\documentclass{amsart}
\begin{document}
{\noindent\small {\em Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol.~2000(2000), No.~33, pp.~1--11.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.swt.edu \quad ejde.math.unt.edu (login: ftp)}
\thanks{\copyright 2000 Southwest Texas State University  and
University of North Texas.}
\vspace{1cm}

\title[\hfilneg EJDE--2000/33\hfil Existence of solutions ]
{ Existence of solutions for a sublinear \\
system of elliptic equations }

\author[Carlos Cid \& Cecilia Yarur \hfil EJDE--2000/33\hfilneg]
{ Carlos Cid \& Cecilia Yarur }

\address{Carlos Cid \hfill\break
Departamento de Ingenier\'{\i}a Matem\'atica, Universidad de Chile \hfill\break
Casilla 170/3, Correo 3, Santiago, Chile}
\email{ccid@dim.uchile.cl}

\address{Cecilia Yarur \hfill\break
Departamento de Matem\'aticas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile \hfill\break
Casilla 307, Correo 2, Santiago, Chile}
\email{cyarur@fermat.usach.cl}

\date{}
\thanks{Submitted January 21, 2000. Published May 9, 2000.}
\thanks{The second author was partially supported by FONDECYT grant  1990877,
\hfill\break\indent
 FONDAP de Matem\'aticas Aplicadas, and by DICYT}
\subjclass{ 35A20, 35J60 }
\keywords{Semilinear elliptic systems, sub-harmonic functions, \hfill\break\indent
super-harmonic functions }


\begin{abstract}
We study the existence of non-trivial non-negative
solutions for the system
$$ \displaylines{
   -\Delta u  = |x|^av^p \cr
    \Delta v  = |x|^bu^q\,,
}$$
where $p$ and $q$ are positive constants with $pq<1$, and the domain is the
unit ball of ${\mathbb R}^N$ ($N>2$) except for the center zero.
We look for pairs of functions that satisfy the above system and Dirichlet
boundary conditions set to zero. Our results  also apply to some super-linear
systems.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle


\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{rem}{Remark}[section]
\numberwithin{equation}{section}


\section{Introduction}
The purpose of this paper is to study the existence of
non-trivial non-negative solutions to the Dirichlet problem
\begin{equation}\label{poten}
\begin{gathered}
-\Delta u  = |x|^av^p \quad\text{in $B'$},\\
 \Delta v  = |x|^bu^q \quad\text{in $B'$},\\
u=v= 0\quad\text{on $\partial B$}\,,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $p>0$, $q>0$, $pq<1$,  $B$ is the unit ball of ${\mathbb R}^N$ ($N>2$)
centered at $0$,  and  $B'=B\setminus\{0\}$.

By a non-negative solution of \eqref{poten} we mean a pair of functions
$u$, $v$ in $ C^2(B')$ such that  $u\ge 0$,  $v\ge 0$, and
$(u, v)$ satisfies \eqref{poten}. Note that $u$ is  super-harmonic
whereas $v$ is sub-harmonic in $B'$.

In \cite{cy}, we proved the existence of solutions for \eqref{poten}
in the  super-linear case, $pq>1$. Bidaut-Veron and
Grillot \cite{bg} studied the behavior of solutions near zero and the
non-existence of non-negative solutions without boundary conditions.

A non-negative non-trivial solution
$(u, v)$ is said to be  {\em singular} at zero
(or just  singular) if
$$\limsup_{x\to 0} (u(x)+v(x))=+\infty\,.
$$
Note that since $v$ is sub-harmonic it must be
singular at zero, and thus any non-trivial non-negative solution
to \eqref{poten} is  singular at zero.

Let
$$ L:=\limsup_{x\to 0} |x|^{N-2}(u(x)+v(x)).
$$
If $0 <L < +\infty$,  we say that  $(u, v)$ has a {\em fundamental} singularity.
If $L = + \infty$, we call this singularity a {\em strong} singularity.

The existence of singular non-negative
solutions  of  fundamental type for  systems more  general
than \eqref{poten} was proved in \cite{cy3}.
Recall that for
\begin{equation} \label{li}
\begin{gathered}
-\Delta u = u^q,\quad u > 0 \quad \text{in $B'$},\\
u= 0 \quad\text{on $\partial B$},
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
solutions that are singular and non-negative exist if
$$q <\frac{N+2}{N-2}.
$$
In such a case, the solution $u$ with a
singularity at zero satisfies
$$ 0\le \limsup_{x \to 0} |x|^{N-2}u(x)< +\infty,
$$
and thus the singularity is of  fundamental type.
See Lions \cite{li}, Ni and Sacks
\cite{nsa}, Lin \cite{lin} and the references therein.

Br\'ezis and Veron \cite{bv} showed  that for
$q\ge N/(N-2)$  solutions of
\begin{equation} \label{bv}
\Delta u= |u|^{q-1}u \quad \text{in $B'$}
\end{equation}
are bounded near zero. For $q < N/(N-2)$, Veron \cite{v} proved
the existence of non-negative singular solutions of \eqref{bv} with
either a strong or a fundamental singularity at zero.


Next, we state our main result for Problem \eqref{poten}.

\begin{thm} \label{noexis} Let $p>0$, $ q>0$ and $pq<1$. Then
there exists a non-trivial  non-negative solution to \eqref{poten}
if and only if
\begin{equation}\label{gamma2}
 p< \frac{N+a}{N-2} \  \text{and \  $ N+a + \beta p  > 0$}, \end{equation}
 where
\begin{equation}\label{defbeta}
\beta:= b+2-(N-2)q\,.
\end{equation}
Moreover, if $(a, b, p, q)$ satisfies \eqref{gamma2}, then for
any $c > 0$, there  exists a non-negative solution $(u, v)$
such that
 $$\lim_{x\to 0} |x|^{N-2}u(x) = c\,.
 $$
If in addition
 $$ q \ge \frac{N+b}{N-2}\,,$$
the above solution has a singularity of strong type at zero.
\end{thm}


 In Section 2,  we shall  prove the existence of singular non-negative solutions
for a system more general than \eqref{poten};  see Theorems~\ref{exis4}
and \ref{weak} below.  As for \eqref{bv},
under additional assumptions for \eqref{poten}, we find both
fundamental and strong types of singularities.
In Section 3, we prove Theorem \ref{noexis}, and give some
applications of our result for bi-harmonic equations.


\section{Existence results for general systems}

In this section, we prove the existence of singular non-negative
 radially symmetric  solutions to
\begin{equation}
 \label{potengeneralradial}
\begin{gathered}
-(r^{N-1}u'(r))'  = r^{N-1}f(r,v(r)) \quad \text{ in $(0,1)$,}\\
(r^{N-1} v'(r))'  = r^{N-1}g(r,u(r))
\quad \text{ in $(0,1)$,}\\
u(1)=v(1)= 0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
without sub-linear type conditions. In particular the  results in
this section apply to \eqref{poten} with $pq\not=1$. When $pq<1$,
our results are optimal as stated in Theorem \ref{noexis}. When
$pq >1$, our results extend some results in \cite{cy} to the
inequality case.

Throughout this section we will assume that $f$ and $g$ are non-negative
continuous functions from $(0, 1)\times{\mathbb R}^+$ to $\mathbb R$ and
satisfying
\begin{equation} \label{hipotesisradial}
0 \le f(r, s) \le f_1(r, s), \quad  0\le g(r, s) \le g_1(r, s),
\end{equation}
where $f_1$ and $g_1$ are continuous functions that are non-decreasing
as functions of $s$.

  Set $u_0(r):=r^{2-N}-1$, and  fixed positive values $\alpha$ and $d$,
define
\begin{equation} \label{defv1}
v_{\alpha}(r):= du_0(r)+ \int_r^1 s^{1-N}\int_s^1
t^{N-1}g_1(t, \alpha t^{2-N}) \,dt\, ds\,.
\end{equation}
To state the main result of this section, we assume that
$$\displaylines{
 \rlap{(H1)}\hfill  \Lambda_{\alpha}:=
(N-2)^{-1}\int_0^1 t^{N-1}f_1(t, v_{\alpha}(t)) dt <\infty\,.\hfill
}$$

\begin{thm} \label{exis4} Assume that $f$ and $g$ are two non-negative
 continuous functions satisfying
\eqref{hipotesisradial}.  Assume that there exists $\alpha>0$ such
that (H1) is satisfied and $\Lambda_{\alpha} < \alpha$.  Then
there exist infinitely many positive solutions to
\eqref{potengeneralradial}. Moreover, for any $c \in [0,\alpha-
\Lambda_{\alpha})$ there exists a solution $(u,v)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{compotamientodesolucionu}
\lim_{r\to 0^+}r^{N-2}u(r)=c\,.
\end{equation}
\end{thm}

\paragraph{\bf Proof} Let $c$ be such that $0\leq c < \alpha-\Lambda_{\alpha}$.
Consider the the system of integrals
\begin{equation}\label{integral2}
\begin{aligned}
u(r)&= cu_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_0^s t^{N-1}f(t,v(t))\,dt\,ds\,,\\
 v(r)&= du_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1
t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))\,dt\,ds\,.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Define the operator $T=(T_1, T_2)$, where
\begin{equation}\label{operador2}
\begin{aligned}
T_1(u, v)(r)&=cu_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_0^s
t^{N-1}f(t,v(t))\,dt\,ds\,,\\
T_2(u, v)(r)&= du_0(r)+ \int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1 t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))\,dt\,ds\,.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Then a non-negative fixed point $(u,v)$ of the operator $T$ is is
a non-negative solution to \eqref{potengeneralradial}. To apply
the Schauder fixed point Theorem to $T$, we do the following three
steps. First construct an invariant set ${\mathcal M}$ under $T$.
Second transform the set ${\mathcal M}$ into a set ${\mathcal A}$,
and thus the operator $T$ into an operator $W$. Third prove the
continuity and compactness of $W$  on ${\mathcal A}$.
\bigskip

\noindent{\bf Step 1.} Let ${\mathcal M}$ be a subset of $(C(0,1])^2$
defined by
\begin{equation}\label{cotas4}
{\mathcal M}:=\{(u,v): 0\le u(r) \le \alpha r^{2-N}, \quad
0\le v(r) \le v_{\alpha}(r)\}.
\end{equation}
Next, we show that $T({\mathcal M})\subset {\mathcal M}$. Let $(u,
v) \in {\mathcal M}$, and thus $v(r) \le v_{\alpha}(r)$.
Therefore, from the definition of $T_1$ and
\eqref{hipotesisradial} we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
T_1(u,v)(r)\leq& c
u_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_0^st^{N-1}f_1(t,v_{\alpha}(t))dtds\\
                 \leq& cu_0(r)+ (N-2)\Lambda_{\alpha}\int_r^1 s^{1-N}ds\\
                \leq &
               \alpha r^{2-N},\\
\end{aligned}
$$
where we used the choice of $c$. Now, we  show that
$T_2(u,v)(r)\leq v_{\alpha}(r)$. Since $(u, v)\in {\mathcal M}$,
and from the definition of $v_{\alpha}$ given by \eqref{defv1} $$
T_2(u,v)(r)\leq du_0(r)+
\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1t^{N-1}g_1(t,\alpha t^{2-N})\,dt\,ds
                  =v_{\alpha}(r).
$$
\bigskip

\noindent{\bf Step 2.} Let $\varepsilon > 0$,  and let
$\vartheta\in C^1((0, 1))\cap C([0, 1])$ be a non-negative
function such that
$$\vartheta(r):=  \begin{cases}
     0               & \text{if $r=0$},\\
    v^{-1-\varepsilon}_{\alpha}(r) & \text{if $r\in (0, 1/2)$}, \\
    1 & \text{if $r\in(3/4, 1]$}.
  \end{cases}$$
 Since $v_{\alpha}(r) \ge d r^{2-N}$ near zero,   the continuity of
  $\vartheta$ at zero follows.

 Let ${\mathcal A}$ be the subset of
$(C[0,1])^2$ defined by $$ {\mathcal A}= \left\{ (y,z): 0\le
y(r) \le \alpha r^{\varepsilon}, \  0\le z(r) \le
\vartheta(r)v_{\alpha}(r) \right\}. $$

Define in ${\mathcal A}$ the operator
\begin{equation}
\label{definicionoperadorTtilde122A} W(y,z)(r)=(W_1(y,z)(r),
W_2(y,z)(r)),
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{definicionoperadorTtilde122B}
\begin{aligned}
W_1(y,z)(r)&=
r^{N-2+\varepsilon}T_1\left(r^{2-N-\varepsilon}y(r),\vartheta^{-1}(r)z(r)
\right),\\ W_2(y,
z)(r)&=\vartheta(r)T_2\left(r^{2-N-\varepsilon}y(r),\vartheta^{-1}(r)z(r)
\right),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and thus
\begin{equation}\label{definicionoperadorTtilde122}
\begin{aligned}
W_1(y,z)(r)&=
r^{N-2+\varepsilon}\Bigl(cu_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_0^s
t^{N-1}f\left(t,\vartheta^{-1}(t)z(t)\right)\,dt\,ds\Bigr),\\ W_2(y,
z)(r)&= \vartheta(r)\Bigl(d u_0(r)+ \int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1
t^{N-1}g\left(t,t^{2-N-\varepsilon}y(t)\right)\,dt\,ds\Bigr).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By   \eqref{definicionoperadorTtilde122A} and
\eqref{definicionoperadorTtilde122B} we have that $(y, z)$ is a
fixed point of $W$ if and only if   $( u,
v)=(r^{2-N-\varepsilon}y,\vartheta^{-1}z)$ is a fixed point of $
T$. Moreover, from  Step 1 we have that $W({\mathcal
A})\subset {\mathcal A}$. Furthermore, ${\mathcal A}$  is a closed
convex bounded subset of $(C[0,1])^2$. In order to show existence
of a fixed point, via Schauder fixed point theorem, to $W$ in
${\mathcal A}$ it is enough to prove that $W$ is a continuous and
compact operator, which is done in the next step.
\bigskip

\noindent{\bf Step 3.} First,  we show that $W({\mathcal A})$ is a
relatively compact subset of  $(C[0,1])^2$. Since $W({\mathcal
A})$ is bounded, by  Ascoli-Arzela  theorem, it is
 enough to prove that $W({\mathcal A})$ is an equicontinuos
 subset of $(C[0,1])^2$. This can be done by
proving the existence of two functions $\psi,\varphi\in L^1(0,1)$
and a positive constant $C$ such that for any $r\in [0,1]$,
\begin{equation}\label{condicionsobrederivadadeW1}
\left|\frac{d}{dr}{W}_1(y,z)(r)\right|\leq C\psi(r)
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{condicionsobrederivadadeW2}
\left|\frac{d}{dr}{W}_2(y,z)(r)\right|\leq C\varphi(r)\,.
\end{equation}
From \eqref{definicionoperadorTtilde122} and with  \ $' = d/dr $
we have
\begin{align*}
{W'}_1(y,z)(r)=& (N-2+\varepsilon)r^{-1}W_1(y, z)(r)  \\ &-c(N-2)
r^{\varepsilon-1}- r^{\varepsilon-1}\int_0^r
t^{N-1}f\left(t,\vartheta^{-1}(t)z(t)\right)\,dt\,.
\end{align*}
Thus, using invariance property of $W$ in ${\mathcal A}$ and the
definition of $\Lambda_{\alpha}$ we obtain $$
\left|\frac{d}{dr}{W}_1(y,z)(r)\right|\leq \Bigl((N-2)(\alpha
+c + \Lambda_{\alpha}) +\varepsilon \alpha \Bigr) r^{\varepsilon-1}.
 $$
Hence, $W_1$ satisfies
\eqref{condicionsobrederivadadeW1} with
$\psi(r)=r^{\varepsilon-1}$.
Similarly, by \eqref{definicionoperadorTtilde122} we obtain
\begin{align*}
W'_2(y,z)(r)=&\frac{\vartheta'(r)}{\vartheta(r)} W_2(y,z)(r)
-d(N-2)r^{1-N}\vartheta(r) \\
&-\vartheta(r)r^{1-N}\int_r^1
t^{N-1}g(t,t^{2-N-\varepsilon}y(t))dt\,.
\end{align*}
Using again the invariance property of $W$ in ${\mathcal A}$ we obtain
$$
|W'_2(y,z)(r)| \leq |\vartheta'(r)|v_{\alpha}(r) +
\vartheta(r)r^{1-N}\bigl( (N-2)d + \int_r^1 t^{N-1}g_1(t,\alpha
t^{2-N})dt\bigr), $$ and by definition \eqref{defv1} of
$v_{\alpha}$ we have $$ |W'_2(y,z)(r)|\leq
|\vartheta'(r)|v_{\alpha}(r)+
\vartheta(r)|v'_{\alpha}(r)|=\varphi(r). $$ The function $\varphi
\in L^1(0,1)$, since it is  bounded for $r>1/2$ and for $r$ near
zero $$\varphi(r)=
-(2+\varepsilon)v'_{\alpha}(r)v^{-1-\varepsilon}_{\alpha}(r).$$

Finally, we prove the continuity of  $W$ in ${\mathcal A}$. Let
$(y_n,w_n)$ be any sequence  converging on ${\mathcal A}$ to
$(y,w)$ and let $r\in[0,1]$ be fixed.  From the definition of $W$
 given by \eqref{definicionoperadorTtilde122} and the continuity
of $u\mapsto f(t,u)$, $u\mapsto g(t,u)$, uniform convergence of
$(y_n,w_n)$ to $(y,w)$ and the Lebesgue dominated convergence
theorem we easily deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{convergenciapuntualdeW}
\lim_{n\to\infty}W(y_n,w_n)(r)=W(y,w)(r)
\end{equation}
for all $r\in[0,1]$. Moreover, since ${\mathcal A}$ is closed and
$W({\mathcal A})$ is equicontinuous, then $\{W(y_n,w_n):n\geq
1\}\cup\{W(y,w)\}$ is an equicontinuous family. Thus from
pointwise convergence \eqref{convergenciapuntualdeW} we obtain the
uniform convergence, that is, $W(y_n,w_n)$ converges to $W(y,w)$
uniformly. Therefore $W$ is a continuous operator.

Thus by Schauder fixed point theorem, there exists $(u,v)\in
{\mathcal M}$ satisfying $$
\begin{aligned}
u(r)&= cu_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_0^s t^{N-1}f(t,v(t))dt
ds,\\ v(r)&= du_0(r)+\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1
t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))\,dt\,ds\,.\\
\end{aligned}
$$
Hence there exists a  positive solution to \eqref{potengeneralradial}.

The behavior of $u$ at zero is a consequence of  L'H\^opital rule.
$$
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{r\to 0^+}r^{N-2}u(r)&= c +\lim_{r\to 0^+}\frac{
\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_0^s t^{N-1}f(t,v(t))\,dt\,ds}{r^{2-N}},\\
  &=c+\lim_{r\to 0^+}\frac{ r^{1-N}\int_0^r t^{N-1}f(t,v(t))dt }
    {(N-2)r^{1-N}},\\
  &=c+\frac{1}{N-2}\lim_{r\to 0^+}\int_0^r t^{N-1}f(t,v(t))dt, \\
  &=c.
\end{aligned}$$
\quad\hfill$\square$ \smallskip


As a consequence of the  construction of non-negative solutions
given in the above theorem, we have the following result about
existence of positive solutions with a strong singularity.

\begin{cor} \label{existenciadesingfuerte}
Assume that the hypotheses in Theorem \ref{exis4} hold and $g(r,
s)$ is non decreasing in $s$. Then,
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] If   \begin{equation} \int_0^1 t^{N-1}g(t, \alpha
t^{2-N})dt=+\infty \quad \text{for any $\alpha
>0,$} \label{condicionsobrearadial}
\end{equation}  there exists a non-negative solution
 $(u, v)$ to
\eqref{potengeneralradial} with a strong singularity.

\item[(ii)] If $$\int_0^1 t^{N-1}g(t, \alpha t^{2-N})dt <+\infty
\quad \text{for any $\alpha >0$, }$$ any non-negative non-trivial
radially symmetric solution
   has  fundamental singularity.\end{enumerate}
\end{cor}
\paragraph{\bf Proof} Assume first that \eqref{condicionsobrearadial} is satisfied. Let $(u,v)$
be a solution to \eqref{potengeneralradial} constructed in Theorem
\ref{exis4} with $c>0$. Thus,  $$ v(r)= du_0(r)+
\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1 t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))\,dt\,ds\,. $$ By a
generalize version of  L'H\^opital rule (see Proposition 7.1 in
\cite{GaMaMiYa}) we have $$
\begin{aligned}
\liminf_{r\to 0^+}r^{N-2}v(r)& \ge \liminf_{r\to 0^+}\frac{
\int_r^1s^{1-N}\int_s^1 t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))\,dt\,ds}{r^{2-N}},\\
 & \ge \liminf_{r\to 0^+}\frac{ r^{1-N}\int_r^1
 t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))dt }{(N-2)r^{1-N}},\\
   &=\frac{1}{N-2}\lim_{r\to 0^+}\int_r^1 t^{N-1}g(t,u(t))dt=+\infty, \\
\end{aligned}
$$ where the last equality holds by \eqref{condicionsobrearadial}
and since $\lim_{r \to 0^+}r^{N-2}u(r) = c$.

Assume now, that $\int_0^1 t^{N-1}g(t, \alpha t^{2-N})dt
<+\infty$, and let $(u, v)$ be a non-negative solution to
\eqref{potengeneralradial}. Since $-r^{N-1}u'(r)$ is non
decreasing, we easily obtain that  $u(r) \le \alpha r^{2-N}$,
where $\alpha= -u'(1)/(N-2)$. Moreover, from the second in
\eqref{potengeneralradial} $v$ satisfies $$v(r)= du_0(r)+ \int_r^1
s^{1-N} \int_s^1 t^{N-1} g(t, u(t))\,dt\,ds\,$$ and thus $$v(r)\le
\Bigl(d + (N-2)^{-1}\int_0^1 t^{N-1} g(t, \alpha t^{2-N} ) dt
\Bigr) u_0(r),$$ and the conclusion follows.
\hfill$\square$ \smallskip

Next, we will show a general existence result of  fundamental
singular solutions which is included in \cite{cy3}, Theorem 4.3.
We give an idea of the proof for the sake of completeness .

For this purpose, let  $\alpha >0 $ and let $$ u_{\alpha}(r):=
\int_r^1 s^{1-N}\int_0^s t^{N-1} f_1(t, \alpha t^{2-N}) \,dt\,ds\,.$$
\begin{thm} \label{weak} Assume that $f$ and $g$ are two non
negative functions satisfying \eqref{hipotesisradial}. Assume that
$$\int_0^1 t^{N-1}f_1(t, \alpha t^{2-N})dt <\infty,$$ and $$
\lambda_{\alpha}:= \frac{1}{N-2}\int_0^1 t^{N-1}g_1(t,
u_{\alpha}(t))dt <\infty.$$ Moreover, suppose that for some
$\alpha>0$, we have $\lambda_{\alpha} <\alpha$. Then, for any  $d
\in ( \lambda_{\alpha}, \alpha]$, there exists a non-negative
solution $(u, v)$ to \eqref{potengeneralradial} such that
$$\lim_{r \to 0^+}r^{N-2}(u,v)(r)= (0, d).$$
\end{thm}

\paragraph{\bf Proof}
The proof of this result is similar to the proof of Theorem
\ref{exis4}. Let $d\in ( \lambda_{\alpha}, \alpha]$, and let $F=
(F_1, F_2)$ be given by \begin{align*} F_1(u, v)(r) &= \int_r^1
s^{1-N}\int_0^s t^{N-1} f(t,v(t))dt,\\ F_2(u, v)(r) &= du_0(r)
-\int_r^1 s^{1-N}\int_0^s t^{N-1} g(t,u(t))dt.
\end{align*}
Define ${\mathcal N}$ as the subset of $C((0,1])^2$ such that $$
{\mathcal N}:= \{(u, v) \ | \ 0\le u\le u_{\alpha}, \ 0\le v\le
\alpha u_0 \}. $$ Under the assumptions of the theorem, it is not
difficult to prove that $F({\mathcal N}) \subset {\mathcal N}$.
The rest  of the proof follows the ideas of Theorem \ref{exis4}.
\hfill$\square$ \smallskip

Next, we will apply Theorem \ref{exis4}  to problem
\eqref{potengeneralradial} with
\begin{equation} \label{potencia} 0\le f(r, s)\le r^a s^p,\quad
0\le g(r, s)\le r^b s^q.
\end{equation}

\begin{thm}\label{h1} Let $p>0$ and $q>0, $ with $pq\not=1$ and suppose
that $(a, b, p, q)$ satisfies \eqref{gamma2}.
 Assume that $f$ and $g$ are two non
negative functions satisfying \eqref{potencia}.  Then, there exist
$c_0 > 0$ such that for any $c\in [0, c_0)$ there exists  $(u, v)$
a non-negative singular solution to \eqref{potengeneralradial}
such that $$ \lim_{r \to 0^+}r^{N-2}u(r) =c.$$
Moreover, if $pq <1$ then $c_0= +\infty$.
\end{thm}

\paragraph{\bf Proof} Let $$ f_1(r, s)= r^a s^p, \quad g_1(r, s)= r^b s^q.$$
The function $v_{\alpha}$ defined by \eqref{defv1} is given now by
\begin{equation}\label{defv1poten} v_{\alpha}(r):= du_0(r)
+ \alpha^q\int_r^1 s^{1-N} \int_s^1 t^{N-1+b-(N-2)q}\,dt\,ds\,.
\end{equation}
Next, we show that (H1) is equivalent to
$$N+a+ \min\{\beta, 2-N\}p >0,$$
where $\beta$ is defined by \eqref{defbeta}.
Let \begin{equation} \label{defw1} w_1(r):= \int_r^1 s^{1-N}
\int_s^1 t^{N-1+b-(N-2)q}\,dt\,ds\,.\end{equation}
Thus, by setting $\rho:=\beta +N-2$,
$$w_1(r)=\begin{cases} \frac{u_0(r)}{\rho(N-2) }+
\frac{r^{\beta}-1}{\rho \beta} &\text{if $\beta\not=0 $ and
$\rho\not=0$,  }\\[5pt]
\frac{u_0(r)}{(N-2)^2}+\frac{\log(r)}{N-2} & \text{if $\beta=0$},\\[5pt]
\int_r^1s^{1-N}|\log(s)| ds &\text{ if $ \rho =0$.}
\end{cases}$$
Moreover, if $\rho = 0$, $$\lim_{r\to 0^+} r^{N-2}| \log(r)|^{-1}
w_1(r)= (N-2)^{-1}.$$
Now, the proof of the equivalence to (H1) follows easily.

To prove the existence of a non-negative solution  it is sufficient  to
find $d$ and $\alpha$ positive constants such that
\begin{equation} \label{desigualdad}
\Lambda_{\alpha} = (N-2)^{-1}\int_0^1
t^{N-1+a} v^p_{\alpha}(t)dt < \alpha\,.
\end{equation} Since
$v_{\alpha}= du_0 + \alpha^q w_1$, where $w_1$ is given by
\eqref{defw1}, and using the inequality $(x+y)^p\le C (x^p+ y^p)$,
for any non-negative numbers $x$ and $y$, and where
$C=\max\{1,2^{p-1}\}$, we see that \eqref{desigualdad} is satisfied
if
\begin{equation} \label{desigualdad1}
A d^p + B\alpha^{pq}<(N-2)\alpha\,,
\end{equation}
where
$$A:= \int_0^1 t^{N-1+a}u^p_0(t)dt, \quad B:= \int_0^1 t^{N-1+a}w^p_1(t)\, dt\,.$$
If we choose, for instance, $d$ such that $Ad^p = B \alpha^{pq}$,
\eqref{desigualdad1} is satisfied for any $\alpha$ such that
$$
 2B\alpha^{pq-1} < N-2\,.$$

 Moreover, by Theorem \ref{exis4} there exists
$(u, v)$ non-negative singular solution
 such that $\lim_{r\to 0^+}r^{N-2}u(r)=c$, for any $c\in [0,
 \alpha-\Lambda_{\alpha})$, and thus if $pq<1$ and  since
$\alpha-\Lambda_{\alpha}  $ tends to
 infinity as $\alpha $ does, the existence in the sub-linear case is
for any $c>0$.
\hfill$\square$ \smallskip

The following result is an application of  Theorem \ref{weak} to
problem \eqref{potengeneralradial}.

\begin{thm}\label{weakpotencia} Assume that $f$ and $g$ are two
non-negative functions satisfying \eqref{potencia}, with  $p>0$ and
$q>0$ and $pq\not=1$. Also assume that $(a, b, p, q)$
satisfies
$$ p < (N+a)/(N-2) \ \text{ and \ $ N+b + \mu q>0$} ,$$
where $\mu:=\min\{ a+2-(N-2)p, 0\}$.
Then, there exist $d_0\ge 0$ and $d_1>0$, with $d_0< d_1$, such
that for any $d\in (d_0, d_1)$ there exists $(u, v)$ a
non-negative singular solution to \eqref{potengeneralradial} such that
$$ \lim_{r \to 0^+}r^{N-2}(u, v)(r) =(0, d).$$
 Moreover, if $pq <1$, $d_1= +\infty $ and if $pq> 1$,  $d_0=0$.
\end{thm}

\begin{rem}
In \cite{cy} we proved existence of solutions for \eqref{poten} in the
super-linear case, that is when $pq >1$. In the
super-linear case, Theorem \ref{h1} and Theorem \ref{weakpotencia}
do not give the optimal region of the values $(a, b, p, q)$  of
existence of non-negative solutions to \eqref{poten}. However, we
will show later that for the sub-linear case Theorem \ref{h1} is
optimal, see Theorem 1.1.
\end{rem}

As a consequence of Theorem \ref{h1}, Corollary
\ref{existenciadesingfuerte} and Theorem \ref{weakpotencia} we
have the following.

\begin{cor} Let $p>0$ and $q>0$, and consider
\begin{equation}\label{particular1}
\begin{gathered}
-\Delta u  = v^p \quad\text{in $ B'$}, \\
\Delta v   = u^q \quad\text{in $ B'$}, \\
 u=v= 0\quad\text{on $\partial B$},
\end{gathered}
 \end{equation} with $q \ge N/(N-2)$ and $N+ \bigl(2-(N-2)q\bigr) p>0$.
Then, there exist fundamental and strongly singular non-negative solutions of
\eqref{particular1}.
\end{cor}

\section{Proof of main theorem \ref{noexis}}
In this section we prove our main result and we give some
applications to  bi-harmonic equations.

\paragraph{\bf Proof of Theorem \ref{noexis} } Let $p>0$, $q>0$ and $pq<1$.
Assume that $(a, b, p, q)$ satisfies \eqref{gamma2}. The existence
of a non-negative  singular solution to \eqref{poten} follows
from Theorem \ref{h1}.

Assume that $(a, b, p, q)$ does not satisfies
\eqref{gamma2}, with  $p>0$, $q>0$ and $pq<1$ and let $(u, v)$ be
a non-negative solution to \eqref{poten}. We will show that $(u,
v)$ must be the trivial solution.

First, when $N+a +\beta p \le 0$, the conclusion follows form Theorem 1.2 in
\cite{bg}.

Now,  assume that $p \ge (N+a)/(N-2)$. Since $u$ is a
non-negative super-harmonic function, from Theorem 1 in \cite{bl}, we
obtain that
$$|x|^{a }v^p\in L_{loc}^1(B).
$$
Moreover, since $v$ is sub-harmonic  there exists a non-negative
constant $c$ (possible $c=\infty$) such that
$\lim_{r\to 0^+}r^{N-2}\overline{v}(r)=c$,
where  $\overline{v}$ is the
spherical average of $v$. Assume first that  $c=0$. Let
$w(s):=s{\overline v}(r)$ with $s=r^{N-2}$. We easily obtain that
 $w$ is a convex function satisfying $w(0)=w(1)=0$, and
thus $v=0$. On the other hand, if  $c\neq 0$, we have for some
positive constant $C$  such that for all $r$ near $0$,
\begin{equation}
\label{funda} \overline{v}(r)\ge Cr^{2-N}\,.
\end{equation}
By Remark 3.1 in \cite{bg} and \eqref{funda}
we deduce that
$\overline{v^p}(r)\ge C {\overline{v}}^p(r)\ge Cr^{(2-N)p}$, and
thus
$$\infty>\int_{B_{\epsilon}(0)}|x|^{a }v^p(x) dx \ge C
\int_{0}^{\epsilon} r^{a+N-1 }{\overline{v}}^p(r)dr\ge C
\int_{0}^{\epsilon} r^{a+N-1-p(N-2) }dr, $$
contradicting $p\ge \frac{N+a}{N-2}$.

The last assertion on the theorem  follows from Corollary
\ref{existenciadesingfuerte}.
\hfill$\square$ \smallskip


The following two results are applications of Theorem
\ref{noexis}  to the bi-harmonic equation.

\begin{cor} Let $N>2$, and let  $0 < q < 1$. Then there exist positive
solutions of
\begin{equation} \label{bihar}
\begin{gathered} \Delta^2 u +|x|^b u^q=0 \quad  \hbox{in }B'_1(0), \\
u=\Delta u= 0 \quad \hbox{on } \partial B_1(0),  \end{gathered}
\end{equation}
such that $-\Delta u\ge 0$, if and only if $$ q <
\frac{N+b+2}{N-2}. $$
\end{cor}

\begin{cor} Let $N>2$, and $0 < q < 1$.
Then there exist positive solutions of {\rm (\ref{bihar})} such
that $\Delta u\ge 0$, if and only if
$$ q < \frac{N+b}{N-2}. $$
\end{cor}

As a consequence of the results  in \cite{cy}  and the two corollaries above,
we obtain the following.

\begin{cor} Let $N>2$, and $0 < q \not= 1$.
Then \begin{enumerate}

\item[(i)] There exist positive solutions of {\rm (\ref{bihar})} with
$b=0$ such that $-\Delta u\ge 0$, if and only if $$ (N-4)q < N. $$

\item[(ii)] There exist positive solutions of {\rm (\ref{bihar})} with
$b=0$ such that $\Delta u\ge 0$, if and only if $$ q <
\frac{N}{N-2}. $$
\end{enumerate}
\end{cor}

\begin{thebibliography}{00}



\bibitem{bl}  H. Brezis and P.L.  Lions, A note on isolated singularities for linear elliptic equations, in
``Mathematical Analysis and Applications", A.L. Nachbin, editor,
Academic Press, New York (1981), 263-266.

\bibitem{bv}  H. Brezis and L. Veron, Removable singularities of some nonlinear elliptic equations
 {\em Archive Rat. Mech. Anal.} {\bf 75} (1980), 1-6.


\bibitem{bg} M.F. Bidaut-Veron  and P. Grillot,  Asymptotic behaviour of elliptic system
 with mixed absorption and source
terms, {\em Asymptot. Anal.,} (1999), {\bf 19}, 117-147.

\bibitem{cy} C. Cid and C. Yarur. A sharp existence result for a
Dirichlet mixed problem. The superlinear case. To appear in
Nonlinear Anal. T.M.A.

\bibitem{cy3} C. Cid and C. Yarur. Existence results of positive singular solutions for a
Dirichlet problem, submitted.

\bibitem{GaMaMiYa} M. Garc\'{\i}a-Huidobro, R.  Man\'asevich, E. Mitidieri,
and C. Yarur,   Existence and noexistence of positive singular
solutions for a class of semilinear systems. {\em Archive Rat.
Mech. Anal.} {\bf 140}  (1997), 253-284.


\bibitem{lin} S. S. Lin, Semilinear elliptic equations on singularly perturbed domains,
{\em Comm. Partial Diff. Equ.} {\bf 16} (1991),617-645.


\bibitem{li} P.L. Lions, Isolated singularities in semilinear problems,
 {\em J. Differential Equations} {\bf 38} (1980), 441-450.


\bibitem{nsa} W.M. Ni and P. Sacks,  Singular behavior in nonlinear parabolic equations,
 {\em Trans. Amer. Mat. Soc.  } {\bf 287} (1985), 657-671.


\bibitem{v} L. Veron, Singular solutions of some nonlinear elliptic
equations, {\em Nonlinear Analysis, Methods \& Applications } {\bf
5} (1981), 225-242.


\end{thebibliography}



\end{document}
