\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2015 (2015), No. 138, pp. 1--15.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2015 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2015/138\hfil Variational approach to fractional BVP]
{Variational approach to fractional boundary value problems with two
control parameters}

\author[M. Ferrara, A. Hadjian \hfil EJDE-2015/138\hfilneg]
{Massimiliano Ferrara, Armin Hadjian}

\address{Massimiliano Ferrara \newline
Department of Law and Economics,
University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria,
Via dei Bianchi, 2-89127 Reggio Calabria, Italy}
\email{massimiliano.ferrara@unirc.it}

\address{Armin Hadjian \newline
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences,
University of Bojnord, P.O. Box 1339, Bojnord 94531, Iran}
\email{a.hadjian@ub.ac.ir}

\thanks{Submitted February 18, 2015. Published May 20, 2015.}
\subjclass[2010]{58E05, 26A33, 34A08, 34B15, 45J05, 91A80, 91B55}
\keywords{Fractional differential equations; Caputo fractional derivatives;
\hfill\break\indent variational methods; multiple solutions}

\begin{abstract}
 This article concerns the multiplicity of solutions for a fractional
 differential equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions and two
 control parameters. Using variational methods and three critical
 point theorems, we give some new criteria to guarantee that the
 fractional problem has at least three solutions.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\allowdisplaybreaks


\section{Introduction}

Fractional differential equations have been proved to be valuable
tools in the modeling of many phenomena in various fields of physic,
chemistry, biology, engineering and economics. There has been
significant development in fractional differential equations, one
can see the monographs of Miller and Ross \cite{MiRo}, Samko et al
\cite{SaKiMa}, Podlubny \cite{Pod}, Hilfer \cite{Hil}, Kilbas et al
\cite{k1} and the papers
\cite{AHM,Bai1,Bai2,BL,BeHaNt,Ko,LaVa,WaZh,WDC,Zh} and references
therein.

Critical point theory has been very useful in determining the
existence of solutions for integer order differential equations with
some boundary conditions; see for instance, in the vast literature
on the subject, the classical books \cite{MaWi,Rab,Str,Will} and
references therein. But until now, there are a few results for
fractional boundary value problems (briefly BVP) which were
established exploiting this approach, since it is often very
difficult to establish a suitable space and variational functional
for fractional problems.

The aim of this article is to study the nonlinear fractional
boundary value problem
\begin{equation}\label{e1.1}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{d}{dt} \Big({}_0D_t^{\alpha-1}({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u(t))
-{}_t D_T^{\alpha-1}({}_t^cD_T^{\alpha} u(t))\Big)
+\lambda f(t,u(t))+\mu g(t,u(t))=0, \\
\quad\text{ a.e. } t\in [0,T],\\
u(0)=u(T)=0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $\alpha \in (1/2,1]$, ${}_0 D_t^{\alpha-1}$ and
${}_t D_T^{\alpha-1}$ are the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional
integrals of order $1-\alpha$ respectively, $_0^c D_t^{\alpha}$ and
$_t^c D_T^{\alpha}$ are the left and right Caputo fractional
derivatives of order $0<\alpha\leq 1$ respectively, $\lambda$ and
$\mu$ are positive real parameters, and
$f,g:[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ are continuous functions.

In this article, employing two three critical point theorems
which we recall in the next section (Theorems \ref{the2.1} and
\ref{the2.2}), we establish the exact collections of the parameters
$\lambda$ and $\mu$, for which the problem \eqref{e1.1} admits at
least three weak solutions; see Theorems \ref{the3.1} and
\ref{the3.2}.

For more information, we refer the reader to
\cite{Bai3,GaMo,Nya} where the existence and multiplicity of
solutions for problem \eqref{e1.1}, with $\mu=0$, using the critical
point theory is proved; see also \cite{AHR, DagHeiMolica} where
analogous variational approaches have been developed on studying
nonlinear perturbed differential equations.
A special case of Theorem \ref{the3.1} is the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{t1.1}
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function. Put
$ F(\xi):=\int_0^\xi f(x)dx$ for each $\xi\in
\mathbb{R}$. Assume that $F(d)>0$ for some $d>0$ and $F(\xi)\geq 0$
in $[0,d)$ and
$$
\liminf_{\xi\to 0}\frac{F(\xi)}{\xi^2}
=\limsup_{|\xi|\to+\infty}\frac{F(\xi)}{\xi^2}=0.
$$
Then, there is $\lambda^\star>0$ such that for each
$\lambda>\lambda^\star$ and for every continuous function
$g:[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying the asymptotic
condition
$$
\limsup_{|\xi|\to+\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}
\int_{0}^{\xi}g(t,s)ds}{\xi^2}<+\infty,
$$
there exists $\delta^\star_{\lambda,g}>0$ such that, for each
$\mu\in[0,\delta^\star_{\lambda,g}[$, the problem
\begin{gather*}
\frac{d}{dt} \Big({}_0
D_t^{\alpha-1}({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u(t)) -{}_t D_T^{\alpha-1}({}_t^c
D_T^{\alpha} u(t))\Big)
+\lambda f(u(t))+\mu g(t,u(t))=0, \\
\text{ a.e. } t\in [0,T],\\
u(0)=u(T)=0,
\end{gather*}
admits at least three solutions.
\end{theorem}

The following result is a consequence of Theorem
\ref{the3.2}.

\begin{theorem}\label{t1.2}
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a nonnegative continuous function
such that
$\lim_{t\to 0} f(t)/t=0$ and
$$
\int_{0}^{10}f(s)ds<\frac{25}{12}\int_{0}^{1}f(s)ds.
$$
Then, for every
$$
\lambda\in\Big]\frac{24}{\int_{0}^{1}f(s)ds},\frac{50}{\int_{0}^{10}f(s)ds}\Big[
$$
and for every nonnegative continuous function
$g:[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$, there exists
$\delta^\star>0$ such that, for each $\mu\in[0,\delta^\star[$, the
problem
\begin{gather*}
 2u''(t)+\lambda f(u(t))+\mu g(t,u(t))=0, \quad\text{a.e. } t\in [0,1],\\
u(0)=u(1)=0,
\end{gather*}
admits at least three solutions.
\end{theorem}

\section{Preliminaries}

The original three critical point theorem is due to Pucci and Serrin
\cite{PS1,PS2} and establishes that if $X$ is a real Banach space
and a function $f:X\to\mathbb{R}$ is of class $C^1$,
satisfies the Palais-Smale condition, and has two local minima, then
$f$ has at least three distinct critical points. This result has
been extended in the framework of problems depending on a real
parameter by Ricceri \cite{Ricceri}, who also established a precise
range of the parameter that guarantees the existence of at least
three critical points.

Our main tools are critical point theorems that we recall here in a
convenient form. The first result has been obtained in
\cite{BonaMara} and it is a more precise version of 
\cite[Theorem 3.2]{BonaCand}. The second one has been established in
\cite{BonaCand}.


\begin{theorem}[{\cite[Theorem 3.6]{BonaMara}}]\label{the2.1}
Let $X$ be a reflexive real Banach space; $\Phi:X\to
\mathbb{R}$ be a coercive, continuously G\^{a}teaux differentiable
and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous functional whose
G\^{a}teaux derivative admits a continuous inverse on $X^\ast;$
$\Psi:X\to \mathbb{R}$ be a continuously G\^{a}teaux
differentiable functional whose G\^{a}teaux derivative is compact
such that
$\Phi(0)=\Psi(0)=0$.
Assume that there exist $r>0$ and $\overline{x}\in X$, with
$r<\Phi(\overline{x})$, such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A1)] $\frac{\sup_{\Phi(x)\leq r}\Psi(x)}{r}<\frac{\Psi(\overline{x})}{\Phi(\overline{x})};$
\item[(A2)] for each $\lambda\in
\Lambda_r:=]\frac{\Phi(\overline{x})}{\Psi(\overline{x})},\frac{r}{\sup_{\Phi(x)\leq
r}\Psi(x)}[$ the functional $I_\lambda:=\Phi-\lambda\Psi$ is
coercive.
\end{itemize}
Then, for each $\lambda\in\Lambda_r$ the functional $I_\lambda$ has
at least three distinct critical points in $X$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem}[{\cite[Theorem 3.3]{BonaCand}}]\label{the2.2}
Let $X$ be a reflexive real Banach space;
$\Phi:X\to\mathbb{R}$ be a convex, coercive and continuously
G\^ateaux differentiable functional whose derivative admits a
continuous inverse on $X^\ast$; $\Psi:X\to\mathbb{R}$ be a
continuously G\^ateaux differentiable functional whose derivative is
compact, such that
$$
\inf_{X}\Phi=\Phi(0)=\Psi(0)=0.
$$
Assume that there are two positive constants $r_1,r_2$ and
$\overline{x}\in X$, with $2r_1<\Phi(\overline{x})< r_2/2$,
such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A3)] $\frac{\sup_{\Phi(x)<r_1}\Psi(x)}{r_1}<
\frac{2}{3}\frac{\Psi(\overline{x})}{\Phi(\overline{x})}$;
\item[(A4)] $\frac{\sup_{\Phi(x)<r_2}\Psi(x)}{r_2}<
\frac{1}{3}\frac{\Psi(\overline{x})}{\Phi(\overline{x})}$;
\item[(A5)] for each $\lambda$ in
$$
\Lambda'
:=\Big]\frac{3}{2}\frac{\Phi(\overline{x})}{\Psi(\overline{x})},\
\min\Big\{ \frac{r_1}{\sup_{\Phi(x)<r_1}\Psi(x)},\
\frac{\frac{r_2}{2}}{\sup_{\Phi(x)<r_2}\Psi(x)}\Big\}\Big[
$$
and for every $x_1,x_2\in X$, which are local minima for the
functional $I_\lambda:=\Phi-\lambda\Psi$, and such that
$\Psi(x_1)\geq 0$ and $\Psi(x_2)\geq 0$ one has
$\inf_{s\in[0,1]}\Psi(sx_1+(1-s)x_2)\geq 0$.
\end{itemize}
Then, for each $\lambda\in\Lambda'$ the functional $I_\lambda$ has
at least three distinct critical points which lie in
$\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_2[)$.
\end{theorem}

Now, we introduce some necessary definitions and properties of the
fractional calculus which are used in this article.

\begin{definition}\label{def2.1}\rm
Let $u$ be a function defined on $[a,b]$. The left and right
Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals  of order $\alpha>0$ for a
function $u$  are defined by
\begin{gather*}
{}_a D_t^{-\alpha}u(t):=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}
\int_a^t (t-s)^{\alpha-1}u(s) ds,\\
{}_t D_b^{-\alpha}u(t) := \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_t^b
(s-t)^{\alpha-1} u(s) ds,
\end{gather*}
for every $t \in [a,b]$, provided the right-hand sides are pointwise
defined on $[a,b]$, where $\Gamma(\alpha)$ is the standard gamma
function given by
$$
\Gamma(\alpha):=\int_0^{+\infty}z^{\alpha-1}e^{-z}dz.
$$
\end{definition}

Set $AC^n([a,b],{\mathbb{R}})$ as the space of functions
$u:[a,b]\to {\mathbb{R}}$ such that $u$ belongs to $C^{n-1}([a,b],
{\mathbb{R}})$ and $u^{(n-1)}$ belongs to $AC([a,b],{\mathbb{R}})$. Here, as
usual, $C^{n-1}([a,b],{\mathbb{R}})$ denotes the set of mappings
having $(n-1)$ times continuously differentiable on $[a,b]$. In
particular we denote
$AC([a,b],{\mathbb{R}}):=AC^1([a,b],{\mathbb{R}})$.

\begin{definition}\label{def2.2}\rm
Let $\gamma \ge 0$ and $n \in \mathbb{N}$.

(i) If $\gamma \in (n-1, n)$ and $u\in AC^n([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$,
then the left and right Caputo fractional derivatives of order
$\gamma$ for function $u$ denoted by $_a^c D_t^{\gamma}u(t)$ and
$_t^c D_b^{\gamma}u(t)$, respectively, exist almost everywhere on
$[a, b]$, $_a^c D_t^{\gamma}u(t)$ and $_t^c D_b^{\gamma}u(t)$ are
represented by
\begin{gather*}
{}_a^c D_t^{\gamma}u(t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(n-\gamma)} \int_a^t
(t-s)^{n-\gamma-1} u^{(n)}(s) ds, \\
{}_t^c D_b^{\gamma}u(t) = \frac{(-1)^n}{\Gamma(n-\gamma)} \int_t^b
(s-t)^{n-\gamma-1} u^{(n)}(s) ds,
\end{gather*}
for every $t \in [a, b]$, respectively.

(ii) If $\gamma = n - 1$ and $u \in AC^{n-1}([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$,
then $_a^c D_t^{n-1}u(t)$ and $_t^c D_b^{n-1}u(t)$ are represented
by
\[
{}_a^c D_t^{n-1}u(t) = u^{(n-1)}(t), \quad\text{and}\quad _t^c
D_b^{n-1}u(t) = (-1)^{(n-1)} u^{(n-1)}(t),
\]
for every $t\in [a,b]$.
\end{definition}

With these definitions, we have the rule for fractional integration
by parts, and the composition of the Riemann-Liouville  fractional
integration operator with the Caputo fractional differentiation
operator, which were proved in \cite{k1} and \cite{SaKiMa}.

\begin{proposition}\label{prop2.1}
We have the following property of fractional integration
\begin{equation}
\int_a^b [_a D_t^{-\gamma}u(t)] v(t) dt = \int_a^b [_t
D_b^{-\gamma}v(t)] u(t) dt, \quad  \gamma > 0,\label{e2.1}
\end{equation}
provided that $u \in L^p([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$,
$v \in L^q([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$ and $p \ge 1$, $q \ge 1$,
$1/p + 1/q \le 1 + \gamma$
or $p \neq  1$, $q \neq  1$, $1/p + 1/q = 1 + \gamma$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proposition}\label{prop2.2}
Let $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $n-1 < \gamma \le n$.
If $u \in AC^n([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$ or $u \in C^n([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$, then
\begin{gather*}
{}_a D_t^{-\gamma}({}_a^c D_t^{\gamma} u(t)) = u(t) - \sum
_{j=0}^{n-1} \frac{u^{(j)}(a)}{j!}(t-a)^j,
\\
{}_t D_b^{-\gamma}({}_t^c D_b^{\gamma} u(t)) = u(t) - \sum
_{j=0}^{n-1} \frac{(-1)^ju^{(j)}(b)}{j!}(b-t)^j,
\end{gather*}
for every $t \in [a, b]$. In particular, if $0<\gamma\le 1$ and $u
\in AC([a, b], {\mathbb{R}})$ or $u \in C^1([a,b],{\mathbb{R}})$,
then
\begin{equation}\label{e2.2}
{}_a D_t^{-\gamma}({}_a^c D_t^{\gamma} f(t))=f(t)-f(a),\quad
\text{and}\quad _t D_b^{-\gamma}({}_t^c D_b^{\gamma}
f(t))=f(t)-f(b).
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{remark}\label{rmk2.1}\rm
 By  \eqref{e2.1} and Definition \ref{def2.2}, it is obvious
that $u \in AC([0, T],\mathbb{R})$ is a solution of problem
\eqref{e1.1} if and only if $u$ is a solution of the boundary value
problem
\begin{equation}\label{e2.3}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{d}{dt} \left({}_0
D_t^{-\beta}(u'(t)) + {}_t D_T^{-\beta}(u'(t))\right)
+\lambda f(t,u(t)) = 0 \quad \text{ a.e. } t\in [0,T]\\
u(0) = u(T) = 0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $\beta := 2(1-\alpha) \in [0, 1)$.
Recall that a function $u\in AC([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ is called a
solution of BVP \eqref{e2.3} if:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] the map
$t\mapsto {}_0 D_t^{-\beta}(u'(t)) + {}_t D_T^{-\beta}(u'(t))$
is differentiable for almost every $t\in [0,T]$, and
\item[(ii)] the function $u$ satisfies \eqref{e2.3}.
\end{itemize}
\end{remark}

To establish a variational structure for the main problem, it is
necessary to construct appropriate function spaces.
Following \cite{JZ}, we denote by $C_0^{\infty}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ the
set of all functions $g\in C^{\infty}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ with
$g(0)=g(T)=0$.


\begin{definition}\label{def2.3}\rm
Let $0 < \alpha \le 1$. The fractional derivative space
$E_0^{\alpha}$  is defined by the closure of $C_0^{\infty}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$
with respect to the norm
\[
\|u\|:=\Big(\int_0^T |_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u(t)|^2 dt+\int_0^T
|u(t)|^2dt\Big)^{1/2},
\]
for every $u \in E^{\alpha}_0$.
\end{definition}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk2.2} \rm
It is obvious that the fractional derivative space $E_0^{\alpha}$ is
the space of functions $u \in L^2([0,T],\mathbb{R})$  having an
$\alpha$-order Caputo fractional derivative $_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u \in
L^2([0, T],\mathbb{R})$ and $u(0)=u(T)=0$.
\end{remark}

\begin{proposition}\label{prop2.3}
Let $\alpha \in (0, 1]$. The fractional derivative space
$E_0^{\alpha}$ is reflexive and separable Banach space.
\end{proposition}

For  $u\in E^\alpha_0$, set
\begin{gather*}
\|u\|_{L^s}:=\Big(\int_0^T  |u(t)|^s dt \Big)^{1/s},\quad(s\geq 1),\\
\|u\|_\infty:=\max_{t\in [0,T]}|u(t)|.
\end{gather*}
One has the following two Lemmas.

\begin{lemma}\label{lem2.1}
 Let $\alpha \in (1/2, 1]$. For all $u\in E_0^{\alpha}$, we have
\begin{gather}
\|u\|_{L^2}  \le \frac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)} \|\empty_0^c
D_t^{\alpha}u\|_{L^2}, \label{e2.4}  \\
\|u\|_{\infty} \le \frac{T^{\alpha -
1/2}}{\Gamma(\alpha)\sqrt{2\alpha-1}} \|_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u\|_{L^2}.
\label{e2.5}
\end{gather}
\end{lemma}

Hence, we can consider $E_0^{\alpha}$ with respect to the
(equivalent) norm
\begin{equation}
\|u\|_{\alpha}:=\Big(\int_0^T |_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u(t)|^2
dt\Big)^{1/2}=\|_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u\|_{L^2},\quad \forall u \in
E_0^{\alpha} \label{e2.6}
\end{equation}
in the following analysis.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{JZ}] \label{ineq}
Let $\alpha \in (1/2, 1]$, then for every $u \in E_0^{\alpha}$, we
have
\begin{equation}
|\cos (\pi \alpha)| \|u\|_{\alpha}^2 \le  - \int_0^T {}_0^c
D_t^{\alpha} u(t) \cdot {}_t^c D_T^{\alpha} u(t) dt \le
\frac{1}{|\cos (\pi \alpha)|} \|u\|_{\alpha}^2. \label{e2.7}
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}


In the rest of this article,
$f,g:[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ are continuous
functions, and $\lambda,\mu>0$ are real parameters. Put
$$
F(t,\xi):=\int_0^\xi f(t,s)\,ds, \quad
G(t,\xi):=\int_0^\xi g(t,s)\,ds,
$$
for all $(t,\xi)\in[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}$.
Set $ G^c:=\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq c}G(t,\xi)\,dt$ for all $c>0$
and $G_d:=\inf_{[0,T]\times[0,d]}G$
for all $d>0$. Clearly, $G^c\geq 0$ and $G_d\leq 0$.


We consider the functional
$I_\lambda:E_0^\alpha\to\mathbb{R}$, defined by
\begin{equation}\label{e2.8}
I_\lambda(u):=\Phi(u)-\lambda\Psi(u),\quad u\in E_0^\alpha,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{gather}\label{e2.9}
\Phi(u):= -\int_0^T {}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}u(t)\cdot{}_t^c
D_T^{\alpha} u(t)\,dt, \\
\label{e2.10}
\Psi(u):=\int_0^T[F(t,u(t))+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}G(t,u(t))]dt.
\end{gather}
Clearly, $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ are G\^{a}teaux differentiable
functionals whose  derivatives at the point $u \in
E_0^{\alpha}$ are
\begin{align*}
\Phi'(u)(v)&=-\int_0^T({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}u(t)\cdot{}_t^c
D_T^{\alpha}v(t)+{}_t^c D_T^{\alpha}u(t)\cdot{}_0^c
D_t^{\alpha}v(t))\,dt,\\
\Psi'(u)(v)&=\int_0^T
\big[f(t,u(t))+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}g(t,u(t))\big]v(t)\,dt\\
&=-\int_0^T \int_0^t
\big[f(s,u(s))+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}g(s,u(s))\big]\,ds\cdot
v'(t)\,dt,
\end{align*}
for every $v \in E_0^{\alpha}$. By Definition \ref{def2.2} and
\eqref{e2.2}, we have
\[
\Phi'(u)(v)=\int_0^T({}_0 D_t^{\alpha-1}({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}
u(t))-{}_t D_T^{\alpha-1}({}_t^c D_T^{\alpha}u(t)))\cdot v'(t)\,dt.
\]
Hence, $I_{\lambda}=\Phi-\lambda\Psi\in
C^1(E_0^{\alpha},\mathbb{R})$. Moreover, a critical point of the
functional $I_\lambda$ is a solution of \eqref{e1.1}. Indeed, if
$u_\star\in E_0^{\alpha}$ is a critical point of $I_{\lambda}$, then
\begin{equation}\label{e2.11}
\begin{aligned}
0=I_{\lambda}'(u_\star)(v)
&=\int_0^T \Big({}_0 D_t^{\alpha-1}({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}u_\star(t))
-{}_t D_T^{\alpha-1}({}_t^c D_T^{\alpha}u_\star(t))\\
&\quad+\lambda\int_0^t f(s,u_\star(s))\,ds+\mu\int_0^t
g(s,u_\star(s))\,ds\Big)\cdot v'(t)\,dt,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for every $v\in E_0^{\alpha}$. We can choose $v\in E_0^{\alpha}$
such that
\[
v(t)=\sin\frac{2k\pi t}{T} \quad \text{or} \quad
v(t)=1-\cos \frac{2k\pi t}{T}, \quad (k=1, 2, \dots).
\]
The theory of Fourier series and \eqref{e2.11} imply
\begin{equation}\label{e2.12}
\begin{aligned}
&{}_0 D_t^{\alpha-1}({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha} u_\star(t))-{}_t
D_T^{\alpha-1}({}_t^c D_T^{\alpha} u_\star(t))\\
&+\lambda\int_0^t
f(s,u_\star(s))\,ds+\mu\int_0^t g(s,u_\star(s))\,ds=\kappa
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
a.e. on $[0,T]$ for some $\kappa\in\mathbb{R}$. By \eqref{e2.12}, it
is easy to show  that $u_\star\in E_0^{\alpha}$ is a solution of
\eqref{e1.1}.

To conclude this section, we cite a recent monograph by Krist\'aly,
 R\u adulescu and Varga \cite{KrisRadVar} as a general reference on
variational methods adopted here.

\section{Main results}

In this section we establish our main abstract results. We put
\begin{gather*}
\Omega:=\frac{T^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}}{\Gamma(\alpha)\sqrt{2\alpha-1}},\\
\begin{aligned}
C(T,\alpha)
&:= \int_0^{T/4}t^{2-2\alpha}\,dt+\int_{T/4}^{3T/4}\big[t^{1-\alpha}
-\big(t-\frac{T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}\big]^2\,dt\\
&\quad +\int_{3T/4}^T\big[t^{1-\alpha}-\big(t-\frac{T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}
+\big(t-\frac{3T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}\big]^2\,dt,
\end{aligned} \\
\omega_{\alpha,d}:=\frac{16d^2}{T^2\Gamma^2(2-\alpha)
|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}C(T,\alpha).
\end{gather*}
Fixing $c,d>0$ such that
$$
\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}}{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}
F(t,d)\,dt}<\frac{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}
$$
and selecting
\begin{equation}\label{e3.1}
\lambda\in\Lambda:=\Big]\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}}{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}
F(t,d)\,dt},\frac{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}\Big[,
\end{equation}
put
\begin{equation}\label{e3.2}
\delta:=\min\Big\{\frac{
c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|-\lambda\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}{\Omega^2G^c},\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}-\lambda
\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt}{TG_d}\Big\}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{e3.3}
\overline{\delta}:=\min\Big\{\delta,\frac{1}
{\max\big\{0,\frac{2T\Omega^2}{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}
\limsup_{|\xi|\to+\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}G(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}\big\}}\Big\},
\end{equation}
where we read $\frac{r}{0}=+\infty$ whenever this case occurs.
With the above notation we are able to prove the following result.


\begin{theorem}\label{the3.1}
Assume that there exist positive constants $c,d$, with
\begin{equation}\label{e3.4}
c<\Big(\frac{4\Omega d}{T\Gamma(2-\alpha)}\Big)\sqrt{C(T,\alpha)},
\end{equation}
such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A6)] $F(t,\xi)\geq 0$, for each
$(t,\xi)\in([0,\frac{T}{4}]\cup[\frac{3T}{4},T])\times[0,d]$;

\item[(A7)] 
\[
\frac{\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}{c^2}<\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}\frac{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}
F(t,d)\,dt}{\omega_{\alpha,d}};
\]

\item[(A8)] 
\[
\limsup_{|\xi|\to +\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}F(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}
<\frac{\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}{2c^2T}.
\]
\end{itemize}

Then, for every $\lambda\in\Lambda$, where $\Lambda$ is given by
\eqref{e3.1}, and for every continuous function
$g:[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
\limsup_{|\xi|\to +\infty}
\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}G(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}<+\infty,
$$
there exists $\overline{\delta}>0$ given by \eqref{e3.3} such that,
for each $\mu\in [0,\overline{\delta}[$, problem \eqref{e1.1} admits
at least three solutions.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Fix $\lambda$, $g$ and $\mu$ as in the conclusion. It suffices to
show the functional $I_\lambda$ defined in \eqref{e2.8} has at least
three critical points in $E_0^\alpha$. We prove this by verifying
the conditions given in Theorem \ref{the2.1}. Note that $\Phi$
defined in \eqref{e2.9} is a nonnegative G\^{a}teaux differentiable
and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous functional, and its
G\^{a}teaux derivative admits a continuous inverse on
$(E_0^\alpha)^\ast$. Further, from Lemma \ref{ineq}, the functional
$\Phi$ is coercive. Indeed, one has
$$
\Phi(u)\geq |\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|u\|_\alpha^2\to +\infty,
$$
as $\|u\|_\alpha\to +\infty$. Moreover, $\Psi$ defined in
\eqref{e2.10} is a continuously G\^{a}teaux differentiable
functional whose G\^{a}teaux derivative is compact.
 We will verify
(A1) and (A2) of Theorem \ref{the2.1}.

Let $w$ be the function defined by
\begin{equation}\label{e3.4'}
w(t):=\begin{cases}
\frac{4d}{T}t, & t\in [0,T/4),\\
 d, & t\in [T/4,3T/4],\\
\frac{4d}{T}(T-t), & t\in (3T/4,T],
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
and put
$$
r:=\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}c^2.
$$
It is easy to check that $w(0)=w(T)=0$ and $w\in L^2([0,T])$.
Moreover, $w$ is Lipschitz continuous on $[0,T]$, and hence $w$ is
absolutely continuous on $[0,T]$. By calculations, we have
\begin{equation*}
{}_0^cD_t^\alpha w(t)=\begin{cases}
\frac{4d}{T\Gamma(2-\alpha)}t^{1-\alpha}, & t\in [0,T/4),\\
 \frac{4d}{T\Gamma(2-\alpha)}\big[t^{1-\alpha}
-\big(t-\frac{T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}\big], & t\in [T/4,3T/4],\\
\frac{4d}{T\Gamma(2-\alpha)}\big[t^{1-\alpha}
-\big(t-\frac{T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}+\big(t-\frac{3T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}\big],
& t\in (3T/4,T].
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Obviously, ${}_0^cD_t^\alpha w$ is continuous on $[0,T]$ and
\begin{align*}
&\int_0^T|{}_0^cD_t^\alpha w(t)|^2\,dt\\
&= \frac{16d^2}{T^2\Gamma^2(2-\alpha)}
\Big\{\int_0^{T/4}t^{2-2\alpha}\,dt
+\int_{T/4}^{3T/4}\big[t^{1-\alpha}
-\big(t-\frac{T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}\big]^2\,dt\\
&\quad +\int_{3T/4}^T\big[t^{1-\alpha}-\big(t-\frac{T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}
+\big(t-\frac{3T}{4}\big)^{1-\alpha}\big]^2\,dt\Big\}\\
&:= \frac{16d^2}{T^2\Gamma^2(2-\alpha)}C(T,\alpha).
\end{align*}
Therefore, from inequality \eqref{e3.4} one has
$$
\Phi(w)\geq|\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|w\|^2_\alpha
=\frac{16d^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{T^2\Gamma^2(2-\alpha)}C(T,\alpha)>r.
$$
Also, by using condition (A6), since $0\leq w(t)\leq d$ for each
$t\in[0,T]$, we infer
\begin{align*}
\Psi(w)
&= \int_0^T[F(t,w(t))+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}G(t,w(t))]dt\\
&\geq \int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}\int_0^TG(t,w(t))\,dt\\
&\geq \int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}TG_d.
\end{align*}
For all $u\in E_0^\alpha$ with $\Phi(u)\leq r$, by Lemma \ref{ineq},
we have
$$
|\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|u\|_\alpha^2\leq\Phi(u)\leq r,
$$
which implies
$$
\|u\|_\alpha^2\leq\frac{1}{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}r.
$$
On the other hand, by Lemma \ref{lem2.1}, when $\alpha>1/2$, for
each $u\in E_0^{\alpha}$ we have
\begin{equation}\label{e3.5}
\|u\|_{\infty}\le \Omega\Big(\int_0^T |_0^c D_t^{\alpha}
u(t)|^2\,dt \Big)^{1/2}=\Omega\|u\|_{\alpha}.
\end{equation}
Thus, we obtain
$$
|u(t)|\leq\Omega\sqrt{\frac{r}{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}}=c,\quad\forall
t\in[0,T].
$$
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
\frac{\sup_{\Phi(u)\leq r}\Psi(u)}{r}
&\leq \frac{\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}G(t,\xi)\,dt}
{\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}c^2}\\
&= \frac{\Omega^2}{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}\Big(\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}G^c\Big).
\end{align*}
From this, if $G^c=0$, it is clear that 
\begin{equation}\label{e3.6}
\frac{\sup_{\Phi(u)\leq r}\Psi(u)}{r}<\frac{1}{\lambda},
\end{equation}
while, if $G^c>0$, it turns out to be true bearing in mind that
$$
\mu<\frac{
c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|-\lambda\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}{\Omega^2G^c}.
$$
On the other hand, taking into account that
$$
\Phi(w)\leq\frac{1}{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}\|w\|_\alpha^2=\omega_{\alpha,d},
$$
we have
\[
\frac{\Psi(w)}{\Phi(w)}
\geq\frac{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt +\frac{\mu}{\lambda}G_d}{\omega_{\alpha,d}}.
\]
Hence, if $G_d= 0$, we find
\begin{equation}\label{e3.7}
\frac{\Psi(w)}{\Phi(w)}>\frac{1}{\lambda},
\end{equation}
while, if $G_d<0$, the same relation holds since
$$
\mu<\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}-\lambda\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}
F(t,d)\,dt}{TG_d}.
$$
Therefore, from \eqref{e3.6} and \eqref{e3.7}, condition (A1)
of Theorem \ref{the2.1} is verified.

Now,  to prove the coercivity of the functional $I_\lambda$,
first we assume that
$$
\limsup_{|\xi|\to +\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}F(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}>0.
$$
Therefore, fixing
$$
\limsup_{|\xi|\to
+\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}F(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}<\varepsilon
<\frac{\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}{2c^2T},
$$
from (A8) there is a function $h_\varepsilon\in L^1([0,T])$
such that
$F(t,\xi)\leq\varepsilon\xi^2+h_\varepsilon(t)$,
for each $t\in[0,T]$ and $\xi\in\mathbb{R}$. Taking \eqref{e3.5}
into account and since 
\[
\lambda<\frac{ c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt},
\]
 it follows that
\begin{equation} \label{e3.8}
\begin{aligned}
\lambda\int_0^T F(t,u(t))\,dt
&\leq \lambda\Big(\varepsilon\int_0^T(u(t))^2dt+\int_0^T h_\varepsilon(t)\,dt\Big)
\\
&<\frac{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}\Big(\varepsilon\Omega^2T\|u\|_\alpha^2
+\|h_\varepsilon\|_{L^1([0,T])}\Big),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for each $u\in E_0^\alpha$. Since $\mu<\overline{\delta}$,
we obtain
$$
\limsup_{|\xi|\to+\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}G(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}
<\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2T\mu \Omega^2};
$$
then, there is a function $h_\mu\in L^1([0,T])$ such that
$$
G(t,\xi)\leq\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2T\mu\Omega^2}\xi^2+h_\mu(t),
$$
for each $t\in[0,T]$ and $\xi\in\mathbb{R}$. Thus, taking again
\eqref{e3.5} into account, it follows that
\begin{equation} \label{e3.9}
\begin{aligned}
\int_0^TG(t,u(t))\,dt
&\leq \frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2T\mu\Omega^2}\int_0^T(u(t))^2dt
+\int_0^Th_\mu(t)\,dt\\
&\leq \frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2\mu}\|u\|_\alpha^2+\|h_\mu\|_{L^1([0,T])},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for each $u\in E_0^\alpha$. Finally, putting together \eqref{e3.8}
and \eqref{e3.9}, we have
\begin{align*}
I_\lambda(u)
&= \Phi(u)-\lambda\Psi(u)\\
&\geq |\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|u\|_\alpha^2-\frac{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}
{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}\Big(\varepsilon\Omega^2T\|u\|_\alpha^2
 +\|h_\varepsilon\|_{L^1([0,T])}\Big)\\
&\quad -\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2}\|u\|_\alpha^2-\mu\|h_\mu\|_{L^1([0,T])}\\
&= |\cos(\pi\alpha)|\Big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{c^2T}{\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq
c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}\varepsilon\Big)\|u\|_\alpha^2\\
&\quad -\frac{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|h_\varepsilon\|_{L^1([0,T])}}
{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}-\mu
\|h_\mu\|_{L^1([0,T])}.
\end{align*}
On the other hand, if
$$
\limsup_{|\xi|\to
+\infty}\frac{\sup_{t\in[0,T]}F(t,\xi)}{\xi^2}\leq 0,
$$
then there exists a function $h_\varepsilon\in L^1([0,T])$ such that
$F(t,\xi)\leq h_\varepsilon(t)$ for each $t\in[0,T]$ and
$\xi\in\mathbb{R}$. Arguing as before we obtain
$$
I_\lambda(u)\geq\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2}\|u\|_\alpha^2
-\frac{c^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|h_\varepsilon\|_{L^1([0,T])}}
{\Omega^2\int_0^T\max_{|\xi|\leq c}F(t,\xi)\,dt}-\mu
\|h_\mu\|_{L^1([0,T])}\,.
$$
Both cases lead to the coercivity of $I_\lambda$ and condition
(A2) of Theorem \ref{the2.1} is verified.

Since, from \eqref{e3.6} and \eqref{e3.7},
$$
\lambda\in\Lambda\subseteq\Big]\frac{\Phi(w)}{\Psi(w)},
\frac{r}{\sup_{\Phi(u)\leq r}\Psi(u)}\Big[,
$$
Theorem \ref{the2.1} ensures the existence of at least three
critical points for the functional $I_\lambda$ and the proof is
complete.
\end{proof}


Now, we state a variant of Theorem \ref{the3.1} in which no
asymptotic condition on $g$ is requested. In such a case, the
functions $f$ and $g$ are supposed to be nonnegative.

Fixing positive constants $c_1,c_2$ and $d$ such that
$$
\frac{3}{2}\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}}{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt}<
\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}
\min\Big\{\frac{c_1^2}{\int_0^T
F(t,c_1)\,dt}, \frac{c_2^2}{ 2\int_0^T
F(t,c_2)\,dt}\Big\},
$$
and selecting
\begin{equation}\label{e3.10}
\lambda\in\Lambda'
:=\Big]\frac{3}{2}\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}}{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt},
\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}\min\Big\{\frac{c_1^2}{\int_0^T
F(t,c_1)\,dt}, \frac{c_2^2}{ 2\int_0^T
F(t,c_2)\,dt}\Big\}\Big[,
\end{equation}
we put
\begin{equation}\label{e3.11}
\delta^\star:=\min\Big\{\frac{c_1^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|-\lambda\Omega^2
\int_0^T F(t,c_1)\,dt}{\Omega^2G^{c_1}},
\frac{c_2^2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|-2\lambda\Omega^2 \int_0^T
F(t,c_2)\,dt}{2\Omega^2G^{c_2}}\Big\}.
\end{equation}
With the above notation we have the following multiplicity result.

\begin{theorem}\label{the3.2}
Assume that there exist three positive constants $c_1,c_2$ and $d$
with
\begin{equation}\label{e3.12}
c_1<\frac{2d\Omega}{T\Gamma(2-\alpha)}\sqrt{2C(T,\alpha)}
<\frac{c_2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{2},
\end{equation}
such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A9)] $f(t,\xi)\geq 0$ for all $(t,\xi)\in[0,T]\times[0,c_2]$;

\item[(A10)] 
$$
\max\Big\{\frac{\int_0^T
F(t,c_1)\,dt}{ c_1^2},\frac{2\int_0^T
F(t,c_2)\,dt}{ c_2^2}\Big\}
<\frac{2}{3}\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}
F(t,d)\,dt}{\omega_{\alpha,d}\Omega^2}.
$$
\end{itemize}
Then, for each $\lambda\in\Lambda'$, where $\Lambda'$ is given by
\eqref{e3.10}, and for every nonnegative continuous function
$g:[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$, there exists
$\delta^\star>0$ given by \eqref{e3.11} such that, for each
$\mu\in[0,\delta^\star[$, problem \eqref{e1.1} admits at least three
distinct solutions $u_i$, $i=1,2,3$, such that
$$
0\leq u_i(t)<c_2,\quad \forall t\in[0,T],\; i=1,2,3.
$$
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Without loss of generality, we can assume $f(t,\xi)\geq 0$ for all
$(t,\xi)\in[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}$. Fix $\lambda$, $g$ and $\mu$ as
in the conclusion and take $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ as in the proof of
Theorem \ref{the3.1}. We observe that the regularity assumptions of
Theorem \ref{the2.2} on $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ are satisfied. Then, our
aim is to verify (A3) and (A4).

To this end, put $w$ as given in \eqref{e3.4'}, and
$$
r_1:=\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}c_1^2,\quad
r_2:=\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}c_2^2.
$$
By using the condition \eqref{e3.12}, we get $
2r_1<\Phi(w)<\frac{r_2}{2}$. Since $\mu<\delta^\star$ and $G_d=0$,
one has
\begin{align*}
\frac{\sup_{\Phi(u)<r_1}\Psi(u)}{r_1}
&= \frac{\sup_{\Phi(u)<r_1}\big[\int_0^T
F(t,u(t))\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}\int_0^T
G(t,u(t))\,dt\big]}{r_1}\\
&\leq \frac{\int_0^T F(t,c_{1})\,dt
+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}G^{c_1}}{\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}c_1^2}\\
&< \frac{1}{\lambda}
 <\frac{2}{3}\frac{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}
TG_d}{\omega_{\alpha,d}}\\
&\leq \frac{2}{3}\frac{\Psi(w)}{\Phi(w)},
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
\frac{2\sup_{\Phi(u)<r_2}\Psi(u)}{r_2}
&= \frac{2\sup_{\Phi(u)<r_2}\big[\int_0^T
F(t,u(t))\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}\int_0^T
G(t,u(t))\,dt\big]}{r_2}\\
&\leq \frac{2\int_0^T
F(t,c_2)\,dt+2\frac{\mu}{\lambda}G^{c_2}}{\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}c_2^2}\\
&< \frac{1}{\lambda}
<\frac{2}{3}\frac{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}F(t,d)\,dt+\frac{\mu}{\lambda}
TG_d}{\omega_{\alpha,d}}\\
&\leq \frac{2}{3}\frac{\Psi(w)}{\Phi(w)},
\end{align*}
Therefore, (A3) and (A4) of Theorem \ref{the2.2} are
satisfied.

Finally, we verify that $I_\lambda$ satisfies the assumption
(A5) of Theorem \ref{the2.2}. Let $u_1$ and $u_2$ be two local
minima for $I_\lambda$. Then $u_1$ and $u_2$ are critical points for
$I_\lambda$, and so, they are solutions for problem \eqref{e1.1}. We
claim that the solutions obtained are nonnegative. Indeed, if
$\bar{u}$ is a solution of problem \eqref{e1.1}, then one has
\begin{align*}
&-\int_0^T({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)\cdot{}_t^c
D_T^{\alpha}v(t)+{}_t^c D_T^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)\cdot{}_0^c
D_t^{\alpha}v(t))\,dt\\
&=\lambda\int_0^T f(t,\bar{u}(t))v(t)\,dt+\mu\int_0^T g(t,\bar{u}(t))v(t)\,dt
\end{align*}
for all $v\in E_0^\alpha$. Arguing by a contradiction, assume that
the set $A:=\{t\in[0,T] : \bar{u}(t)<0\}$ is non-empty and of
positive measure. Put $\bar{v}:=\min\{\bar{u},0\}$. Clearly,
$\bar{v}\in E_0^\alpha$. So, taking into account that $\bar{u}$ is a
solution and by choosing $v=\bar{v}$, from our sign assumptions on
the data, one has
\begin{align*}
&-\int_A({}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)\cdot{}_t^c
D_T^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)+{}_t^c D_T^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)\cdot{}_0^c
D_t^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t))\,dt\\
&=\lambda\int_A f(t,\bar{u}(t))\bar{u}(t)\,dt+\mu\int_A
g(t,\bar{u}(t))\bar{u}(t)\,dt\leq 0.
\end{align*}
On the other hand, by Lemma \ref{ineq}, we have
$$
2|\cos(\pi\alpha)|\|\bar{u}\|^2_{E_0^\alpha(A)}\leq-\int_A({}_0^c
D_t^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)\cdot{}_t^c D_T^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)+{}_t^c
D_T^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t)\cdot{}_0^c D_t^{\alpha}\bar{u}(t))\,dt
$$
Hence, $\bar{u}\equiv0$ on $A$ which is absurd. Then, we deduce
$u_{1}(t)\geq 0$ and $u_{2}(t)\geq 0$ for every $t\in[0,T]$. Thus,
it follows that $su_{1}+(1-s)u_{2}\geq 0$ for all $s\in [0,1]$, and
that
$$
(\lambda f+\mu g)(t,su_1+(1-s)u_2)\geq 0,
$$
and consequently, $\Psi(su_1+(1-s)u_2)\geq 0$, for every
$s\in[0,1]$. So, also (A5) holds.

From Theorem \ref{the2.2}, for every
$$
\lambda\in\Big]\frac{3}{2}\frac{\Phi(w)}{\Psi(w)},\ \min\Big\{
\frac{r_1}{\sup_{\Phi(u)<r_1}\Psi(u)},\
\frac{\frac{r_2}{2}}{\sup_{\Phi(u)<r_2}\Psi(u)}\Big\}\Big[,
$$
the functional $I_\lambda$ has at least three distinct critical
points which are the solutions of problem \eqref{e1.1} and the
conclusion is achieved.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{t1.1}]
Fix
$\lambda>\lambda^\star:=\frac{2\omega_{\alpha,d}}{TF(d)}$
for some $d>0$ such that $F(d)>0$. Recalling that
$$
\liminf_{\xi\to 0}\frac{F(\xi)}{\xi^2}=0,
$$
there is a sequence $\{c_n\}\subset]0,+\infty[$ such that
$\lim_{n\to +\infty}c_{n}=0$ and
$$
\lim _{n\to +\infty}\frac{\max_{|\xi| \leq
c_{n}}F(\xi)}{c_n^2}=0.
$$
Indeed, one has
$$
 \lim_{n\to +\infty}\frac{\max_{|\xi| \leq
c_n}F(\xi)}{c_n^2}=\lim_{n\to
+\infty}\frac{F(\xi_{c_n})}{\xi_{c_n}^2}
\frac{\xi_{c_n}^2}{c_n^2}=0,
$$
where $ F(\xi_{c_n})=\max_{|\xi| \leq c_{n}}F(\xi).$
Therefore, there exists $\overline{c}>0$ such that
$$
\frac{\max_{|\xi|
\leq\overline{c}}F(\xi)}{\overline{c}^2}<\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}
\min\Big\{\frac{F(d)}{2\omega_{\alpha,d}},\frac{1}{T\lambda}\Big\}
$$
and $\overline{c}<\frac{4\Omega
d}{T\Gamma(2-\alpha)}\sqrt{C(T,\alpha)}$. Hence, the conclusion
follows from Theorem \ref{the3.1}
\end{proof}


\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{t1.2}]
Our aim is to apply Theorem \ref{the3.2} by choosing $c_2=10$ and
$d=1$. Therefore, taking into account that $\alpha=T=1$, one has
\begin{gather*}
\frac{3}{2}\frac{\omega_{\alpha,d}}{\int_{T/4}^{{3T}/4}
F(t,d)dt}=\frac{24}{\int_{0}^{1}f(s)ds}, 
\\
\frac{|\cos(\pi\alpha)|}{\Omega^2}\frac{c_2^2}{2\int_0^T
F(t,c_{2})dt}=\frac{50}{\int_{0}^{10}f(s)ds}.
\end{gather*}
Since $\lim_{t\to 0} f(t)/t=0$, one has
$$
\lim_{t\to
0}\frac{\int_{0}^{t}f(s)ds}{t^{2}}=0.
$$
Then, there exists a positive constant $c_1<2$ such that
\begin{gather*}
\frac{\int_{0}^{c_1}f(s)ds}{c_1^{2}}<\frac{1}{24}\int_{0}^{1}f(s)ds, \\
\frac{c_1^{2}}{\int_{0}^{c_1}f(s)ds}>\frac{50}{\int_{0}^{10}f(s)ds}.
\end{gather*}
Hence, a simple computation shows that all assumptions of Theorem
\ref{the3.2} are satisfied, and the conclusion follows.
\end{proof}

\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{AHM} G. A. Afrouzi, A. Hadjian, G. Molica Bisci;
{Some results for one dimensional fractional problems}, submitted.

\bibitem{AHR} G. A. Afrouzi, A. Hadjian, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
{Variational approach to fourth-order impulsive differential
equations with two control parameters},
\emph{Results Math.}, \textbf{65} (2014), 371-384.

\bibitem{Bai1} C. Bai;
{Impulsive periodic boundary value problems for fractional
differential equation involving Riemann-Liouville sequential
fractional derivative},
\emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.}, \textbf{384} (2011), 211-231.

\bibitem{Bai2} C. Bai;
{Solvability of multi-point boundary value problem of nonlinear
impulsive fractional differential equation at resonance},
\emph{Electron. J. Qual. Theory  Differ. Equ.}, \textbf{89} (2011), 1-19.

\bibitem{Bai3} C. Bai;
{Existence of solutions for a  nonlinear fractional boundary value
problem via a local minimum theorem},
\emph{Electron. J. Differential Equations}, \textbf{176} (2012), 1-9.

\bibitem{BL} Z. Bai and H. Lu;
{Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear
fractional differential equation},
\emph{J. Math. Anal. Appl.}, \textbf{311} (2005), 495-505.

\bibitem{BeHaNt} M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, S. K. Ntouyas;
{Boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional
order and nonlocal conditions},
\emph{Nonlinear Anal.}, \textbf{71} (2009), 2391-2396.

\bibitem{BonaCand} G. Bonanno, P. Candito;
{Non-differentiable functionals and applications to elliptic
problems with discontinuous nonlinearities},
\emph{J. Differential Equations}, \textbf{244} (2008), 3031-3059.

\bibitem{BonaMara} G. Bonanno, S. A. Marano;
On the structure of the critical set of non-differentiable
functions with a weak compactness condition,
\emph{Appl. Anal.}, \textbf{89} (2010), 1-10.

\bibitem{DagHeiMolica} G. D'Agu\`{\i}, S. Heidarkhani, G. Molica Bisci;
{Multiple solutions for a perturbed mixed boundary value problem
involving the one-dimensional $p$-Laplacian},
\emph{Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.}, (2013), No. 24, 14 pp.

\bibitem{GaMo} M. Galewski, G. Molica Bisci;
{Existence results for one-dimensional fractional equations},
preprint.

\bibitem{Hil} R. Hilfer;
\emph{Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics},
{World Scientific, Singapore}, 2000.

\bibitem{JZ} F. Jiao and Y. Zhou;
{Existence of solutions for a class of fractional boundary value
problems via critical point theory},
\emph{Comput. Math. Appl.}, \textbf{62} (2011), 1181-1199.

\bibitem{k1} A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo;
\emph{Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations},
{Elsevier, Amsterdam}, 2006.

\bibitem{Ko} N. Kosmatov;
{Integral equations and initial value problems for nonlinear
differential equations of fractional order},
\emph{Nonlinear Anal.}, \textbf{70} (2009), 2521-2529.

\bibitem{KrisRadVar} A. Krist\'aly, V. R\u{a}dulescu, Cs. Varga;
\emph{Variational Principles in Mathematical Physics, Geometry, and
Economics: Qualitative Analysis of Nonlinear Equations and
Unilateral Problems},
{Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, no. 136,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge}, 2010.

\bibitem{LaVa} V. Lakshmikantham, A.S. Vatsala;
{Basic theory of fractional differential equations},
\emph{Nonlinear Anal.}, \textbf{69} (2008), 2677-2682.

\bibitem{MaWi} J. Mawhin, M. Willem;
\emph{Critical Point Theorey and Hamiltonian Systems},
{Springer, New York}, 1989.

\bibitem{MiRo} K. S. Miller, B. Ross;
\emph{An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional
Differential Equations},
{Wiley, New York}, 1993.

\bibitem{Nya} N. Nyamoradi;
{Infinitely many solutions for a class of fractional boundary value
problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions},
\emph{Mediterr. J. Math.}, \textbf{11} (2014), 75-87.

\bibitem{Pod} I. Podlubny;
\emph{Fractional Differential Equations},
{Academic Press, San Diego}, 1999.

\bibitem{PS1} P. Pucci, J. Serrin;
{Extensions of the mountain pass theorem},
\emph{J. Funct. Anal.}, \textbf{59} (1984), 185-210.

\bibitem{PS2} P. Pucci, J. Serrin;
{A mountain pass theorem},
\emph{J. Differential Equations}, \textbf{60} (1985), 142-149.

\bibitem{Rab} P. H. Rabinowitz;
\emph{Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to
Differential Equations},
in: CBMS, vol. 65, Amer. Math. Soc., 1986.

\bibitem{Ricceri} B. Ricceri;
On a three critical points theorem,
\emph{Arch. Math. (Basel)}, \textbf{75} (2000), 220-226.

\bibitem{SaKiMa} S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev;
\emph{Fractional Integral and Derivatives: Theory and Applications},
{Gordon and Breach, Longhorne, PA}, 1993.

\bibitem{Str} M. Struwe;
\emph{Variational Methods, Applications to Nonlinear Partial
Differential Equations and Hamiltonian Systems},
{Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg}, 1990.

\bibitem{WaZh} J. Wang, Y. Zhou;
{A class of fractional evolution equations and optimal controls},
\emph{Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.} \textbf{12} (2011), 262-272.

\bibitem{WDC} Z. Wei, W. Dong, J. Che;
{Periodic boundary value problems for fractional differential
equations involving a Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative},
\emph{Nonlinear Anal.}, \textbf{73} (2010), 3232-3238.

\bibitem{Will} M. Willem;
\emph{Minimax Theorems}, {Birkh\"{a}user}, 1996.

\bibitem{Zh} S. Zhang;
{Positive solutions to singular boundary value problem for nonlinear
fractional differential equation},
\emph{Comput. Math. Appl.}, \textbf{59} (2010), 1300-1309.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
