\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 224, pp. 1--9.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2012 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2012/224\hfil Superlinear Schr\"odinger-Maxwell equations]
{Infinitely many large energy solutions of superlinear
Schr\"odinger-Maxwell equations}

\author[ L. Li, S.-J. Chen \hfil EJDE-2012/224\hfilneg]
{Lin Li, Shang-Jie Chen}  

\address{Lin Li \newline
School of Mathematics and Statistics,
Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China \newline
Department of Science, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering,
 Zigong 643000,  China}
\email{lilin420@gmail.com}

\address{Shang-Jie Chen \newline
School of Mathematics and Statistics,
Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China}
\email{11183356@qq.com}

\thanks{Submitted July 10, 2012. Published December 11, 2012.}
\subjclass[2000]{35J35, 35J60, 47J30, 58E05}
\keywords{Schr\"odinger-Maxwell equations; superlinear; fountain theorem;
\hfill\break\indent variational methods}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article we study the existence of infinitely many
 large energy solutions for the superlinear Schr\"odinger-Maxwell
 equations
 \begin{gather*}
   -\Delta u+V(x)u+ \phi u=f(x,u) \quad \text{in }\mathbb{R}^3,\\
   -\Delta \phi=u^2, \quad \text{in }\mathbb{R}^3,
  \end{gather*}
 via the Fountain Theorem in critical point theory. In particular,
 we do not use the classical Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction and main results}

In this article, we study the system of
Schr\"odinger-Maxwell equations
\begin{equation}\label{eq:p}
  \begin{gathered}
    -\Delta u+V(x)u+ \phi u=f(x,u) \quad \text{in }\mathbb{R}^3,\\
    -\Delta \phi=u^2, \quad \text{in }\mathbb{R}^3.
  \end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Such a system, also called Schr\"odinger-Poisson equations, arises in
an interesting physical context. In fact, according to a classical model, 
the interaction of a charge particle with an
electro-magnetic field can be described by coupling the nonlinear
 Schr\"odinger's and Maxwell's equations 
(we refer the reader to \cite{Benci1998} and the references  
therein for more details on the physical aspects). 
In particular, if we are looking for electrostatic-type solutions, 
we just have to solve \eqref{eq:p}.

In recent years, system \eqref{eq:p} with $V(x)\equiv 1$ or being 
radially symmetric, has been widely studied under various conditions 
on $f$, see for example 
\cite{Azzollini2008, Coclite2003, Coclite2002, D'Aprile2004, Kikuchi2007, 
Ruiz2006, Salvatore2006, Zhao2009}. Specially, 
in \cite{Coclite2003, Coclite2002} it is proved the existence of a sequence 
of  radial solutions for  system \eqref{eq:p} by the Symmetric Mountain 
Pass Theorem in \cite{Bartolo1983}. The case of nonradial potential $V(x)$ 
has been considered in \cite{Wang2007}, when $f$ is asymptotically 
linear at infinity, and in \cite{Azzollini2008, Zhao2008}, when $f$ 
is superlinear at infinity. Moreover, in \cite{Zhao2008}, 
the authors considered  system \eqref{eq:p} with periodic potential $V(x)$, 
and the existence of infinitely many geometrically distinct  
solutions has been proved by the nonlinear superposition principle 
established in \cite{Ackermann2006}. By the way, we would like to point 
out that nonexistence results for \eqref{eq:p} can be found 
in \cite{Azzollini2008,D'Aprile2004a,Kikuchi2007,Ruiz2006,Wang2007}.

The problem of finding infinitely many large energy solutions is a very 
classical problem: there is an extensive literature concerning the 
existence of infinitely many large energy solutions of a plethora of 
problems via the Symmetric Mountain Pass Theorem and Fountain 
Theorem (cf. Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz \cite{Ambrosetti1973a}, 
Rabinowitz \cite{Rabinowitz1986}, Bartsch \cite{Bartsch1993}, 
Bartsch and Willem \cite{Bartsch1995a}, Struwe \cite{Struwe2008},
 Willem \cite{Willem1996}, etc). The infinitely many large energy 
solutions for system \eqref{eq:p} are obtained in \cite{Chen2009} 
with the following variant ``Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz'' type condition 
(AR for short),
\begin{itemize}
  \item [(AR)] There exist $\mu > 4$ such that for all $s \in \mathbb{R}$
         and $x\in \mathbb{R}^3 $,
         \[
           \mu F(x,s):= \mu \int_{0}^{s} f(x,t) \,\mathrm{d}t \leq sf(x,s).
         \]
\end{itemize}
After that, Li et al. \cite{Li2010a} study \eqref{eq:p} without the (AR)
condition. They use variant Fountain Theorem establish by
 Zou \cite{Zou2001}. Later, some authors also study this problem
without the (AR) condition, see Alves et al. \cite{MR2769159} and
Yang and Han \cite{MR2863939}.

In this article, we  use the Fountain Theorem (see Theorem 2.4) 
to find infinitely many large energy solutions  to system \eqref{eq:p}.
 We can see that \eqref{eq:p} can be proved directly with the Fountain Theorem 
under Cerami condition. We assume the following assumptions:
\begin{itemize}
  \item [(V1)] $V\in C(\mathbb{R}^3,\mathbb{R})$ satisfies 
 $\inf_{x\in   {\mathbb{R}^3}} V(x) \geq a_1 > 0$, where $a_1>0$ is a constant.
 Moreover, for every $M>0$, 
$\operatorname{meas}(\{x\in {\mathbb{R}}^3:V(x)\leq M\})< \infty$,
 where meas denote the Lebesgue measure in $\mathbb{R}^3$.

  \item [(F1)] $f\in C(\mathbb{R}^3\times \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})$ 
and for some $2<p<2^*=6$, $a_2>0$,
      \[
        |f(x,z)|\leq a_2(|z|+|z|^{p-1}),
      \]
      for a.e.  $x\in {\mathbb{R}^3}$ and all $z\in \mathbb{R}$.
      \[
        \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(x,z)}{z} =0
      \]
      uniformly for $x \in \mathbb{R}^3$.

\item [(F2)]  $\lim_{|z| \to  \infty} \frac{F(x,z)}{|z|^{4}} = + \infty$, 
uniformly in $x \in \mathbf{R^3}$ and $F (x, 0) \equiv 0$,
$F (x, z) \geq 0$ for all $(x, z) \in \mathbb{R}^3 \times \mathbb{R}$.

\item [(F3)] There exits a constant $\theta \geq 1$ such that
      \[
        \theta H(x,z) \geq H(x,s z)
      \]
      for all $x \in \mathbb{R}^3$, $z \in \mathbb{R}$ and
$s \in [0,1]$, where $H(x,z) = z f(x,z) -4 F(x,z)$.

\item [(F4)] $f(x,-z)=-f(x,z)$ for any $x\in {\mathbb{R}^3}$ and all
 $z\in \mathbb{R}$.
\end{itemize}

The main results of the present article are as follows.

\begin{theorem}\label{main}
  Assume that {\rm (V1), (F1)--(F4)} hold,
  then system \eqref{eq:p} has infinitely many solutions 
$\{(u_k,\phi_k)\}$ in $H^1({\mathbb{R}}^3) \times D^{1,2}({\mathbb{R}}^3)$
satisfying
\begin{align*}
&\frac{1}{2}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\Big(|\nabla
    u_k|^2+V(x)u_k^2\Big)\,\mathrm{d}x-\frac{1}{4}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}|\nabla
    \phi_{k}|^2\,\mathrm{d}x+\frac{1}{2}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3} 
\phi_{k}u_k^2\,\mathrm{d}x -\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3} F(x,u_k)\,\mathrm{d}x\\
&\to +\infty.
\end{align*}
\end{theorem}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk1.1} \rm
Obviously, (F2) can be derived from (AR). Under (AR), any (PS) sequence 
of the corresponding energy functional is bounded, which plays an 
important role of the application of variational methods. 
Indeed, there are many superlinear functions which do not satisfy the (AR) 
condition.
 For instance the function 
\begin{equation}\label{nar}
f(x,z)=z^3\ln(1+|z|)
\end{equation}
does not satisfy the (AR) condition.
But it is easy to see this function  satisfies (F2) and (F3). 
There are many functions which satisfy (F3), but do not satisfy condition 
(AR) for any $\mu > 4$. However, we can not deduce condition $(F3)$ 
from condition (AR). For example, let
\[
    f(x,u)=5|u|^4 \int_0^u |t|^{1+\sin t}t \,\mathrm{d}t + |u|^{6 + \sin u} u,
\]
then
\[
    F(x,z)=|z|^5 \int_0^z |t|^{1+\sin t} t \,\mathrm{d}t\,.
\]
It is easy to see that $f (x, u)$ satisfies condition (AR) for $\mu = 5$,
but it does not satisfy $(F3)$. Thus, $(F3)$ is also superlinear
conditions and complement with (AR).
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}\rm
In \cite{MR2863939}, Yang and Han used
\begin{itemize}
\item[(F3')] $\frac{f (x,u)}{ u^3}$ is increasing for $u > 0$ 
and  decreasing for $ u < 0$, for all $x \in \mathbb{R}^3$.
\end{itemize}
to obtain a bounded Cerami sequence. Li et al. \cite{Li2010a}, used
\begin{itemize}
\item[(F3'')] $H(x,s) \leq H(x,t)$ for all 
$(s,t)\in \mathbb{R}^{+} \times \mathbb{R}^{+}$, $s \leq t$  and a.e. 
$x \in \mathbb{R}^3$
\end{itemize}
to solve the problem \eqref{eq:p}. (F3') implies that (F3''), 
as we can see in \cite[Lemma 2.2]{MR2653749}. 
We see that our condition (F3) is more general than (F3''). 
If $\theta = 1$ we can get that $H(x, z)$ is increasing in $\mathbb{R}^{+}$ 
with respect to $z$.  Moreover, (F3) gives some general sense of monotony 
when $\theta > 1$ and we can find some examples that satisfy (F3)
 but do not satisfy (F3''). For example, let
\[
    f (x, z) = 4z^3 \ln(1 + z^4) + 2 \sin z,
\]
it follows that
\[
    H(x, z) = 4 z^4 - 4 \ln(1 + z^4) + 2 z  \sin z + 8 \cos z.
\]
Let $\theta = 100$, we can prove by some simple computation that $f$
satisfies (F3) but does not satisfy (F3'') any more.
\end{remark}


\section{Variational settings and preliminary results}

Before stating our main results, we give several notations. Define
the function space
\[
  H^1({\mathbb{R}}^3):=
\{u\in L^2({\mathbb{R}}^3): \nabla u \in L^2({\mathbb{R}}^3) \}
\]
with the usual norm
\[
  \|u\|_{H^1}:=\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\Big(|\nabla u|^2+u^2\Big)
\,\mathrm{d}x\Big)^{1/2},
\]
and define the function space
\[
  D^{1,2}({\mathbb{R}}^3):=\{u\in L^{2^*}({\mathbb{R}}^3)
: \nabla u \in L^2({\mathbb{R}}^3) \}
\]
with the norm
\[
  \|u\|_{D^{1,2}}:=\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}|\nabla u|^2\,\mathrm{d}x\Big)^{1/2}.
\]
Let
\[
  E:=\{u\in H^1({\mathbb{R}}^3):\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}
(|\nabla u|^2+V(x)u^2)\,\mathrm{d}x<\infty \}.
\]
Then $E$ is a Hilbert space with the inner product
\[
  (u,v)_E=\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\left(\nabla u\cdot \nabla v+V(x)uv\right)\,\mathrm{d}x
\]
and the norm $\|u\|_E=(u,u)_E^{1/ 2}$.
Obviously, the embedding $E\hookrightarrow L^s({{\mathbb{R}}^3})$
is continuous, for any $s\in [2, 2^*]$.


\begin{lemma}[{\cite[ Lemma 3.4]{Zou2006}}] \label{lemma2.1}
  Under assumption  {\rm (V1)},  the embedding 
 $$ E\hookrightarrow L^s({\mathbb{R}}^3)$$
 is compact for any $s\in [2, 2^*)$.
\end{lemma}

It is clear that system \eqref{eq:p} is the Euler-Lagrange equations 
of the functional $J: E \times D^{1,2}({\mathbb{R}}^3)\to \mathbb{R}$
defined by
\[
  J(u,\phi) = \frac{1}{2} \|u\|_E^2-\frac{1}{4}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}
|\nabla \phi|^2\,\mathrm{d}x+\frac{1}{2}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi u^2
\,\mathrm{d}x-\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}F(x,u)\,\mathrm{d}x.
\]
Evidently, the action functional $J$ belongs to $C^1(E\times
D^{1,2}({\mathbb{R}}^3),\mathbb{R})$ and its critical points are the
solutions of \eqref{eq:p}. It is easy to know that $J$ exhibits a strong
indefiniteness, namely it is unbounded both from below and from
above on infinitely dimensional subspaces. This indefiniteness can
be removed using the reduction method described in \cite{Benci1999}, by
which we are led to study a one variable functional that does not
present such a strongly indefinite nature.

Now, we recall this method.

For any $u\in E$, the Lax-Milgram theorem (see \cite{Gilbarg2001}) 
implies there exists a unique $\phi_u\in D^{1,2}({\mathbb{R}}^3)$ such that
\[
  -\Delta \phi_u=u^2
\]
in a weak sense. We can write an integral expression for $\phi_u$ in the form:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:phiu}
  \phi_u=\frac{1}{4 \pi}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\frac{u^2(y)}{|x-y|}\,\mathrm{d}y,
\end{equation}
for any $u\in E$ (for detail, see section 2 of \cite{Chen2009}).
The functions $\phi_u$ possess the following properties:

\begin{lemma}[{\cite[Lemma 2.2]{Chen2009}}] \label{lemma2.2}
  For any $u\in E$, we have:
  \begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] $\|\phi_u\|_{D^{1,2}}\leq a_3\|u\|^2_{L^{12/5}}$, where $a_3>0$
                does not depend on $u$. As a consequence there exists $a_4>0$ such
                that
                \[
                  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_u u^2\,\mathrm{d}x\leq a_4 \|u\|^4_{E};
                \]
\item[(2)] $\phi_u\geq 0$.
  \end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

So, we can consider the functional $I:E \to {\mathbb{R}}$ defined 
by $I(u)=J(u,\phi_u)$. After multiplying $-\Delta \phi_u=u^2$ by $\phi_u$ 
and integration by parts, we obtain
\[
  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}|\nabla \phi_u|^2\,\mathrm{d}x
=\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_u u^2\,\mathrm{d}x.
\]
Therefore, the reduced functional takes the form
\[
I(u) = \frac{1}{2}\|u\|_E^2+\frac{1}{4}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_u
u^2\,\mathrm{d}x-\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}F(x,u)\,\mathrm{d}x.
\]
From Lemma 2.2, $I$ is well defined. Furthermore, it is well known
that $I$ is $C^1$ functional with derivative given by
\begin{equation}\label{dao}
  \langle I'(u),v\rangle=\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\Big(\nabla
u \cdot \nabla v+V(x)uv+\phi_u uv-f(x,u)v\Big)\,\mathrm{d}x.
\end{equation}
Now, we can apply
Theorem 2.3 of \cite{Benci1999} to our functional $J$ and obtain:

\begin{proposition} \label{prop2.3}
  The following statements are equivalent:
  \begin{itemize}
    \item[(1)] $(u,\phi)\in E \times D^{1,2}({\mathbb{R}}^3)$ 
is a critical point of $J$ (i.e. $(u,\phi)$ is a solution of \eqref{eq:p});
    \item[(2)] $u$ is a  critical point of $I$ and $\phi=\phi_u$.
  \end{itemize}
\end{proposition}

For reader's convenience, we introduce the Cerami condition, 
which was established by Cerami \cite{Cerami1978}.

\begin{definition} \label{def2.4} \rm
  Assume functional $\Phi$ is $C^1$ and $c \in \mathbb{R}$, 
if any sequence $\{ u_{n} \}$ satisfying $\Phi (u_n) \to c$ and 
$(1+ \|u_n\|)\| \Phi' (u_n)\| \to 0$ has a convergence subsequence, 
we say $\Phi$ satisfies Cerami condition at the level $c$.
\end{definition}

To complete the proof of our theorems, we need the following critical 
point theorem.

\begin{theorem}[Fountain Theorem under Cerami conditon]\label{ft}
  Let $X$ be a Banach space with the norm $\|\cdot\|$ and let $X_j$ 
be a sequence of subspace of $X$ with $\dim X_j< \infty$ for 
each $j\in \mathbf{N}$. Further, 
$X=\overline{\oplus _{j\in {\mathbf{N}}}X_j}$, the closure of the 
direct sum of all $X_j$. Set $W_k=\oplus _{j=0}^kX_j$, 
$Z_k=\overline{\oplus _{j=k}^{\infty}X_j}$. Consider an even functional  $\Phi \in C^1(X, \mathbb{R})$ (i.e. $\Phi(-u)=\Phi(u)$ for all $u\in E$). If, for every $k\in \mathbf{N}$, there exist $\rho_k>r_k>0$ such that
  \begin{itemize}
    \item [$(\Phi1)$] $a_k:=\max _{u\in W_k, \|u\|=\rho_k}\Phi(u)\leq 0$,
    \item [$(\Phi2)$] $b_k:=\inf _{u\in Z_k, \|u\|=r_k}\Phi(u)\to +\infty$, 
 as $k\to \infty$,
    \item [$(\Phi3)$] the Cerami condition holds at any level $c > 0$.
  \end{itemize}
Then $\Phi$ has an unbounded sequence of critical values.
\end{theorem}
\begin{remark}\rm
  Cerami condition is weaker than the (PS) condition. However, it was shown in \cite{Bartolo1983} that from Cerami condition a deformation lemma follows and, as a consequence, we can also get minimax theorems.
\end{remark}

\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{main}}

We choose an orthogonal basis $\{e_j\}$ of $X:=E$ and define
$W_k:=\operatorname{span}\{e_1,\cdots, e_k\}$, $Z_k:=W_{k-1}^{\bot}$.
To complete the proof of our theorems, we need the following lemma.

\begin{lemma}[{\cite[Lemma 2.5]{Chen2009}}]\label{lemma2.5}
  For any $2\leq p<2^*$, we have that
  \[
    \beta_k:=\sup_{u\in Z_k, \|u\|_E=1}\|u\|_{L^p}\to 0,\quad k\to \infty.
  \]
\end{lemma}

Now, we show that the functional $I$ satisfies the Cerami condition.

\begin{lemma} \label{lm1.1}
Under the assumptions {\rm (F1)--(F3)}, the functional $I(u)$ 
satisfies the Cerami condition at any positive level.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We suppose that $\{ u_{n} \}$ is the Cerami sequence, that is for some 
$c \in \mathbb{R}^+$
\begin{equation}\label{cc1}
I(u_{n}) = \frac{1}{2}\|u_{n}\|_E^2+\frac{1}{4}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_{u_{n}}
u_{n}^2\,\mathrm{d}x-\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}F(x,u_{n})\,\mathrm{d}x \to c \quad (n \to \infty)
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{cc2}
  (1+\| u_{n} \|_{E})I' (u_{n})\to 0 \quad (n \to \infty).
\end{equation}
From \eqref{cc1} and \eqref{cc2}, for $n$ large enough, we have
\begin{equation}\label{c}
\begin{split}
  1 + c 
&\geq I(u_n)-\frac{1}{4}\langle I'(u_n),u_{n}\rangle\\
&= \frac{1}{4}\| u_{n} \|^{2}_{E} 
 + \frac{1}{4} \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}f(x,u_n)u_{n}\,\mathrm{d}x 
 - \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}F(x,u_n)\,\mathrm{d}x.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
We claim that $\{u_{n}\}$ is bounded. Otherwise there should exist 
a subsequence of $\{u_{n}\}$ satisfying $\|u_{n}\|_{E} \to \infty$ 
as $n \to \infty$. Denote $w_{n}=\frac{u_n}{\|u_{n}\|_{E}}$, 
then $\{w_{n}\}$ is bounded. Up to a subsequence, for some $w\in E$, we obtain
\begin{equation} \label{eq:embeding}
\begin{gathered}
   w_{n}\rightharpoonup w  \quad \text{in }E,\\
   w_{n}\to w            \quad \text{in }L^{t}(\mathbb{R}^3), \;
 2 \leq t < 2^{*},\\
   w_{n}(x)\to w(x)  \quad \text{a.e. in }\mathbb{R}^3.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Suppose, $w \neq  0$ in $E$. Dividing by $\|u_{n}\|_{E}^{4}$ in both
sides of \eqref{cc1}, by (1) of lemma \ref{lemma2.2} we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{3.5}
  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\frac{F(x,u_{n})}{ \|u_{n}\|_{E}^{4} } \,\mathrm{d}x
= \frac{1}{2 \|u_{n}\|_{E}^{2}} +\frac{\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_{u_{n}} u_{n}^2 \,\mathrm{d}x - c }{ 4 \|u_{n}\|_{E}^{4}} + o(\| u_n \|_{E}^{-4}) \leq a_5 < \infty,
\end{equation}
where $a_5$ is a positive constant. We consider this situation,
 $\Omega := \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^3 | w(x) \neq 0 \}$, by $(F2)$,
for all $x \in \Omega$,
\[
  \frac{F(x, u_{n})}{\|u_{n}\|_{E}^{4}}
= \frac{F(x, u_{n})}{|u_{n}|^{4}}w_{n}^{4}(x) \to +\infty \quad (n \to \infty).
\]
Since $|\Omega| > 0$, using Fatou's Lemma, we obtain
\[
  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{F(x, u(x)_{n})}{\|u(x)_{n}\|_{E}^{4}} \,\mathrm{d}x \to +\infty \quad (n \to \infty).
\]
This contradicts \eqref{3.5}.

On the another hand, if $w(x)= 0$, we can define a sequence
 $\{t_{n}\}\subset\mathbb{R}$:
\[
  I(t_{n}u_{n})=\max_{t\in[0,1]}I(tu_{n}).
\]
Fix any $m >0$, let $\overline{w}_{n}=\sqrt{4m}\frac{u_{n}}{\|u_{n}\|_{E}}
=\sqrt{4m} w_{n}$. By $(F1)$,
\[
  |f(x,z)|\leq a_2 |z|+ a_2 |z|^{p-1},
\]
for a.e. $x\in {\mathbb{R}}^3$ and all $z\in {\mathbb{R}}$.
 By the equality $F(x,z) = \int^1_0f(x,tz)z \,\mathrm{d}t $ we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{F}
  F(x,z)\leq \frac{a_2}{2} |z|^2 + a_6 |z|^{p}
\end{equation}
for any $x\in {\mathbb{R}}^3$ and all $z\in {\mathbb{R}}$,
where $a_6 = \frac{a_2}{p}$. Due to (3.5), we obtain
\[
  \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(x,\overline{w}_{n})\,\mathrm{d}x
\leq \lim_{n\to\infty}\left( \frac{a_2}{2}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|\overline{w}_{n}|^{2} \,\mathrm{d}x
+ a_6 \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|\overline{w}_{n}|^{p} \,\mathrm{d}x \right)=0.
\]
Then for $n$ large enough,
\begin{equation}\label{infty}
  \begin{split}
    I(t_nu_n)
&\geq  I(\overline{w}_{n})\\
&=  2m + \frac{1}{4} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \phi_{\overline{w}_{n}}
\overline{w}_{n}^{2} \,\mathrm{d}x
-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(x,\overline{w}_{n})\,\mathrm{d}x
 \geq  m.
  \end{split}
\end{equation}
Due to \eqref{infty}, $\lim_{n\to\infty}I(t_{n}u_{n})=+\infty$.
Since $I(0)=0$, and $I(u_{n})\to c$, then $0<t_{n}<1$ if $n$ large enough,
we have
\begin{align*}
 & \int_{\mathbb{R}^3 }\left( \nabla t_{n}u_{n} \nabla t_{n}u_{n} +V(x) t_{n}u_{n} t_{n}u_{n} + \phi _{t_{n}u_{n}} t_{n}u_{n} t_{n}u_{n} -f(x,t_{n}u_{n})t_{n}u_{n}\right)\,\mathrm{d}x\\
 & =  \langle I'(t_{n}u_{n}),t_{n}u_{n}\rangle \\
 & =  t_{n}\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\biggm|_{t=t_{n}}I(tu_{n})=0.
\end{align*}
Thus, by (F3) we obtain
\begin{align*}
   &I(u_n)-  \frac{1}{4}\langle I'(u_n),u_{n}\rangle\\
    & = \frac{1}{4} \| u_{n}\|_{E}^{2} + \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \left[ \frac{1}{4} f(x,u_{n}) u_{n} -F(x, u_{n})\right] \,\mathrm{d}x\\
    & = \frac{1}{4} \| u_{n}\|_{E}^{2} + \frac{1}{4} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} H(x, u_{n}) \,\mathrm{d}x \\
    & \geq \frac{1}{4 \theta} \| t_{n}u_{n}\|_{E}^{2} + \frac{1}{4 \theta} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} H(x, t_{n}u_{n}) \,\mathrm{d}x \\
    & = \frac{1}{4 \theta} \| t_{n}u_{n}\|_{E}^{2} + \frac{1}{\theta} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \left[ \frac{1}{4} f(x,t_{n}u_{n}) t_{n}u_{n} -F(x, t_{n}u_{n})\right] \,\mathrm{d}x\\
    & = \frac{1}{\theta}I(t_{n}u_n)-\frac{1}{4 \theta}\langle I'(t_{n}u_n),t_{n}u_{n}\rangle \to + \infty.
  \end{align*}
This contradicts \eqref{c}. So $\{u_{n}\}$ is bounded.
 Going if necessary to a subsequence,
we can assume that $u_n\rightharpoonup u$ in $E$.
In view of  Lemma \ref{lemma2.1}, $u_n\to u$ in $L^s({\mathbb{R}}^3)$
for any $s\in [2, 2^*)$. By \eqref{dao}, we easily get
\[
\begin{split}
\|u_n-u\|_E^2& =\langle I'(u_n) - I'(u), u_n-u\rangle+
 \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}(f(x,u_n)-f(x,u))(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x \\
 & \quad -\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}(\phi_{u_n}u_n- \phi_u u)(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x.
\end{split}
\]
It is clear that
\[
  \langle I'(u_n)-I'(u), u_n-u\rangle \to 0.
\]
According to assumptions $(F1)$, there exists $a_6>0$ such that
\[
  f(x,u)\leq \frac{a_2}{2}|u| + a_6 |u|^{p-1}
\]
for a.e. $x\in {\mathbb{R}}^3,$ and all $z\in {\mathbb{R}}$. Using the H\"older inequality, we obtain
\begin{align*}
    & \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}(f(x,u_n)-f(x,u))(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x\\
    & \leq \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3} \left[ \frac{a_2}{2}(|u_n|+|u|) + a_6 \left( |u_n|^{p-1}+|u|^{p-1} \right) \right] |u_n-u| \,\mathrm{d}x\\
    & \leq \frac{a_2}{2} \left(\|u_n\|_{L^2}^2+\|u\|_{L^2}^2\right)\|u_n-u\|_{L^2}^2 +a_6 \left(\|u_n\|_{L^p}^{p-1}+\|u\|_{L^p}^{p-1}\right)\|u_n-u\|_{L^p}
\end{align*}
Since $u_n\to u$ in $L^s({\mathbb{R}}^3)$ for any $s\in [2, 2^*)$, we have
\[
  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}(f(x,u_n)-f(x,u))(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x\to 0,\quad
 \text{as }  n\to\infty.
\]
By the H\"older inequality, Sobolev inequality and Lemma \ref{lemma2.2}, we have
\[
\begin{split}
\big|\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x \big|
&\leq \|\phi_{u_n}u_n\|_{L^2}\|u_n-u\|_{L^2}\\
&\leq \|\phi_{u_n}\|_{L^6}\|{u_n}\|_{L^3}\|u_n-u\|_{L^2}\\
&\leq a_8\|\phi_{u_n}\|_{D^{1,2}}\|{u_n}\|_{L^3}\|u_n-u\|_{L^2}\\
&\leq a_4a_8\|{u_n}\|^2_{L^{12/5}}\|{u_n}\|_{L^3}\|u_n-u\|_{L^2},
\end{split}
\]
where $a_8>0$ is a constant. Again using $u_n\to  u$ in
$L^s({\mathbb{R}}^3)$ for any $s\in [2, 2^*)$, we have
\[
  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x\to 0,\quad
\text{as } n\to\infty.
\]
Similarly, we  obtain
\[
  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}\phi_{u}u(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x\to 0, \quad
\text{as } n\to\infty.
\]
Thus,
\[
  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^3}(\phi_{u_n}u_n-\phi_uu)(u_n-u)\,\mathrm{d}x\to 0,\quad
 \text{as }  n\to\infty,
\]
so that $\|u_n-u\|_E\to 0$. We get that $I(u)$ satisfies Cerami condition.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{main}]
Due to Lemma \ref{lm1.1}, $I(u)$ satisfies Cerami condition.
 Next, we verify that $I(u)$ satisfies the rest conditions of Theorem \ref{ft}.

First, we verify  that $I(u)$ satisfies ($\Phi 1$). It follows from (F2)
 that for any $M > 0$, there exists $\delta(M) > 0$, such that for all
 $x \in \mathbb{R}^3$, $|z| \geq \delta$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{Fgeq}
  F(x,z) \geq \frac{1}{4} M |z|^{4}.
\end{equation}
Taking $\widetilde{M} := \sup_{|z|< \delta} 
\big( \frac{1}{4} M |z|^4 - \frac{F(x,z)}{|z|^2} \big)$, 
then by \eqref{Fgeq} we obtain
\[
  F(x,z) \geq \frac{1}{4} M |z|^{4} - \widetilde{M} |z|^2
\]
for a.e. $x\in {\mathbb{R}}^3,$ and all $z\in {\mathbb{R}}$. Hence we have
\[
  I (u) \leq \frac{1}{2} \|u\|_E^2 + \frac{a_4} {4} \|u\|_E^4
- \frac{1}{4} M \|u\|_{L^4}^{4} + \widetilde{M} \|u\|_{L^2}^2.
\]
Since, on the finitely
dimensional space $W_k$ all norms are equivalent, we have that
\[
  I (u) \leq \frac{1}{2} \|u\|_E^2 + \frac{a_4} {4} \|u\|_E^4
- \frac{1}{4} M a_{10} \|u\|_{E}^{4} + \widetilde{M} a_{10} \|u\|_{E}^2,
\]
where $a_{10}$ is a constant. Now since
$\frac{a_4}{4} - \frac{1}{4} M a_{10} < 0$, when $M$ is large enough,
it follows that
\[
  a_k:=\max _{u\in W_k, \|u\|_E=\rho_k}I(u)\leq 0
\]
for some $\rho_k >0$ large enough.

Secondly, we prove that $I(u)$ satisfies ($\Phi$2). Due to \eqref{F}, we have
\begin{align*}
  I(u)&\geq  \frac{1}{2}\|u\|_E^2 -\varepsilon\|u\|_{L^2}^{2}-a_6\|u\|_{L^p}^p\\
      &\geq  \Big( \frac{1}{2} - \frac{\varepsilon}{a_1} \Big)\|u\|_E^2 - a_6 {\beta_k}^p \|u\|_E^p,
\end{align*}
where $a_1$ is a lower bound of $V(x)$ from (V1) and $\beta _k$ are
defined in Lemma \ref{lemma2.5}. Choosing $r_k:=(a_6 p\beta_k^p)^{1/(2-p)}$, we
obtain
\begin{align*}
    b_k &=  \inf _{u\in Z_k, \|u\|_E=r_k} I(u)\\
     &\geq  \inf _{u\in Z_k, \|u\|_E = r_k} 
\big[ \big( \frac{1}{2} - \frac{\varepsilon}{a_1} \big) 
 \|u\|_E^2 - a_6 {\beta_k}^p \|u\|_E^p \big]\\
     &\geq  \Big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\varepsilon}{a_1}- \frac{1}{p} \Big) (a_6 p \beta_k^p )^{\frac{2}{2-p}}.
  \end{align*}
Because $\beta_k\to 0$ as $k\to 0$ and $p>2$, we have
\[
  b_k\geq \Big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\varepsilon}{a_1} - \frac{1}{p} \Big)
(a_6 p \beta_k^p )^{\frac{2}{2-p}} \to +\infty
\]
for enough small $\varepsilon$. This proves ($\Phi$2).
Now, we apply Theorem \ref{ft} to complete the proof o Theorem \ref{main}.
\end{proof}

\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referees for their
 knowledgeable reports, which helped us to improve
our manuscript.

The first author was supported by National Natural Science Foundation 
of China (No. 11201323), Scientific Research Fund of SUSE (No. 2011KY03) 
and Scientific Reserch Fund of SiChuan Provincial Education 
Department (No.12ZB081), while the second one by Natural Science 
Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (Grant No. cstc2012jjA00032) and 
Science and Technology Researching Program of Chongqing Educational 
Committee of China (Grant No.KJ120703).

\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{Ackermann2006}
N.~Ackermann.
\newblock A nonlinear superposition principle and multibump solutions of
  periodic {S}chr\"odinger equations.
\newblock {\em J. Funct. Anal.}, 234(2):277--320, 2006.

\bibitem{MR2769159}
C.~O. Alves, M.~A.~S. Souto, and S.~H.~M. Soares.
\newblock Schr\"odinger-{P}oisson equations without {A}mbrosetti-{R}abinowitz
  condition.
\newblock {\em J. Math. Anal. Appl.}, 377(2):584--592, 2011.

\bibitem{Ambrosetti1973a}
A.~Ambrosetti and P.~H. Rabinowitz.
\newblock Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications.
\newblock {\em J. Functional Analysis}, 14:349--381, 1973.

\bibitem{Azzollini2008}
A.~Azzollini and A.~Pomponio.
\newblock Ground state solutions for the nonlinear {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell
  equations.
\newblock {\em J. Math. Anal. Appl.}, 345(1):90--108, 2008.

\bibitem{Bartolo1983}
P.~Bartolo, V.~Benci, and D.~Fortunato.
\newblock Abstract critical point theorems and applications to some nonlinear
  problems with ``strong'' resonance at infinity.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 7(9):981--1012, 1983.

\bibitem{Bartsch1993}
T.~Bartsch.
\newblock Infinitely many solutions of a symmetric {D}irichlet problem.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 20(10):1205--1216, 1993.

\bibitem{Bartsch1995a}
T.~Bartsch and M.~Willem.
\newblock On an elliptic equation with concave and convex nonlinearities.
\newblock {\em Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.}, 123(11):3555--3561, 1995.

\bibitem{Benci1998}
V.~Benci and D.~Fortunato.
\newblock An eigenvalue problem for the {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell equations.
\newblock {\em Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal.}, 11(2):283--293, 1998.

\bibitem{Benci1999}
V.~Benci, D.~Fortunato, A.~Masiello, and L.~Pisani.
\newblock Solitons and the electromagnetic field.
\newblock {\em Math. Z.}, 232(1):73--102, 1999.

\bibitem{Cerami1978}
G.~Cerami.
\newblock An existence criterion for the critical points on unbounded
  manifolds.
\newblock {\em Istit. Lombardo Accad. Sci. Lett. Rend. A}, 112(2):332--336
  (1979), 1978.

\bibitem{Chen2009}
S.~J. Chen and C.~L. Tang.
\newblock High energy solutions for the superlinear {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell
  equations.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 71(10):4927--4934, 2009.

\bibitem{Coclite2002}
G.~M. Coclite.
\newblock A multiplicity result for the {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell equations
  with negative potential.
\newblock {\em Ann. Polon. Math.}, 79(1):21--30, 2002.

\bibitem{Coclite2003}
G.~M. Coclite.
\newblock A multiplicity result for the nonlinear {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell
  equations.
\newblock {\em Commun. Appl. Anal.}, 7(2-3):417--423, 2003.

\bibitem{D'Aprile2004a}
T.~D'Aprile and D.~Mugnai.
\newblock Non-existence results for the coupled {K}lein-{G}ordon-{M}axwell
  equations.
\newblock {\em Adv. Nonlinear Stud.}, 4(3):307--322, 2004.

\bibitem{D'Aprile2004}
T.~D'Aprile and D.~Mugnai.
\newblock Solitary waves for nonlinear {K}lein-{G}ordon-{M}axwell and
  {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell equations.
\newblock {\em Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A}, 134(5):893--906, 2004.

\bibitem{Gilbarg2001}
D.~Gilbarg and N.~S. Trudinger.
\newblock {\em Elliptic partial differential equations of second order}.
\newblock Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
\newblock Reprint of the 1998 edition.

\bibitem{Kikuchi2007}
H.~Kikuchi.
\newblock On the existence of a solution for elliptic system related to the
  {M}axwell-{S}chr\"odinger equations.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 67(5):1445--1456, 2007.

\bibitem{Li2010a}
Q.~D. Li, H.~Su, and Z.~L. Wei.
\newblock Existence of infinitely many large solutions for the nonlinear
  {S}chr\"oinger-{M}axwell equations.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 72(11):4264 -- 4270, 2010.

\bibitem{MR2653749}
S.~Liu.
\newblock On superlinear problems without the {A}mbrosetti and {R}abinowitz
  condition.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 73(3):788--795, 2010.

\bibitem{Rabinowitz1986}
P.~H. Rabinowitz.
\newblock {\em Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to
  differential equations}, volume~65 of {\em CBMS Regional Conference Series in
  Mathematics}.
\newblock Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences,
  Washington, DC, 1986.

\bibitem{Ruiz2006}
D.~Ruiz.
\newblock The {S}chr\"odinger-{P}oisson equation under the effect of a
  nonlinear local term.
\newblock {\em J. Funct. Anal.}, 237(2):655--674, 2006.

\bibitem{Salvatore2006}
A.~Salvatore.
\newblock Multiple solitary waves for a non-homogeneous
  {S}chr\"odinger-{M}axwell system in {$\mathbb{R}\sp 3$}.
\newblock {\em Adv. Nonlinear Stud.}, 6(2):157--169, 2006.

\bibitem{Struwe2008}
M.~Struwe.
\newblock {\em Variational methods}, volume~34 of {\em Results in Mathematics
  and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics}.
\newblock Springer-Verlag, Berlin, fourth edition, 2008.
\newblock Applications to nonlinear partial differential equations and
  Hamiltonian systems.

\bibitem{Wang2007}
Z.~P. Wang and H.~S. Zhou.
\newblock Positive solution for a nonlinear stationary
  {S}chr\"odinger-{P}oisson system in {$\mathbb{R}\sp 3$}.
\newblock {\em Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.}, 18(4):809--816, 2007.

\bibitem{Willem1996}
M.~Willem.
\newblock {\em Minimax theorems}.
\newblock Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications,
  24. Birkh\"auser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1996.

\bibitem{MR2863939}
M.-H. Yang and Z.-Q. Han.
\newblock Existence and multiplicity results for the nonlinear
  {S}chr\"odinger-{P}oisson systems.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.}, 13(3):1093--1101, 2012.

\bibitem{Zhao2008}
L.~G. Zhao and F.~K. Zhao.
\newblock On the existence of solutions for the {S}chr\"odinger-{P}oisson
  equations.
\newblock {\em J. Math. Anal. Appl.}, 346(1):155--169, 2008.

\bibitem{Zhao2009}
L.~G. Zhao and F.~K. Zhao.
\newblock Positive solutions for {S}chr\"odinger-{P}oisson equations with a
  critical exponent.
\newblock {\em Nonlinear Anal.}, 70(6):2150--2164, 2009.

\bibitem{Zou2001}
W.~M. Zou.
\newblock Variant fountain theorems and their applications.
\newblock {\em Manuscripta Math.}, 104(3):343--358, 2001.

\bibitem{Zou2006}
W.~M. Zou and M.~Schechter.
\newblock {\em Critical point theory and its applications}.
\newblock Springer, New York, 2006.

\end{thebibliography}



\end{document}
