
\documentclass[twoside]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb, amsmath}

\pagestyle{myheadings}
\markboth{\hfil Nonlocal Cauchy problems \hfil EJDE--2002/47}
{EJDE--2002/47\hfil Abdelkader Boucherif\hfil}

\begin{document}

\title{\vspace{-1in}%
\parbox{\linewidth}{\footnotesize\noindent
{\sc  Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. {\bf 2002}(2002), No. 47, pp. 1--9. \newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp  ejde.math.swt.edu  (login: ftp)} 
\vspace{\bigskipamount} \\
%
Nonlocal Cauchy problems for first-order multivalued differential equations 
%
\thanks{\emph{Mathematics Subject Classifications:} 34A60, 34G20. 
\hfil\break\indent
{\em Key words:} Cauchy problems, multivalued differential equations,
nonlocal condition, \hfil\break\indent
topological transversality theorem. \hfil\break\indent
\copyright 2002 Southwest Texas State University. \hfil\break\indent
Submitted January 27, 2002. Published May 28, 2002.} }

\date{}
\author{Abdelkader Boucherif}
\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
  We prove the existence of solutions for a nonlocal Cauchy problem
  for a first-order multivalued differential equation.
  Our approach is based on the topological transversality theory 
  for set-valued maps.
\end{abstract}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
 \numberwithin{equation}{section}

\section{Introduction}

In this paper, we investigate the existence of solutions for the nonlocal
Cauchy problem 
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered} x'(t)\in F( t,x(t)) \quad t\in (0,T] \\
x(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}x( t_{k}) =0 \end{gathered}  \label{e1}
\end{equation}
Here $F:J\times \mathbb{R}\rightarrow {2}^{\mathbb{R}}$ is a set-valued map, 
$J=[0,T]$, $0<t_{1}<t_{2}<\dots <t_{m}<1$, and $a_{k}\neq 0$ for all 
$k=1,2,\dots ,m$. Nonlocal Cauchy problems for ordinary differential
equations (single-valued $F$) have been investigated by several authors,
both for the scalar case and the abstract case (see for instance \cite
{Byszewski,Han-Park} and the references therein). Also, classical initial
value problems for multivalued differential equations have been considered
by many authors (see \cite{Deimling,Ben-Bou,Frigon} and the references
therein). The importance of nonlocal conditions in many applications is
discussed in \cite{Byszewski,Byszewski 1} . Also, reference \cite{Jackson}
contains examples of problems with nonlocal conditions and references to
other works dealing with nonlocal problems.

\section{Preliminaries}

In this section we introduce notations, definitions and results that will be
used in the remainder of this paper.

\subsection*{Function spaces}

Let $J$ be a compact interval in $\mathbb{R}$. $C(J)$ is the Banach space of
continuous real-valued functions defined on $J$, with the norm $\Vert x\Vert
_{0}=\sup \{|x(t)|;\;t\in J\}$ for $x\in C(J)$. $C^{k}(J)$ is the Banach
space of $k$-times continuously differentiable functions. $L^{p}(J)$ is the
set of measurable functions $x$ such that $\int_{J}|x(t)|^{p}dt<+\infty $.
Define $\Vert x\Vert _{L^{p}}=(\int_{J}|x(t)|^{p}dt)^{1/p}$. The Sobolev
spaces $W^{k,p}(J)$ are defined as follows: 
\begin{eqnarray*}
W^{1,p}(J):= &&\Big\{x\in L^{p}(J);\exists \,x^{\prime }\in L^{p}(J)\text{
such that }\int_{J}x\phi ^{\prime }=-\int_{J}x^{\prime }\phi \\
&&\forall \phi \in C^{1}(J)\text{ with compact support}\Big\}
\end{eqnarray*}
or equivalently, 
\begin{equation*}
W^{1,p}(J)=\left\{ x:J\rightarrow \mathbb{R}{};x%
\mbox{ absolutely
continuous and }x^{\prime }\in L^{p}(J),\;1\leq p\leq \infty \right\} \,.
\end{equation*}
Then we define 
\begin{equation*}
W^{k,p}(J)=\left\{ x\in W^{k-1,p}(J);\;x^{\prime }\in W^{k-1,p}(J)\right\}
\quad k\geq 2.
\end{equation*}
The notation $H^{1}(J)$ is used for $W^{1,2}(J)$. Let 
\begin{equation*}
H_{b}^{1}(J):=\{u\in H^{1}(J);u(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}u(t_{k})=0\}.
\end{equation*}
Note that the embeddings $j:W^{k,p}(J)\rightarrow C^{k-1}(J)$, $p>1$, are
completely continuous for $J$ compact \cite{Brezis}.

\subsection*{Set-valued Maps}

Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces. A set-valued map $G:X\to 2^{Y}$ is said to
be compact if $G(X)=\overline{\cup \{G(x);x\in X\}}$ is compact. $G$ has
convex (closed, compact) values if $G(x)$ is convex (closed, compact) for
every $x\in X$. $G$ is bounded on bounded subsets of $X$ if $G(B)$ is
bounded in $Y$ for every bounded subsets $B$ of $X$. A set-valued map $G$ is
upper semicontinuous at $z_{0}\in X$ if for every open set O containing 
$Gz_{0}$, there exists a neighborhood $\mathcal{M}$ of $z_{0}$ such that 
$G(\mathcal{M})\subset O$. $G$ is upper semicontinuous on $X$ if it is upper
semicontinuous at every point of $X$. If $G$ is nonempty and compact-valued
then $G$ is upper semicontinuous if and only if $G$ has a closed graph. The
set of all bounded closed convex and nonempty subsets of $X$ is denoted by 
$bcc(X)$. A set-valued map $G:J\to bcc(X)$ is measurable if for each 
$x\in X$, the function $t\mapsto \mbox{dist}(x,G(t))$ is measurable on 
$J$. If $X\subset Y$, $G$ has a fixed point if there exists $x\in X$ 
such that $x\in Gx$. Also, $|G( x)|=\sup\{ | y| ;\,y\in G(x)\}$.

\paragraph{Definition}

A multivalued map $F:J\times \mathbb{R}\rightarrow {}2^{\mathbb{R}}$ is said
to be $L^{1}$-Carath\'{e}odory if

\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]  $t\mapsto F(t,y)$ is measurable for each $y\in \mathbb{R}{}$;

\item[(ii)]  $y\mapsto F(t,y)$ is upper semicontinuous for almost all $t\in
J $;

\item[(iii)]  For each $\sigma >0$, there exists $h_{\sigma }\in L^{1}(J,%
\mathbb{R}{}_{+})$ such that 
\begin{equation*}
\Vert F(t,y)\Vert =\sup \{|v|:v\in F(t,y)\}\leq h_{\sigma }(t)
\end{equation*}
for all $|y|\leq \sigma $ and for almost all $t\in J$.
\end{itemize}

The set of selectors of $F$ that belong to $L^{1}$ is denoted by 
\begin{equation*}
S_{F( .,y( .) ) }^{1}=\{v\in L^{1}(J,{}):v(t)\in F(t,y(t))\ \hbox{for a.e.}\
t\in J\}
\end{equation*}
By a solution of (\ref{e1}) we mean an absolutely continuous function $x$ on 
$J$, such that $x^{\prime}\in L^{1}$ and 
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered} x'(t)=f(t)\quad \text{a.e. }t\in (0,T] \\
x(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}x( t_{k}) =0 \end{gathered}  \label{e2}
\end{equation}
where $f\in S_{F( .,x( .) ) }^{1}$.

Note that for an $L^{1}$-Carath\'{e}odory multifunction $F:J\times \mathbb{R}%
\rightarrow 2^{\mathbb{R}}$ the set $S_{F(.,x(.))}^{1}$ is not empty (see 
\cite{LaOp}). For more details on set-valued maps we refer to \cite{Deimling}.

\subsection*{Topological Transversality Theory for Set-valued Maps}

Let $X$ be a Banach space, $C$ a convex subset of $X$ and $U$ an open subset
of $C$. $K_{\partial U}(\overline{U},2^{C})$ shall denote the set of all
set-valued maps $G:\overline{U}\to 2^{C}$ which are compact, upper
semicontinuous with closed convex values and have no fixed points on 
$\partial U$ (i.e., $u\notin Gu$ for all $u\in \partial U)$. A compact
homotopy is a set-valued map $H:[0,1]\times \overline{U}\to 2^{C}$ which is
compact, upper semicontinuous with closed convex values. If $u\notin
H(\lambda ,u)$ for every $\lambda \in [0,1],u\in \partial U$, $H$ is said to
be fixed point free on $\partial U$. Two set-valued maps $F,G\in K_{\partial
U}(\overline{U},2^{C})$ are called homotopic in $K_{\partial U}(\overline{U}%
,2^{C})$ if there exists a compact homotopy $H:[0,1]\times \overline{U}\to
2^{C}$ which is fixed point free on $\partial U$ and such that $H(0,\cdot
)=F $ and $H(1,\cdot )=G$. $G\in K_{\partial U}(\overline{U},2^{C})$ is
called essential if every $F\in K_{\partial U}(\overline{U},2^{C})$ such
that $G|_{\partial U}=F|_{\partial U}$, has a fixed point. Otherwise $G$ is
called inessential. For more details we refer the reader to \cite{Frigon}.

\begin{theorem}[Topological transversality theorem] \label{thm1}
Let  $F, G$ be two homotopic set-valued maps in $K_{\partial U}( \overline{U},
2^C)$. Then $F$ is essential if and only if $G$ is essential.
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem} \label{thm2}
Let $G: \overline{U} \to 2^C$ be the constant set-valued map
$G(u) \equiv u_0$. Then, if $u_0 \in U$, $G$ is essential
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem}[Nonlinear Alternative] \label{thm3}
Let $U$ be an open subset of a convex set $C$, with $0 \in U$.
 Let $H: [0,1] \times \overline{U} \to 2^C$ be a compact homotopy such
 that $H_0 \equiv 0$. Then, either
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] $H(1,\cdot )$ has a fixed point in $\overline{U}$, or

\item[(ii)]  there exists $u\in \partial U$ and $\lambda \in (0,1)$
such that $u\in H(\lambda ,u)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\section{Main results}

To prove our main results, we assume the following:

\begin{enumerate}
\item[(H0)]  $a_{k}\neq 0$ for each $k=1,2,\dots ,m$ and 
$\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}+1\neq 0$.

\item[(H1)]  $F:J\times \mathbb{R}{}\rightarrow 
bcc(\mathbb{R}),\;(t,x)\mapsto F(t,x)$ is

\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)]  measurable in $t$, for each $x\in \mathbb{R}{}$

\item[(ii)]  upper semicontinuous with respect to $x\in {}$ for a.e. $t\in J$
\end{enumerate}

\item[(H2)]  $|F(t,x)|\leq \psi (\left| x\right| )$ for a.e. $t\in J$, all 
$x\in \mathbb{R}{,}$ where $\psi :[0,+\infty )\rightarrow (0,+\infty )$ is
continuous nondecreasing and such that $\limsup_{\rho \rightarrow \infty }%
\frac{\psi (\rho )}{\rho }=0$.
\end{enumerate}

Our first result reads as follows.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm4}
If the assumptions (H0), (H1), and (H2) are
satisfied, then the initial-value problem (\ref{e1}) has at least one
solution.
\end{theorem}

\paragraph{Proof}

This proof will be given in several steps, and uses some ideas from [6].

\noindent \textbf{Step 1.} Consider the set-valued operator $\Phi
:C(J)\rightarrow L^{2}(J)$ defined as 
\begin{equation*}
(\Phi x)(t)=F(t,x(t)).
\end{equation*}
Note that $\Phi $ is well defined, upper semicontinuous, with convex values
and sends bounded subsets of $C(J)$ into bounded subsets of $L^{2}(J)$. In
fact, we have 
\begin{equation*}
\Phi x:=\left\{ u:J\rightarrow \mathbb{R\quad }{}\mbox{ measurable;}%
\;u(t)\in F(t,x(t))\mbox{ a.e. }t\in J\right\} .
\end{equation*}
Let $z\in C(J)$. If $u\in \Phi z$ then 
\begin{equation*}
|u(t)|\leq \psi (\left| z(t)\right| )\leq \psi (\Vert z\Vert _{0}).
\end{equation*}
Hence $\Vert u\Vert _{L^{2}}\leq C_{0}:=\psi (\Vert z\Vert _{0})$. This
shows that $\Phi $ is well defined. It is clear that $\Phi $ is convex
valued.

Now, let $B$ be a bounded subset of $C(J)$. Then, there exists $K>0$ such
that $\Vert u\Vert _{0}\leq K$ for $u\in B$. So, for $w\in \Phi u$ we have 
$\Vert w\Vert _{L^{2}}\leq C_{1}$, where $C_{1}=\psi (K)$. Also, we can argue
as in [5, p. 16] to show that $\Phi $ is upper semicontinuous.

\noindent \textbf{Step 2}. Let $x$ be a possible solution of (\ref{e1}).
Then there exists a positive constant $R^{\ast }$, not depending on $x$,
such that 
\begin{equation*}
|x(t)|\leq R^{\ast }\quad \mbox{ for all $t$ in $J$}.
\end{equation*}
It follows from the definition of solutions of (\ref{e1}) that 
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered} x'(t)=f(t)\quad \text{a.e. }t\in (0,T] \\
x(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}x( t_{k}) =0 \end{gathered}  \label{e3}
\end{equation}
where $f\in S_{F(.,x(.))}^{1}$. Simple computations give 
\begin{equation}
x(t)=\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big)^{-1}\big(-\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}%
\int_{0}^{t_{k}}f(s)ds\big)+\int_{0}^{t}f(s)ds  \label{e4}
\end{equation}
Hence 
\begin{equation*}
|x(t)|\leq \big|\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big)^{-1}\big|\big(%
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|\int_{0}^{t_{k}}|f(s)|ds\big)+\int_{0}^{t}|f(s)|ds
\end{equation*}
Assumption (H2) yields 
\begin{equation*}
|x(t)|\leq \big|\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big)^{-1}\big|\big(%
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|\int_{0}^{t_{k}}\psi (|x(s)|)ds\big)+\int_{0}^{t}\psi
(|x(s)|)ds
\end{equation*}
Let 
\begin{equation*}
R_{0}=\max \left\{ |x(t)|;t\in J\right\} .
\end{equation*}
Then 
\begin{equation*}
R_{0}\leq \big|\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big)^{-1}\big|\big(%
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|\,t_{k}\psi (R_{0})\big)+T\,\psi (R_{0})
\end{equation*}
or 
\begin{equation*}
R_{0}\leq \Big[\big\{\big|\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big)^{-1}\big|%
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|\,t_{k}\big\}+T\,\Big]\psi (R_{0})
\end{equation*}
The above inequality implies 
\begin{equation*}
1\leq \Big(T+\big|(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k})^{-1}\big|\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|%
\,t_{k}\Big)\frac{\psi (R_{0})}{R_{0}}
\end{equation*}
Now, the condition on $\psi $ in (H2) shows that there exists $R^{\ast }>0$
such that for all $R>R^{\ast }$, 
\begin{equation*}
\Big(T+\big|(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k})^{-1}\big|\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|\,t_{k}%
\Big)\frac{\psi (R)}{R}<1.
\end{equation*}
Comparing these last two inequalities, we see that $R_{0}\,\leq R^{\ast }$.
Consequently, we obtain $\left| x(t)\right| \leq R^{\ast }$ for all $t\in J$.

\noindent \textbf{Step 3}. For $0\leq \lambda \leq 1$ consider the
one-parameter family of problems 
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered} x'(t)\in \lambda F( t,x(t)) \quad t\in J, \\ x(0)
+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}x( t_{k}) =0. \end{gathered}  \label{e1l}
\end{equation}
It follows from Step 2 that if $x$ is a solution of (\ref{e1l}) for some $%
\lambda \in \lbrack 0,1]$, then 
\begin{equation*}
|x(t)|\leq R^{\ast }\quad \mbox{ for all }t\in J
\end{equation*}
and $R^{\ast }$ does not depend on $\lambda $. Define $\Phi _{\lambda
}:C(J)\rightarrow L^{2}(J)$ as 
\begin{equation*}
(\Phi _{\lambda }x)(t)=\lambda F(t,x(t)).
\end{equation*}
Step 1 shows that $\Phi _{\lambda }$ is upper semicontinuous, has convex
values and sends bounded subsets of $C(J)$ into bounded subsets of $L^{2}(J)$.
 Let $j:H_{b}^{1}(J)\rightarrow C(J)$ be the completely continuous
embedding. The operator $L:H_{b}^{1}(J)\rightarrow L^{2}(J)$, defined by 
$(Lx)(t)=x^{\prime }(t)$ has a bounded inverse (in fact this follows from the
solution of (\ref{e3}) which is given by (\ref{e4})), which we denote by 
$L^{-1}$. Let $B_{R^{\ast }+1}:=\left\{ x\in C(J);\Vert x\Vert _{0}<R^{\ast
}+1\right\} $. Define a set-valued map $H:[0,1]\times B_{R^{\ast
}+1}\rightarrow C(J)$ by 
\begin{equation*}
H(\lambda ,x)=(j\circ L^{-1}\circ \Phi _{\lambda })(x).
\end{equation*}
We can easily show that the fixed points of $H(\lambda ,\cdot )$ are
solutions of (\ref{e1l}). Moreover, $H$ is a compact homotopy between 
$H(0,\cdot )\equiv 0$ and $H(1,\cdot )$. In fact, $H$ is compact since $\Phi
_{\lambda }$ is bounded on bounded subsets and $j$ is completely continuous.
Also, $H$ is upper semicontinuous with closed convex values. Since solutions
of (1)$_{\lambda }$ satisfy $\Vert x\Vert _{0}\leq R^{\ast }<R^{\ast }+1$ we
see that $H(\lambda ,\cdot )$ has no fixed points on $\partial B_{R^{\ast
}+1}$.

Now, $H(0,\cdot)$ is essential by Theorem 2. Hence $H_1$ is essential. This
implies that $j\circ L^{-1}\circ \Phi$ has a fixed point. Therefore problem 
(\ref{e1}) has a solution . This completes the proof of Theorem \ref{thm4}.
\hfill$\Box$ \smallskip

Our next result is based on an application of the nonlinear alternative. We
shall replace condition (H2) by

\begin{description}
\item[(H2')]  $|F(t,x)|\leq p(t)\psi (\left| x\right| )$ for a.e. $t\in J$,
all $x\in \mathbb{R}{,}$ where $p\in L^{1}(J,\mathbb{R}{}_{+})$, $\psi
:[0,+\infty )\rightarrow (0,+\infty )$ is continuous nondecreasing and such
that 
\begin{equation*}
\sup_{\delta \in (0,\infty )}\frac{\delta }{[\{|(1+%
\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k})^{-1}|\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_{k}|\,\}+T\,]\,\Vert p\Vert
_{L^{1}}\psi (\delta )}>1
\end{equation*}
\end{description}

Now, we state our second result.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm5}
If assumptions (H0), (H1), and (H2') are
satisfied, then the initial value problem (\ref{e1}) has at least one
solution.
\end{theorem}

\paragraph{Proof}

This proof is similar to the proof of Theorem \ref{thm4}. Let $M_{0}>0 $ be
defined by 
\begin{equation*}
\frac{M_{0}}{[\{\left| ( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}) ^{-1}\right|
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_k| \,\int_{0}^{t_{k}}p(s)ds\}+\left\| p\right\|
_{L^{1}}\,]\psi ( M_{0}) }>1.
\end{equation*}
Let $U:=\left\{ x\in C(J);\Vert x\Vert _{0}<M_{0}\right\}$. Then consider
the compact homotopy (see Step 3 above) $H:[0,1]\times U\to C(J)$ defined by 
\begin{equation*}
H(\lambda ,x)=(j\circ L^{-1}\circ \Phi _{\lambda })(x).
\end{equation*}
Suppose that alternative (ii) in Theorem \ref{thm3} holds. This means that
there exist $u\in \partial U$ and $\lambda \in (0,1)$ such that $u\in
H(\lambda,u)$, or equivalently 
\begin{gather*}
u^{\prime}(t)\in \lambda F( t,u(t)) \quad t\in J, \\
u(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}u( t_{k}) =0
\end{gather*}
Now, as in Step2 above, assumption (H2') yields 
\begin{equation*}
| u(t)| \leq \big| \big( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big) ^{-1}\big| \big( %
\sum_{k=1}^{m}| a_{k}| \int_{0}^{t_{k}}p(s)\psi ( | u(s)| ) ds\big) %
+\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi (| u(s)| ) ds
\end{equation*}
Since $\psi $ is increasing, 
\begin{equation*}
|u(t)| \leq \big| \big( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big) ^{-1}\big| \big( %
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_k| \int_{0}^{t_{k}}p(s)\psi ( \| u\| _{0}) ds\big) %
+\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi ( \| u\| _{0}) ds\,.
\end{equation*}
Since for $u\in \partial U$ we have $\Vert u\Vert _{0}=M_{0}$ this last
inequality implies that 
\begin{equation*}
M_{0}\leq \big| \big( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big) ^{-1}\big| \big( %
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_k| \int_{0}^{t_{k}}p(s)\psi ( M_{0}) ds\big) %
+\int_{0}^{t}p(s)\psi ( M_{0}) ds
\end{equation*}
which, in turn gives 
\begin{equation*}
M_{0}\leq \Big[ \Big\{\big| \big( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big) ^{-1}\big| %
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_k| \int_{0}^{t_{k}}p(s)ds\Big\}+\int_{0}^{t}p(s)ds\Big]\psi
( M_{0})
\end{equation*}
Hence, 
\begin{equation*}
M_{0}\leq \Big[ \Big\{\big| \big( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\big) ^{-1}\big| %
\sum_{k=1}^{m}|a_k| \int_{0}^{t_{k}}p(s)ds\Big\}+\| p\| _{L^{1}}\Big]\psi (
M_{0})
\end{equation*}
This, clearly, contradicts the definition of $M_{0}$. Therefore, condition
(ii) of Theorem \ref{thm3} does not hold. Consequently, $H(1,.)$ has a fixed
point, which is a solution of problem (\ref{e1}).

\paragraph{Remark}

For nonlocal initial values of the form $x(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}x( t_{k})
=x_{0}$, where $x_{0}$ is a given nonzero real number, we let $%
y(t)=x(t)-x_{0}(1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}) ^{-1}$. Then $y$ is a solution to the
problem 
\begin{gather*}
y^{\prime}(t)\in F( t,y(t)+x_{0}( 1+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}) ^{-1}) \\
y(0)+\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}y( t_{k}) =0
\end{gather*}

\paragraph{Acknowledgement}

The author wishes to thank KFUPM for its constant support.

\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{Ben-Bou}  M. Benchohra and A. Boucherif, \emph{On first order
multivalued initial and periodic value problems}, Dynamic Syst.Appl. Vol. 9
(2000), 559-568.

\bibitem{Brezis}  H. Brezis, \emph{Analyse Fonctionnelle et Applications},
Masson, Paris, 1983.

\bibitem{Byszewski}  L. Byszewski, \emph{Theorems about the existence and
uniqueness of solutions of a semilinear evolution nonlocal Cauchy problem},
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 162 (1991), 494-505.

\bibitem{Byszewski 1}  L. Byszewski, \emph{Abstract nonlinear nonlocal
problems and their physical interpretation}, in `` Biomathematics,
Bioinformatics and Applications of Functional Differential Difference
Equations'', H.Akca, V.Covachev and E. Litsyn, Eds., Akdeniz Univ. Publ.,
Antalya, Turkey, 1999

\bibitem{Deimling}  K. Deimling, \emph{Multivalued Differential Equations},
W. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1992.

\bibitem{Frigon}  M. Frigon, \emph{Application de la transversalite
topologique a des problemes non lineaires pour des equations differentielles
ordinaires}, Dissertationes Math. 296 PWN, Warszava, 1990.

\bibitem{Han-Park}  H-K. Han and J-Y. Park, \emph{Boundary controllability
of differential equations with nonlocal conditions}, J. Math. Anal. Appl.
230 (1999), 242-250.

\bibitem{Jackson}  D. Jackson, \emph{Existence and uniqueness of solutions
to semilinear nonlocal parabolic equations}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. Vol. 172
(1993), 256-265.

\bibitem{LaOp}  A. Lasota and Z. Opial, \emph{An application of the
Kakutani-Ky-Fan theorem in the theory of ordinary differential equations},
Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 13 (1965), 781-786.
\end{thebibliography}

\noindent\textsc{Abdelkader Boucherif }\newline
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals \newline
Department of Mathematical Sciences \newline
P.O. Box 5046 Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia \newline
e-mail: aboucher@kfupm.edu.sa

\end{document}
