\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2010(2010), No. 20, pp. 1--16.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2010 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2010/20\hfil Fractional differential inclusions]
{Existence results for boundary-value problems with
nonlinear fractional differential inclusions and integral
conditions}

\author[S. Hamani, M. Benchohra,  J. R. Graef\hfil EJDE-2010/20\hfilneg]
{Samira Hamani, Mouffak Benchohra, John R. Graef} 

\address{Samira Hamani \newline
Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques, 
Universit\'e de Sidi Bel-Abb\`es\\ 
B.P. 89, 22000, Sidi Bel-Abb\`es, Alg\'erie}
\email{hamani\_samira@yahoo.fr}

\address{Mouffak Benchohra \newline
Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques, 
Universit\'e de Sidi Bel-Abb\`es\\ 
B.P. 89, 22000, Sidi Bel-Abb\`es, Alg\'erie}
\email{benchohra@univ-sba.dz}

\address{John R. Graef \newline
Department of Mathematics,  
University of  Tennessee at Chattanooga\\ 
Chattanooga, TN  37403-2504, USA}
\email{John-Graef@utc.edu}

\thanks{Submitted September 8, 2009. Published January 28, 2010.}
\subjclass[2000]{26A33, 34A60, 34B15}
\keywords{Boundary-value problem;
differential inclusion; fractional integral; \hfill\break\indent
Caputo fractional derivative; existence; uniqueness; fixed point;
integral conditions}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article, the authors establish sufficient conditions
 for the existence of solutions for a class of boundary value
 problem for fractional differential inclusions involving the
 Caputo fractional derivative and nonlinear integral conditions.
 Both cases of convex and nonconvex valued right hand sides are
 considered. The topological structure of the set of solutions
 also examined.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}

\section{Introduction}

This article concerns the existence and uniqueness of solutions
of the boundary value problem (BVP for short) with fractional
order differential inclusions and nonlinear integral conditions of
the form
\begin{gather}\label{e1}
^{c}D^{\alpha}y(t)\in F(t,y), \quad\text{for a.e. } 
t\in J=[0, T],\; 1<\alpha\leq 2, \\
\label{e2}
y(0)-y'(0)=\int_{0}^{T}g(s,y)ds, \\
\label{e3}
y(T)+y'(T)=\int_{0}^{T}h(s,y)ds,
\end{gather}
where $^{c}D^{\alpha}$ is the Caputo fractional derivative,
$F: J\times \mathbb{R} \to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$
is a multivalued map, ($\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$ is
the family of all nonempty subsets of $\mathbb{R}$), and $g$,
$h : J\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ are given continuous functions.
Differential equations of fractional order have recently proved to
be valuable tools in the modelling of many phenomena in various
fields of science and engineering. There are numerous
applications to problems in viscoelasticity, electrochemistry, control,
porous media, electromagnetics, etc. (see \cite{DiFr, GaKlKe, GlNo, Hil,
Mai, MeScKiNo, OlPs}). There has been a significant development in
ordinary and partial differential equations involving both
Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives in recent
years; see the monographs of Kilbas \emph{et al.} \cite{KST}, Miller
and Ross \cite{MiRo}, Samko \emph{et al.} \cite{SaKiMa} and the
papers of Agarwal \emph{et al.} \cite{ABH}, Benchohra \emph{et al.} \cite{BeGrHa},
Benchohra and Hamani \cite{BeHa},  Daftardar-Gejji
and Jafari \cite{DaJa}, Delbosco and Rodino \cite{DeRo}, Diethelm
\emph{et al.} \cite{DiFr,DiFo,DiWa}, El-Sayed \cite{El,El1,El2},
Furati and Tatar \cite{FuTa1, FuTa}, Kaufmann and Mboumi
\cite{KM}, Kilbas and Marzan \cite{KiMa}, Mainardi \cite{Mai},
Momani and Hadid \cite{MoHa}, Momani \emph{et al.} \cite{MoHaAl},
Ouahab \cite{Oua}, Podlubny \emph{et al.} \cite{PoPeViLeDo},  Yu and
Gao \cite{YuGa} and the references therein. In \cite{BBO, BHNO}
the authors studied the existence  and uniqueness of solutions of
classes of initial value problems for functional differential
equations with infinite delay and fractional order, and in
\cite{BBHN} a class of perturbed functional  differential
equations involving the Caputo fractional derivative has been
considered. Related problems to \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} have been
considered by means of different methods by Belarbi \emph{et al.}
\cite{BBD} and Benchohra \emph{et al.} in \cite{BHH, BHN} in the
case of $\alpha=2$.

Applied problems require definitions of fractional derivatives
allowing the utilization of physically interpretable initial
conditions that contain $y(0)$, $y'(0)$, etc., and the same is true for
boundary conditions. Caputo's fractional derivative
satisfies these demands.  For more details on the geometric and
physical interpretation for fractional derivatives of both
Riemann-Liouville and Caputo types see  \cite{HePo, Pod1}. The web
site http://people.tuke.sk/igor.podlubny/ authored by Igor Podlubny
contains more information on fractional calculus and its
applications, and hence it is very useful for those interested in this field.

Boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions
constitute a very interesting and important class of problems.
They include two, three, multipoint, and nonlocal boundary value
problems as special cases. Integral boundary conditions appear in
population dynamics \cite{Bla} and cellular systems \cite{AdAd}.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some preliminary
results needed in the following sections. In Section 3, we present an existence result for the problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} when the right hand side is convex valued by
using the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type. In Section
4, two results are given for nonconvex valued right hand sides. The
first one is based upon a fixed point theorem for contraction
multivalued maps due to Covitz and Nadler \cite{CoNa}, and the second one on
the nonlinear alternative of Leray Schauder type \cite{GrDu} for
single-valued  maps, combined with a selection theorem due to
Bressan-Colombo \cite{BrCo} (also see \cite{Fry}) for lower
semicontinuous multivalued maps with decomposable values. The
topological structure of the solutions set is considered in
Section 5. An example is presented in the last section. These
results extend to the multivalued case some results from the above
cited literature, and constitute a new contribution to this emerging
field of research.

\section{Preliminaries}

In this section, we introduce notation, definitions, and preliminary
facts that will be used in the remainder of this paper.
Let $C(J,\mathbb{R})$ be the Banach space of all continuous functions
from $J$ to $\mathbb{R}$ with the norm
$$
\|y\|_{\infty}=\sup\{|y(t)|: 0\le t \le T\},
$$
and let $L^{1}(J,\mathbb{R})$ denote the Banach space of
functions $y:J\to \mathbb{R}$ that are Lebesgue
integrable with norm
$$
\|y\|_{L^1}=\int_{0}^{T}|y(t)|dt.
$$
We let $L^{\infty}(J,\mathbb{R})$ be the Banach space of bounded measurable
functions
$y: J \to \mathbb{R}$ equipped with the norm
$$
\| y\|_{L^{\infty}}=\inf\{c>0: |y(t)|\leq c, \text{ a.e. } t\in J\}.
$$
Also, $AC^{1}(J,\mathbb{R})$ will denote the space of functions
$y:J \to \mathbb{R}$ that are absolutely continuous and whose first
 derivative, $y'$, is absolutely continuous.
 Let $(X,\|\cdot\|)$ be a Banach space and let
$P_{cl}(X) = \{Y\in \mathcal{P}(X): Y \text{ is closed}\}$,
$P_{b}(X) = \{Y\in \mathcal{P}(X): Y \text{ is bounded}\}$,
$P_{cp}(X) = \{Y\in \mathcal{P}(X): Y \text{ is compact}\}$,
and $P_{cp,c}(X)=\{Y\in \mathcal{P}(X): Y \text{ is compact and convex}\}$.  A multivalued map $G:X\to P(X)$ is
{\it convex} ({\it closed}) valued if $G(x)$ is convex (closed) for all $x\in
X$. We say that $G$ is {\it bounded on bounded sets} if $G(B)=\cup_{x\in B}G(x)$ is bounded in $X$ for all $B\in P_{b}(X)$ (i.e., $\sup_{x\in
B}\{\sup\{|y|: y\in G(x) \}\}<\infty)$. The mapping $G$ is called {\it upper
semi-continuous} ({\it u.s.c.}) on $X$ if for each $x_{0}\in X$, the set
$G(x_{0})$ is a nonempty closed subset of $X$, and if for each
open set $N$ of $X$ containing $G(x_{0})$, there exists an open
neighborhood $N_0$ of $x_{0}$ such that $G(N_0)\subseteq N$. We say that $G$
is {\it completely continuous} if $G(\mathcal{B})$ is relatively
compact for every $\mathcal{B}\in P_{b}(X)$. If the multivalued map
$G$ is completely continuous with nonempty compact values, then
$G$ is u.s.c. if and only if $G$ has a closed graph (i.e.,
$x_{n}\to x_{*}, \ y_{n}\to y_{*}, \
y_{n}\in G(x_{n})$ imply $y_{*}\in G(x_{*})$). The mapping $G$ has a {\it fixed point} if there is $x\in X$ such that $x\in G(x)$. The set of fixed points of the multivalued operator $G$ will be denoted by $Fix G$. A
multivalued map $G:J\to P_{cl}(\mathbb{R})$ is said to be {\it measurable} if
for every $y\in \mathbb{R}$, the function
$$ t\mapsto d(y,G(t))=\inf\{|y-z|: z\in G(t) \}$$
is measurable. For more
details on multivalued maps see the books of Aubin and Cellina
\cite{AuCe}, Aubin and Frankowska \cite{AuFr}, Deimling \cite{Dei},
and Hu and Papageorgiou \cite{HuPa}.

\begin{definition} \label{def2.1} \rm
A multivalued map $F: J\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$
is Carath\'eodory if
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] $t\mapsto F(t,u)$ is  measurable for each $u\in\mathbb{R}$, and
\item[(ii)] $u\mapsto F(t,u)$ is upper semicontinuous for almost
all $t\in J$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}

For each $y\in C(J,\mathbb{R})$, define the set of {\it selections} for $F$ by
$$
S_{F,y}=\{v\in L^1(J,\mathbb{R}): v(t)\in F(t,y(t))\text{ a.e. } t\in J\}.
$$
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space induced from the normed space $(X,
|\cdot |)$.  Consider
$H_{d}:\mathcal{P}(X)\times \mathcal{P}(X)\to\mathbb{R}_{+}\cup\{\infty\}$
given by
$$
H_{d}(A,B)=\max\big\{\sup_{a\in A}d(a,B), \,
\sup_{b\in B}d(A,b)\big\},
$$
where $d(A,b)=\inf_{a\in A}d(a,b)$ and  $d(a,B)=\inf_{b\in B}d(a,b)$.
Then $( P_{b,cl}(X),H_{d})$ is a
metric space and $(P_{cl}(X),H_{d})$ is a generalized metric space
(see \cite{Kis}).

\begin{definition} \label{def2.2} \rm
A multivalued operator $N:X\to  P_{cl}(X)$ is called:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] $\gamma$-Lipschitz if  there
exists $\gamma>0$ such that
$$
H_d(N(x),N(y))\leq \gamma d(x,y),
\quad \text{for all}  x, y\in X;
$$
\item[(b)] a contraction if  it is
$\gamma$-Lipschitz with $\gamma<1$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}

The following lemma will be used in the sequel.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{CoNa}] \label{CN}
Let $(X,d)$ be a complete metric space. If $N: X\to P_{cl}(X)$ is
a contraction, then $Fix N \neq \emptyset$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{definition}[\cite{KST,Pod}] \label{def2.4} \rm
The fractional (arbitrary) order integral of the function $h\in
L^1([a,b],\mathbb{R}_+)$ of order $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}_+$ is defined by
$$
I^{\alpha}_ah(t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_a^t (t-s)^{\alpha-1} h(s)ds,
$$
where $\Gamma$ is the gamma function. When $a=0$, we write
$I^{\alpha}h(t)=h(t)*\varphi_{\alpha}(t)$, where
$\varphi_{\alpha}(t)=\frac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}$ for
$t>0$, $\varphi_{\alpha}(t)=0$ for $t\leq 0$, and
$\varphi_{\alpha}\to \delta(t)$\ as $\alpha\to 0$, where $\delta$
is the delta function.
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}[\cite{KST,Pod}] \label{def2.5} \rm
For a function $h$ given on the interval $[a,b]$, the $\alpha$-th
Riemann-Liouville fractional-order derivative of $h$ is defined
by
\[
(D^{\alpha}_{a+}h)(t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n-\alpha)}
\big(\frac{d}{dt}\big)^{n}\int_
a^t(t-s)^{n-\alpha-1}h(s)ds.
\]
Here $n=[\alpha]+1$ and $[\alpha]$ denotes the integer part of
$\alpha$.
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}[\cite{KST}] \label{def2.6} \rm
For a function $h$ given on the interval $[a,b]$, the Caputo
fractional-order derivative of $h$ is defined by
$$
(^{c}D_{a+}^{\alpha}h)(t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n-\alpha)}\int_
a^t(t-s)^{n-\alpha-1}h^{(n)}(s)ds,
$$
where $n=[\alpha]+1$.
\end{definition}

\section{The Convex Case}

In this section, we are concerned with the existence of solutions
for the problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} when the right hand side has
convex values. Initially, we assume that $F$ is a compact and convex
valued  multivalued map.

\begin{definition} \label{def3.1} \rm
A function $y\in  AC^{1}(J,\mathbb{R})$ is  said to be a solution of
\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}, if there exists a function $v\in
L^1(J,\mathbb{R})$ with $v(t)\in F(t,y(t))$, for a.e. $t\in J$, such that
$$ ^{c}D^{\alpha}y(t)=v(t), \ \text{ a.e. } \ t\in J, \
1<\alpha\leq 2, $$
and the function $y$ satisfies conditions \eqref{e2} and \eqref{e3}.
\end{definition}

For the existence of solutions for the problem
\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}, we need the following auxiliary lemmas.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{Zh}] \label{l1}
Let $\alpha > 0$; then the differential equation
$$  ^{c}D^{\alpha}h(t)=0  $$
has the solutions $
h(t)=c_{0}+c_{1}t+c_{2}t^{2}+\dots +c_{n-1}t^{n-1}$, where $c_{i}\in
\mathbb{R}$, $i=0,1,2,\dots ,n-1$, and $n=[\alpha]+1$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}[\cite{Zh}] \label{l2}
Let $\alpha > 0$; then
$$
{I^{\alpha}}^{c}D^{\alpha}h(t)=h(t)+
c_{0}+c_{1}t+c_{2}t^{2}+\dots +c_{n-1}t^{n-1}
$$
for some $c_{i}\in \mathbb{R}$, $i=0,1,2,\dots ,n-1$, where $n=[\alpha]+1$.
\end{lemma}

As a consequence of Lemmas \ref{l1} and \ref{l2}, we have the
following result which will be useful in the remainder of the paper.

\begin{lemma}\label{l3}
Let  $1< \alpha\leq 2$ and
let  $ \sigma,\rho_{1},  \rho_{2}: J \to\mathbb{R}$ be continuous. A
function $y$ is a solution of the fractional integral equation
\begin{equation}\label{e7}
y(t)=P(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)\sigma(s)ds,
\end{equation}
 where
\begin{equation}\label{e8}
 P(t)=\frac{T+1-t}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{1}(s) ds+
\frac{t+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{2}(s) ds
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{e9}
G(t,s)= \begin{cases}
\frac{(t-s)^{\alpha-1}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}-\frac{(1+t)(T-s)
^{\alpha-1}}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha)}-\frac{(1+t)(T-s)
^{\alpha-2}}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha-1)}, & 0\leq s\leq t,\\[4pt]
-\frac{(1+t)(T-s)^{\alpha-1}}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha)}-\frac{(1+t)(T-s)
^{\alpha-2}}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha-1)}, & t\leq s < T,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
if and only if  $y$  is
a solution of the fractional  BVP
\begin{gather}\label{e10}
^{c}D^{\alpha}y(t)=\sigma(t), \quad t\in J, \\
\label{e11}
y(0)-y'(0)=\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{1}(s)ds, \\
\label{e12}
y(T)+y'(T)=\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{2}(s)ds.
\end{gather}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 Assume that $y$ satisfies \eqref{e10}; then Lemma \ref{l2}
implies
\begin{equation}\label{e13}
y(t)=c_{0}+c_{1}t+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}
\int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\alpha-1}\sigma(s)ds.
\end{equation}
 From \eqref{e11} and \eqref{e12}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{e14}
c_{0}-c_1=\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{1}(s)ds
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{e15}
\begin{aligned}
&c_0+c_{1}(T+1)+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}
\int_{0}^{T}(T-s)^{\alpha-1}\sigma(s)ds\\
&+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha-1)}\int_{0}^{T}(T-s)^{\alpha-2}\sigma(s)ds\\
&=\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{2}(s)ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Solving \eqref{e14}--\eqref{e15}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{e16}
\begin{aligned}
c_1&=\frac{1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{2}(s)ds-\frac{1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{1}(s)ds\\
&\quad -\frac{1}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha)}
\int_{0}^{T}(T-s)^{\alpha-1}\sigma(s)ds\\
&\quad -\frac{1}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha-1)}
\int_{0}^{T}(T-s)^{\alpha-2}\sigma(s)ds
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{e17}
\begin{aligned}
c_0&=\frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{1}(s)ds+\frac{1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\rho_{2}(s)ds\\
&\quad -\frac{1}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha)}
\int_{0}^{T}(T-s)^{\alpha-1}\sigma(s)ds\\
&\quad -\frac{1}{(T+2)\Gamma(\alpha-1)}
\int_{0}^{T}(T-s)^{\alpha-2}\sigma(s)ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
 From \eqref{e13}, \eqref{e16}, \eqref{e17}, and the fact that
$\int_{0}^{T}=\int_{0}^{t}+\int_{t}^{T}$,  we obtain \eqref{e7}.

Conversely, if $y$ satisfies equation \eqref{e7},
then clearly \eqref{e10}--\eqref{e12} hold.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}\label{rmk3.5} \rm
It is clear that the function $t\mapsto\int_{0}^{T}|G(t,s)|ds$ is
continuous on $J$, and hence is bounded. Thus, we let
$$
\tilde G:=\sup\{\int_{0}^{T}|G(t,s)|ds, \; t\in J\}.
$$
\end{remark}

Our first result is based on the nonlinear alternative of
Leray-Schauder type for multivalued maps \cite{GrDu}.

\begin{theorem}\label{t1}
Assume that the following hypotheses hold:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H1)]  $F: J\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathcal{P}_{cp,c}(\mathbb{R})$ is a
Carath\'eodory  multi-valued map;

\item[(H2)] There exist $p\in L^{\infty} (J,\mathbb{R}^+) $ and a continuous nondecreasing function $\psi:[0,\infty)\to (0,\infty)$ such that
$$
 \|F(t,u)\|_{\mathcal{P}}=\sup\{|v|: v\in F(t,u)\}\leq p(t)\psi(|u|)
\quad \text{for all } t\in J.\;  u\in \mathbb{R};
$$

\item[(H3)] There exist $\phi_{g}\in L^{1}(J,\mathbb{R}^{+})$
and a continuous nondecreasing function
$\psi^{*}:[0,\infty)\to (0,\infty)$ such that
$$
|g(t,u)|\leq \phi_{g}(t)\psi^{*}(|u|) \quad \text{for all}  t\in J,\;
 u\in \mathbb{R}.
$$

\item[(H4)] There exist $\phi_{h}\in L^{1}(J,\mathbb{R}^{+})$
and a continuous nondecreasing function
$\overline \psi:[0,\infty)\to (0,\infty)$ such that
$$
|h(t,u)|\leq \phi_{h}(t)\overline \psi(|u|) \quad \text{for all}
  t\in J,\;   u\in \mathbb{R}.
$$

\item[(H5)] there exists $l\in L^{\infty}(J,\mathbb{R}^+)$
such that
\begin{gather*}
H_d(F(t,u),F(t,\overline u))\leq l(t)|u-\overline u|\quad
\text{for every } u, \; \overline u\in \mathbb{R}, \\
 d(0,F(t,0))\leq l(t) \quad \text{a.e. }  t\in J.
\end{gather*}

\item[(H6)] There exists a number $M>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq2}
\frac{M}{a \psi^{*}(M)+b \overline \psi(M)+  c \tilde G\psi(M)}>1,
 \end{equation}
where
$$
 a=\frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{g}(s)ds, \quad
b=\frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{h}(s)ds, \quad
 c=\|p\|_{L^{\infty}}.
$$
\end{itemize}
Then the  \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} has at least one solution on $J$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
 We transform the problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} into a fixed point
problem by considering the multivalued operator
\begin{equation} \label{eq*}
N(y)=\big\{h\in C(J,\mathbb{R}):h(t)= P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v(s)ds
 , \ v \in S_{F,y}\big\},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation} \label{P}
 P_y(t)=\frac{T+1-t}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T} g(s,y(s)) ds+
\frac{t+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}h(s,y(s)) ds
\end{equation}
and the function $G(t,s)$ is given by \eqref{e9}. Clearly, from Lemma
\ref{l3}, the fixed points of $N$ are solutions to
\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}. We shall show that $N$ satisfies the
assumptions of the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type
\cite{GrDu}. The proof will be given in several steps.
\smallskip

{\bf Step 1:} \emph{$N(y)$ is convex for each $y\in C(J,\mathbb{R})$.}
Indeed, if $h_{1}$ and $h_{2}$ belong to $N(y)$, then there
exist $v_{1}$, $v_{2}\in S_{F,y}$ such that, for all$t\in J$, we have
$$
 h_{i}(t) =  P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v_{i}(s)ds, \quad i=1,2.
 $$
Let $0\leq d\leq 1$. Then, for each $t\in J$, we have
$$
(dh_{1}+(1-d)h_{2})(t) =
P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)[dv_{1}(s)+(1-d)v_{2}(s)]ds.
$$
Since $S_{F,y}$ is convex (because $F$ has convex values), we have
$ dh_{1}+(1-d)h_{2}\in N(y)$.
\smallskip

{\bf Step 2}: \emph{$N$ maps bounded sets into bounded sets
in $C(J,\mathbb{R})$.}
Let $ B_{\eta^*}=\{y\in C(J,\mathbb{R}): \|y\|_{\infty}\leq \eta^* \}$ be a
bounded set in $C(J,\mathbb{R})$ and let $y\in B_{\eta^*}$. Then for each
$h\in N(y)$ and $t\in J$, from (H2)--(H4), we have
\begin{align*}
|h(t)|&\leq
\frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}|g(s,y(s))|ds
 +\frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}|h(s,y(s))|ds\\
&\quad +\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)|v(s))|ds \\
&\leq \frac{T+1}{T+2}\psi^{*}(\|y\|_{\infty})\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{g}(s)ds +
\frac{T+1}{T+2} \, \overline
\psi(\|y\|_{\infty})\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{h}(s)ds\\
&\quad + \psi(\|y\|_{\infty}) \|p\|_{L^{\infty}}\tilde G.
\end{align*}
Therefore,
\[
\|h\|_{\infty} \leq \frac{T+1}{T+2}
\psi^{*}(\eta^*)\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{g}(s)ds +
\frac{T+1}{T+2} \, \overline \psi(\eta^*)\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{h}(s)ds
+ \psi(\eta^*)  \|p\|_{L^{\infty}}\tilde G:=\ell.
\]


{\bf Step 3}: \emph{$N$ maps bounded sets into
equicontinuous sets of $C(J,\mathbb{R})$.}
Let $t_{1}$, $t_{2}\in J$ with $t_{1}<t_{2}$,
let $B_{\eta^*}$ be a bounded set in $C(J,\mathbb{R})$ as in Step  2,
 and let $y\in B_{\eta^*}$ and  $h\in N(y)$. Then
\begin{align*}
|h(t_{2})-h(t_{1})|
&=\frac{t_{2}-t_{1}}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}|g(s,y(s))|ds
 + \frac{t_{2}-t_{1}}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}|h(s,y(s))|ds\\
&\quad + \int_0^{T} |G(t_2,s)-G(t_1,s)| |v(s)|ds.\\
&\leq \frac{t_{2}-t_{1}}{T+2}\,\psi^{*}(\eta^*)\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{g}(s)ds
+\frac{t_{2}-t_{1}}{T+2}\,\overline\psi(\eta^*)\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{h}(s)ds
\\
&\quad +\psi(\eta^*) \|p\|_{L^{\infty}}\int_{0}^{T}|G(t_2,s)-G(t_1,s)|ds.
\end{align*}
As $t_{1}\to t_{2}$, the right-hand side of the
above inequality tends to zero. As a consequence of Steps 1 to 3
together with the Arzel\'a-Ascoli theorem, we can conclude that
$N:C(J,\mathbb{R})\to \mathcal{P} (C(J,\mathbb{R}))$ is
  completely continuous.
\smallskip

{\bf Step 4:} \emph{$N$ has a closed graph.}
Let $y_{n}\to y_{*}$, $h_{n}\in N(y_{n})$, and  $h_{n} \to h_{*}$.
We need to show that $h_{*}\in N(y_{*})$. Now, $h_{n}\in N(y_{n})$
implies there exists $v_{n}\in S_{F, y_{n}}$ such that, for each
$t\in J$,
$$
h_{n}(t)=P_{y_{n}}(t)+ \int_{0}^{T} G(t,s)v_{n}(s)ds.
$$
We must show that there exists $v_{*}\in S_{F, y_{*}}$ such that
for each $t\in J$,
$$
h_{*}(t)= P_{y_{*}}(t)+ \int_{0}^{T} G(t,s)v_{*}(s)ds.
$$
Since $F(t,\cdot)$ is upper semicontinuous, for every
$\varepsilon>0$, there exist $n_0(\epsilon)\geq 0$ such
 that for every $n\geq n_0$, we have
$$
v_n(t)\in F(t,y_n(t))\subset F(t,y_{*}(t))+\varepsilon  B(0,1)
\quad \text{a.e. } t\in J.
$$
 Since $F(\cdot,\cdot)$ has compact values, there exists a
 subsequence $v_{n_m}(\cdot)$ such that
\begin{gather*}
v_{n_m}(\cdot)\to v_*(\cdot) \quad \text{as } m\to\infty,\\
v_*(t)\in F(t,y_*(t)) \quad  \text{a.e. } t\in J.
\end{gather*}
For every  $w\in F(t,y_{*}(t))$, we have
$$
 |v_{n_m}(t)-v_*(t)| \leq |v_{n_m}(t)-w|+|w-v_*(t)|,
$$
and so
 $$
|v_{n_m}(t)-v_*(t)|\leq d(v_{n_m}(t),F(t,y_*(t))).
$$
By an analogous relation obtained by interchanging the roles of
$v_{n_m}$ and $v_*$, it follows that
$$
|v_{n_m}(t)-v_*(t)|\leq  H_d(F(t,y_n(t)),F(t,y_*(t)))
\leq l(t)\|y_n-y_*\|_{\infty}.
$$
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
|h_{n_m}(t)-h_*(t)|&\leq
\int_0^T |g(s,y_{n_m}(s)) - g(s,y_*(s))|ds  \\
&\quad + \int_0^T |h(s,y_{n_m}(s)) - h(s,y_*(s))|ds \\
&\quad + \int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)|v_{n_m}(s)-v_*(s)|ds.
\end{align*}
Since
\begin{align*}
\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)|v_{n_m}(s)-v_*(s)|ds
&\leq \int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)l(s)ds\|y_{n_m}-y_*\|_{\infty} \\
&\leq \tilde G \|l\|_{L^{\infty}} \|y_{n_m}-y_*\|_{\infty},
\end{align*}
and $g$ and $h$ are continuous,
$\|h_{n_m}-h_*\|_{\infty} \to 0$ as $m\to\infty$.
\smallskip

{\bf Step 5:} \emph{A priori bounds on solutions.}
Let $y$ be a possible solution of the
problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}. Then, there exists $v\in S_{F,y}$
such that, for each  $t\in J$,
\begin{align*}
|y(t)|
&\leq  \frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{g}(s)\psi^{*}(|y(s)|)ds
+\frac{T+1}{T+2} \int_{0}^{T}\phi_{h}(s)\overline \psi(|y(s)|)ds\\
&\quad + \int_{0}^{T} G(t,s) p(s)\psi(|y(s)|)ds\\
& \leq \frac{T+1}{T+2} \, \psi^{*}(\|y\|_{\infty})
\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{g}(s)ds + \frac{T+1}{T+2} \, \overline
\psi(\|y\|_{\infty})\int_{0}^{T}\phi_{h}(s)ds\\
&\quad + \psi(\|y\|_{\infty}) \tilde G \|p\|_{L^{\infty}}.
\end{align*}
Therefore,
 $$
\frac{\|y\|_{\infty}}{a \psi^{*}(\|y\|_{\infty})+b \overline
\psi(\|y\|_{\infty})+  c \tilde G\psi(\|y\|_{\infty})}\leq 1.
$$
Hence, by  \eqref{eq2}, there exists  $M$ such that
$\|y\|_{\infty} \neq M$.
Let
$$
U=\{y\in C(J,\mathbb{R}): \|y\|_{\infty}<M\}.
$$
The operator $N: \overline U\to \mathcal{P}(C(J,\mathbb{R}))$ is upper
semicontinuous and completely continuous. From the choice of $U$,
there is no $y\in \partial U$ such that $y\in \lambda N(y)$ for some
$\lambda\in(0,1)$. As a consequence of the nonlinear alternative of
Leray-Schauder type, we conclude that $N$ has a fixed point
$y$ in $\overline U$ which is a solution
of the problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}.
This completes the proof of the theorem.
\end{proof}

\section{The Nonconvex Case}

 This section is devoted to proving the existence of solutions for
\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} with a nonconvex valued right hand side. Our
first result is based on the fixed point theorem for contraction
multivalued maps given by Covitz and Nadler \cite{CoNa}; the
second one makes use of a selection theorem due to Bressan and
Colombo (see \cite{BrCo, Fry}) for lower semicontinuous operators with
decomposable values combined with the nonlinear Leray-Schauder
alternative.

\begin{theorem}\label{t3}
Assume that {\rm (H5)} and the following
hypotheses hold:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H7)] There exists a constant $k^{*}>0$ such that
$|g(t,u)-g(t,\overline u)|\leq k^{*} |u-\overline u|$
for all $t\in J$ and $u,  \overline u \in \mathbb{R}$.

\item[(H8)] There exists a constant $k^{**}>0$ such that
$|h(t,u)-h(t,\overline u)|\leq k^{**} |u-\overline u|$
for all $t\in J$ and $u,  \overline u \in \mathbb{R}$.

\item[(H9)] $F: J\times \mathbb{R} \to  P_{cp}(\mathbb{R})$
has the property that $F(\cdot,u): J\to P_{cp}(\mathbb{R})$ is measurable,
and integrably bounded for each $u\in \mathbb{R}$.
\end{itemize}
If
\begin{equation}\label{eqq2}
\big[\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{*}+\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{**}
+ k \tilde G \big] < 1,
\end{equation}
where $ k = \|l\|_{L^{\infty}}$,
then  \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} has at least one solution on $J$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk4.2} \rm
For each $y\in C(J,\mathbb{R})$, the
set $S_{F,y}$ is nonempty since, by (H9), $F$ has a measurable
selection (see \cite[Theorem III.6]{CaVa}).
\end{remark}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{t3}]
 We shall show that $N$ given in \eqref{eq*} satisfies the assumptions
of Lemma \ref{CN}. The proof will be given in two steps.
\smallskip

{\bf Step 1}: \emph{$N(y)\in  P_{cl}(C(J,\mathbb{R}))$ for all$y\in C(J,\mathbb{R})$.}
Let $(h_{n})_{n\geq 0}\in N(y)$ be such that
$h_{n}\to \tilde h \in C(J,\mathbb{R})$. Then there exists $v_n\in S_{F,y}$
such that, for each $t\in J$,
$$
h_{n}(t)= P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v_{n}(s)ds.
$$
 From (H5) and the fact that $F$ has compact values, we may pass to a
subsequence if necessary to obtain that $v_n$ converges weakly to $v$
in $L_{w}^1(J,\mathbb{R})$ (the space endowed with the weak topology).
Using a standard argument, we can show that $v_n$ converges
strongly to $v$ and hence $v\in S_{F,y}$. Thus, for each
$t\in J$,
$$
h_{n}(t)\to\tilde h(t)= P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v(s)ds,
 $$
so $\tilde h\in N(y)$.
\smallskip

{\bf Step 2}:  \emph{There exists $\gamma < 1$ such that}
$$
H_d(N(y),N(\overline y))\leq \gamma\|y-\overline
y\|_{\infty} \quad \text{for all}  y, \; \overline y\in C(J,\mathbb{R}).
$$
Let $y$, $\overline y \in C(J,\mathbb{R})$ and $h_{1}\in N(y)$.
Then, there exists $v_{1}(t)\in F(t,y(t))$ such that, for each
$t\in J$,
 $$ h_{1}(t)= P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v_{1}(s)ds.
$$
 From (H5) it follows that
$$
H_d(F(t,y(t)), F(t,\overline y(t)))\leq
l(t)|y(t)-\overline y(t)|.
$$
Hence, there exists $w\in F(t,\overline y(t))$ such that
$$
|v_{1}(t)-w|\leq l(t)|y(t)-\overline y(t)|, \quad t\in J.
$$
Consider $U: J\to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$ given by
$$
U(t)=\{w\in \mathbb{R}: |v_{1}(t)-w|\leq l(t)|y(t)-\overline y(t)|\}.
 $$
Since the multivalued operator $V(t)=U(t)\cap F(t,\overline y(t))$
is measurable (see Proposition \cite[III.4]{CaVa}),
there exists a function $v_{2}(t)$ which is a
measurable selection for $V$. Thus, $v_{2}(t)\in F(t,\overline y(t))$,
and for each $t\in J$,
$$
|v_{1}(t)-v_{2}(t)|\leq l(t)|y(t)-\overline y(t)|.
$$
For each $t\in J$, define
$$
h_{2}(t)= P_{\bar y}(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v_{2}(s)ds,
$$
where
$$
P_{\bar y}(t)=\frac{T+1-t}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T} g(s,\overline y(s)) ds+
\frac{t+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}h(s,\overline y(s)) ds.
$$
Then, for $t\in J$,
\begin{align*}
|h_{1}(t)-h_{2}(t)|
&\leq \frac{T+1}{T+2}
\int_{0}^{T}|g(s,y(s))-g(s,\overline y(s))|ds\\
&\quad + \frac{T+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}|h(s,y(s))-h(s,\overline y(s))|ds\\
&\quad + \int_{0}^{T}G(s,t)|v_{1}(s)-v_{2}(s)|ds \\
&\leq  \frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{*}\|y-\overline y\|_{\infty}
 +\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2} k^{**}\|y-\overline y\|_{\infty}
 + \tilde Gk \|y-\overline y\|_{\infty}\\
&\leq  \big[\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{*}+\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{**}
+ k \tilde G \big]
 \|y-\overline y\|_{\infty}.
\end{align*}
Therefore,
$$
\|h_{1}-h_{2}\|_{\infty} \leq \big[\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{*}
+ \frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{**} + k \tilde G \big]
 \|y-\overline y\|_{\infty}.
$$
By an analogous relation, obtained by interchanging the roles of $y$
and $\overline y$, it follows that
$$
H_d(N(y),N(\overline y)) \leq
\big[\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{*}+\frac{T(T+1)}{T+2}k^{**} + k \tilde G \big]
\|y-\overline y\|_{\infty}.
 $$
Therefore, by \eqref{eqq2}, $N$ is a contraction, and so by
Lemma \ref{CN}, $N$ has a fixed point $y$ that is a solution
 to \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}. The proof is now complete.
\end{proof}

Next, we present a result for  problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} in the
spirit of the nonlinear alternative of Leray Schauder type
\cite{GrDu} for single-valued
 maps combined with a selection theorem
due to Bressan and Colombo \cite{BrCo} for lower semicontinuous multivalued maps
with decomposable values. Details on multivalued maps with
decomposable values and their properties can be found in the recent
book by Fryszkowski \cite{Fry}.

Let $A$ be a subset of $[0,T]\times \mathbb{R}$. We say that $A$
is $\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{B}$ {\it measurable} if $A$ belongs
to the $\sigma$-algebra
generated by all sets of the form $\mathcal{J}\times D$ where $\mathcal{J}$ is Lebesgue measurable in $[0,T]$ and $D$ is Borel measurable in
$\mathbb{R}$. A subset\ $A$\ of\ $L^1([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ is {\it decomposable} if for all
$u,v\in A$\ and measurable $\mathcal{J}\subset [0,T]$, $u\chi_\mathcal{J}
+v\chi_{[0,T]-\mathcal{J}}\in A$, where $\chi$ stands for the
characteristic function.

Let $G:X\to\mathcal{P}(X)$ be a multivalued operator with  nonempty
closed values. We say that $G$ is {\it lower semi-continuous}
({\it l.s.c.}) if the set
 $\{x\in X: G(x)\cap B\neq \emptyset\}$ is open for any open
set $B$ in $X$.

\begin{definition} \label{def4.3} \rm
Let  $Y$ be a separable metric space and
$N: Y\to\mathcal{P}(L^1([0,T]$, $\mathbb{R}))$ be a multivalued operator.
We say  $N$ has property  (BC) if
\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] $N$ is lower  semi-continuous (l.s.c.);
\item[(2)] $N$  has nonempty closed and  decomposable values.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}

Let $F: [0,T]\times \mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$ be a multivalued map with
nonempty compact values. Assign to  $F$  the multivalued operator
$\mathcal{F}: C([0,T],\mathbb{R})\to\mathcal{P}(L^1([0,T],\mathbb{R})) $
by
$$
\mathcal{F}(y)=\{w\in L^1([0,T],\mathbb{R}): w(t)\in F(t, y(t))
\text{ for a.e. }  t\in[0,T]\}.
$$
The operator $\mathcal{F}$ is called the
Niemytzki operator associated to $F$.

\begin{definition} \label{def4.4} \rm
Let $F: [0,T]\times \mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$ be a multivalued function
with non\-empty compact values. We say $F$ is of lower semi-continuous
type (l.s.c. type) if its associated Niemytzki operator $\mathcal{F}$
is lower semi-continuous and has nonempty closed and decomposable
values.
\end{definition}

Next, we state a selection theorem due to Bressan and Colombo.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{BrCo}] \label{BC}
Let $Y$ be separable metric space
and $N: Y\to \mathcal{P}(L^1([0,T]$, $\mathbb{R}))$ be a multivalued operator
that has property (BC). Then $N$ has a continuous selection, i.e.,
there exists a continuous (single-valued) function  $\tilde g:Y\to
L^1([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ such that $\tilde g(y)\in N(y)$\ for every $y\in Y$.
\end{theorem}

Let us introduce the  hypotheses
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H10)]  $F:[0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$ is a
nonempty compact valued multivalued map such that:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] $(t,u)\mapsto F(t,u)$\ is $\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{B}$
measurable;
\item[(b)] $y\mapsto F(t,y)$ is lower semi-continuous for a.e.
$t\in[0,T]$;
\end{itemize}

\item[(H11)] for each $q>0$, there exists a function
$h_q\in L^1([0,T],\mathbb{R}^+)$ such that
$\|F(t,y)\|_{\mathcal{P}}\leq h_q(t)$
for a.e. $t\in[0,T]$ and for $y\in \mathbb{R}$
with $|y|\leq q$.
\end{itemize}

The following lemma is crucial in the proof of our main theorem.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{FrGr}] \label{FG}
Let $F: [0,T]\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})$ be a multivalued map with
nonempty compact values. Assume that  {\rm (H10), (H11)} hold.
Then $F$ is of lower semicontinuous type.
\end{lemma}

We are now ready for our next main result in this section.

\begin{theorem}\label{t5}
Suppose that conditions {\rm (H2)--(H4), (H6), (H10), (H11)}
 are satisfied. Then the problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} has at least
one solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
 Conditions (H10) and (H11) imply, by Lemma \ref{FG}, that $F$ is of
lower semi-continuous type. By Theorem \ref{BC}, there exists
a continuous function $f: C([0,T],\mathbb{R})\to L^1([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ such that
$f(y)\in\mathcal{F}(y) $ for all $y\in C([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
Consider the problem:
\begin{gather}\label{eqq10}
^{c}D^{\alpha}y(t) = f(y)(t), \quad \text{for a.e. } t\in
J=[0, T],\quad 1<\alpha\leq 2, \\
\label{eqq11}
y(0)-y'(0)=\int_{0}^{T}g(s,y)ds, \\
\label{eqq12}
y(0)-y'(0)=\int_{0}^{T}g(s,y)ds.
\end{gather}
Observe that if $y\in AC^{1}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ is a solution of the
problem \eqref{eqq10}--\eqref{eqq12}, then  $y$ is a solution to the
problem \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}.

We reformulate the problem \eqref{eqq10}--\eqref{eqq12} as a fixed point
problem for the operator $N_1: C([0,T,\mathbb{R})\to C([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ defined
by:
$$
N_1(y)(t)=P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)f(y)(s)ds,
$$
where the functions $P_y$ and $G$ are given by \eqref{P} and \eqref{e9},
respectively. Using (H2)--(H4) and (H6), we can easily show (using
arguments similar to those in the proof of Theorem \ref{t1})
that the operator $N_1$ satisfies all conditions in the
Leray-Schauder alternative.
\end{proof}

\section{Topological Structure of the Solutions Set}

In this section, we present a result on the topological structure of
the set of solutions of \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}.

\begin{theorem}\label{t4}
Assume that {\rm (H1)} and the following
hypotheses hold:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H12)] There exists  $p\in C(J,\mathbb{R}^+) $  such that
 $\|F(t,u)\|_{\mathcal{P}}\leq p(t)(|u| + 1)$
for all $t\in  J$ and  $u\in \mathbb{R}$;

\item[(H13)] There exists $p_{1}\in C(J,\mathbb{R}^+)$
  such that $ |g(t,u)|\leq p_{1}(t)(|u| + 1)$
for all $t\in J$ and $u\in \mathbb{R}$;

\item[(H14)] There exists $p_{2}\in C(J,\mathbb{R}^+)$ such that
$ |h(t,u)|\leq p_{2}(t)(|u| + 1)$
for all $t\in J$ and $u\in \mathbb{R}$.
\end{itemize}
If
\[
 \frac{T(T+1)}{T+2} \, \frac{M+1}{M}
\big[\|p_1\|_{\infty} +\|p_2\|_{\infty}
+ \tilde G \frac{T+2}{T(T+1)} \|p\|_{L^\infty}\big]< 1,
\]
then the solution set of  \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} is nonempty and
compact in $C(J,\mathbb{R})$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
 Let
$$
S=\{y\in C(J, \mathbb{R}): y  \text{ is solution of \eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3}}\}.
$$
 From Theorem \ref{t1}, $S\neq \emptyset$.
Now, we prove that $S$ is compact. Let $(y_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\in S$; then
there exists $v_n\in S_{F,y_n}$ such that, for $t\in J$,
$$
 y_n(t)= P_{y_{n}}(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v_{n}(s)ds,
 $$
where
$$
 P_{y_{n}}(t)=\frac{T+1-t}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T} g(s,y_n(s)) ds+
\frac{t+1}{T+2}\int_{0}^{T}h(s,y_n(s)) ds
$$
and the function $G(t,s)$ is given by \eqref{e9}.

 From (H12)--(H14) we can prove that there exists a constant $M_1>0$
such that
$$
\|y_n\|_{\infty}\leq M_1 \quad \text{for all } n\geq1.
$$
As in Step 3 of the proof of Theorem \ref{t1}, we can easily
show that the set $\{y_n:n\geq 1\}$ is equicontinuous in $C(J,\mathbb{R})$,
and so by the Arz\'ela-Ascoli Theorem, we can
conclude that there exists a subsequence (denoted again by $\{y_n\}$)
 of $\{y_n\}$ converging to $y$ in $C(J, \mathbb{R})$. We shall show that
there exist $v(\cdot)\in F(\cdot,y(\cdot))$ such that
$$
y(t)= P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v(s)ds.
$$
Since $F(t,\cdot)$ is upper semicontinuous, for every $\varepsilon>0$,
there exists $n_0(\epsilon)\geq 0$ such that, for every $n\geq n_0$,
we have
$$
v_n(t)\in F(t,y_n(t))\subset F(t,y(t))+\varepsilon  B(0,1) \quad
\text{a.e. } t\in J.
$$
Since $F(\cdot,\cdot)$ has compact values, there
exists a subsequence $v_{n_m}(\cdot)$ such that
\begin{gather*}
v_{n_m}(\cdot)\to v(\cdot)\quad \text{as } m\to\infty,\\
v(t)\in F(t,y(t))\quad \text{a.e. } t\in J.
\end{gather*}
It is clear that the subsequence $v_{n_m}(t)$ is integrally bounded.
By the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we have
that $v\in L^{1}(J, \mathbb{R})$, which implies that $v\in S_{F,y}$. Thus,
$$
y(t)=P_y(t)+\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)v(s)ds, \quad t\in J.
$$
Hence, $S\in\mathcal{P}_{cp}(C(J,\mathbb{R}))$, and this completes the
proof of the theorem.
\end{proof}

\section{ An Example}

As an application of the main results, we consider the fractional
differential inclusion
\begin{gather}\label{ex1}
^c D^{\alpha}y(t)\in F(t,y), \quad  \text{a.e. }  t\in J=[0,1],\;
1<\alpha\leq 2,\\
\label{ex2}
y(0)-y'(0)=\int_{0}^{1}s^5(1+|y(s)|)ds, \\
\label{ex3}
y(1)+y'(1)=\int_{0}^{1}s^{5}(1+|y(s)|)ds.
\end{gather}
Set
$$
F(t,y)=\{v\in \mathbb{R}: f_1(t,y)\leq v\leq f_2(t,y)\},
$$
where $f_1,  f_2:J\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ are measurable in $t$
and Lipschitz continuous in $y$.
We assume that for each
 $t\in J$, $f_1(t,\cdot)$ is lower semi-continuous
(i.e., the set $\{y\in  \mathbb{R}: f_1(t,y)>\mu\}$ is open for all
$\mu\in \mathbb{R}$), and assume that
 for each $t\in J$, $f_2(t,\cdot)$ is upper semi-continuous
(i.e., the set $\{y\in \mathbb{R}: f_2(t,y)<\mu\}$ is open for each).
Assume that
$$
 \max(|f_1(t,y)|,\  |f_2(t,y)|) \leq \frac{t}{9}(1+|y|) \quad
 \text{for all }  t\in J  \text{ and }  y\in \mathbb{R}.
$$
 From \eqref{e9}, $G$ is given by
$$
G(t,s)=\begin{cases}
\frac{(t-s)^{\alpha-1}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}-\frac{(1+t)(1-s)
^{\alpha-1}}{3\Gamma(\alpha)}-\frac{(1+t)(1-s)
^{\alpha-2}}{3\Gamma(\alpha-1)},& 0\leq s\leq t,
\\[4pt]
-\frac{(1+t)(1-s)^{\alpha-1}}{3\Gamma(\alpha)}-\frac{(1+t)(1-s)
^{\alpha-2}}{3\Gamma(\alpha-1)},& t\leq s < 1.
\end{cases}
$$
We have
$T=1$, $\phi_{g}(t)=t^{5}$, $\phi_{h}(t)=t^{5}$, $a=1/9$,
$b=1/9$, $c=1/9$, and
$$
\psi(y)=1+y, \quad \psi^{*}(y)=1+y, \quad
 \overline\psi(y)=1+y, \quad \text{for all}
 y\in [0,\infty).
$$
Also,
\begin{align*}
\int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)ds
&=\int_{0}^{t}G(t,s)ds+\int_{t}^{1}G(t,s)ds\\
&=\frac{t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}
  +\frac{(1+t)(1-t)^{\alpha}}{3\Gamma(\alpha+1)}
 -\frac{(1+t)}{3\Gamma(\alpha+1)}
 +\frac{(1+t)(1-t)^{\alpha-1}}{3\Gamma(\alpha)}\\
&\quad -\frac{(1+t)}{3\Gamma(\alpha)}
 -\frac{(1+t)(1-t)^{\alpha}}{3\Gamma(\alpha+1)}
 -\frac{(1+t)(1-t)^{\alpha-1}}{3\Gamma(\alpha)}.
 \end{align*}
It is easy to see that
$$
\tilde G<\frac{3}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}+\frac{2}{\Gamma(\alpha)}<5.
$$
A simple calculation shows that condition \eqref{eq2}
is satisfied for $M>7/2$.
It is clear that $F$ is compact and convex valued,
and it is upper semi-continuous (see \cite{Dei}). Since all the
conditions of Theorem \ref{t1}  are satisfied, BVP
\eqref{ex1}--\eqref{ex3} has at least one solution $y$ on $J$.

\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{AdAd} G. Adomian and G. E. Adomian, Cellular systems and
aging models, \emph{Comput. Math. Appl.} {\bf 11} (1985) 283--291.

\bibitem{ABH} R. P. Agarwal, M. Benchohra, and S. Hamani, Boundary value problems
for fractional differential equations, \emph{Adv. Stud. Contemp.
Math.} {\bf 16} (2) (2008), 181--196.

\bibitem{AuCe} J. P. Aubin and A. Cellina, \emph{Differential
Inclusions}, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, New York, 1984.

\bibitem{AuFr} J. P. Aubin and H. Frankowska, \emph{Set-Valued Analysis},
 Birkhauser, Boston, 1990.

\bibitem{BBD} A. Belarbi, M. Benchohra, and B. C. Dhage, Existence theory
 for perturbed boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions,
\emph{Georgian Math. J.}, {\bf 13} (2) (2006), 215--228.

\bibitem{BBHN} A. Belarbi, M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, and S. K. Ntouyas,
Perturbed functional differential equations with fractional order,
\emph{Commun. Appl. Anal.} {\bf 11} (3-4) (2007), 429--440.

\bibitem{BBO} A. Belarbi, M. Benchohra and A. Ouahab, Uniqueness
results for fractional functional differential equations with
infinite delay in Fr\'echet spaces, \emph{Appl. Anal.} {\bf 85}
(2006), 1459--1470.

\bibitem{BeGrHa} M. Benchohra, J. R. Graef and S. Hamani, Existence
results for boundary value problems with nonlinear fractional
differential equations, \emph{Appl. Anal.} {\bf 87} (2008), 851--863.

\bibitem{BeHa} M. Benchohra and S. Hamani,  Nonlinear boundary value problems
for differential inclusions with Caputo fractional derivative, \emph{
Topol. Meth. Nonlinear Anal.}, {\bf 32} (1) (2008), 115-130.

\bibitem{BHH} M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, and J. Henderson, Functional
differential inclusions with integral boundary conditions, \emph{
Electr. J. Qual. Theo. Differential Equations}, No. 15 (2007),
1--13.

\bibitem{BHN} M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, and J. J. Nieto, The method of
upper and lower solutions for second order differential inclusions
with integral boundary conditions, \emph{Rocky Mountain J. Math.}
(to appear).

\bibitem{BHNO}  M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, S. K. Ntouyas, and A. Ouahab,
Existence results for fractional order functional differential
equations with infinite delay, \emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf
338} (2) (2008), 1340--1350.

\bibitem{Bla} K. W. Blayneh, Analysis of age structured
host-parasitoid model, \emph{Far East J. Dyn. Syst.} {\bf 4}
(2002), 125--145.

\bibitem{BrCo} A. Bressan and G. Colombo, Extensions  and selections
of maps with decomposable values, \emph{Studia Math.} {\bf 90}
(1988), 69--86.

\bibitem{CaVa} C. Castaing and M. Valadier, \emph{Convex Analysis
and Measurable Multifunctions}, Lecture Notes in Mathematics {\bf
580}, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1977.

\bibitem{CoNa} H. Covitz and S. B. Nadler Jr.,
 Multivalued contraction mappings in generalized metric spaces, \emph{
Israel J. Math.} {\bf 8} (1970), 5--11.

\bibitem{DaJa} V. Daftardar-Gejji and H. Jafari, Analysis of a system of
nonautonomous fractional differential equations involving Caputo
derivatives. \emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf 328} (2) (2007),
1026--1033.

\bibitem{Dei} K. Deimling,  \emph{Multivalued Differential Equations},
Walter De Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1992.

\bibitem{DeRo} D. Delbosco and L. Rodino, Existence
and uniqueness for a nonlinear fractional differential equation,
\emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf 204} (1996), 609--625.

\bibitem{DiFr} K. Diethelm and A. D. Freed, On the
solution of nonlinear fractional order differential equations used
in the modeling of viscoplasticity, in ``Scientific Computing in
Chemical Engineering II-Computational Fluid Dynamics, Reaction
Engineering and Molecular Properties" (F. Keil, W. Mackens, H.
Voss, and J. Werther, Eds), pp. 217-224, Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg, 1999.

\bibitem{DiFo} K. Diethelm and N. J. Ford, Analysis of
fractional differential equations, \emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf
265} (2002), 229--248.

\bibitem{DiWa} K. Diethelm and G. Walz, Numerical
solution of fractional order differential equations by
extrapolation, \emph{Numer. Algorithms} {\bf 16} (1997), 231--253.

\bibitem{El} A. M. A. El-Sayed, Fractional order
evolution equations, \emph{J. Fract. Calc.} {\bf 7} (1995),
89--100.

\bibitem{El1} A. M. A. El-Sayed, Fractional order
diffusion-wave equations, \emph{Intern. J. Theo. Physics}  {\bf 35}
(1996), 311--322.

\bibitem{El2} A. M. A. El-Sayed, Nonlinear functional
differential equations of arbitrary orders, \emph{Nonlinear  Anal.}
{\bf 33} (1998), 181--186.

\bibitem{FrGr} M. Frigon and A. Granas, Th\'eor\`emes d'existence pour des
inclusions diff\'erentielles sans convexit\'e, \emph{C. R. Acad.
Sci. Paris, Ser. I } {\bf 310} (1990), 819--822.

\bibitem{Fry} A. Fryszkowski, \emph{Fixed Point Theory for Decomposable Sets.
Topological Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications}, {\bf 2}.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004.

\bibitem{FuTa1} K. M. Furati and  N-e. Tatar, An existence result for a nonlocal fractional differential problem.
\emph{J. Fract. Calc.} {\bf 26} (2004), 43--51.

\bibitem{FuTa} K. M. Furati and  N-e. Tatar, Behavior of solutions
for a weighted Cauchy-type fractional differential problem. \emph{J.
Fract. Calc.} {\bf 28} (2005), 23--42.

\bibitem{GaKlKe} L. Gaul, P. Klein, and S. Kempfle,
Damping description involving fractional operators, \emph{Mech.
Systems  Signal Processing} {\bf 5} (1991), 81--88.

\bibitem{GlNo} W. G. Glockle and T. F. Nonnenmacher, A fractional
calculus approach of self-similar protein dynamics, \emph{Biophys.
J.} {\bf 68} (1995), 46--53.

\bibitem{GrDu} A. Granas and J. Dugundji,  \emph{Fixed Point Theory},
Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.

\bibitem{HePo} N. Heymans and I. Podlubny, Physical interpretation of initial
conditions for fractional differential equations with
Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. \emph{Rheologica Acta}
{\bf 45} (5) (2006), 765--772.

\bibitem{Hil} R. Hilfer, \emph{Applications of Fractional Calculus in
Physics}, World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.

\bibitem{HuPa} Sh. Hu and N. Papageorgiou,  \emph{Handbook of
Multivalued Analysis, Theory {\bf I}}, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.

\bibitem{KM} E. R. Kaufmann and E. Mboumi, Positive solutions of a
boundary value problem for a nonlinear fractional differential
equation, \emph{Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.} 2007, No.
3, 11 pp.

\bibitem{KiMa} A. A. Kilbas and S. A. Marzan, Nonlinear
differential equations with the Caputo fractional derivative in
the space of continuously differentiable functions, \emph{
Differential Equations} {\bf 41} (2005), 84--89.

\bibitem{KST} A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo,
 \emph{Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations}.
North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 204. Elsevier Science B.V.,
Amsterdam, 2006.

\bibitem{Kis} M. Kisielewicz, \emph{Differential Inclusions
and Optimal Control}, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991.

\bibitem{Mai} F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus: Some
basic problems in continuum and statistical mechanics, in
``Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics" (A.
Carpinteri and F. Mainardi, Eds), pp. 291-348,  Springer-Verlag,
Wien, 1997.

\bibitem{MeScKiNo} F. Metzler, W. Schick, H. G. Kilian,
and T. F. Nonnenmacher, Relaxation in filled polymers: A
fractional calculus approach, \emph{J. Chem. Phys.} {\bf 103}
(1995), 7180--7186.

\bibitem{MiRo} K. S. Miller and B. Ross,
\emph{An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential
Equations},  John Wiley, New York, 1993.

\bibitem{MoHa} S. M. Momani and S. B. Hadid, Some
comparison results for integro-fractional differential
inequalities. \emph{J. Fract. Calc.} {\bf 24} (2003), 37--44.

\bibitem{MoHaAl} S. M. Momani,  S. B. Hadid, and Z. M.
Alawenh, Some analytical properties of solutions of differential
equations of noninteger order, \emph{Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.} {\bf
2004} (2004), 697--701.

\bibitem{OlPs} K. B. Oldham and J. Spanier, \emph{The Fractional
Calculus}, Academic Press, New York, London, 1974.

\bibitem{Oua} A. Ouahab, Some results for fractional
boundary value problem of differential inclusions,
 \emph{Nonlinear Anal.} {\bf 69} (2008), 3877--3896.

\bibitem{Pod} I. Podlubny, \emph{Fractional
Differential Equation}, Academic  Press, San Diego, 1999.

\bibitem{Pod1} I. Podlubny, Geometric and physical interpretation
of fractional integration and fractional differentiation, \emph{
Fract. Calculus Appl. Anal. } {\bf 5} (2002), 367--386.

\bibitem{PoPeViLeDo} I. Podlubny, I. Petra\v s,  B. M.
Vinagre,  P. O'Leary, and  L. Dor\v cak, Analogue realizations of
fractional-order controllers. Fractional order  calculus and its
applications, \emph{Nonlinear Dynam.}  {\bf 29} (2002), 281--296.

\bibitem{SaKiMa} S. G. Samko, A. A.  Kilbas, and O. I.
Marichev, \emph{Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Theory and
Applications}, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, 1993.

\bibitem{Yos} K. Yosida, \emph{Functional Analysis},
$6^{\text{th}}$ edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.

\bibitem{YuGa} C. Yu and G. Gao, Existence of
fractional differential equations, \emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf
310} (2005), 26--29.

\bibitem{Zh} S. Zhang, Positive solutions for boundary-value
problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations, \emph{
Electron. J. Diff. Equ.} 2006, No. 36, pp. 1--12.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
