\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{cite}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2015 (2015), No. 105, pp. 1--10.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2015 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2015/105\hfil Weak solutions]
{Weak solutions to discrete nonlinear two-point boundary-value
problems of Kirchhoff type}

\author[B. Kone, I. Nyanquini, S. Ouaro \hfil EJDE-2015/105\hfilneg]
{Blaise Kone, Isma\"el Nyanquini, Stanislas Ouaro}

\address{Blaise Kone \newline
Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques et Informatique (LAMI),
Institut Burkinab\'e des Arts et M\'etiers, Universit\'e de Ouagadougou,
 03 BP 7021 Ouaga 03 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso}
\email{leizon71@yahoo.fr}

\address{Isma\"el Nyanquini \newline
Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques et Informatique (LAMI),
Institut des  Sciences Exactes et Appliqu\'ees, Universit\'e
Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, 01 BP 1091 Bobo-Dioulasso 01,
Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso}
\email{nyanquis@yahoo.fr}

\address{Stanislas Ouaro \newline
Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques et Informatique (LAMI), UFR
Sciences Exactes et Appliqu\'ees, Universit\'e de Ouagadougou,
03 BP 7021 Ouaga 03 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso}
\email{souaro@univ-ouaga.bf, ouaro@yahoo.fr}

\thanks{Submitted June 29, 2014. Published April 21, 2015.}
\subjclass[2010]{47A75, 35B38, 35P30, 34L05, 34L30}
\keywords{Kirchhoff type problems; discrete boundary-value problem;
\hfill\break\indent critical point; weak solution; electrorheological fluids}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article, we prove the existence of weak solutions to a family
 of discrete boundary-value problems whose right-hand side belongs to 
 a discrete  Hilbert space. As an extension, we prove the existence  of
 weak solutions for problems whose right-hand side depends on the solution.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

In this article, we study the nonlinear discrete boundary-value problem
\begin{equation} \label{e1.1}
\begin{gathered}
-M(A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\Delta (a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))=f(k), \quad
  k\in\mathbb{Z}[1,T]\\
u(0)=\Delta u(T)=0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $T\geq 2$ is a positive integer and $\Delta u(k)=u(k+1)-u(k)$
is the forward difference operator. Throughout this paper, we denote
by $\mathbb{Z}[a,b]$ the discrete interval $\{a,a+1,\dots ,b\}$ where $a$
and $b$ are integers and $a<b$.

We consider in \eqref{e1.1} two different boundary conditions:
 a Dirichlet boundary condition $(u(0)=0)$ and a Neumann boundary condition
 $(\Delta u(T)=0)$. In the literature, the boundary condition considered
 in this paper is called a mixed boundary condition.
We also consider the function space
\begin{displaymath}
W=\{v:\mathbb{Z}[0,T+1]\to\mathbb{R} \text{ such that } v(0)=\Delta v(T)=0\}.
\end{displaymath}
 $W$ is a $T$-dimensional Hilbert space (see [1]) with the inner product
\begin{displaymath}
\left(u,v\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{T} u(k) v(k), \quad \forall u,v\in W.
\end{displaymath}
The associated norm is defined by
\[ 
\|u\|=\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}| u(k)|^2\Big)^{1/2}.
\]
For the data $f$ and $a$, we assume the following.
\begin{gather}
f:\mathbb{Z}[1,T]\to\mathbb{R}, \label{e1.2}
\\
\parbox{95mm}{$a(k,.):\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ for  $k\in \mathbb{Z}[0,T]$
 and there exists a mapping $A:\mathbb{Z}[0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \to\mathbb{R}$
 satisfying $a(k,\xi)=\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi}A(k,\xi)$ and
$A(k,0)=0$  for all $k\in \mathbb{Z}[0,T]$,} \label{e1.3}
\\
(a(k,\xi)-a(k,\eta))(\xi-\eta)>0 \;\forall k\in \mathbb{Z}[0,T]
\text{ and $\xi,\eta\in\mathbb{R}$ such that }\xi\neq\eta, \label{e1.4}
\\
|\xi|^{p(k)}\leq a(k,\xi)\xi\leq p(k)A(k,\xi) \quad
\forall k\in \mathbb{Z}[0,T] \text{ and }\xi\in\mathbb{R}. \label{e1.5}
\end{gather}
Moreover, in this paper, we assume that
\begin{equation} \label{e1.6}
p: \mathbb{Z}[0,T]\to (1,+\infty).
\end{equation}
We also assume that the function $M: (0, +\infty)\to (0, +\infty)$
is continuous and nondecreasing and
there exist positive reals number $B_{1}, B_2$ with $B_{1} \leq B_2$ and
$\alpha \geq 1$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{e1.7}
B_{1} t^{\alpha -1} \leq M(t) \leq B_2 t^{\alpha -1}\quad \text{for }
t \geq t^* >0.
\end{equation}
The function $M(A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))$  in the left-hand side
of \eqref{e1.1} is more general than the one  in \cite{KO}.
Indeed, if we take $M(t)=1$, \eqref{e1.1} is the
problem studied by Kon\'e et al \cite{KO}.


Problem \eqref{e1.1} has its origin in the theory of nonlinear vibration.
For instance,  the following equation describes the free
 vibration of a stretched string (see \cite{Op})
\begin{equation} \label{eqkirkoff}
\rho\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial t^2}
=\Big(T_{0}+\frac{Ea}{2L}\int^{L}_{0}|\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}|^2dx\Big)
\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}
\end{equation}
where $\rho > 0$ is the mass per unit length, $T_{0}$ is the base tension,
$E$ is the Young modulus, $a$ is the area of cross section and $L$ is the
initial length of the string.
\eqref{eqkirkoff} takes into account the change of the tension on the string
which is caused by the change of its length during the vibration.
The nonlocal equation of this type was first proposed by Kirchhoff in 1876
(see \cite{Kir}). After that, several physicists also consider such equations
for their researches in the theory of nonlinear vibrations theoretically or
experimentally \cite{Car1,Car2,Nar,Op}. Moreover mathematically, the solvability
of several Kirchhoff type quasilinear hyperbolic equations have been extensively
discussed. As far as we know, the first study which deals with anisotropic discrete
boundary-value problems of $p(.)$-Kirchhoff type difference equation was done
by Yucedag (see \cite{Yu}). In this paper, we improve the work by Yucedag \cite{Yu}
since our main operator is more general than the one in \cite{Yu}.
As examples of functions satisfying assumptions
\eqref{e1.3}--\eqref{e1.7}, we can give the following.
\begin{itemize}
\item $M(A(k,\xi))=M(\frac{1}{p(k)}|\xi|^{p(k)})=1$, where
$M(t)=1$ and $a(k,\xi)=|\xi|^{p(k)-2}\xi$, for $k\in \mathbb{Z}[0,T]$ and
$\xi\in\mathbb{R}$.

\item $M(A(k,\xi))=a+\frac{b}{p(k)}\big[\big(1+|\xi|^2\big)^{p(k)/2}-1\big]$,
where $M(t)=a+bt$ and $a(k,\xi)=\big(1+|\xi|^2\big)^{(p(k)-2)/2}\xi$,
for all $k\in \mathbb{Z}[0,T]$ and $\xi\in\mathbb{R}$.
\end{itemize}
The remaining part of this article is organized as follows:
section 2 is devoted to mathematical preliminaries.
The main existence result is stated and proved in section 3.
Finally, in section 4, we discuss some extensions.

\section{Preliminaries}

We will use the following symbols.
\begin{displaymath}
p^{-}=\min_{k\in\mathbb{Z}[0,T]}p(k), \quad
p^{+}=\max_{k\in\mathbb{Z}[0,T]}p(k).
\end{displaymath}
It is useful to introduce other norms on $W$, namely
\begin{displaymath}
|u|_{m}=\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{m}\Big)^{1/m}\quad \forall u\in W
\text{ and }m\geq 2.
\end{displaymath}
We have the following inequalities (see \cite{CY,MRT}):
\begin{equation} \label{e2.1}
T^{(2-m)/(2m)}|u|_2\leq|u|_{m}\leq T^{1/m}|u|_2\quad
\forall u\in W \text{ and }m\geq 2.
\end{equation}
In the sequel, we will use the following auxiliary result.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{GNO}] \label{lem2.1}
There exist two positive constants $C_1$  and  $C_2$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{e2.2}
\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|\Delta u(k-1)|^{p(k-1)}
\geq C_{1}\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|\Delta u(k-1)|^2\Big)^{p^{-}/2}-C_2,
\end{equation}
 for all $u\in W$ with $\|u\|>1$.
\end{lemma}

Next we have the discrete Wirtinger's inequality, see
\cite[Theorem 12.6.2, page 860]{Ag}.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2.2}
For any function $u(k)$, $k \in \mathbb{Z}[0,T]$ satisfying $u(0)=0$,
 the following inequality holds
\begin{equation} \label{e2.3}
 4\sin^2\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\sum_{k=1}^{T}| u(k)|^2
 \leq \sum_{k=1}^T |\Delta u(k-1)|^2.
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}

\section{Existence of weak solutions}

In this section, we study the existence of weak solution of \eqref{e1.1}.

\begin{definition} \label{def3.1}
A weak solution of \eqref{e1.1} is a function $u\in W$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{e3.1}
 M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))
 \Delta v(k-1)
 =\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)v(k)
 \end{equation}
 for all $v\in W$.
 \end{definition}

Note that, since $W$ is a finite dimensional space, the weak solutions
coincide with the classical solutions of the problem \eqref{e1.1}.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm3.2}
Assume that \eqref{e1.2}-\eqref{e1.7} hold. Then, there exists at least
one weak solution of \eqref{e1.1}.
\end{theorem}

For the proof of the above theorem, we define the energy functional corresponding
to problem \eqref{e1.1}, $J: W\to\mathbb{R}$ as follows:
\begin{equation} \label{e3.2}
J(u)=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))-\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)u(k),
\end{equation}
where $\widehat{M}(t)= \int_{0}^{t}M(s)\,ds$.
We first establish some basic properties of $J$.

\begin{proposition} \label{prop3.3}
The functional $J$ is well-defined on $E$ and is of class $C^{1}(W,\mathbb{R})$
with derivative given by
\begin{equation} \label{e3.3}
\begin{aligned}
\langle J'(u),v\rangle
&=M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))\Delta v(k-1)\\
&-\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)v(k),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for all $u,v\in W$.
\end{proposition}

The proof  of the above proposition  can be found in \cite{NO}.

We now define  the functional $I:H\to\mathbb{R}$ by
\begin{displaymath}
I(u)=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))).
\end{displaymath}
We need the following lemma for the proof of Theorem \ref{thm3.2}.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem3.4} The functional $I$ is weakly lower semi-continuous.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 By \eqref{e1.3} and \eqref{e1.4}, we have that $A$ is convex with respect
 to the second variable. Thus, it is enough to show that $I$ is lower
 semi-continuous. For this, we fix $u\in H$ and $\epsilon>0$.
 Since $I$ is convex, we deduce that for any $v\in H$,
\begin{align*}
I(v)&\geq I(u)+\langle I'(u),v-u\rangle\\
&\geq I(u)+M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
 \sum_{k=1}^{T+1}a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))\\
&\quad\times \left(\Delta v(k-1) -\Delta u(k-1)\right)\\
&\geq I(u)-\Big(M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\Big)
\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|\\
&\quad\times |\Delta v(k-1)-\Delta u(k-1)|\\
&\geq I(u)-C_{0}\sum_{k=1}^{T}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|(|v(k)-u(k)+u(k-1)
 - v(k-1)|)\\
&\geq I(u)-C_{0}\sum_{k=1}^{T}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|(|v(k)-u(k)|+|u(k-1)- v(k-1)|),
\end{align*}
where $C_{0}=\Big(1+ M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\Big)$.
We denote
\begin{gather*}
X_1 =\sum_{k=1}^{T}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))||v(k)-u(k)|,\\
X_2 =\sum_{k=1}^{T}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))||u(k-1)-v(k-1)|.
\end{gather*}
By using Schwartz inequality, we obtain
\begin{align*}
X_1 & \leq \Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|^2\Big)^{1/2}
\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}| v(k)- u(k)|^2\Big)^{1/2}\\
&\leq \Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|^2\Big)^{1/2}\|v-u\|
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
X_ 2& \leq \Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|^2\Big)^{1/2}
\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}| u(k-1)- v(k-1)|^2\Big)^{1/2}\\
&\leq \Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|^2\Big)^{1/2}\|v-u\|.
\end{align*}
Finally, we have
\begin{align*}
I(v)& \geq I(u)- C_0\Big(1+2\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|^2
 \Big)^{1/2}\|v-u\|\\
&\geq I(u)-\epsilon,
\end{align*}
for all $v\in W$ with $\|v-u\|<\delta=\epsilon/K(T, u)$, where
$$
K(T,u)=C_{0}\Big(1+2\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}|a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))|^2\Big)^{1/2}.
$$
We conclude that $I$ is weakly lower semi-continuous.
The proof of Lemma \ref{lem3.4} is then complete.
\end{proof}

\begin{proposition} \label{prop3.5}
The functional $J$ is bounded from below, coercive and weakly lower
semi-continuous.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
By Lemma \ref{lem3.4}, $J$ is weakly lower semicontinuous. We will only prove the
coerciveness of the energy functional since the boundeness from below
of $J$ is a consequence of coerciveness. By \eqref{e1.5} and \eqref{e1.7},
 we deduce that
\begin{align*}
J(u)&=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
-\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)u(k)\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sum_{k=0}^{T+1} {|\Delta u(k-1)|^{p(k-1)}}\Big)^{\alpha}
-\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)u(k).
\end{align*}
To prove the coercivity of $J$, we may assume that $\|u\|> 1$ and we get
from the above inequality and Lemma \ref{lem2.1}, that
\begin{align*}
J(u)&\geq \frac{B_{1}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big[C_{1}\Big( \sum_{k=1}^{T+1} |\Delta u(k-1)|^2\Big)^{p^{-}/2}-C_2
\Big]^{\alpha}-\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)u(k)\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1} |\Delta u(k-1)|^2\Big)^{\alpha p^{-}/2}
-K(\alpha, C_2) C_2^{\alpha}\\
&\quad -\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|f(k)|^2\Big)^{1/2}
\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^2\Big)^{1/2}.
\end{align*}
Using Wirtinger's discrete inequality, we obtain
\begin{align*}
J(u)
&\geq  \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(4\sin^2\left(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\right) \sum_{k=1}^{T+1} | u(k)|^2
\Big)^{\alpha p^{-}/2}\\
&\quad -K'-\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|f(k)|^2\Big)^{1/2}
\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^2\Big)^{1/2}\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}2^{\alpha p^{-}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{ \alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big)
\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1} | u(k)|^2\Big)^{\alpha p^{-}/2}-K'-K_1\|u\|\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{\alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\big)\Big)
\|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}}-K'-K_1\|u\|,
\end{align*}
where $K_1$ and $K'$ are two positive constants. Hence, as $\alpha p^{-}> 1$,
then $J$ is coercive.
\end{proof}

By Proposition \ref{prop3.5}, $J$ has a minimizer which is a weak solution of \eqref{e1.1}.

\section{Extensions}
\subsection{Extension 1}
In this section, we show that the existence result obtained for \eqref{e1.1}
can be extended to more general discrete boundary-value problems of the form
\begin{equation} \label{e4.1}
\begin{gathered}
\begin{aligned}
&- M(A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\Delta (a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
 +|u(k)|^{q(k)-2}u(k)\\
&=f(k),\quad k\in\mathbb{Z}[1,T] 
\end{aligned}\\
 u(0)=\Delta u(T)=0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $T\geq 2$ is a positive integer and where we assume that 
$q:\mathbb{Z}[1,T]\to (1, +\infty)$.
By a weak solution of problem \eqref{e4.1}, we understand a function 
$u\in W$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{e4.2}
\begin{aligned}
 &M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))\Delta v(k-1)\\
&+\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{q(k)-2}u(k)v(k)\\ 
&= \sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)v(k),
\quad \text{for any }v\in W.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

\begin{theorem} \label{thm4.1} 
Under assumptions \eqref{e1.2}-\eqref{e1.7},  problem \eqref{e4.1} has at 
least one weak solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
For $u\in W$, 
\begin{equation} \label{e4.3}
J(u)=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
+\sum_{k=1}^{T} \frac{1}{q(k)}|u(k)|^{q(k)} -\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)u(k)
\end{equation}
is such that $J\in C^{1}(W;\mathbb{R})$ is weakly lower semi-continuous 
and we have
\begin{align*}
\langle J'(u),v\rangle 
&={M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}
a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))\Delta v(k-1)\\
&\quad +\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{q(k)-2}u(k)v(k) - \sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)v(k),
\end{align*}
for all $u,v\in W$.
This implies that the weak solutions of \eqref{e4.1} coincide with the 
critical points of $J$. Next, we prove that $J$ is bounded from below and 
coercive in order to complete the proof.
\end{proof}

Since
\[
\sum_{k=1}^{T} \frac{1}{q(k)}|u(k)|^{q(k)} \geq 0,
\]
it follows that
\begin{equation} \label{e4.4}
J(u) \geq \widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))) 
-\sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k)u(k).
\end{equation}
Using  Proposition \ref{prop3.5}, we deduce that $J$ is bounded from below and coercive.

\subsection{Extension 2}
In this section, we show that the existence result obtained for \eqref{e1.1} 
can be extended to more general discrete boundary-value problems of the form
\begin{equation} \label{e4.5}
\begin{gathered}
\begin{aligned}
&-{M}(A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\Delta (a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
+\lambda|u(k)|^{\beta^{+} -2}u(k) \\
&=f(k,u(k)), \quad  k\in\mathbb{Z}[1,T]
\end{aligned} \\ 
  u(0)=\Delta u(T)=0,
\end{gathered} 
\end{equation}
where $T\geq 2$ is a positive integer, $\lambda\in \mathbb{R}^{+}$ and 
$f:\mathbb{Z}[1,T]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a continuous function
 with respect to the second variable for all 
$(k,z)\in \mathbb{Z}[1,T]\times\mathbb{R}$.

For  $k\in \mathbb{Z}[1,T]$ and every $t\in\mathbb{R}$, we put 
$ F(k,t)=\int^{t}_{0}f(k,\tau)d\tau$.
By a weak solution of problem \eqref{e4.5}, we understand a function 
$u\in W$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{e4.6}
\begin{aligned}
&{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))
\Delta v(k-1)\\
&+\lambda\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{\beta^{+}-2}u(k)v(k) \\ 
&=  \sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k,u(k))v(k),\quad \text{  for all }v\in W.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
We assume that there exists a positive constant $C_{3}$  such that
\begin{equation} \label{e4.7}
|f(k,t)|\leq C_{3}(1+|t|^{\beta(k)-1}), \quad \text{for all }
(k,t)\in \mathbb{Z}[1,T]\times\mathbb{R},
\end{equation}
 where $1<\beta^{-}<\alpha p^{-}$.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm4.2} 
Under assumptions \eqref{e1.3}--\eqref{e1.7} and \eqref{e4.7}, there exists
 $\lambda^{*}>0$ such that for $\lambda \in [\lambda^{*},+\infty)$, 
 problem \eqref{e4.5} has at least one weak solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof} 
Let $ g(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{T}F(k,u(k))$, then $g':W\to W$ is completely continuous 
and thus, $g$ is weakly lower semi-continuous.
Therefore, for $u\in W$,
\begin{equation} \label{e4.8}
J(u)=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
+\frac{\lambda}{\beta^{+}}\sum_{k=1}^{T} |u(k)|^{\beta^{+}} 
-\sum_{k=1}^{T}F(k,u(k))
\end{equation}
is such that $J\in C^{1}(W;\mathbb{R})$, is weakly lower semi-continuous
 and we have
\begin{align*}
\langle J'(u),v\rangle
&=  {M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))) 
 \sum_{k=1}^{T+1}a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))\Delta v(k-1)\\
&\quad +\lambda   \sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{\beta^{+}-2}u(k)v(k) 
 - \sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k,u(k))v(k),
\end{align*} 
for all $u,v\in W$.
This implies that the weak solutions of problem \eqref{e4.5} coincide 
with the critical points of $J$. We then have to prove that $J$ is bounded 
below and coercive  to complete the proof.

For $u\in W$ such that $\|u\|> 1$,
\begin{align*}
J(u)&\geq  \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{ \alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big) 
 \|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}} \\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda}{\beta^{+}}\sum_{k=1}^{T} |u(k)|^{\beta^{+}}-K'
 -\sum_{k=1}^{T}F(k,u(k))\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{\alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big) \|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}}
 +\frac{\lambda}{\beta^{+}}\sum_{k=1}^{T} |u(k)|^{\beta^{+}}-K'\\
&\quad -C' \sum_{k=1}^{T}\left(1+|u(k)|^{\beta(k)}\right)\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{\alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big) 
 \|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}}+\frac{\lambda}{\beta^{+}}\sum_{k=1}^{T} |u(k)|^{\beta^{+}}
 -K'-C'T\\
&\quad -C'\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{\beta(k)}\Big)\\
&\geq \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{ \alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big) 
\|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}}+\frac{\lambda}{\beta^{+}}
 \sum_{k=1}^{T} |u(k)|^{\beta^{+}}-K'-C'T\\
&\quad -C'\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{\beta^{-}}
 + \sum_{k=1}^{T}|u(k)|^{\beta^{+}}\Big)\\
&\geq    \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{ \alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big) 
\|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}} \\
&\quad +(\frac{\lambda}{\beta^{+}}-C')
 \sum_{k=1}^{T} |u(k)|^{\beta^{+}}-K'-C'T -K\|u\|^{\beta^{-}}\\
&\geq  \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}{2^{ \alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big)
 \|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}}-K'-C'T-K\|u\|^{\beta^{-}},
\end{align*}
where we put $\lambda^{*}=C'\beta^+$ and where $K$, $K'$ and $C'$ 
are positive constants.
Furthermore, by the fact that $1<\beta^{-}<\alpha p^{-}$, it turns out that
\[
J(u)\geq  \frac{B_{1}C_{1}^{\alpha}2^{2^{ \alpha p^{-}}}}{\alpha (p^{+})^{\alpha}}
\Big(\sin^{\alpha p^{-}}\Big(\frac{\pi}{2(2T+1)}\Big)\Big) \|u\|^{\alpha p^{-}}
-K'-C'T-K\|u\|^{\beta^{-}} \to+\infty
\]
as $\|u\|\to+\infty$,
where $K$ is a positive constant. Therefore, $J$ is coercive. 
\end{proof}

\subsection{Extension 3}

In this section, we show that the existence result obtained for \eqref{e1.1}
 can be extended to more general discrete boundary-value problems of the form
\begin{equation} \label{e4.9}
\begin{gathered}
-{M}(A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\Delta (a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))) =f(k,u(k)), \quad
  k\in\mathbb{Z}[1,T]\\ 
  u(0)=\Delta u(T)=0,
\end{gathered} 
\end{equation}
where $T \geq 2$.
 We suppose that $ F^{+}(k,t)=\int_{0}^{t}f^{+}(k,\tau)d\tau$ is such 
that there exist two positive constants $C_{4}$ and $C_{5}$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{e4.10}
f^{+}(k,t)\leq C_{4}+C_{5}|t|^{\beta-1}, \quad\text{for all }
(k,t)\in \mathbb{Z}[1,T]\times\mathbb{R},
\end{equation}
where $1<\beta< \alpha p^{-}$.
By a weak solution of problem \eqref{e4.9}, we understand a function $u\in W$ 
such that
\begin{equation} \label{e4.11}
\begin{aligned}
&M(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}
a(k-1,\Delta u(k-1))\Delta v(k-1)\\ 
&= \sum_{k=1}^{T}f(k,u(k))v(k),\quad \text{for all }v\in W.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

\noindent\begin{theorem} \label{thm4.3} 
Under assumptions \eqref{e1.3}-\eqref{e1.7} and \eqref{e4.10}, problem \eqref{e4.9} 
has at least one weak solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
As $f=f^{+}-f^{-}$, letting 
\[
F^{+}(k,t)=\int_{0}^{t}f^{+}(k,\tau)d\tau,\quad 
F^{-}(k,t)=\int_{0}^{t}f^{-}(k,\tau)d\tau,
\]
 we have
\begin{align*}
J(u)&=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))-\sum_{k=1}^{T}F(k,u(k))\\
&=\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))-\sum_{k=1}^{T}F^{+}(k,u(k))
+\sum_{k=1}^{T}F^{-}(k,u(k))\\
&\geq\widehat{M}(\sum_{k=1}^{T+1}A(k-1,\Delta u(k-1)))
-\sum_{k=1}^{T}F^{+}(k,u(k)).
\end{align*}
Therefore, similarly to the proof of Theorem \ref{thm4.2}, the statement of
Theorem \ref{thm4.3} follows immediately. 
\end{proof}

\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{Ag} R. P. Agarwal; 
\emph{Difference Equations and Inequalities}: Theory, Methods, and Applications, vol. 
\textbf{228} of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 
Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2000.

\bibitem{CY} X. Cai, J. Yu; 
\emph{Existence theorems for second-order discrete boundary-value problems}, 
J. Math. Anal. Appl. \textbf{320} (2006), 649-661.

\bibitem{Car1} G. F. Carrier; 
\emph{On the nonlinear vibration problem of the elastic string},
 Quart. Appl. Math. 3 (1945), 157-165.

\bibitem{Car2} G. F. Carrier; 
\emph{A note on the vibrating string,} Quart. Appl. Math. 7 (1949), 97-101.

\bibitem{GNO} A. Guiro, I. Nyanquinim, S. Ouaro; 
\emph{On the solvability of discrete nonlinear Neumann problems involving 
the $p(x)$-Laplacian}, Adv Differ Equ 32 (2011), 1-14.

\bibitem{Kir} G. Kirchhoff;
\emph{Vorlesungen \"uber mathematische Physik: Mechanik}, 
Teubner, Leipzig, 1876.

\bibitem{KO}  B. Kon\'e, S. Ouaro; 
\emph{On the solvability of discrete nonlinear two point boundary value problems}, 
Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2012, Article ID 927607 (2012).

\bibitem{MRT} M. Mihailescu, V. Radulescu, S. Tersian;
 \emph{Eigenvalue problems for anisotropic discrete boundary value problems,} 
J. Differ. Equ. Appl. \textbf{15}(6), 557--567 (2009).

\bibitem{Nar} R. Narashima; 
\emph{Nonlinear vibration of an elastic string,} 
J. Sound Vibration 8 (1968), 134-146.

\bibitem{NO} I. Nyanquini, S. Ouaro; 
\emph{On the solvability of discrete nonlinear Neumann problems of Kirchhoff type}. 
Submitted.

\bibitem{Op} D. W. Oplinger; 
\emph{Frequency response of a nonlinear stretched string,} 
J. Acoustic Soc. Amer. 32 (1960), 1529-1538.

\bibitem{Yu} Z. Yucedag; 
\emph{Existence of solutions for anisotropic discrete boundary value problems 
of Kirchhoff type}, 10.12732/ijdea.v13i1.1364 (2014), 1-15.

\end{thebibliography}



\end{document}
