $\|f(y)-f(\overline y)\|\leq
c\|y-\overline y\|$, \ for
each $t\in J$ and $y,\overline y\in C(J,E)$,
where $c$ is a nonnegative constant.
\end{enumerate}
  Then IVP (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}) has at
least one mild solution on $J$, provided
$$cM(1+b\|B\|)+M\|B\|b+\frac{M}{\tau}<1.
$$
\end{theorem}
%
{\bf Proof.}  Transform (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}) into a fixed
point problem.
Consider the multivalued operator $N:C(J,E)\to {\mathcal P}(C(J,E))$,
defined by
\begin{eqnarray*}
N(y)&:=&\Big\{h\in C(J,E):
h(t)=[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta \\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)\, ds
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)v(s)\, ds,
\Big\}
\end{eqnarray*}
where
$v\in S_{F,y}=\Bigl\{v\in L^{1}(J,E) : v(t)\in
F(t,y(t)) \hbox{ for a.e. } t\in J \Bigr\}$.

\begin{remark}  \rm  (i) \ It is clear that the fixed
points of $N$ are solutions to (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}). \\
(ii) For each $y\in C(J,E)$, the set $S_{F,y}$ is
nonempty since, by (A2), $F$ has  a measurable selection
\cite[Theorem III.6]{CaVa}.
\end{remark}

We shall show that $N$ satisfies the assumptions of
Lemma \ref{l3}. The proof will be given in two steps.

\paragraph{Step 1:}  $N(y)\in P_{cl}(C(J,E)$ for
each $y\in C(J,E)$.\\
Indeed, let $(y_{n})_{n\geq 0}\in N(y)$ be such that
$y_{n}\to  \tilde y$ in $C(J,E)$. Then $\tilde y\in C(J,E)$ and
\begin{eqnarray*}
y_{n}(t)&\in& [C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)\, ds
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)F(s,y(s))\, ds, \,\, t\in J.
\end{eqnarray*}
Using the closedness property of the values of $F$ and
the second part
of
(A3) we can prove that  $\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)\, ds
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)F(s,y(s))\, ds$ is closed, for each
$t\in J.$  Then $y_{n}(t)\to   \tilde y(t)$ in
$$
[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y))+S(t)\eta
+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By(s)\, ds
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)F(s,y(s))\, ds,
$$
$t\in J$. So, $\tilde y\in N(y)$.

\paragraph{Step 2:}  $H_{d}(N(y_1),N(y_2))\leq
\gamma\|y_1-y_2\|$ for
each $y_1, y_2\in C(J,E)$ (where $\gamma<1$).\\
Let $y_1,y_2 \in C(J,E)$ and $h_1\in
N(y_1)$. Then,
there exists  $g_1(t)\in F(t,y_{1}(t))$ such that
\begin{eqnarray*}
h_1(t)&=&[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y_1))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By_1(s)\, ds
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g_1(s)\, ds,\quad  t\in J.
\end{eqnarray*}
  From (A3), it follows that
$$
H_{d}(F(t,y_1(t)), F(t,y_2(t)))\leq
l(t)\|y_1-y_2\|.$$
Hence, there is $w\in F(t,y_2(t))$ such that
$\|g_1(t)-w\|\leq l(t)\|y_1-y_2\|$,  $t\in J$.
Consider $U:J\to {\mathcal P}(E)$, given by
$$
U(t)=\{w\in E: \|g_1(t)-w\|\leq
l(t)\|y_1-y_2\|\}.$$
Since the multivalued operator $V(t)=U(t)\cap
F(t,y_{2}(t))$ is measurable \cite[Prop. III.4]{CaVa}),
  there exists $g_2(t)$ a measurable
selection for $V$.  So,
$g_2(t)\in F(t,y_2(t))$ and
$$
\|g_1(t)-g_2(t)\|\leq l(t)\|y_1-y_2\| \ \
\hbox{for each } t\in J.
$$
Let us define,  for each $t\in J$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
h_2(t)&=&[C(t)-S(t)B](y_{0}-f(y_2))+S(t)\eta\\
&&+\int_{0}^{t}C(t-s)By_2(s)\, ds
+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-s)g_2(s)\, ds,
\quad  t\in J.
\end{eqnarray*}
Then, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lefteqn{\|h_1(t)-h_2(t)\|}\\
&\leq&(M+bM\|B\|)\|f(y_1)-f(y_2)\|+M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|
y_1(s)-y_2(s))\|ds
\\
&&+M\int_{0}^{t}\|g_1(s)-g_2(s)\|\,ds\\
&\leq&cM(1+b\|B\|)\|y_1(t)-y_2(t)\|+M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|y_1(s)-y_2(s)\|d
s\\
&&+M\int_{0}^{t}l(s)\|y_1(s)-y_2(s)\|ds\\
&=&
cM(1+b\|B\|)\|y_1(t)-y_2(t)\|+M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|y_1(s)-y_2(s)\|ds
\\
&&+M\int_{0}^{t}l(s)e^{-\tau L(s)}e^{\tau
L(s)}\|y_1(s)-y_2(s)\|\,ds\\
&\leq& cM(1+b\|B\|)e^{\tau L(t)}\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}
+M\|B\|be^{\tau L(t)}\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}
\\
&&+M\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}\int_{0}^{t}l(s)e^{\tau
L(s)}ds\\
&\leq& cM(1+b\|B\|)e^{\tau L(t)}\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}
+M\|B\|be^{\tau L(t)}\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}\\
&&+M\frac{\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}}{\tau}e^{\tau L(t)},
\end{eqnarray*}
where $L(t)=\int_{0}^{t}l(s)ds$, $\tau$ is a positive constant, and
$\|\cdot\|_{\cal B}$ is the
Bielecki norm on $C(J,E)$, defined by
$$
\|y\|_{\cal B}=\max_{t\in J}\{\|y(t)\|e^{-\tau L(t)}\}.$$
Then
$$
\|h_1-h_2\|_{\cal B}\leq
\big[cM(1+b\|B\|)+M\|B\|b+\frac{M}{\tau}\big]\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}.$$
By the analogous relation, obtained by interchanging
the roles of $y_1$ and $y_2$, it follows that
$$
H_{d}(N(y_1),N(y_2))\leq
\big[cM(1+b\|B\|)+M\|B\|b+\frac{M}{\tau}\big]\|y_1-y_2\|_{\cal B}.
$$
Since $ cM(1+b\|B\|)+M\|B\|b+\frac{M}{\tau}<1$, $N$ is
a contraction and thus, by Lemma \ref{l3}, it has a
fixed point
$y$, which is a mild solution to (\ref{e1})-(\ref{e2}).
\hfill$\diamondsuit$

\begin{thebibliography}{99} \frenchspacing

\bibitem{BaCh2} K. Balachandran and M. Chandrasekaran,
Existence of
solutions of a delay
differential equation with nonlocal condition, {\em
Indian J. Pure
Appl. Math.} {\bf 27} (5) (1996), 443-449.
\bibitem{BaGo} J. Banas and K. Goebel, Measures of
Noncompactness in Banach Spaces,
Marcel-Dekker, New York, 1980.

\bibitem{Bys} L. Byszewski, Existence and uniqueness
of mild  and classical
solutions of  semilinear functional differential
evolution nonlocal Cauchy problem,
{\em  Selected Problems of Mathematics}, Cracow Univ. of Tech.,
Aniversary Issue, {\bf  6 } (1995), 25-33.

\bibitem{Bys1} L. Byszewski, Theorems about the
existence and
uniqueness of
solutions of a semilinear evolution nonlocal Cauchy
problem, {\em J.
Math.
Anal.
Appl.}
{\bf 162} (1991), 494-505.
\bibitem{CaVa} C. Castaing and M. Valadier, Convex
Analysis and Measurable
Multifunctions, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol.
580, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1977.

\bibitem{CoNa} H. Covitz and S. B. Nadler Jr.,
Multivalued contraction
mappings in generalized metric spaces, {\em Israel J.
Math.} {\bf 8} (1970),
5-11.
\bibitem{Dei} K. Deimling, Multivalued Differential
Equations, Walter
de
Gruyter,
Berlin-New York, 1992.
\bibitem{Fat} H. O. Fattorini, Second Order Ordinary
differential
equations
in Banach
spaces, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
\bibitem{Gol} J. A. Goldstein, Semigroups of Linear
Operators and
Applications,
Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1985.
\bibitem{Gor} L. Gorniewicz, Topological Fixed Point
Theory of Multivalued
Mappings, Mathematics and its Applications, 495,
Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, 1999.
\bibitem{HeLa} S. Heikkila and V. Lakshmikantham,
Monotone Iterative
Techniques
for Discontinuous Nonlinear Differential Equations,
Marcel Dekker, New
York,
1994.
\bibitem{HuPa} S. Hu and  N. Papageorgiou,  Handbook
of Multivalued
Analysis, Volume I: Theory, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht,
Boston,
London, 1997.
\bibitem{LaOp} A. Lasota and Z. Opial, An application
of the
Kakutani-Ky-Fan theorem in the theory
of ordinary differential equations,  {\em Bull. Acad.
Polon. Sci. Ser.
Sci.
Math.
Astronom. Phys.} {\bf 13} (1965), 781-786.
\bibitem{Mar} M. Martelli, A Rothe's type theorem for
non-compact
acyclic-valued map, {\em Boll. Un. Mat. Ital.} (4)
{\bf 11}  (1975),
no 3.
suppl., 70-76.

\bibitem{MP} M. Matos and D. Pereira, On a hyperbolic
equation  with
strong
damping, {\em Funkcial. Ekvac.} {\bf
34} (1991), 303-311.

\bibitem{NtTs} S. K. Ntouyas and P. Ch. Tsamatos,
Global existence for
semilinear evolution equations with nonlocal
conditions, {\em J. Math.
Anal. Appl.}
{\bf 210} (1997), 679-687.
\bibitem{NtTs1} S. K. Ntouyas and P. Ch. Tsamatos,
Global existence for
second order semilinear
ordinary and delay integrodifferential equations with
nonlocal
conditions,
{\em Applic. Anal.} {\bf 67}
(1997), 245-257.
\bibitem{Nto} S. K. Ntouyas, Global existence results
for certain
second order
  delay integrodifferential equations with nonlocal
conditions, {\em
Dynam.
Systems Appl.}
  {\bf 7} (1998), 415-426.

\bibitem{P} S. K. Patcheu, On the global solution and
asymptotic
behaviour
for the generalized damped extensible
beam equation, {\em J. Differential Equations} {\bf
135} (1997),
299-314.

\bibitem{TrWe} C. C. Travis and G.F. Webb, Second
order differential
equations in
Banach spaces, Proc. Int. Symp. on Nonlinear Equations
in Abstract
Spaces,
Academic
Press, New York (1978), 331-361.
\bibitem{TrWe1} C. C. Travis and G.F. Webb, Cosine
families and
abstract
nonlinear
second order differential equations, {\em Acta Math.
Hung.} {\bf  32}
(1978),
75-96.
\bibitem{Yos} K. Yosida, Functional Analysis,
$6^{\hbox{th}}$ edn.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.

\end{thebibliography}

\noindent\textsc{Mouffak Benchohra } \\
Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques,
Universit\'e de Sidi Bel Abb\`es,\\
  BP 89,  22000 Sidi Bel Abb\`es,
Alg\'erie\\
e-mail: benchohra@yahoo.com\smallskip

\noindent\textsc{Efrosini P. Gatsori}\\
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina \\
451 10 Ioannina, Greece \\
e-mail: egatsori@yahoo.gr\smallskip


\noindent\textsc{Sotiris K. Ntouyas }\\
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina \\
451 10 Ioannina, Greece \\
e-mail: sntouyas@cc.uoi.gr\\
http://www.uoi.gr/schools/scmath/math/staff/snt/snt.htm




\section*{Addendum: January 28, 2002}

The authors would like to thank Prof. P. Ch. Tsamatos for point out
the invalidity of the growth condition imposed on $f$ in conditon
(H3). 
Consecuently, (H3) must be replaced by
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H3)]  There exists a constant $Q$ such that
$$
\|f(y)\|\leq Q \quad \mbox{for each } y\in C(J,E)$$
\end{itemize}

\noindent In (H4) the constant $c$ must be replaced by
$$c=M(1+b\|B\|)(\|y_{0}\|+Q)+bM\|\eta\|.$$

\noindent In Step 2 of the proof of Theorem 3.1, $...+Q\|y(t)\|)$ must be
replaced by $..+Q)$ and two lines below $...+Qr)$ must be replaced by
$...+Q)$ \medskip

\noindent In Step 5 of the proof Theorem 3.1 from "The above formula...." 
to 10 lines below "$\|y(t)\|\leq
v(t),\quad t\in J,$" must be replaced by:
\\
The above formula implies (by  (H3) and (H4)) that, for each $t\in
J$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|y(t)\|&\leq&
(M+bM\|B\|)(\|y_{0}\|+Q)+bM\|\eta\|\\
   &&+M\|B\|\int_{0}^{t}\|y(s)\|ds+
Mb\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi(\|y(s)\|)ds.
\end{eqnarray*}
Let us denote  the right-hand side of the above
inequality as $v(t)$. Then we have
\begin{gather*}
v(0)=M(1+b\|B\|)(\|y_{0}\|+Q)+bM\|\eta\|, \\
   \|y(t)\|\leq v(t),\quad t\in J,
\end{gather*}
End of addendum.
\end{document}



