\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{graphicx}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2015 (2015), No. 49, pp. 1--19.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2015 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2015/49\hfil Stability with respect to initial time difference]
{Stability with respect to initial time difference for generalized delay
differential equations}

\author[R. Agarwal, S. Hristova, D. O'Regan \hfil EJDE-2015/49\hfilneg]
{Ravi Agarwal, Snezhana Hristova, Donal O'Regan}

\address{Ravi Agarwal \newline
Department of Mathematics,  Texas A\& M University-Kingsville,
Kingsville,  TX 78363,  USA}
\email{agarwal@tamuk.edu}

\address{Snezhana Hristova \newline
Plovdiv University,  Tzar Asen 24,
4000 Plovdiv,  Bulgaria}
\email{snehri@gmail.bg}

\address{Donal O'Regan \newline
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics,
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland}
\email{donal.oregan@nuigalway.ie}

\thanks{Submitted October 20, 2014. Published February 19, 2015.}
\subjclass[2000]{34K45, 34D20}
\keywords{Stability; initial data difference;  Lyapunov function;
\hfill\break\indent delay differential equation}

\begin{abstract}
 Stability with initial data difference for nonlinear
 delay differential equations is introduced.   This type of stability
 generalizes the known concept of stability in the literature. It
 gives us the opportunity to compare the behavior of two nonzero
 solutions when both initial values and initial intervals are
 different. Several sufficient conditions for stability and for
 asymptotic stability with initial time difference are obtained.
 Lyapunov functions as well as  comparison results for scalar
 ordinary differential equations are employed. Several examples are
 given to illustrate the theory.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

One of the main problems in the qualitative theory of differential
equations is  stability of the solutions. Stability gives us the
opportunity to compare the behavior of solutions starting at
different points. Often in real situations it may be impossible to
have only a change in the space variable and to keep the initial
time or the initial time interval unchanged. This situation requires
introducing and studying a new generalization of the classical
concept of stability which involve the change of both the initial
time/interval and the initial points/functions.  The concept of
stability with initial time difference is a generalization of the
classical concept of stability of a solution.

Recently, various
types of stability with initial time difference were studied for
 \begin{itemize}
 \item ordinary differential equations (\cite{CY}, \cite{LLD}-\cite{So1}, \cite{YS}, \cite{YS1});
 \item  fuzzy differential equations (\cite{YC});
 \item  fractional differential equations (\cite{Y}).
 \end{itemize}

We note that stability with initial time difference for delay differential
equations was initiated recently and some initial results were
published in \cite{SH1}, \cite{HP}.


In the present paper, we study the  stability with initial data
difference for delay differential equations  based on the
application of Lyapunov's functions and the Razumikhin method.  The
derivative of Lyapunov functions with respect to the given equations
and initial time difference is defined in an appropriate way.
Comparison results for ordinary differential equation with a
parameter are employed. Several examples are given to illustrate the
theoretical results

\section{Preliminary notes and results}

Let $r_k>0$, ($k=1,2,\dots, m$),  be  given finite numbers,
$R_+=[0,\infty)$. Define delay operators $G_k: C([-r_k, \infty),
\mathbb{R}^n) \to \mathbb{R}^{n}$, ($ k=1,2,\dots,m$),   such that for any function
$x\in C([-r_k, \infty), \mathbb{R}^n)$, and any point $t\in \mathbb{R}_+$ and $
k=1,2,\dots,m$ there exists a point $\xi\in [t-r_k,t]$,
$\xi=\xi(x,t,k)$, such that $ G_k(x)(t)=p_k(t)x(\xi)$ where $p_k\in
C(\mathbb{R}_+, \mathbb{R})$.  Let $r=\max\{r_k:k=1,2,\dots,m\}$.

 Consider the nonlinear generalized delay functional differential equations
 with bounded delays
\begin{equation} \label{1}
x'=f(t,x(t),G_1(x)(t), G_2(x)(t), \dots, G_m(x)(t))\quad\text{for } t\geq t_0,
\end{equation}
with initial condition
\begin{equation} \label{2}
x(t+t_0)=\varphi (t)\quad\text{for }  t \in [-r,0],
\end{equation}
where  $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$, $f:\mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}^{nm}\to \mathbb{R}^n$,
 $t_0\in \mathbb{R}_+$,  $\varphi:[-r,0]\to\mathbb{R}^n$.

Shortly we will denote the initial value problem by IVP.
We would like to note some partial cases of \eqref{1}:
\begin{itemize}

\item if  $G_k(x)(t)=x(t-r_k)$ for $t\in \mathbb{R}_+$ then  \eqref{1}
reduces to  delay
differential equations with  several constant delays
$x'=f(t,x(t),x(t-r_1), x(t-r_2), \dots, x(t-r_m))$ (for example, see
\cite{Ha} and the cited references therein);

\item  if  $G_k(x)(t)=\max_{s\in
[t-r_k,t]}x(s)$ for $t\in \mathbb{R}_+$ then \eqref{1} reduces to
differential equations with maxima (see, for example,
\cite{AH,DH,BH,HH,SH5,SS})
\[ % \label{1001}
 x'=f(t,x(t),\max_{s\in [t-r_1,t]}x(s),
\max_{s\in [t-r_2,t]}x(s), \dots, \max_{s\in
[t-r_m,t]}x(s))
\]

\item  if  $ G_k(x)(t)=x(t-r_k(t))$ for $t\in \mathbb{R}_+$, where
$r_k:\mathbb{R}_+\to[0,r]$, then \eqref{1} reduces to delay differential
equations with variable
bounded delays $x'=f(t,x(t),x(t-r_1(t)), x(t-r_2(t)), \dots,
x(t-r_m(t)))$ (for example, $r(t)=C|sin(t)|$  or $r(t)=\frac{C
t}{t+1}$ for $t\in \mathbb{R}_+$, where $C=const$); see \cite{Ha} and the
cited references therein;

\item  let $r>0$ and  $ G(x)(t)=\int_{t-r}^t x(s)ds$ for $t\in \mathbb{R}_+$.
Then equation \eqref{1} reduces
to   delay differential equations with distributed delay.
\end{itemize}


 Denote the solution of the initial value problem \eqref{1}, \eqref{2}
by $x(t;t_0,\varphi)$. Consider also the initial value problem for \eqref{1}
at a different initial data, i.e.
\begin{equation} \label{3}
x(t+\tau_0)=\psi (t)\quad\text{for }   t\in [-r,0].
\end{equation}
where  $\tau_0\in R_+, \tau_0\not = t_0$,  $\psi\in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$,
$\psi \not \equiv \varphi$.

Denote the solution of  \eqref{1}, \eqref{3} by $x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$.
 Both functions $x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ and $x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$ differ not only
 on the initial functions but also on the initial intervals.


In our work we will assume that IVP \eqref{1}, \eqref{2} has a solution
 $x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ defined on $[t_0-r,\infty)$ for any $t_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$
 and any $\varphi\in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$.

The main purpose of the paper is comparing the behavior of  two solutions
 $x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ and $x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$ of \eqref{1} with initial 
time difference.

Let $\rho,\lambda>0$ be given constants and consider the sets:
\begin{gather*}
K=\{ a\in C[\mathbb{R}_+,\mathbb{R}_+] :  a(s)  \text{ is strictly increasing and }
 a(0)=0\}; \\
S(\rho)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n : \|x\|\leq \rho\};\\
KS(\rho)=\{ a\in C[[0,\rho],\mathbb{R}_+]:a(s)  
\text{ is strictly increasing }  a(0)=0\};\\
\begin{aligned}
\tilde{KS}(\rho,\lambda)=\big\{& a\in C[[0,\rho]\times[0,\lambda],\mathbb{R}_+]
\text{$a$ is strictly increasing in its first argument},\\
& a(0,0)=0 \big\}.
\end{aligned}
\end{gather*}
We introduce the notation
$$
\|\phi\|_0=\max \{\|\phi(s)\|: s\in [-r,0]\},
$$
where  $\phi\in C(\ [-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$.

\begin{definition} \label{def1} \rm
 Let $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ be a given solution of  \eqref {1}, \eqref{2}.
The solution $x^*(t)$  is said to be

$\bullet$ \emph{stable with initial time difference} if for every $\epsilon >0$
there exist  $\delta =\delta (\epsilon,t_0)>0$ and  $ \Delta=\Delta (\epsilon,t_0)>0$
such that  for any $\psi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$ and any $\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$,
   the inequalities  $\|\varphi-\psi\|_0<\delta$ and $|\tau_0-t_0|<\Delta$ imply
 $\|x(t+\eta;\tau_0,\psi)-x^*(t)\|<\epsilon$ for $t\geq t_0$ where $\eta=\tau_0-t_0$;

$\bullet$ \emph{attractive with initial time difference} if there exists $\beta>0$
such that for every $\epsilon >0$   there exist $T=T(\epsilon,t_0)>0$ such that
for any $\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$ and  any  $\psi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$  the inequalities
$\|\varphi-\psi\|_0<\beta$ and $|\tau_0-t_0|<\Delta$ imply
$\|x(t+\eta;\tau_0,\psi)-x^*(t)\|<\epsilon$ for $t\geq t_0+T$ where
$\eta=\tau_0-t_0$.

$\bullet$ \emph{asymptotically stable with initial time difference} if the
solution $x^*(t)$  is stable with initial time difference and attractive with
initial time difference.
\end{definition}


\begin{definition} \label{def2} \rm
The generalized delay differential equation \eqref{1}  is said to be

$\bullet$   \emph{uniformly stable with initial time difference} if for  any
solution  $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ of  \eqref{1}, \eqref{2} and for every
$\epsilon >0$   there
exist  $\delta =\delta (\epsilon )>0$ and  $ \Delta=\Delta (\epsilon )>0$
such that for any $\psi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$ and any $\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$,
  the  inequalities  $\|\varphi-\psi\|_0<\delta$ and $|\tau_0-t_0|<\Delta$
imply $\|x(t+\eta;\tau_0,\psi)-x^*(t)\|<\epsilon$ for $t\geq t_0$ where
$\eta=\tau_0-t_0$;

$\bullet$  \emph{uniformly attractive with initial time difference} if there
exist $\beta>0$ and $\Delta>0$ such  that for  any solution
$x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ of  \eqref {1}, \eqref{2} and for
every $\epsilon >0$   there exist $T=T(\epsilon)>0$ such that for any
$\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$ and  any  $\psi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$  the inequalities
$\|\varphi-\psi\|_0<\beta$ and $|\tau_0-t_0|<\Delta$ imply
$\|x(t+\eta;\tau_0,\psi)-x^*(t)\|<\epsilon$ for $t\geq t_0+T$ where $\eta=\tau_0-t_0$.

$\bullet$  \emph{uniformly asymptotically stable with initial time difference}
if \eqref{1}  is uniformly stable with initial time difference and uniformly
attractive with initial time difference.
 \end{definition}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk1} \rm
Without loss of generality we will consider the case when $\tau_0>t_0$.
\end{remark}


\begin{remark} \label{rmk2} \rm
If  $t_0=\tau_0$ and $x^*(t)\equiv 0$ then the introduced in Definition \ref{def1}
stability with initial time difference is reduced to stability of zero
solution (see, for example, \cite{Ha} and cited therein references)
\end{remark}

We will give a brief overview of both concepts of stability:
the known in the literature stability and the introduced stability
with initial time difference.
\smallskip

\emph{{Case 1.}} (\emph{Stability of  a
nonzero solution}).  Consider the solution $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$
of  \eqref{1}, \eqref{2}. To study the stability of $x^*(t)$ we get
another solution $\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;t_0,\psi)$ of \eqref{1}, with
initial condition $\tilde{x}(t+t_0)=\psi(t)$ for $t\in[-r,0]$  where
the initial function  $\psi\in  C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n):\psi\not \equiv
\varphi$.  Now define the difference between both solutions
$z(t)=\tilde{x}(t)-x^*(t)$. The function $z(t)$ is a solution of the
following initial value problem for the generalized delay
differential equation
\begin{equation} \label{666}
\begin{gathered}
z'=\tilde{f}(t,z(t),G_1(z)(t), G_2(z)(t), \dots, G_m(z)(t)), \quad t\geq t_0 \\
z(t+t_0)=\phi(t),\quad t\in [-r,0],
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align*}
&\tilde {f}(t,z,G_1(z)(t), G_2(z)(t), \dots, G_m(z)(t)) \\
&=f(t,z+x^*(t), G_1(z+x^*)(t), G_2(z+x^*)(t), \dots, G_m(z+x^*)(t)) \\
&\quad -f(t,x^*(t),G_1(x^*)(t), G_2(x^*)(t), \dots, G_m(x^*)(t))
\end{align*}
and $\phi(t)=\psi(t)-\varphi (t)$, $t\in [-r,0]$.

  The initial value problem  \eqref{666} has a zero solution.
Therefore,  the study of stability properties of the nonzero solution
$x^*(t)$ of \eqref{1} is equivalent to  the study of  stability of the
zero solution of \eqref{666}.
\smallskip

 \emph{Case 2}. (\emph{Stability with initial data difference}). Consider the
 solution  $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$   of  \eqref{1}, \eqref{2}.
To study the stability with initial time
 difference of $x^*(t)$ we get another solution  $\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$
of \eqref{1}, with initial
 condition $\tilde{x}(t+\tau_0)=\psi(t)$ for $t\in[-r,0]$  where  the initial
 function  $\psi\in  C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n):\psi\not \equiv \varphi$ and the  point
$ \tau_0\not = t_0$.  Similarly  to Case 1 we consider the difference
between both solutions $z(t)=\tilde{x}(t+\eta)-x^*(t)$
 where $\eta=\tau_0-t_0$. The function $z(t)$ depends significantly on $\eta$
and it is a solution of the
 initial value problem for the generalized  delay differential equation
 \begin{equation} \label{61}
\begin{gathered}
z '=\tilde{f}(t,z,G_1(z)(t), G_2(z)(t), \dots, G_m(z)(t),\eta), \quad t\geq t_0 \\
z(t+t_0)=\phi(t),\quad  t\in [-r,0],
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
 where
\begin{align*}
&\tilde{f}(t,z(t),G_1(z)(t), G_2(z)(t), \dots, G_m(z)(t),\eta)\\
&=f(t+\eta,z+x^*(t), G_1(z+x^*)(t), G_2(z+x^*)(t), \dots, G_m(z+x^*)(t)) \\
&\quad -f(t,x^*(t),G_1(x^*)(t), G_2(x^*)(t), \dots, G_m(x^*)(t))
\end{align*}
and $\phi(t)=\psi(t)-\varphi (t)$, $t\in [-r,0]$.


In the nonauthonomous case the  initial value problem  \eqref{61} has
no zero solution. Therefore, in this case  the study of  stability with
initial data difference of $x^*(t)$ could not be reduced  to the study
of stability  of the zero solution of an appropriate
 delay differential equation.

   Now we  give some examples to illustrate the concepts of
stability with initial time difference.

 \begin{example} \label{examp1} \rm
Consider the delay differential equation:
\begin{equation} \label{888}
x'(t)= x(t)(2- x(t-1))\ \quad\text{for } t\geq t_0
\end{equation}
 with an initial condition
 \begin{equation} \label{889}
 x(t+t_0)=t^2   \quad\text{for } t\in[-1,0],
\end{equation}
 where $x\in\mathbb{R}$.

 Denote the solution of the initial value problem \eqref{888}, \eqref{889}
for  $t_0=1$ by $x(t)$ and the
 solutions of \eqref{888}, \eqref{889} for  $t_0=5$ by $y(t)$.
From Figure 1 it is seen that
 both solutions differ only by shifting. Therefore,  the stability with
initial time difference  for time invariant delay differential equations reduces
to stability of a nonzero solution in the literature.
\end{example}


 \begin{example} \label{examp2}\rm
 Consider the  delay differential equation:
\begin{equation} \label{8885}
x'(t)= \frac{x(t)(10- x(t-1))}{t}\ \quad\text{for } t\geq t_0
\end{equation}
 with an initial condition
 \begin{equation} \label{8895}
x(t+t_0)=\varphi(t)  \quad\text{for } t\in[-1,0],
\end{equation}
 where $x\in\mathbb{R}$, $t_0>0$.

 Consider the initial value problem \eqref{8885}, \eqref{8895}
for various initial points $t_0$ and initial functions $\varphi(t)$:
 \begin{itemize}
 \item  $t_0=3$, $\varphi(t)=t^2$ and denote its solution by $x(t)$;
 \item $t_0=5$, $\varphi(t)=t^2$ and denote its solution by $y(t)$;
 \item $t_0=3.5$,  $\varphi(t)=t^2 +0.1$ and denote its solution by $u(t)$;
 \item $t_0=2.5$,  $\varphi(t)=t^2 +0.001$ and denote its solution by $v(t)$.
 \end{itemize}

 We graph the shifted solutions $y(t+2)$, $u(t+0.5)$ , $v(t-0.5)$ and the fixed
 solution $x(t)$.
  From Figure 2 it can be seen these solutions are closer to the solution
$x(t)$ when $t$ increases.
  It seems the solution $x(t)$ could be stable with initial time difference.
\end{example}

   Both examples prove that for nonautonomous differential equations the
stability with initial time difference
differs from types of stability in the literature.


 \begin{remark} \label{rmk3} \rm
The concept of stability with initial time difference is important in
the nonautonomous case.
 \end{remark}

\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.48\linewidth}
 \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig1} % Fig1.pdf}
{\small  Figure 1. Graph of solutions $y(t)$  and $x(t)$ of \eqref{888}.}
\end{minipage} \quad
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.48\linewidth}
 \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2} % Fig100.pdf}
{\small  Figure 2.  Graph of solutions $x(t)$, $y(t+2)$, $u(t+0.5)$ 
and $v(t-0.5)$ of \eqref{8885}.}
\end{minipage}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

Also, in Example \ref{examp2}, the equation \eqref{8885} has an equilibrium $10$ which
is stable. Now we  consider an equation which solution is unbounded.

 \begin{example} \label{examp3}\rm
 Consider the  delay differential equation:
\begin{equation} \label{858}
x'(t)= -x(t)+tx(t-1))\ \quad\text{for } t\geq t_0
\end{equation}
 with an initial condition
 \begin{equation} \label{856}
 x(t+t_0)=\varphi(t)   \quad\text{for } t\in[-1,0],
\end{equation}
 where $x\in\mathbb{R}$, $t_0>0$.

 Consider the initial value problem \eqref{858}, \eqref{856} for
various initial points $t_0$ and initial functions $\varphi(t)$:
 \begin{itemize}
 \item  $t_0=3$, $\varphi(t)=t$ and denote its solution by $\tilde{x}(t)$;
 \item $t_0=3.5$, $\varphi(t)=t+1$ and denote its solution by $\tilde{y}(t)$;
 \item $t_0=3.1$,  $\varphi(t)=t-1$ and denote its solution by $\tilde{u}(t)$;
 \item  $t_0=2.8$,  $\varphi(t)=t+0.11$ and denote its solution by $\tilde{v}(t)$.
 \end{itemize}
We graph the shifted solutions $\tilde{y}(t+0.5)$, $\tilde{u}(t+0.1)$,
 $\tilde{v}(t-0.2)$ and the fixed solution $x(t)$ on both intervals $[3,5]$
and $[98,100]$ on Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.
The fixed solution $\tilde{x}(t)$ is unbounded. Also, the solutions
 $\tilde{u}(t+0.1)$  and $\tilde{v}(t-0.2)$ are closer to $\tilde{x}(t)$
comparatively with $\tilde{y}(t+0.5)$ for $t\to \infty$.
 Therefore, closer initial data could guarantee closeness of the solutions.
\end{example}
 We need some sufficient conditions for stability with initial time difference.


\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.48\linewidth}
 \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig3} % 
{\small Figure 3. Graph of solutions $\tilde{x}(t)$, $\tilde{y}(t+0.5)$,
 $\tilde{u}(t+0.1)$ , $\tilde{v}(t-0.2)$ of \eqref{858} for $t\in[3,5]$.}
\end{minipage}
\quad
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.48\linewidth}
 \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig4}
{\small Figure 4. Graph of solutions $\tilde{x}(t)$, $\tilde{y}(t+0.5)$, 
$\tilde{u}(t+0.1)$ , $\tilde{v}(t-0.2)$ of \eqref{858} for $t\in[98,100]$.}
\end{minipage}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

 Let $J\subset\mathbb{R}_+$, $\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ and $I\subset \mathbb{R}_+$.
Consider the class $\Lambda(J,\Delta)$ of
 functions   $V(t,x)\in C(J\times\Delta, R_+):   V(t, x)$ is Lipschitz
with respect to its second argument.

We will study the stability with initial time difference by Lyapunov
functions from the class  $\Lambda$ and a modification of the Razumikhin method.
 Note if $x(t)$ is a solution of  $x'=f(t,x)$ then $x(t+\eta )$ is  a
   solution of $x'=f(t+\eta,x)$. It requires a new definition of the derivative
of Lyapunov functions along the trajectories of the given differential equations.

  We will define \emph{a derivative} of the function
$V(t,x)\in \Lambda(J,\Delta)$     along trajectory of the solutions of \eqref{1}
\emph{with respect to initial time difference}. Let $t\in J$, $\eta\in I$
and $\phi, \psi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n):\phi(0)- \psi(0)\in \Delta $.  Then define
\begin{align*}
&D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t,\phi(0), \psi(0),\eta)\\
&=\limsup_{\epsilon \to 0-}\frac{1}{\epsilon}
\Big\{ V\Big(t+\epsilon ,\phi(0)-\psi(0)
+ \epsilon \Big( f(t,\phi(0),G_1(\phi)(0), G_2(\phi)(0), \dots,\\
&\quad  G_m(\phi)(0)) -f(t+\eta,\psi(0),G_1(\psi)(0), G_2(\psi)(0), \dots,
G_m(\psi)(0))\Big )\Big ) \\
&\quad -V(t,\phi(0)-\psi(0))\Big\}.
\end{align*}
Note that $V(t,x)$ is a scalar valued function, but the derivative with
initial time difference $D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t,\phi(0), \psi(0),\eta)$
is a functional.

\begin{remark} \label{rmk4} \rm
The above definition of a derivative of the function $V(t,x)$  along trajectories
of solutions of \eqref{1} with respect to initial time difference
generalizes the derivative of the function $V(t,x)$ along
trajectories of solutions of \eqref{1} used for studying the stability of
the  zero solution (the case when $\eta=0$, $G_k(0)(t)\equiv 0$,
$k=1,2,\dots, m$ and $f(t,0,0,\dots,0)\equiv 0$).
\end{remark}

Now we  prove some comparison results giving us the relationship
between Lyapunov functions,
generalized delay differential equation \eqref{1} and a scalar ordinary
 differential equation with a parameter.

Consider the scalar ordinary differential equation with a parameter:
\begin{equation} \label{100}
 u'=g(t,u,\eta),\quad u(t_0)=u_0
\end{equation}
 where $u\in \mathbb{R}$,
$g\in C(\mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}\times [0,\rho],\mathbb{R})$, $g(t,0, 0)\equiv 0$,
$\eta \in [0,\rho]$ is a parameter, $\rho >0$ is a given number.

Also, for any fixed natural number $n$ we will consider the  initial value problem
\begin{equation} \label{6}
u'=g(t,u,\eta)+\frac{1}{n},\quad  u(t_0)=u_0+\frac{1}{n}.
\end{equation}
We  will assume that for any  $(t_0,u_0)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}$ and any
$\eta\in[0,\rho]$ the initial value problems \eqref{100} and \eqref{6}
 have solutions $u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)$ and $u_n(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)$, respectively,
which are defined on  $[t_0,\infty)$. In the case of
non-uniqueness of the solution we will assume the existence of a
maximal one.
Note the existence of solutions of nonlinear ordinary differential equations
with small parameters are studied in Chapter 1 of the book \cite{MRo}.

We will use the stability of the zero solution of \eqref{100} with
respect to a parameter defined by the following definition:

\begin{definition} \label{def3} \rm
The zero solution of \eqref{100} is said to be
\begin{itemize}
\item stable with respect to the parameter if  for any $\epsilon >0$  and
any $t_0\geq 0$  there exist  $\delta =\delta (t_0, \epsilon )>0$ and
$ \Delta=\Delta (t_0, \epsilon)>0$ such that for any $u_0\in \mathbb{R}:|u_0|<\delta$
and any $\eta \in\mathbb{R}:|\eta|<\Delta$    the inequality
 $|u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)|<\epsilon$ for $t\geq t_0$ holds,  where
$u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)$ is a solution of \eqref{100} for the given $u_0$ and $\eta$;

 \item uniformly stable with respect to the parameter if  above
$\delta =\delta (\epsilon )>0$ and  $ \Delta=\Delta (\epsilon)>0$,
 i.e. they do not depend on $t_0$.
   \end{itemize}
\end{definition}

 \begin{remark} \label{rmk5} \rm
Note if $g(t,u,\eta)\equiv 0$ then the zero solution of \eqref{100}
is uniformly stable with respect to the parameter.
 \end{remark}

\begin{lemma}[Comparison result] \label{lem1}
Assume the following conditions are satisfied:

1. The functions   $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0, \varphi)$ and
$\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$ are solutions of  initial value problems
\eqref{1}, \eqref{2}, and \eqref{1}, \eqref{3} defined on  $[t_0-r,T]$
and $[\tau_0-r,T+\eta^*]$, respectively, where
 $t_0, \tau_0\in \mathbb{R}_+$, $t_0\not =\tau_0$, $\eta^*=\tau_0-t_0\in (0,\rho]$,
 $\rho>0$, $T>t_0$ are given numbers.

2. The function $ g \in  C([t_0,T]\times \mathbb{R}\times [0,\rho],\mathbb{R}_+)$.


3. The function $V\in \Lambda([t_0-r,T],\mathbb{R}^n)$ and for any point
$t \in [t_0,T]$  such that $ V(t+s,x^*(t+s)-\tilde{x}(t+s+\eta))
<V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))$ for $s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
$$
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, x^*(t),\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*),\eta^*)
\leq g\big(t,V\big(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*)\big), \eta^*\big )
$$
holds.

4.  The function $u^*(t)=u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta^*)$ is the maximal solution
of the initial value   problem \eqref{100}   defined on $[t_0,T]$, where
$u_0\in \mathbb{R}$ is such that $\max_{s\in [-r,0]}V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s))\leq u_0$.

   Then the inequality  $V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))\leq u^*(t)$ holds
 for $t\in [t_0,T]$.
\end{lemma}

    \begin{proof}
Let $u_n(t)=u_n(t;t_0,u_0,\eta^*)$, $t\in[t_0,T]$,  be the maximal
solution of the initial value problem \eqref{6} where
 $\eta=\eta^*$ and $n$ is a natural number.

Define the function $m(t)\in C([t_0-r,T],\mathbb{R}_+)$ by
$m(t)=V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))$.
 We will  prove that for any natural number $n$,
\begin{equation} \label{72}
   m(t)\leq u_n(t)  \quad\text{for } t\in [t_0,T].
\end{equation}
Note that for any natural number $n$ the inequalities
$m(s)\leq u_0<u_n(t_0)$, $s\in[t_0-r,t_0]$ hold, i.e.
\eqref{72} holds for $t=t_0$.

Assume that inequality \eqref{72} is not true. Let $n$ be a natural
number such that there exists a point $\xi >t_0:m(\xi)> u_n(\xi)$.
Let  $t^*_n=\max \{t>t_0: m(s)<u_n(s)\text{ for }  s\in[t_0,t)\}$,
$t^*_n<T$.
Then $m(t^*_n)= u_n(t^*_n),\; m(t)<u_n(t) \mbox{ for } t\in[t_0-r,t^*_n)$,
 and
\begin{align*}
D_-m(t^*_n)
&= \lim_{h\to 0-}\frac{m(t^*_n+h)-m(t^*_n)}{h}
 \geq  \lim_{h\to 0-}\frac{u_n(t^*_n+h)-u(t^*_n)}{h} \\
&=  u'_n(t^*_n)=g(t,u_n(t^*_n),\eta^*)+\frac{1}{n}
 >g(t^*_n,m(t^*_n),\eta^*).
\end{align*}


 From  $g (t,u, \eta^*)+\frac{1}{n}> 0$ on $[t^*_n-r,t^*_n]$
it follows that the function $u_n(t)$ is nondecreasing on $[t^*_n-r,t^*_n]$
and $ m(t^*_n)=u_n(t^*_n)\geq u_n(s)>m(s)$ for $s\in [t^*_n-r,t^*_n)$, i.e.
the inequality
 \begin{equation} \label{91}V(t^*_n+s,x^*(t^*_n+s)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+s+\eta^*))
<V(t^*_n,x^*(t^*_n)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*))
\end{equation}
  holds for $s\in [-r,0)$.

  According to condition 3 of Lemma \ref{lem1}, for the point $t^*_n$ we have
  that
  \begin{align*}
&D_-m(t^*_n)  \\
&=  \lim_{h\to 0-}\frac{V(t^*_n+h,x^*(t^*_n+h)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*+h))
 -V(t^*_n,x^*(t^*_n)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*)}{h}  \\
&= \lim_{h\to 0-}\frac{1}{h}\Big\{ \Big[V(t^*_n+h,x^*(t^*_n+h)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*+h)) \\
  &\quad   -V(t^*_n+h,x^*(t^*_n)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*) \\
  &\quad  +h\Big(f(t^*_n,x^*(t^*_n),G_1(x^*)(t^*_n),  \dots, G_m(x^*)(t^*_n)) \\
  &\quad -f(t^*_n+\eta^*,\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*),G_1(\tilde{x})(t^*_n+\eta^*), \dots, G_m(\tilde{x})(t^*_n+\eta^*))\Big)\Big] \\
 &\quad  + \Big[ V(t^*_n+h,x^*(t^*_n)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*) \\
 &\quad +h\Big(f(t^*_n,x^*(t^*_n),G_1(x^*)(t^*_n), \dots, G_m(x^*)(t^*_n)) \\
  &\quad -f(t^*_n+\eta^*,\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*),G_1(\tilde{x})(t^*_n+\eta^*),  \dots, G_m(\tilde{x})(t^*_n+\eta^*))\Big)\\
  &\quad  -V(t^*_n,x^*(t^*_n)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*)  \Big]\Big\} \\
  &\leq D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t^*_n, x^*(t^*_n),\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*),\eta^*) \\
  &\leq  g(t^*_n,V(t^*_n,x^*(t^*_n)-\tilde{x}(t^*_n+\eta^*)),\eta^*)
 =g(t^*_n,m(t^*_n),\eta^*).
\end{align*}

The obtained contradiction proves inequality \eqref{72} for any natural
 number $n$. Let $\lim _{n\to\infty} u_n(t)=\tilde{u}(t)$.
It is clear $\tilde{u}(t)$ is a solution of IVP\eqref{100}.
Since $u^*(t)$ is the maximal solution of IVP\eqref{100} we obtain from
 \eqref{72}
$V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))=m(t)\leq \tilde{u}(t)\leq u^*(t)$,
$t\in[t_0,T]$.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk6} \rm
Note that the claim of Lemma \ref{lem1} is true if the inequality
$$
\max_{s\in [-r,0]}V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s))\leq u_0
$$
in Condition 4 is replaced by $V(t_0,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))\leq u_0$.
\end{remark}

In the case when $g(t,x,\eta)\equiv 0$ in Lemma \ref{lem1}, we obtain the following result.

\begin{corollary} \label{coro1}
Assume the following conditions are satisfied:

   1. The functions  $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0, \varphi)$ and
$\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$ are solutions of  initial value problems
\eqref{1}, \eqref{3}, and \eqref{1}, \eqref{2} defined on
$[t_0-r,T]$ and $[\tau_0-r,T+\eta^*]$, respectively. where
$t_0, \tau_0\in \mathbb{R}_+:\eta^*=\tau_0-t_0$, $T>t_0$.


 2.  The function $V\in \Lambda([t_0-r,T],\mathbb{R}^n)$ and for any point
$t \in [t_0,T]$  such that
 $ V(t+s,x^*(t+s)-\tilde{x}(t+s+\eta^*))<V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))$
for $s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
$$
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, x^*(t),\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*),\eta^*)\leq 0
$$
   holds.

Then for $t\in [t_0,T]$ the inequality
$V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))\leq \max_{s\in [-r,0]}V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s)) $
holds.
\end{corollary}

 The result of Lemma \ref{lem1} is true on the half line. The idea is to fix $T>t_0$
and once again we have \eqref{72}. Then $\tilde{u}(t)=\lim_{n\to \infty} u_n(t)$
 satisfies IVP\eqref{100} for $t\in [t_0,T]$. We can do this argument for
each $T<\infty$. Thus yields the following result.

 \begin{corollary} \label{coro2}
Assume the following conditions are satisfied:

    1. The functions   $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0, \varphi)$ and $\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$
are solutions of  initial value problems \eqref{1}, \eqref{2}, and
 \eqref{1}, \eqref{3} defined on  $[t_0-r,\infty)$ and $[\tau_0-r,\infty)$,
respectively, where  $t_0, \tau_0\in \mathbb{R}_+$, $t_0\not =\tau_0$,
$\eta^*=\tau_0-t_0 \in (0,\rho]$, $\rho>0$,  $T>t_0$ are given number.

    2. The function $ g \in  C([t_0,\infty)\times \mathbb{R}\times [0,\rho],\mathbb{R}_+)$.


   3.  The function $V\in \Lambda([t_0-r,\infty),\mathbb{R}^n)$ and for any point
$t \geq t_0$  such that
$ V(t+s,x^*(t+s)-\tilde{x}(t+s+\eta^*))<V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))$
for $s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
$$
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, x^*(t),\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*),\eta^*)
\leq g(t,V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*), \eta^*)
$$
   holds.

 4.  The function $u^*(t)=u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta^*)$ is the maximal solution of
the initial value  problem \eqref{100}   defined on $[t_0,\infty)$, where
 $u_0\in \mathbb{R}$ is such that $\max_{s\in [-r,0]}V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s))\leq u_0$.

   Then the inequality  $V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))\leq u^*(t)$ holds
for $t\geq t_0$.
\end{corollary}

   \begin{remark} \label{rmk7} \rm
Note the claim of Corollary \ref{coro2} is true if the inequality
$$
\max_{s\in [-r,0]}V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s))\leq u_0
$$
in Condition 4 is replaced by $V(t_0,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))\leq u_0$.
\end{remark}

When  in Condition 4 of Lemma \ref{lem1} the derivative of the Lyapunov function is negative,
the following result is true.

   \begin{lemma} \label{lem2}  Assume the following conditions are satisfied:

   1. The functions   $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0, \varphi)$ and $\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$
are solutions of  initial value problems \eqref{1}, \eqref{2}, and
\eqref{1}, \eqref{3} defined on  $[t_0-r,T]$ and $[\tau_0-r,T+\eta^*]$,
respectively, and $\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*)\|\leq \lambda$ for $t\in[t_0-r,T]$,
where  $t_0, \tau_0\in \mathbb{R}_+$,  $\eta^*=\tau_0-t_0\in (0,\rho]$,
$\rho,\lambda>0$, $T>t_0$ are given numbers.

   2.  The function $V\in \Lambda([t_0-r,T], S(\lambda))$ and for any point
$t \in [t_0,T]$  such that
$ V(t+s,x^*(t+s)-\tilde{x}(t+s+\eta^*))<V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))$ for
$s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
$$
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, x^*(t),\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*),\eta^*)
< -c(\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*)\|,\eta)
$$
   holds where $c\in \tilde{KS}(\lambda, \rho)$.

Then for $t\in [t_0,T]$ the inequality
$$
V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))\leq V(t_0,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))
-\int_{t_0}^{t}c(\|x^*(s)-\tilde{x}(s+\eta^*)\|,\eta^*)ds
$$
holds.
   \end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Define the function $m(t)\in C([t_0-r,T],\mathbb{R}_+)$ by
$m(t)=V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*))$  and the function
 $p\in C([t_0,T],\mathbb{R}_+)$  by $p(t)=c(\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta^*)\|,\eta^*)$.
Let $\epsilon>0$ be an arbitrary number.  We will prove that
    \begin{equation} \label{661}
m(t)< m(t_0)-\int_{t_0}^t p(s)ds+\epsilon,\quad t\in [t_0,T].
\end{equation}
Assume the contrary and let
$t^*=\inf \{t\in[t_0,T]:m(t)\geq  m(t_0)-\int_{t_0}^t p(s)ds+\epsilon\}$.
It is clear $t^*\in (t_0,T]$  and
 \begin{equation} \label{778}
\begin{gathered}
m(t^*)= m(t_0)-\int_{t_0}^{t^*} p(s)ds +\epsilon,\\
m(t)<m(t_0)-\int_{t_0}^t p(s)ds+\epsilon\quad \mbox{for } t\in [t_0,t^*).
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Therefore,
\begin{equation} \label{779}
  D^-m(t^*)\geq -p(t^*).
\end{equation}

  From \eqref{778} it follows that $m(t^*)>m(t^*-s)$ for $s\in[-r,0)$,
  i.e. $V(t^*+s,x^*(t^*+s)-\tilde{x}(t^*+s+\eta^*))<V(t^*,x^*(t^*)
-\tilde{x}(t^*+\eta^*))$ for $s\in [-r,0)$.
  Then from condition 2 we obtain
  \begin{align*}
D_-m(t^*)
&\leq D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t^*, x^*(t^*),\tilde{x}(t^*+\eta^*),\eta^*) \\
&<-c(\|x^*(t^*)-\tilde{x}(t^*+\eta^*)\|,\eta^*)\\
&=-p(t^*).
\end{align*}
This inequality contradicts \eqref{779}.
Therefore, inequality \eqref{661} is satisfied.
Since $\epsilon>0$ is an arbitrary number,
  inequality \eqref{661}   proves the result.
\end{proof}

\section{Main results}

We obtain some sufficient conditions for the stability with initial
time difference. We will start with stability for a given solution.

 \begin{theorem}[Stability with initial time difference of a solution] \label{thm1}
 Assume:

 1. The function $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$, $t\geq t_0-r$, is a solution
of \eqref{1},\eqref{2}, where $\varphi\in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$, $t_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$.

2.  The function $ g \in  C([t_0,\infty)\times \mathbb{R}\times [0,\rho], \mathbb{R}_+)$,
  $g(t,0,0)\equiv 0$, $\rho>0$ is a given number.

3. There exists a function $V\in \Lambda ([t_0-r,\infty),\mathbb{R}^n) $  such that
   $V(t_0,0)= 0$ and
  \begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]  for any point $t\geq t_0$ and any function
   $ \psi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
   $ V(t+s,x^*(t+s)-\psi(s))< V(t,x^*(t)-\psi(0))$ for
   $s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation}
   D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, x^*(t),\psi(0)),\eta)\leq g(t,V(t,x^*(t)-\psi(0)),\eta)
   \end{equation}
   holds for $\eta\in[0,\rho]$.

\item[(ii)]  $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)$ for $ t\geq t_0$, $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$,
  where  $b\in K$.
\end{itemize}

4. The  zero solution of \eqref{100} is  stable with respect to the parameter.

     Then  the solution $x^*(t)$  is  stable  with initial time difference.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $\epsilon\in (0,\rho]$ be a positive  number.
From condition 4    there exist  $\Delta=\Delta(t_0, \epsilon)>0$ and
$\delta_1 =\delta_1(t_0, \epsilon)>0$   such that   the inequalities
$|\eta|<\Delta$ and  $|u_0|<\delta_1$ imply
\begin{equation} \label{20}
|u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)|<b(\epsilon),\quad t\geq t_0,
\end{equation}
 where  $u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)$ is a solution of IVP \eqref{100}.

Since $V(t_0,0)= 0$  there exists $\delta_2=\delta_2(t_0,\delta_1)>0$ such
that $V(t_0,x)<\delta_1$ for $\|x\|<\delta_2$.
Let  $\psi\in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n):\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\delta_2$ and
$\tau_0:0<\eta=\tau_0- t_0<\Delta$. Denote by
$\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi), \ t\geq \tau_0-r$ the solution of the
initial value problem \eqref{1}, \eqref{3}.

 From the choice of the initial function  $\psi$ we have
$\|\varphi(0)-\psi(0)\|<\delta_2$  and  $V(t_0,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))<\delta_1$.

Now let $u_0=V(t_0,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))$.  Then $u_0<\delta_1$ and
inequality \eqref{20} holds. Then from condition 3,  Corollary \ref{coro2} and
Remark \ref{rmk7} we have
\begin{equation} \label{7}
 V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))
\leq u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)<b(\epsilon), \quad t\geq t_0.
 \end{equation}
Then for any $t\geq t_0$ from condition ($ii$) we obtain
$b(\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta)\|)\leq V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))
\leq |u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)|<b(\epsilon)$,
so the result follows.
\end{proof}


 \begin{corollary} \label{cor3}
Let  $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$, $t\geq t_0-r$, be a solution of \eqref{1}, \eqref{2},
 where $\varphi\in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$, $t_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$ and suppose there exist
a function $V\in \Lambda ([t_0-r,\infty),\mathbb{R}^n) $  such that $V(t_0,0)\equiv 0$ and
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq t_0$ and any function
 $ \psi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
$ V(t+s,x^*(t+s)-\psi(s))<V(t,x^*(0)-\psi(0))$ for $s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation} D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, x^*(0),\psi(0)),\eta)\leq 0\end{equation}
   holds.

\item[(ii)]  $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)$ for $ t\geq t_0, \ x\in\mathbb{R}^n $,
  where  $b \in K$.
\end{itemize}
     Then  the solution $x^*(t)$  is  stable  with initial time difference.
\end{corollary}

Now we  obtain some sufficient conditions for the stability with
initial time difference for the given generalized  system of delay
differential equations.

  \begin{theorem}[Uniform stability with initial time difference] \label{thm2}
 Assume:

1. The function $ g \in  C(\mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}\times [0,\rho],\mathbb{R}_+)$,
 $g(t,0,0)\equiv 0$, $\rho>0$ is a given number.

2. There exists a function $V\in \Lambda ([-r,\infty),\mathbb{R}^n) $  such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq 0$, any parameter  $\eta\in(0,\rho]$ and
any functions $\varphi,  \psi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
$ V(t+s,\varphi (s)-\psi(s))< V(t,\varphi (0)-\psi(0))$ for
$s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation}
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0),\psi(0)),\eta)
\leq g(t,V(t,\varphi(0)-\psi(0)),\eta)
\end{equation}
   holds;

\item[(ii)]  $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)\leq a(\|x\|)$ for $ t\geq -r$, $x\in\mathbb{R}^n $,
  where  $a, b \in K$.
\end{itemize}

3. The  zero solution of \eqref{100} is  uniformly stable with respect to
the parameter.

     Then  the generalized system of delay differential equations \eqref{1}
 is  uniformly stable  with initial time difference.
\end{theorem}


\begin{proof}
Let $\epsilon\in (0,\rho]$ be a positive  number and  $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$,
$t\geq t_0-r$, be a solution of \eqref{1},\eqref{2}, where
$\varphi\in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$, $t_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$.

From condition 3, there exist  $\Delta=\Delta( \epsilon)>0$ and
$\delta_1 =\delta_1(\epsilon)>0$   such that   the inequalities
$|\eta|<\Delta$ and  $|u_0|<\delta_1$ imply
\begin{equation} \label{201}
|u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)|<b(\epsilon),\quad t\geq t_0,
\end{equation}
 where $u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)$ is a solution of  IVP \eqref{100}.

Choose $\delta_2=\delta_2(\delta_1)>0$ such that $a(\delta_2)<\delta_1$.
Let  $\psi\in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n):\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\delta_2$ and
$\tau_0:0<\eta=\tau_0- t_0<\Delta$. Denote by
$\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi), \ t\geq \tau_0-r$, the solution of the
initial value problem \eqref{1}, \eqref{3}.

Now let $u_0=\max_{s\in[-r,0]}V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s))$.
Then for every $s\in[-r,0]$ from condition ($\it {ii}$) we get
 $V(t_0+s,\varphi(s)-\psi(s))
\leq a(\|\varphi(s)-\psi(s)\|)\leq a(\||\varphi-\psi\||_0)
\leq  a(\delta_2)<\delta_1$ and therefore $u_0<\delta_1$.
Then  inequality \eqref{201} holds for $t\geq t_0$.

From condition 2  and Corollary \ref{coro2}  we have
\begin{equation} \label{79}
V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))\leq u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta), \quad t\geq
t_0.
\end{equation}
Then for any $t\geq t_0$ from condition ($ii$) we obtain $
b(\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta)\|)\leq
V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta))\leq |u(t;t_0,u_0,\eta)|<b(\epsilon)$,
so the result follows.
\end{proof}

When the derivative of the Lyapunov function is nonpositive we obtain
the following  result for the uniform stability with initial time difference.

\begin{corollary} \label{coro4} Suppose there exist a function
$V\in \Lambda ([-r,\infty),\mathbb{R}^n) $  such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq 0$ and any functions
$\varphi, \psi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
$ V(t+s,\varphi (s)-\psi(s))< V(t,\varphi (0)-\psi(0))$ for
$s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation}
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0),\psi(0)),\eta)\leq 0
\end{equation}
   holds.

\item[(ii)] $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)\leq a(\|x\|)$ for $ t\geq -r, \ x\in\mathbb{R}^n $,
  where  $a,b \in K$.
\end{itemize}
     Then  the generalized system of delay differential equations \eqref{1}
 is  uniformly stable  with initial time difference.
\end{corollary}


\begin{theorem}[Uniform stability with initial time difference of a delay system]
 \label{thm3} \quad \\
Assume:

 1. The function $ g \in  C([\mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}\times [0,\rho],\mathbb{R}_+)$,
$g(t,0,0)\equiv 0$ where $\rho>0$ is a fixed number.


 2. There exists a function $V\in \Lambda ([-r,\infty),S(\lambda)) $  such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq 0$ and any functions
 $\varphi, \psi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
 $\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\lambda$ and
$ V(t+s,\varphi (s)-\psi(s))< V(t,\varphi (0)-\psi(0))$ for
$s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation}
 D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0),\psi(0)),\eta)
\leq g(t,V(t,\varphi(0)-\psi(0)), \eta),
\end{equation}
   holds for $\eta\in[0,\rho]$ where $\lambda>0$ is a given number.

\item[(ii)]  $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)\leq a(\|x\|)$ for
$ t\geq -r, \ x\in S(\lambda)$,   where  $a,b \in K$.
\end{itemize}

 3. The  zero solution of \eqref{100} is  uniformly stable with
respect to the parameter.

     Then  the generalized system of delay differential equations \eqref{1}
is  uniformly stable  with initial time difference.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $\epsilon\in (0,\lambda]$ be a positive  number and $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$,
$t\geq t_0-r$, be a solution of \eqref{1},\eqref{2}, where
 $\varphi\in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$, $t_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$.

From condition 3  of Theorem \ref{thm2} there exist
$\Delta=\Delta(\epsilon)>0$ and
$\delta_1 =\delta_1 (\epsilon)>0$
such that  for any $\tilde{t}_0\geq 0$  the inequalities
$|\eta|<\Delta$ and  $|u_0|<\delta_1$ imply
\begin{equation} \label{2000}
|u(t;\tilde{t}_0,u_0,\eta)|<b(\epsilon),\quad t\geq
\tilde{t}_0,
\end{equation}
 where  $u(t;\tilde{t}_0,u_0,\eta)$ is a solution of
the equation  \eqref{100}. Let $\delta_1< \min\{ \epsilon,
b(\epsilon)\}$ and $\Delta\leq \rho$.

From $a \in K$ there exists  $\delta_2 =\delta_2 (\epsilon)>0$:
 if $s<\delta_2$ then $a(s)<\delta_1$.

Let $\delta=\min (\delta_1, \delta_2)$. Choose the initial function
$\psi\in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such    that $\|\varphi-\psi\|_0<\delta$ and
the initial point $\tau_0>t_0$ such that $\eta_0=\tau_0- t_0<\Delta$.
   Denote by $\tilde{x}(t)=x(t;\tau_0,\psi), \ t\geq \tau_0-r$ the
solution of the initial value problem \eqref{1}, \eqref{3}.

We will prove that
\begin{equation} \label{9011}
\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|<\epsilon,\quad t\geq t_0-r.
\end{equation}
 This inequality  holds  on $[t_0-r,t_0]$.
Assume inequality \eqref{9011}  is not true for all $t>t_0$ and let
$$
t^*=\inf \{ t>t_0:\|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|\geq \epsilon\}.
$$
Then
\begin{equation} \label{3281}
\|x^*(t^*)-\tilde{x}(t^*+\eta_0)\|=\epsilon,\quad\text{and}\quad
  \|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|<\epsilon,\quad t\in [t_0,t^*).
\end{equation}
From the choice of the initial  function  $\psi$, inequalities
$\delta \leq \epsilon$ and  \eqref{3281}  it follows  there exists
a point  $t^*_0\in (t_0,t^*)$ such that
$ \|x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|<\delta \leq \delta _2$ for
$t\in [t_0-r,t_0^*]$.

Now let
$u_0=\max_{s\in[-r,0]}V(t_0^*+s,x^*(t_0^*+s)-\tilde{x}(t_0^*+s+\eta_0))$.
From the choice of the point $t_0^*$ it follows that
$\max_{s\in[-r,0]}\|x^*(t_0^*+s)-\tilde{x}(t_0^*+s+\eta_0)\|<\epsilon
\leq \lambda$. Then from  Lemma \ref{lem1} for the interval $[t_0^*,t^*]$ and
$\eta^*=\eta_0$ we have
\begin{equation} \label{77}
V(t,x^*(t)-\tilde{x}(t+\eta_0))\leq
u^*(t;t_0^*,u_0,\eta_0), \quad t\in [t_0^*,t^*]
\end{equation}
 where $u^*(t;t_0^*,u_0,\eta_0), t\geq t_0^*$ is the maximal solution of
initial value problem for the scalar differential equation \eqref{100}
for the  parameter $\eta_0=\tau_0- t_0$ and initial point $(t_0^*,u_0)$.

Since $[t_0^*-r,t_0^*]\subset [t_0-r,t_0^*]$  we get
$\|x^*(t_0^*+s)-\tilde{x}(t_0^*+s+\eta)\| <\rho$ for $ s\in[-r,0]$
and therefore,
$$
V(t_0^*+s,x^*(t_0^*+s)-\tilde{x}(t_0^*+s+\eta))
\leq a(\|x^*(t_0^*+s)-\tilde{x}(t_0^*+s+\eta)\|)<\delta_1,\ \  s\in[-r,0],
$$
or $u_0<\delta_1$.
Therefore, the solution $u^*(t;t_0^*,u_0,\eta)$ satisfies the inequality
\eqref{2000} for $t\geq t_0^*$ and $\eta=\tau_0- t_0$.

From  inequalities \eqref{2000}, \eqref{77}, the choice of the point
$t^*$, and condition (\emph{ii}) of  Theorem \ref{thm3} we obtain $
b(\epsilon)> |u^{*}(t^*;t_0^*,u_0,\eta)| \geq
V(t^*,x^*(t^*)-\tilde{x}(t^*+\eta))\geq
b(\|x^*(t^*)-\tilde{x}(t^*+\eta)\|)= b(\epsilon)$. The contradiction
proves inequality \eqref{9011} and the result follows.
\end{proof}

 \begin{corollary} \label{coro5}
Suppose there exist a function $V\in \Lambda([-r,\infty),S(\lambda)) $  such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq 0$ and any functions
$\varphi, \psi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
$\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\lambda$ and
 $ V(t+s,\varphi (s)-\psi(s))< V(t,\varphi (0)-\psi(0))$ for
$s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation} D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0),\psi(0)),\eta)\leq 0,\end{equation}
   holds where $\lambda>0$ is a given number;

\item[(ii)]  $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)\leq a(\|x\|)$ for $ t\geq -r, \ x\in S(\lambda)$,
  where  $a,b \in K$.
\end{itemize}
Then  the generalized system of delay differential equations \eqref{1}
is  uniformly stable  with initial time difference.
\end{corollary}

Now consider the derivative of Lyapunov function which is widely
used for the stability of the zero solution:
 \begin{align*}
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t,\phi(0))
&=\limsup_{\epsilon \to 0-}\frac{1}{\epsilon}
\Big\{ V(t+\epsilon ,\phi(0) 
+ \epsilon \Big( f(t,\phi(0),G_1(\phi)(0), G_2(\phi)(0), \\
&\quad \dots, G_m(\phi)(0)) 
 -V(t,\phi(0))\Big)\Big\},
\end{align*}
where  $t\in J$ and $\phi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n):\phi(0)\in \Delta $.

Now we  give a relationship between both derivatives of Lyapunov
functions, the first one guaranteeing  the stability of the zero
solution and the second one guaranteeing the stability with initial
time difference.
First we have the stability of zero solution and stability with initial 
time difference:

\begin{theorem} \label{thm4}
 Assume:

 1.  The function $ \tilde{g} \in  C(\mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}_+)$,
$\tilde{g}(t,0)\equiv 0$.

 2. The function $f\in C (\mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}^{nm},\mathbb{R}^n)$ and for
 any $(t,x,U)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times \mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}^{nm}$  and any $\eta \in[0,\rho]$
the inequality
      $$
|f(t+\eta,x,U)-f(t,x,U)|\leq \lambda(t)|\eta|
$$
      holds, where $\rho>0$ and $\lambda\in C(\mathbb{R}_+,\mathbb{R}_+)$ is a bounded function.

3. There exists a function $V\in \Lambda ([-r,\infty),\mathbb{R}^n) $  such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq 0$ and any function $\varphi \in C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$
such that  $ V(t+s,\varphi (s))< V(t,\varphi (0))$ for $s\in [-r,0)$
the inequality
   \begin{equation}
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0))\leq \tilde{g}(t,V(t,\varphi(0)))
\end{equation}
   holds;

\item[(ii)] $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)\leq a(\|x\|)$ for $ t\geq -r$, $x\in\mathbb{R}^n $,
  where  $a, b \in K$.
\end{itemize}

4. The  zero solution of $u'=g(t,u)$ is  uniformly stable.

     Then  the generalized system of delay differential equations \eqref{1}
is  uniformly stable  with initial time difference.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof} Note
\begin{align*}
&D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0))-\psi(0),\eta)  \\
&= \lim_{h\to 0-}\frac{1}{h}\Big( \Big(V(t+h,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))
 +h\big(f(t,\varphi(0),  \dots, G_m(\varphi)(0)) \\
&\quad -f(t,\psi(0),G_1(\psi)(0), \dots, G_m(\psi)(0))\big)\Big)
 -V(t,\varphi(0))-\psi(0))\Big) \\
&\quad + \Big( V(t+h,\varphi(0)-\psi(0)) +h\big(f(t,\varphi(0),  \dots,
 G_m(\varphi)(0)) \\
&\quad -f(t+\eta,\psi(0),G_1(\psi)(0), \dots, G_m(\psi)(0))\big) \\
&\quad- V(t+h,\varphi(0)-\psi(0)) +h\big(f(t,\varphi(0),
 \dots, G_m(\varphi)(0)) \\
&\quad -f(t,\psi(0),G_1(\psi)(0), \dots, G_m(\psi)(0))\big)\Big).
\end{align*}
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
&D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0))-\psi(0),\eta)  \\
&\leq D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0))-\psi(0))
 + L\|f(t+\eta,\psi(0),G_1(\psi)(0), \dots, G_m(\psi)(0)) \\
&\quad -f(t,\psi(0),G_1(\psi)(0), \dots, G_m(\psi)(0))\|\\
&\leq D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0))-\psi(0))+L\lambda(t)|\eta| \\
&\leq  \tilde{g}(t,\varphi(0))-\psi(0))+L\lambda(t)|\eta|.
\end{align*}
Define the function $g(t,u,\eta)=\tilde{g}(t,u)+L\lambda(t)|\eta|$
for which the inequality (26) in Theorem \ref{thm3} is satisfied and for which the
zero solution of equation \eqref{100} is
uniformly stable with respect to the parameter.
\end{proof}

Now we have the uniform asymptotic stability with initial time difference 
of a system:

\begin{theorem}\label{thm5}
Assume:

  1. There exists a function $V\in \Lambda ([-r,\infty),S(\lambda)) $  such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for any point $t\geq 0$, any parameter $\eta\in[0,\rho]$
and any functions $\varphi, \psi$ in $C([-r,0],\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that
$\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\lambda$ and
$ V(t+s,\varphi (s)-\psi(s))< V(t,\varphi (0)-\psi(0))$ for
$s\in [-r,0)$  the inequality
   \begin{equation}
D^-_{\eqref{1}}V(t, \varphi(0),\psi(0)),\eta)<-c(\|\varphi(0)-\psi(0)\|, \eta),
\end{equation}
holds where $\rho, \lambda>0$ is are given constants, function
$c\in \tilde{KS}(\lambda,\rho)$;

\item[(ii)]  $b(\|x\|)\leq V(t,x)\leq a(\|x\|)$ for $ t\geq -r, \ x\in S(\lambda)$,
  where  $a,b \in KS(\lambda)$.
\end{itemize}

     Then  the generalized system of delay differential equations \eqref{1}
is uniformly asymptotically stable  with initial time difference.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
According to Corollary \ref{coro5} the generalized system of delay differential
equations \eqref{1} is  uniformly stable  with initial time difference.
Therefore, for $\lambda$ and any solution $x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$
of \eqref{1},\eqref{2} there exist numbers $\alpha=\alpha(\lambda)\in (0,\lambda)$ and
 $ \Delta=\Delta (\lambda )\in(0,\rho]$
such that for any  $\psi \in C([-r,0], \mathbb{R}^n)$ and any $\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}_+$,
  the inequalities  $\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\alpha$ and $|\tau_0-t_0|<\Delta$
imply  $\|x(t+\eta;\tau_0,\psi)-x^*(t)\|<\lambda$ for $t\geq t_0$.  where $\eta=\tau_0-t_0$.

Now we  prove the generalized system of delay differential equations
\eqref{1} is uniformly attractive with initial time difference.

Consider the constant  $\beta\in(0,\alpha]$  such that $a(\beta)\leq b(\alpha)$.
Let  $\epsilon \in(0,\lambda]$ be an arbitrary number and
$x^*(t)=x(t;t_0,\varphi)$ be a solution of \eqref{1},\eqref{2}.

Now choose the initial data $\tau_0,\psi$ such that $\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\beta$
and $\eta_0=\tau_0-t_0<\Delta$ and consider the solution
$\tilde{x}(t)= x(t;\tau_0,\psi)$ of \eqref{1}, \eqref{3}.
Then $\||\varphi-\psi\||_0<\alpha$ and therefore the   inequality
\begin{equation} \label{88}
\|\tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)-x^*(t)\|<\lambda\quad\text{for } t\geq t_0
\end{equation}
holds.

Choose the constant $\gamma=\gamma(\epsilon)\in (0,\epsilon]$ such that
$a(\gamma)<b(\epsilon)$. Let  $T>\frac{a(\alpha)}{c(\gamma,\eta_0)}$,
 $T=T(\epsilon)>0$.
We will prove that
\begin{equation} \label{445}
\|x^*(t)- \tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|< \epsilon\quad \text{for } t\geq t_0+T.
\end{equation}
Assume
\begin{equation} \label{44}
\|x^*(t)- \tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|\geq \gamma\quad \text{for every }
t\in [t_0,t_0+T].
\end{equation}
Then according to Lemma \ref{lem2} applied to the interval $[t_0,t_0+T]$, we obtain
\begin{equation} \label{441}\begin{split}
& V(t_0+T,x^*(t_0+T)-\tilde{x}(t_0+T+\eta_0))\\
&\leq V(t_0,\varphi(0)-\psi(0))-\int_{t_0}^{t_0+T}c(\|x^*(s)
 -\tilde{x}(s+\eta_0)\|,\eta_0)ds \\
&\leq a(\|\varphi(0)-\psi(0)\|)-c(\gamma,\eta_0)T\leq a(\||\varphi-\psi\||_0)
 -c(\gamma,\eta_0)T\\
&<a(\alpha)-c(\gamma,\eta_0)T<0.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
The obtained contradiction proves that there exists
$t^*\in [t_0,t_0+T]$ such that $\|x^*(t^*)- \tilde{x}(t^*+\eta_0)\|<\gamma$.
Then for any $t\geq t^*$ the inequalities
\begin{equation} \label{442}
\begin{split}
b(\|x^*(t)- \tilde{x}(t+\eta_0)\|)
&\leq V(t, x^*(t)- \tilde{x}(t^*+\eta_0))\\
&\leq V(t^*, x^*(t^*)- \tilde{x}(t^*+\eta_0))\\
&\leq a(\|x^*(t^*)- \tilde{x}((t^*+\eta_0)\|)\\
&\leq a(\gamma)<b(\epsilon)
\end{split}
\end{equation}
hold.
Therefore, the inequality \eqref{445} holds for all $t\geq t^*$
(hence for $t\geq t_0+T$).
\end{proof}


\section{Applications}

\begin{example} \label{examp4} \rm
 Consider the  system of  delay differential equations with bounded variable delay,
\begin{equation} \label{733}
\begin{gathered}
x_1'(t)= - 1.5x_1(t)+x_2(\tau(t))+h_1(t)\\
x_2'(t)= -1.5x_2(t)+x_1(\tau(t))+h_2(t)\quad\text{for } t\geq t_0
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
 with an initial condition
 \begin{equation} \label{7331}
x_1(t+t_0)=\varphi_1(t) ,\quad x_2(t+t_0)=\varphi_2(t)  \quad\text{for }
t\in[-1,0],
\end{equation}
where $(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2$, $t_0\geq 0$,
$\tau\in C(\mathbb{R}_+,[-1,\infty)): t-1\leq \tau(t)\leq t$.
Note that $\tau(t)=t-|\sin(t)|$ is an example of the delay argument  in \eqref{733}.
\end{example}

Let there exist constants $L_1,L_2>0$ such that
$|h_i(t_1)-h_i(t_2)|\leq L_i|t_1-t_2|$, $i=1,2$.
Consider the Lyapunov function $V(t,x_1,x_2)=0.5(x_1^2+x_2^2)$.
Let $\varphi, \psi\in C([-1,0],\mathbb{R}^2)$, $\varphi=(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)$,
$\psi=(\psi_1,\psi_2)$,  be such that
$(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0),\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0))\in S(\lambda)$, $\lambda>0$,
and  for every $s\in[-1,0)$ the inequality
 \begin{equation} \label{444}
(\varphi_1(0)-\psi_1(0))^2+(\varphi_2(0)-\psi_2(0))^2
>(\varphi_1(s)-\psi_1(s))^2+(\varphi_2(s)-\psi_2(s))^2
\end{equation}
holds.
 Define $f_1(t,\varphi)=- 1.5\varphi_1(t)+\varphi_2(\tau(t))+h_1(t)$ and
$f_2(t,\varphi)=-1.5\varphi_2(t)+\varphi_1(\tau(t))+h_2(t)$.

From the definition of the derivative of Lyapunov function we obtain
\begin{align*}
&D^-_{\eqref{733}}V(t, \varphi(0), \psi(0),\eta)\\
&=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0^{-}}\sup {\frac{1}{h}}
 \Big[V(t+h,\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)+h(f_1(t,\varphi)\\
&\quad   -f_1(t+\eta,\psi)),\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)+h(f_2(t,\varphi)
 -f_2(t+\eta,\psi))) \\
&\quad   -V(t,\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0),\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)) \Big]\\
&= 0.5\lim_{h\rightarrow 0^{-}}\sup {\frac{1}{h}}\Big[
\Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)+h(f_1(t,\varphi)-f_1(t+\eta,\psi))\Big)^2 \\
&\quad -\Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)\Big )^2
 \\
&\quad  +\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)+h(f_2(t,\varphi)-f_2(t+\eta,\psi)
\Big )^2-\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)\Big)\Big ]\\
&= 0.5\lim_{h\rightarrow 0^{-}}\sup \Big[\Big(2\varphi_{1}(0)-2\psi_{1}(0)
 +h(f_1(t,\varphi)-f_1(t+\eta,\psi))\Big) \\
&\quad \times (f_1(t,\varphi)-f_1(t+\eta,\psi)) \\
&\quad  +\Big(2\varphi_{2}(0)-2\psi_{2}(0)+h(f_2(t,\varphi)
 -f_2(t+\eta,\psi)\Big ) (f_2(t,\varphi)-f_2(t+\eta,\psi))\Big]\\
&= \Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)\Big) (f_1(t,\varphi)-f_1(t+\eta,\psi)) \\
&\quad +\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)\Big )(f_2(t,\varphi)-f_2(t+\eta,\psi))\\
&= -1.5 \Big(\Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)\Big)^2
 +\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)\Big )^2\Big)\\
&\quad +\Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)\Big)\Big(\varphi_{1}(\tau(0))
 -\psi_{1}(\tau(0))\Big)\\
&\quad +\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)\Big)
 \Big(\varphi_{2}(\tau(0))-\psi_{2}(\tau(0))\Big)\\
&\quad +(h_1(t+\eta)-h_1(t))+(h_2(t+\eta)-h_2(t)).
\end{align*}
Applying the properties of functions $h_i(t),i=1,2$, inequalities
 $2ab\leq a^2+b^2$ and  \eqref{444} we obtain
\begin{align*}
&D^-_{\eqref{733}}V(t, \varphi(0), \psi(0),\eta)\\
&\leq - \Big(\Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)\Big)^2
 +\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)\Big )^2\Big)\\
&\quad +0.5  \Big(\Big(\varphi_{1}(\tau(0))-\psi_{1}(\tau(0))\Big)^2
 +\Big( \varphi_{2}(\tau(0))-\psi_{2}(\tau(0))\Big)^2 \Big)\\
&\quad  + L|\eta|\Big(|\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)|
 +|\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)|\Big)\\
&\leq -0.5 \Big(\Big(\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)\Big)^2
 +\Big(\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)\Big )^2\Big)\\
&\quad  + L|\eta|\Big(|\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)|
 +|\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)|\Big),
\end{align*}
where $L=\max\{L_1,L_2\}$.

Therefore, using $|\varphi_{1}(0)-\psi_{1}(0)|+|\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)|\leq \lambda$
 we obtain
\begin{equation}
D^-_{\eqref{733}}V(t, \varphi(0), \psi(0),\eta)\leq -V(t,\varphi_{1}(0)
-\psi_{1}(0),\varphi_{2}(0)-\psi_{2}(0)) +L\lambda|\eta|.
\end{equation}
The comparison scalar equation in this case is
\begin{equation} \label{4451}
u'(t)=-u+L \lambda|\eta|.
\end{equation}
The solution of \eqref{445} is  $u(t)=(- L \lambda|\eta|+u_0)e^{-(t-t_0)}+ L \lambda|\eta|$.
Therefore, $|u(t)|\leq |u_0|+2 L \lambda|\eta|$
which shows the zero solution of \eqref{4451}
 is uniformly stable with respect to the parameter $\eta$ and
according to Theorem \ref{thm3} the system \eqref{733} is uniformly
stable with initial time difference.


\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
This research was partially supported by Fund Scientific
Research MU13FMI002, Plovdiv University.


\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{AH} R. Agarwal, S. Hristova;
 Strict stability in terms of two measures for impulsive differential
 equations with ``supremum'', \emph{Appl. Analysis}, \textbf{91}, 7 (2012),
 1379-1392.

\bibitem{BH} D. Bainov, S. Hristova;
 \emph{Differential Equations with ``Maxima''},  Francis \&  Taylor,
CRC Press, 2011.

\bibitem{CY} M. Cicek, C. Yakar, M. Bayram Gucen;
Boundedness and Lagrange stability of fractional order perturbed system
related to unperturbed systems with initial time difference in
Caputo's sense, \emph{Adv. Difference Eq.}, 2011:54

\bibitem{DH}  A. Dishliev, S. Hristova;
Stability on a cone in terms of two measures for differential equations
with ``maxima'', \emph{Ann. Funct. Anal.} \textbf{1}, 1 (2010),  133-143.

\bibitem{Ha} J. Hale;
\emph{Functional Differential Equations},  1971 , Springer.

\bibitem{HH} J. Henderson, S. Hristova, Eventual Practical Stability
and cone valued Lyapunov functions for differential equations with
``Maxima'', \emph{Commun. Appl. Anal.}, \textbf{14}, 4 (2010), 515-524.

\bibitem{SH2} S. Hristova;
 Razumikhin method and cone valued Lyapunov functions for impulsive
differential equations with 'supremum',
\emph{Intern. J. Dynam. Sys.  Diff. Eq.}, \textbf{2}3 (2009), 223-236.

\bibitem{SH3} S. Hristova, Lipschitz stability for impulsive differential
equations with ``supremum'', \emph{Intern. Electr. J. Pure Appl. Math}, \textbf{1}
 4 (2010), 345-358.


\bibitem{SH4} S. Hristova;
Integral stability in terms of two measures for impulsive functional
differential equations, \emph{Math. Comput. Model.},
\textbf{51} 1 (2010), 100-108


\bibitem{SH1} S. Hristova;
Generalization of practical stability for delay differential equations with
respect to initial time difference, \emph{AIP Conf. Proc.}
1570, 313 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1063/1.4854771


\bibitem{SH5} S. Hristova;
Stability on a cone in terms of two measures for impulsive differential
 equations with ``supremum'', \emph{Applied Mathematics Letters},
\textbf{23} 5 (2010), 508-511.


\bibitem{SS} S. Hristova, K. Stefanova;
 Practical stability of impulsive differential equations with ``supremum''
 by integral inequalities, \emph{European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics},
\textbf{5} 1 (2012), 30-44.

\bibitem{HP} S. Hristova, I. Pahleva;
 Stability with initial data difference for delaay differential equations,
 \emph{Proc. 42 Spring Conf.UBM}, Borovetz, April 2–6  (2013), 228-233.

\bibitem{LLD} V. Lakshmikantham, S. Leela, J. V. Devi;
 Stability criteria for solutions of differential equations relative
to initial time difference, \emph{Int. J. Nonlinear Diff. Eqns.} \textbf{5} (1999),
 109–-114.

\bibitem{MR}  F. A. McRae;
 Perturbing Lyapunov functions and stability criteria for initial
time difference, \emph{Apll. Math. Comput.} \textbf{117} (2001), 313-320.

\bibitem{MRo} E. Mishchenko, N. Rozov;
\emph{Differential equations with small parameters and relaxation oscillations},
Plenum Press, New York, 1980, ISBN-13: 978-1-4615-9049-1.

\bibitem{SY}  M. D. Shaw, C. Yakar;
Stability criteria and slowly growing motions with initial time difference,
\emph{Probl. Nonl. Anal. Eng. Sys.} \textbf{1} (2000), 50–66.


\bibitem{SL} X. Song ,  A. Li,  Z. Wang;
 Study on the stability of nonlinear differential equations with initial
time difference, \emph{Nonlinear Anal.: Real World Appl.}
\textbf{11} (2010) 1304–-1311.

\bibitem{So1} X. Song, S. Li,  A. Li;
 Practical stability of nonlinear differential equation with initial time
 difference, \emph{Appl. Math. Comput.} \textbf{203} (2008) 157–162

\bibitem{Y} C. Yakar;
 Fractional Differential Equations in Terms of Comparison Results
and Lyapunov Stability with Initial Time Difference,
 \emph{Abstr. Appl. Anal.}, \textbf{2010} (2010), Article ID 762857.

\bibitem{YC} C. Yakar, M. Cicek, M. B. Gucen;
 Practical stability, boundedness criteria and Lagrange stability of
fuzzy differential systems, \emph{Comput. Math. Appl. } \textbf{64}, 6 (2012),
 2118–2127

\bibitem{YS} C. Yakar, M. Shaw;
 A Comparison result and Lyapunov stability criteria
with initial time difference, \emph{Dynam. Cont., Discr. Impuls. Sys.},
series A: Mathematical Analysis \textbf{12} (2005), 731--737.

\bibitem{YS1} C. Yakar, M. D. Shaw;
 Initial time difference stability in terms of two measures and variational
comparison result, \emph{Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete
and Impulsive Systems. Series A: Mathematical Analysis} \textbf{15} (3) (2008),
 417–-425.

\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
