\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2009(2009), No. 33, pp. 1--8.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2009 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2009/33\hfil Existence and uniqueness]
{Existence and uniqueness of solutions for fourth-order boundary-value
problems\\ in Banach spaces}

\author[Y. Cui, Y. Zou\hfil EJDE-2009/33\hfilneg]
{Yujun Cui, Yumei Zou}  % in alphabetical order

\address{Yujun Cui \newline
 Institute of Mathematics,
 Shandong University of Science and Technology\\
 Qingdao 266510,  China}
\email{cyj720201@163.com,  sdcyj72@163.com}

\address{Yumei Zou \newline
 Institute of Mathematics,
 Shandong University of Science and Technology\\
 Qingdao 266510,  China}
\email{sdzouym@126.com}

\thanks{Submitted March 14, 2008. Published February 19, 2009.}
\thanks{Supported by grant 10671167 from the National Science Foundation of
China}
\subjclass[2000]{47H10}
\keywords{Spectral conditions; M\"onch fixed-point theorem}

\begin{abstract}
 This article concerns the fourth-order boundary-value problem
 \begin{gather*}
 x^{(4)}(t)=f(t,x(t),x''(t)),\quad  t\in (0,1),\\
 x(0)=x(1)=x''(0)=x''(1)=\theta,
 \end{gather*}
 in a Banach space. We present some spectral conditions, on the
 nonlinearity $f(t,u,v)$, to guarantee the existence and uniqueness
 of solutions. Our method is different from the one used in the
 references, even the above problem in a scalar space.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}

\section{Introduction}


In this paper, we consider the existence and uniqueness of solutions
for the fourth-order  boundary-value problem
in a Banach space $E$:
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
 x^{(4)}(t)=f(t,x(t),x''(t)),\quad  t\in (0,1),\\
 x(0)=x(1)=x''(0)=x''(1)=\theta,
 \end{gathered} \label{e1}
\end{equation}
where $f:J\times E\times E\to E$ is continuous, $J=[0,1]$,
$\theta$ is the zero element of $E$. This problem models
deformations of an elastic beam in equilibrium state, whose two ends
are simply supported. Due to its importance in physics,
this problem has been studied by many authors using
Schauder's fixed point theorem and Leray-Schauder degree theory
(see \cite{aft,yang,del,aga} and references therein). In \cite{aft},
Aftabizadeh showed the existence of a solution to \eqref{e1} under
the restriction that $f$ is a bounded function. In \cite[Theorem 1]{yang},
Yang extended Aftabizadeh's result and showed  existence
 under the growth condition
\begin{equation}
|f(t,u,v)|\leq a|u|+b|v|+c,\label{e2}
\end{equation}
where $a, b$ and $c$ are positive constants such that
$\frac{a}{\pi^4}+ \frac{b}{\pi^2}<1$.

However, the above-mentioned references consider
\eqref{e1} only in scalar space. On the other hand, the theory of
ordinary differential equations  in abstract spaces is becoming
an important branch of mathematics in last thirty years because of
its application in partial differential equations and ODE¡¯s in
appropriately infinite dimensional spaces (see, for example
\cite{dem,lak,guo}). As a result the goal of this paper is to fill
up the gap in this area; that is, to investigate the existence and
uniqueness of solutions of \eqref{e1} in a Banach space $E$.

The goal of this paper is to  introduce a new method
to investigate the existence of
solutions for \eqref{e1} when $f$ satisfies  the growth
condition  \eqref{e2}. To do this, we transform
\eqref{e1} into a second-order integro-differential equation. Then
we construct a particular nonempty closed convex set and apply the
M\"onch fixed-point theorem to obtain  existence results for
\eqref{e1}.

The technique used in this paper includes the well-known Gelfand's
formula, a bounded closed convex set, and M\"onch fixed-point
theorem.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives some
preliminaries. Section 3 is devoted to the existence
results of  \eqref{e1} and their proofs. Section 4 is devoted to the
uniqueness  results  \eqref{e1} and their proofs.


\section{Preliminaries}

Let $E$ be a real Banach space with norm $\|\cdot\|$. Evidently,
$C[J,E]$ is a Banach space with norm $\|x\|_{C}=\max_{t\in
J}\|x(t)\|$.

A function $x$ is said to be a solution of \eqref{e1} if $x\in
C^2[J,E]\cap C^4[(0,1),E]$ and satisfies  \eqref{e1}.

For a bounded set $V$ in a Banach space, we denote $\alpha(V)$ the
Kuratowski measure of noncompactness (see \cite{dem,lak,guo}, for
further understanding). In the paper, we will denote $\alpha(\cdot)$
and $\alpha_{C}(\cdot)$ the Kuratowski measure of noncompactness of
a bounded subset in $E$ and in $C[I,E]$, respectively.

Next, we list four lemmas which will be used in
Section 3.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2.1}
Let $V\subset C[J,E]$ be bounded and equicontinuous on $J$. Then
$\alpha(V(t))$ is continuous on $I$ and
$$
\alpha_C(V)= \max_{t\in J}\alpha(V(t)),\quad
\alpha\Big(\Big\{\int_Jx(t)dt:x\in V\Big\}\Big)\leq
\int_J\alpha(V(t))dt.
$$
where $V(t)=\{x(t):x\in V\}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2.2}
Let $H$ be a set of countable strongly measurable functions
$x:J\to E$. Assume, in addition, there exists
$M\in L[J,R^+]$, for any $x\in H$, such that $\|x(t)\|\leq M(t)$, a.e.
$t\in J$, holds. Then $\alpha(H(t))\in L[J,R^+]$, moreover,
$$
\alpha\Big(\Big\{\int_Jx(t)dt:x\in H\Big\}\Big)\leq
2\int_J\alpha(H(t))dt.
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2.3}
M\"onch fixed-point theorem. Let $Q$ be a closed convex set
of $E$ and $u\in Q$. Assume that the continuous operator
$F:Q\to Q$ has the following property: $V\subset Q$
countable, $V\subset \overline{co}(\{u\}\cup F(V))\Longrightarrow V$
is relatively compact. Then $F$ has a fixed point in $Q$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}[\cite{nu}] \label{lem2.4}
Let $P$ be a cone of a real Banach space $E$ and $B$:
$P\to P$ a completely continuous operator. Assume that $B$ is
order-preserving and positively homogeneous of degree $1$ and that
there exist $v\in P\setminus \{\theta\}$, $\lambda>0$ such that
$Bv\geq \lambda v$. Then $r(B)\geq\lambda$, where $r(B)$ denotes the
spectral radius of $B$.
\end{lemma}

\section{Existence  Results}

For convenience, let us  list some conditions to be used later.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H1)] $f\in C[J\times E\times E, E]$. Assume that there exist $a,
b\in (0,+\infty)$, $L(t)\in C[J,[0,+\infty)]$ such that
$$
\|f(t,x,y)\|\leq  a\|x\|+b\|y\|+L(t),\quad \forall\, (t,x,y)\in J\times
E\times E,\;
 \frac{a}{\pi^4}+ \frac{b}{\pi^2}<1.
$$

\item[(H2)]  For any bounded  sets $A, B\subset E$,
 $f$ is uniformly continuous on $I\times A\times B$.
 Assume that there exist  $c, d\in [0,+\infty)$ such that
$$
\alpha(f(t,A, B))\leq c\alpha(A)+d\alpha(B),\quad
\forall\, t\in J,\; \frac{c}{\pi^4}+ \frac{d}{\pi^2}<1.
$$

\item[(H2')]  There exist $c, d\in [0,+\infty)$ such that
$$
\alpha(f(t,A, B))\leq c\alpha(A)+d\alpha(B),\quad
\forall\, t\in J,\;\frac{4c}{\pi^4}+ \frac{2d}{\pi^2}<1.
$$
\end{itemize}

Now let $G(t,s)$ be the Green's function of the linear problem
$\varphi''=0$, $t\in(0,1)$ together with $\varphi(0)=\varphi(1)=0$,
which is explicitly given by
$$
G(t,s)=\begin{cases}
t(1-s), & 0\leq t\leq s\leq 1,\\
s(1-t), & 0\leq s\leq t\leq 1.
\end{cases}
$$
Set
$$
(Tx)(t)=\int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)x(s)ds,\quad t\in J,\; x\in C[I,E].
$$
Obviously, $T:C[J,E]\to C[J,E]$ is continuous.
Let $u=x''$. Since $x(0)=x(1)=\theta$, we have
\begin{equation}
 x(t)=(Tu)(t)=\int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)u(s)ds.\label{e3}
\end{equation}
Using the above transformation and \eqref{e3}, Problem \eqref{e1} becomes
\begin{gather}
 u''(t)=f(t,(Tu)(t),u(t)), \label{e4} \\
 u(0)=u(1)=\theta.\label{e5}
\end{gather}
From these two equalities, we have
$$
u(t)=\int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)f(s,(Tu)(s),u(s))ds.
$$
Now, define an operator $A$ on $C[J,E]$ by
$$
(Au)(t)=\int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)f(s,\int
_{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)u(\tau)d\tau,u(s))ds.
$$
The following Lemma can be easily obtained.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem3.1}
Assume that {\rm (H1)} holds. Then  $A: C[J,E]\to C^2[J,E]$ and
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] $A: C[J,E]\to C^2[J,E]$ is continuous and bounded;

\item[(ii)] Problem \eqref{e1} has a solution in $C^2[J,E]$ if and only
if $A$ has a fixed point in $C[J,E]$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

Let
\begin{gather*}
(K\varphi)(t)=\int_0^1G(t,s)\varphi(s)ds,\quad \forall\, \varphi\in C[J,R],
\\
B\varphi=aK^2\varphi+bK\varphi,\quad  a,b>0,\; \forall\, \varphi\in C[J,R].
\end{gather*}
It is easy to see that $K,B:C[J,R]\to C[J,R]$ are two
continuous linear positive operators and $r(K)=\frac{1}{\pi^2}$.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem3.2}
 Assume that {\rm (H1)} holds. Then there exists a norm
$\|\cdot\|_{C[J]}^*$ which is equivalent with norm
$\|\cdot\|_{C[J]}(\|y\|_{C[J]}=\max_{t\in J}|y(t)|$,
$y\in C[J,R])$ and has the following properties:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] $\|By\|_{C[J]}^*\leq
\frac{r(B)+1}{2}\|y\|_{C[J]}^*$, for all $y\in C[J,R]$.

\item[(ii)] $\|\varphi\|^*_{C[J]}\leq \|\psi\|^*_{C[J]}$ for any
$\varphi,\psi\in C[J,R]$ with $0\leq \varphi(t)\leq \psi(t)$, for all
$t\in J$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof} Since $ r(K)=1/\pi^2$, we
have $ r(B)=\frac{a}{\pi^4}+\frac{b}{\pi^2}<1$. Set
$$
\varepsilon=\frac{1}{2}(1-r(B)).
$$
Since $r(B)<1$,
 by Gelfand's formula, we have that there exists a natural
number $N$ such that for $n\geq N$,
$$
\| B^{n}\|\leq [r(B)+\varepsilon]^{n}
=[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{n}.
$$
For every $y\in C[J,R]$, define
\begin{equation}
\| y\|^{*}_{C[J]}=\sum_{i=1}^{N}[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N-i}
\| B^{i-1}y\|_{C[J]},\label{e6}
\end{equation}
where $T_{1}^{0}=I$ is the identity operator. By \eqref{e6}, It is
easy to see that
$$
[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N}
\| y\|_{C[J]}\leq \|y\|^*_{C[J]}\leq
\sum_{i=1}^{N}[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N-i}
\| B^{i-1}\|\cdot\| y\|_{C[J]},
$$
which implies  $\|\cdot\|^{*}_{C[J]}$ is a norm in
$C[J,R]$ and  equivalent to the norm $\|\cdot\|_{C[J]}$.
For any $y\in C[J,R]$, we have
\begin{align*}
\|By\|^*_{C[J]}
&=\sum_{i=1}^{N}[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N-i}\|B^{i}y\|_{C[J]}\\
&= \frac{r(B)+1}{2}
\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N-i-1}\|B^{i}y\|_{C[J]}
+\|B^{N}y\|_{C[J]}\\
&\leq  \frac{r(B)+1}{2}
\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N-i-1}\|B^{i}y\|_{C[J]}
+[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N}\|y\|_{C[J]}\\
&= \frac{r(B)+1}{2}
\sum_{i=1}^{N}[\frac{r(B)+1}{2}]^{N-i}\|B^{i-1}y\|_{C[J]}
=\frac{r(B)+1}{2}\|y\|^*_{C[J]}.
\end{align*}
Therefore,  (i) holds. The result (ii) is easily
obtained by the positivity of the operator $B$ and the monotonicity
of the norm $\|\cdot\|_{C[J]}$.
\end{proof}

The following theorem is our main result.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm3.1}
Assume that  {\rm (H1), (H2)} hold. Then \eqref{e1} has at least
one solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof} Set
$$
M=\int_0^1s(1-s)L(s)ds.
$$
It is clear that $M<+\infty$. Select
$$
R_1>\max\{1,\frac{2\pi^4M^*}{\pi^4-a-b\pi^2}\},
$$
where $M^{*}=\| M\|^{*}_{C[J]}$. Let
$$
W=\{x\in C[J,E]:\|y(t)\|^*_{C[J]}\leq R_1,\; y(t)=\|x(t)\| \}.
$$
It is clear that $W$  is a bounded closed convex set in $ C[J,E]$.

Now we show that $AW\subset W$. For any $x\in W$, set
$y(t)=\|x(t)\|$, then it follows from (H1) that
\begin{align*}
&\|Ax(t)\|\\
&=\big\|\int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)f(s,\int
_{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)u(\tau)d\tau,u(s))ds\big\| \\
&\leq \int_0^1G(t,s)\Big[a\big\|\int
_{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)u(\tau)d\tau\big\|+b\|u(s)\|+L(s)\Big]ds \\
&\leq   a\int_0^1G(t,s)\int_{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)\|u(\tau)\|d\tau ds
  +b\int_0^1G(t,s)\|u(s)\|ds+\int_0^1s(1-s)L(s)ds \\
&\leq (By)(t)+M.
\end{align*}
Consequently, by  Lemma \ref{lem3.2}, we have
\begin{align*}
\|\|Ax\|\|^*_{C[J]}
&\leq  \|By+M\|^*_{C[J]}\\
&\leq \|By\|^*_{C[J]} + M^* \\
&\leq \frac{r(B)+1}{2}\|y\|^*_{C[J]}+M^*\\
&\leq \frac{1+r(B)}{2}R_4+\frac{1-r(B)}{2}R_1=R_1.
\end{align*}
Hence we obtain $Ax\in W$ for any $x\in W$.

We have by Lemma \ref{lem3.1} that $A$ is a continuous operator from $W$ into
$W$. It is easily seen that seeking a  solution of \eqref{e1} in
$C^2[J,E]\cap C^4[(0,1),E]$ is equivalent to finding a fixed point
of operator $A$ in $C[J,E]$. Thus, our results are established if we
can prove the existence of a fixed point of $A$ in $C[J,E]$.

Let $V\subset W$ be a countable set with
\begin{equation}
V\subset\overline{{\rm co}}\{\{u\}\cup AV\},\quad  u\in W,\label{e7}
\end{equation}
in which $AV=\{Ax:x\in V\}$. Now we show that $V$ is relatively
compact in $C[J,E]$. In fact, we have by \eqref{e7} that
$\alpha_{C}(V)\leq \alpha_{C}(AV)$. Also, it is easy to see that
$AV$ is a class of equicontinuous functions on $J$, hence $V$ is
also a class of equicontinuous functions on $J$ and
$\overline{V(t)}\subset \overline{co}(\{u(t)\}\cup(AV)(t))$
\cite{liu}. This together with Lemma \ref{lem2.1} yields
\begin{equation}
\alpha_{C}(V)=\max_{t\in J}\alpha(V(t)),\quad
\alpha_{C}(AV)=\max_{t\in J}\alpha((AV)(t)),\quad
\alpha(V(t))\leq \alpha((AV)(t)),\label{e8}
\end{equation}
where $(AV)(t)=\{x(t):x\in AV\}$. We now estimate
$\alpha(V(t))$. We have by the definition of $A$ and Lemma \ref{lem2.1},
\begin{align*}
\alpha(V(t))
&\leq \alpha((AV)(t))\\
&=\alpha(\{\int_0^1G(t,s)f(s,\int_0^1G(s,\tau)x(\tau)d\tau,x(s))ds:x\in V\})\\
&\leq \int_0^1G(t,s)\alpha(\{f(s,\int_0^1G(s,\tau)x(\tau)d\tau,x(s)):
x\in V\})ds\\
&\leq  c\int_0^1G(t,s)
\alpha(\{\int_0^1G(s,\tau)x(\tau)d\tau :x\in
V\}ds)+d\int_0^1G(t,s)\alpha(V(s))ds\\
&\leq c\int_0^1G(t,s)\int_0^1G(s,\tau) \alpha(V(\tau))d\tau
ds+d\int_0^1G(t,s)\alpha(V(s))ds\\
&= (cK^2+dK)\alpha(V(t)).
\end{align*}
If $\alpha(V(t))\not\equiv 0$ for some $t\in J$, then by Lemma \ref{lem2.4},
we have $r(cK^2+dK)\geq 1$, which is a contradiction with
$r(cK^2+dK)=\frac{c}{\pi^4}+ \frac{d}{\pi^2}<1$. So
$\alpha(V(t))\equiv 0$ for $\forall\ t\in J$, which implies that $V$
is relatively compact in $C[J,E]$. Consequently, Lemma \ref{lem2.3}
guarantees that $A$ has at least one fixed point in $W$. The proof
of the theorem is completed.
\end{proof}


\begin{theorem} \label{thm3.2}
Assume that {\rm (H1), (H2')} hold,
then  \eqref{e1} has at least one solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The proof is similar to that of Theorem \ref{thm3.1}.  The difference is
that we use Lemma \ref{lem2.2}, instead of Lemma \ref{lem2.1}, to prove
$\alpha(V(t))\equiv 0$, for all $t\in I$; for example,
\begin{align*}
\alpha(V(t))
&\leq \alpha((AV)(t))=\alpha(\{\int_0^1G(t,s)f(s,
 \int_0^1G(s,\tau)x(\tau)d\tau,x(s))ds:x\in V\})\\
&\leq 2\int_0^1G(t,s)\alpha(\{f(s,\int_0^1G(s,\tau)x(\tau)d\tau,x(s)):
x\in V\})ds\\
&\leq 2c\int_0^1G(t,s) \alpha(\{\int_0^1G(s,\tau)x(\tau)d\tau :x\in
V\}ds+2d\int_0^1G(t,s)\alpha(V(s))ds\\
&\leq  4c\int_0^1G(t,s)\int_0^1G(s,\tau)
\alpha(V(\tau))d\tau ds+2d\int_0^1G(t,s)\alpha(V(s))ds\\
&= (4cK^2+2dK)\alpha(V(t)).
\end{align*}
\end{proof}

\section{Uniqueness Results}

\begin{theorem} \label{thm4.1}
$f\in C[J\times E\times E, E]$. Assume that there
exist $\alpha, \beta\in (0,+\infty)$ such that
$$
\|f(t,u_1,v_1)-f(t,u_2,v_2)\|\leq
\alpha\|u_1-u_2\|+\beta\|v_1-v_2\|,\quad \forall\, t\in J,\;
 u_1, v_1, u_2, v_2\in E,
 $$
and
$$
\frac{\alpha}{\pi^4}+ \frac{\beta}{\pi^2}<1.
$$
Then  \eqref{e1} has a unique solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
 From Lemma \ref{lem3.1}, to prove \eqref{e1} has a unique solution,
we have only to show that $A$ has a unique fixed
point in $C[I,E]$. For $x(t), y(t)\in C[I,E]$, we have
\begin{align*}
&\|(A^nx)(t)-(A^ny)(t)\|\\
&= \Big\|\int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\Big[f(s,\int_{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)
  (A^{n-1}x)(\tau)d\tau,(A^{n-1}x)(s)) \\
&\quad -f(s,\int_{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)(A^{n-1}y)(\tau)d
 \tau,(A^{n-1}y)(s))\Big]ds\Big\| \\
&\leq \int_0^1G(t,s)\Big[\alpha\int _{0}^{1}G(s,\tau)
 \|(A^{n-1}x)(\tau)\\
&\quad -(A^{n-1}y)(\tau)\|d\tau+\beta\|
 (A^{n-1}x)(\tau)-(A^{n-1}y)\|\Big]ds \\
&= (\alpha K^2+\beta K)(\|(A^{n-1}x)(s)-(A^{n-1}y)(s)\|)\\
&:=B_1(\|(A^{n-1}x)(s)-(A^{n-1}y)(s)\|).
\end{align*}
By induction, we have
$$
\|(A^nx)(t)-(A^ny)(t)\|\leq
B_1^n(\|x(s)-y(s)\|)\leq \|B_1^n\|\|x-y\|_C.
$$
Thus
$\|A^nx-A^ny\|_C\leq \|B_1^n\|\|x-y\|_C$.

Since $ r(K)=1/\pi^2$, We have
$r(B_1)=\frac{\alpha}{\pi^4}+\frac{\beta}{\pi^2}<1$. Set
$\varepsilon=\frac{1}{2}(1-r(B_1))$. By Gelfand's
formula, we have that there exists a natural number $N_1$ such that
$$
\| B_1^{N_1}\|\leq [r(B_1)+\varepsilon]^{N_1}=[\frac{r(B_1)+1}{2}]^{N_1}<1.
$$
Thus the Banach contraction mapping principle implies $A^{N_1}$ has
a unique fixed point $x^*$ in $C[I,E]$, and so $A$ has a unique
fixed point $x^*$ in $C[I,E]$. Therefore,
$x(t)=\int_0^1G(t,s)x^*(s)ds$ is the unique solution of
\eqref{e1}.
\end{proof}


\begin{thebibliography}{0}

\bibitem{aft} A. R. Aftabizadeh;
Existence and uniqueness theorems for
fourth-order boundary value problems, \emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.}
\textbf{116} (1986): 415-426.

\bibitem{yang} Y. Yang;
Fourth-order two-point boundary value problems, \emph{Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc.} \textbf{104}(1988): 175-180.

\bibitem{del} M. A. DelPino, R. F. Manasevich;
Existence for a fourth-order boundary value problem under a
twoparameter nonresonance condition, \emph{Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc.} \textbf{112} (1991): 81-86.

\bibitem{aga} R. Agarwal;
On fourth-order boundary value problems arising in beam
analysis, \emph{Differential Integral Equations.} \textbf{2} (1989): 91-110.

\bibitem{dem} K. Deimling;
Ordinary Differential Equations in Banach Spaces, {Springer-Verlag}, 1977.

\bibitem{lak}  V. Lakshmikantham and S. Leela;
 Nonlinear Differential Equations in Abstract Spaces,
{Pergamon, Oxford}, 1981.

\bibitem{guo} D. Guo, V. Lakshmikantham and X. Liu;
Nonlinear Integral Equations in Abstract Spaces,
{Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht}, 1996.

\bibitem{nu}R. D. Nussbaum;
Eigenvectors of nonlinear positive operators
and the linear Krein-Rutman theorem In Fixed Point Theory LNM 886.
{New York, Berlin: Springer-Verlag}, 1980, 309-330.

\bibitem{liu}L. S. Liu;
Iterative method for solutions and coupled
quasi-solutions of nonlinear Fredholm integral equations in ordered
Banach spaces, \emph{Indian J Pure Appl Math.} \textbf{27} (1996): 959-972.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
