\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref,amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
Seventh Mississippi State - UAB Conference on Differential Equations and
Computational Simulations,
{\em Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Conf. 17 (2009),  pp. 159--170.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2009 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document} \setcounter{page}{159}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2009/Conf/17\hfil Bounded solutions]
{Bounded solutions: Differential vs difference equations}

\author[J. Mawhin\hfil EJDE/Conf/17 \hfilneg]
{Jean Mawhin} 

\address{Jean Mawhin \newline
D\'epartement de math\'ematique, 
Universit\'e Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium}
\email{jean.mawhin@uclouvain.be}

\thanks{Published April 15, 2009.}
\subjclass[2000]{39A11, 39A12}
\keywords{Difference equations; bounded solutions; 
lower-upper solutions; \hfill\break\indent
 Landesman-Lazer conditions; guiding functions}

\begin{abstract}
 We compare some recent results on bounded solutions (over $\mathbb{Z}$) of  
 nonlinear difference  equations and systems to corresponding ones
 for nonlinear differential equations.  Bounded input-bounded output 
 problems, lower and upper solutions,  Landesman-Lazer conditions 
 and guiding functions techniques are considered. 
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}


\section{Introduction}

In this paper, we survey some recent results on bounded solutions (over
$\mathbb{Z}$) of  nonlinear difference equations or systems, and compare them
to the corresponding  situations for bounded solutions (over $\mathbb{R}$) of
nonlinear differential equations or  systems. 

We first give some  maximum and anti-maximum principles for bounded solutions
of  linear differential equations of the form  
\[ 
u'(t) + \lambda u(t) = f(t) 
\] 
and of corresponding linear difference
equations of the form  
\[ 
\Delta u_{m} + \lambda u_{m} = f_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}). 
\]


Then we compare Landesman-Lazer conditions for bounded solutions of 
Duffing's differential equations 
\[
x'' + cx' + g(x) = p(t),
\]
with those for bounded solutions of 
Duffing's difference equations 
\[
\Delta^2x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m}  + g(x_{m}) = p_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
or 
\[
\Delta^2x_{m-1} + 
c\Delta x_{m-1}  + g(x_{m}) = p_{m}\quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}).
\]

Finally, we compare the method of guiding functions for systems of 
ordinary differential equations 
\[
x' = f(t,x)
\]
and for systems of difference equations 
\[
\Delta x_{m} = f_{m}(x_{m}),
\]
or corresponding discrete dynamical systems
\[
x_{m+1} = g_{m}(x_{m}).
\]

\section{Bounded input--bounded output problem for 
first order linear equations}
 
 
\subsection{Bounded solutions of linear ordinary differential equations}

The \\ 
{\em bounded input-bounded output (BIBO)} problem for the linear ordinary differential equation
\begin{equation}\label{LODE}
u'(t) + \lambda u(t) = f(t)
\end{equation}
consists in finding conditions upon $\lambda$ under which, for each 
$f \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$, \eqref{LODE} 
 has a unique solution  $u \in AC(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$. We denote the usual 
 norm of $v \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ by $|u|_{\infty}$. Such a solution is simply 
 called a {\em bounded solution} of \eqref{LODE}. 
The BIBO problem was essentially solved as follows by Perron in 1930 \cite{P}. If 
 $\lambda = 0$,  we have no uniqueness for $f \equiv 0$, and no existence 
for  $f(t) \equiv 1$. If $\lambda \neq 0$, the homogeneous problem 
\begin{equation}\label{HLODE}
u'(t) + \lambda u(t) = 0
\end{equation}
only has the trivial bounded solution. For 
 $\lambda > 0$, 
 \begin{equation}\label{ODES1}
  u(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t e^{-\lambda(t-s)}f(s)\,ds 
\end{equation}
is a bounded solution of \eqref{LODE}, and hence the unique one. For 
  $\lambda < 0$, 
\begin{equation}\label{ODES2}
  u(t) = - \int_{t}^{+\infty} e^{-\lambda(t-s)}f(s)\,ds
\end{equation}
is a bounded solution of \eqref{LODE}, and hence the unique one. 
We summarize the results in the following 

\begin{proposition}\label{BSODE}
Equation \eqref{LODE} has a unique solution 
$u \in AC(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ for each 
$f \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ if and only if 
$\lambda \in \mathbb{R} \setminus\{0\}$.
\end{proposition}

\subsection{A maximum principle for bounded solutions of differential equations}
The following definition is modelled upon the one given in \cite{CMO} in 
a different  context. 

\begin{definition}\label{MPODE}  \rm
Given  $\lambda \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}$, the linear operator 
  $d/dt +\lambda I : AC(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R}) \to 
L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$  satisfies
a {\em maximum principle} (MP) if, for each  $f \in 
L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$, \eqref{LODE} 
has a unique solution $u$ and  if  $f(t) \geq 0$  $(t \in \mathbb{R})$ 
implies that $\lambda u(t)\geq 0$ $(t \in \mathbb{R})$. The MP is 
{\em strong}  if, furthermore, 
$f(t)\geq 0$ $(t \in \mathbb{R})$ and $\int_{\mathbb{R}}f  > 0$ imply that $
\lambda u(t) > 0$ $(t \in \mathbb{R})$).
\end{definition}

A direct consideration of formulas (\ref{ODES1}) and (\ref{ODES2}) immediately 
implies the following

\begin{proposition}\label{MPODET} 
If  $f \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$, the BIBO problem for 
\eqref{LODE}  has a  MP if and only if 
$\lambda \in \;]-\infty,0[\, \cup \,]0,+\infty[$, 
and the MP is not strong.
\end{proposition}

 
\subsection{Bounded solutions of linear difference equations}

Let 
 $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z}) = \{u = (u_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} : 
\sup_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}|u_{m}| < \infty\}$. Endowed with the norm 
 $|u|_{\infty} := \sup_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}|u_{m}| $,  $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
is a Banach space. 
We denote by  $\Delta u_{m} = u_{m+1}-u_{m} $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ the 
forward difference operator acting on sequences $(u_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$. 
The bounded input-bounded output (BIBO) problem we address is to 
 find the values of $\lambda$ such that, for each 
$(f_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$,  the linear difference 
equation
\begin{equation}\label{LDE}
\Delta u_{m} + \lambda u_{m} = f_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\end{equation}
has a unique solution  $(u_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. 
We refer those  solutions as {\em bounded solutions}. 

Easy computations show that, for $\lambda = 0$,  existence or  uniqueness may 
fail.  Namely, for $f_{m} = 0 $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, any constant sequence 
is a solution in  $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$, and, for $ f_{m} = 1$
$(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, the solutions given by 
$ u_{m} = u_{0} + m $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ are all unbounded. Similarly, for 
$\lambda = 2$, any alternating sequence $(-1)^m c$ is a solution of \eqref{LDE} 
with $f_{m} = 0 $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, and, for 
$f_{m} = (-1)^m $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ none of the solutions 
$  u_{m} = (-1)^m u_{0} + 
m(-1)^{m+1}$  $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ is bounded. 

Now, for $\lambda \in \mathbb{R} \setminus\{0,2\}$, it is easy to see that 
the homogeneous  difference equation
\begin{equation}\label{HLDE}
\Delta u_{m} + \lambda u_{m} = 0
\end{equation}
only has the trivial solution in $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. On the other hand, if 
$\lambda \in \,]0,2[\,$, 
\begin{equation}\label{BS1}
 u_{m} =   
\sum_{k=-\infty}^{m-1}(1-\lambda)^{m-k-1}f_{k} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}) 
\end{equation}
is a solution of \eqref{LDE} belonging to $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$, and hence 
the unique one. 
Similarly, if $\lambda \in \,]-\infty,0[\,\cup \,]2,+\infty[\,$, 
\begin{equation}\label{BS2}
u_{m} =  
- \sum_{k=m}^{\infty}(1-\lambda)^{m-k-1}f_{k} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\end{equation}
is the unique solution of \eqref{LDE} belonging to $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. We summarize 
the results in the following proposition.

\begin{proposition}\label{BSDE}
Equation \eqref{LDE} has a unique solution 
$(u_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ for each 
$(f_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ if and only if 
$\lambda \in \mathbb{R} \setminus\{0,2\}$.
\end{proposition}


\subsection{A maximum principle for bounded solutions of difference equations}

The following definition is modelled upon the one given in \cite{CMO} in a 
different  context. 

\begin{definition}\label{MP} \rm
 Given 
$\lambda \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}$, the linear operator 
 $\Delta +\lambda I : l^\infty(\mathbb{Z}) \to l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  satisfies
a {\em maximum principle} (MP) if  for each  $(f_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\in 
l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$, the equation \eqref{LDE} 
has a unique solution and if  $f_{m}\geq 0 $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z}) $ implies that 
$\lambda u_{m}\geq 0 $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$. The maximum principle is said 
to be   {\em  strong}  if, in addition, 
$f_{m}\geq 0 $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, and $\sup_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}f_{m} > 0$ 
imply that  $\lambda u_{m} > 0 $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z}) $).
\end{definition}

Notice that, in the more classical terminology modelled on the one for 
second order  elliptic operators, the above definition corresponds to a 
 {\em maximum principle} when $\lambda < 0$, and to an 
 {\em anti-maximum  principle} in the sense of Cl\'ement-Pelletier \cite{CP} 
 when $\lambda > 0$. The following 
result can be read directly upon formulas (\ref{BS1}) and (\ref{BS2}).

\begin{proposition}\label{MPT} 
 The BIBO problem for \eqref{LDE} 
 has a  MP if and only if 
$\lambda \in \;]-\infty,0[\, \cup \,]0,1]$,  and this 
MP is not strong;
\end{proposition}

\subsection{BIBO problem: linear differential vs linear difference equations}

It follows from Propositions \ref{MPODET} and \ref{MPT} that the ranges of 
values for which a maximum principle hold are different in the differential 
and the  difference cases. The following simple propositions help to 
understand the reason of  this difference. Given a linear operator $L$ 
between Banach spaces,  let $\sigma(L)$ 
denotes its (complex) spectrum and 
$\mathcal{R}(L) = \mathbb{C} \setminus \sigma(L)$ 
denote its resolvent set. The following propositions are analogous to 
those proved in \cite{CMO} is a  different context. 

\begin{proposition}\label{MPE} 
If the BIBO problem for $L + \lambda I$, with  
$L = \Delta$  or  $d/dt$ has a  MP for some  $\lambda \neq 0$, then 
\begin{equation}\label{MPEF}
|u|_{\infty} \leq \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{|\lambda|}.
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
If $u \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ is the solution of \eqref{LODE} and 
$v = \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{\lambda} \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ the solution of 
\[
Lv + \lambda v = |f|_{\infty},
\]
then $v-u \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ is the solution of 
\[
L(v - u) + \lambda(v-u) = |f|_{\infty} - f
\]
and the MP implies that  $\lambda(v - u) \geq 0$, i.e. that
\[
\lambda u \leq |f|_{\infty}.
\]
Similarly, we have 
\[
L(v+u) + \lambda(v + u) = |f|_{\infty} + f
\]
and hence, by the MP, $\lambda(v + u) \geq 0$, i.e.
$\lambda u \geq - |f|_{\infty}$.
\end{proof}


In the ordinary differential equation case, the estimate (\ref{MPEF}) can also be obtained directly for 
any $\lambda \in \mathbb{R} \setminus\{0\}$.  Indeed,  
it follows from (\ref{ODES1}) that if $\lambda > 0$, then 
\[
|u(t)| \leq |f|_{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{t}e^{-\lambda(t-s)}\,ds = 
\frac{1}{\lambda}|f|_{\infty}.
\]
Similarly, if $\lambda < 0$, we get
\[
|u(t)| \leq |f|_{\infty}\int_{t}^{+\infty}e^{-\lambda(t-s)}\,ds = -\frac{1}{\lambda}
|f|_{\infty}.
\]
In the DE case, the following estimates can be obtained directly from the formulas 
(\ref{BS1}) and (\ref{BS2}) 
\begin{gather*}
|u|_{\infty} \leq \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{|\lambda|} \quad \text{if } \lambda < 0, 
\quad
|u|_{\infty} \leq \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{|\lambda|} \quad \text{if } 0 <\lambda \leq 1,\\
|u|_{\infty} \leq \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{2-\lambda} \quad \text{if } 1 < \lambda < 2, 
\quad
|u|_{\infty} \leq \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{\lambda - 2} \quad \text{if } 2 < \lambda.
\end{gather*}


\begin{proposition}\label{MPR} 
If the BIBO problem for  $L + \lambda I$,  with  
$L = \Delta$  or  $d/dt$ has a  MP for some  $\lambda \neq 0$, then 
\begin{equation}\label{resolvent}
\mathcal{R}(L) \supset \{\mu \in \mathbb{C} : |\mu - \lambda| < |\lambda|\}.
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
We have, for $\mu \in \mathbb{C}$, 
\begin{align*}
Lu + \mu u = f  & \Leftrightarrow   Lu + \lambda u + (\mu - \lambda)u = f \\
 & \Leftrightarrow   u + (\mu - \lambda)(L + \lambda)^{-1}u 
  = (L + \lambda)^{-1}f,
\end{align*}
and, using Proposition \ref{MPE}, 
\[
|(\mu - \lambda)(L + \lambda)^{-1}u|_{\infty} \leq |\mu 
- \lambda|\frac{|u|_{\infty}}{|\lambda|},
\]
so that, for $\frac{|\mu - \lambda|}{|\lambda|} < 1$, equation 
$Lu + \mu u = f$ has a 
unique bounded solution. \end{proof}

It is easy to check that, for the BIBO problem in the ordinary 
differential equation case,  the spectrum $\sigma(L)$ of 
$L : AC(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R}) \to L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ 
is equal to $i\mathbb{R}$. 
 
\begin{figure}[ht]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1} % spectreODE1
\end{center}
\caption{ODE spectrum} \label{fig1}
\end{figure}

Therefore, for any $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$, the set 
$\{\mu \in \mathbb{C} : |\mu - \lambda| < |\lambda|\}$ is always 
contained in the resolvent set 
$\mathcal{R}(L)$. 

Similarly, for the BIBO problem in the difference equation case, 
the spectrum $\sigma(L)$  of 
$L : l^\infty(\mathbb{Z}) \to l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
is the circle   $\{1 + e^{i\theta} : \theta \in [0,2\pi]\}$. 
Hence, for any $\lambda < 0$, the set 
$\{\mu \in \mathbb{C} : |\mu - \lambda | < |\lambda|\}$ is contained 
in $\mathcal{R}(L)$, but, for $\lambda > 0$,
 this is only true for $\lambda \in \,]0,1]$. This, together with 
Proposition \ref {MPR}, sheds some light on the fact that the maximum 
principle 
for the BIBO problem in the difference case only holds for 
$\lambda \in \,]-\infty,0[\, \cup \,]0,1]$. Notice also that 
the estimate $|u|_{\infty} \leq \frac{|f|_{\infty}}{|\lambda|}$ only
 holds for those values of $\lambda$. 
 

\begin{figure}[ht]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2} % spectreDE1
\end{center}
\caption{DE spectrum} \label{fig2}
\end{figure} 
 

\section{Bounded input--bounded output problems for some Duffing's equations}

\subsection{Linear equations}

It is a standard result that the  second order linear ordinary differential 
equation 
\begin{equation}\label{2LODE}
x'' + cx' + ax = f(t)
\end{equation}
has a unique solution $x \in AC^1(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ 
for any 
$f \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ if and only if $a < 0$.

\subsection{Duffing's equations}

Duffing's differential equations are nonlinear second order differential equations of the form
\begin{equation}\label{DUODE}
x'' + cx' + g(x) = p(t),
\end{equation}
where $c \in \mathbb{R}$, $g : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ and $p : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ are continuous. 

Correspondingly, we call 
{\em Duffing difference equations} the second order nonlinear difference 
equations of  the form 
\begin{equation}\label{DUDE1}
\Delta^2x_{m-1} + 
c\Delta x_{m}  + g(x_{m}) = p_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\end{equation}
or 
\begin{equation}\label{DUDE2}
\Delta^2x_{m-1} + 
c\Delta x_{m-1}  + g(x_{m}) = p_{m}\quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\end{equation}
where  
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} = x_{m+1} - 2x_{m} + x_{m-1} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}),
\]
 $g \in C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$, and $  c \in \mathbb{R}.$

The bounded input-bounded output (BIBO) problem for (\ref{DUODE}) consists, for 
 given  $g$, in determining the inputs $p \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ for which  equation (\ref{DUODE}) 
 has at least one solution $u \in AC^1(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$. This problem was 
 first considered by Ahmad \cite{A}, and then by Ortega \cite{O}, Ortega-Tineo 
 \cite{OT}, and Mawhin-Ward \cite{MW}. 
 
 Similarly, the 
 bounded input-bounded output (BIBO) problem for (\ref{DUDE1}) or (\ref{DUDE2}) 
 consists, for given $g$, in determining the inputs  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in 
 l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ for which (\ref{DUDE1}) or (\ref{DUDE2}) has at least one solution 
 $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. See \cite{BM,M}. 
 

\subsection{Bounded lower and upper solutions}

We develop a method of lower and upper solutions for the bounded solutions of 
(\ref{DUDE1}) and (\ref{DUDE2}). We first need a limiting lemma \cite{M}. 

\begin{lemma}\label{LLDE} Let  $f_{m} \in C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ 
$(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, $ c \in \mathbb{R}$
 Assume that, for each  $n \in \mathbb{N}^*$, 
there exists  $(x^n_{m})_{-n-1\leq m\leq n+1}$  such that 
\[
\Delta^2 x^n_{m-1} + c\Delta x^n_{m} + f_{m}(x^n_{m}) = 0 \quad (-n \leq m \leq n)
\]
and such that   $ \alpha_{m} \leq x^n_{m} \leq \beta_{m}$ 
 $(|m| \leq n+1)$ 
 for some 
$(\alpha_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\in  l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$, 
 $(\beta_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in 
 l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. 
 Then there exists 
 $(\widehat x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in  l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  such that 
 \[
\Delta^2 \widehat x_{m-1} + c\Delta \widehat x_{m} + f_{m}(\widehat x_{m}) = 0, 
\; \alpha_{m} \leq \widehat x_{m} \leq \beta_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}).
\]
\end{lemma}

The same result for
\[
\Delta^2 \widehat x_{m-1} + 
c\Delta \widehat x_{m-1} + f_{m}(\widehat x_{m}) = 0 \;(m \in \mathbb{Z}).
\]
The proof is based upon Borel-Lebesgue lemma and Cantor diagonalization 
process. 
\smallskip


We now define the concept of bounded lower and upper solutions for 
second order difference 
equations \cite{M}. Let  $f_{m} \in C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}) $ 
$(m \in \mathbb{Z}), \; c \in \mathbb{R}$.

\begin{definition}\label{LUSDE} \rm
 $(\alpha_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  
 (resp. $(\beta_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$)  is a 
 {\em bounded lower
solution} (resp. {\em upper solution}) for 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + f_{m}(x_{m})=0  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
 if 
\begin{gather*}
 \Delta^2 \alpha_{m-1}+c\Delta \alpha_{m} + f_{m}(\alpha_{m}) 
 \geq 0\\
  (\text{resp.}\quad  \Delta^2 \beta_{m-1}+c\Delta \beta_{m} + 
 f_{m}(\beta_{m})\leq 0) \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}) 
\end{gather*}
\end{definition}
A similar definition holds for
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m-1} + f_{m}(x_{m})=0  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}).
\]
We have the associated existence theorem. 

\begin{theorem}\label{LUSTDE}
 If  $c \geq 0$  (resp.  $c \leq 0$) 
 and 
\begin{gather*}
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + f_{m}(x_{m})  =  0  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})\\
(\text{resp.} \quad \Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m-1} + f_{m}(x_{m}) 
= 0  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}))
\end{gather*}
 has a lower solution  $(\alpha_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  and an upper 
solution  $(\beta_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ such that 
$\alpha_{m} \leq \beta_{m}$ $  (m \in \mathbb{Z}),$
 then it 
 has a solution  $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$  such that 
$\alpha_{m} \leq x_{m} \leq
\beta_{m}  (m \in \mathbb{Z})$
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof} 
The proof is based upon the existence theorem for lower and upper solutions  for the Dirichlet problem
\begin{gather*}
\Delta^2 x_{m-1}+c\Delta x_{m} + f_{m}(x_{m}) = 0  \quad (-n \leq m \leq n)\\
x_{-n-1} = \alpha_{-n-1},\quad  x_{n+1} = \alpha_{n+1}
\end{gather*}
for each $n$ and the limiting Lemma \ref{LLDE}. 
 \end{proof}

An important special case is that of constant lower and upper solutions. 

 \begin{corollary}\label{CLUS}
 If   $c \geq 0$ 
 and if  $\exists  \alpha \leq \beta$  such that 
$f_{m}(\beta) \leq 0 \leq f_{m}(\alpha) $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, 
then 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + f_{m}(x_{m})=0  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
 has a solution  $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$ such that 
$\alpha \leq x_{m} \leq \beta $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z}).$
\end{corollary}

\begin{example} \rm 
If  $c \geq 0$  and  $a > 0$,  then for each  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in 
l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} -a x_{m}=p_{m}  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
 has a unique solution  $(u_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$.
\end{example}

Similar results hold if $c \leq 0$ for the equations 
\begin{gather*}
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m-1} + f_{m}(x_{m})=0  
\quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})\\
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m-1}  -a x_{m}=
p_{m}  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}).
\end{gather*}
In the ordinary differential equation case, a similar  result holds for 
all $c \in \mathbb{R}$ 
 for the equations 
 \begin{gather*}
x'' + cx' + f(t,x) = 0\\
x'' + cx' -ax  = p(t) \quad (a > 0, \quad p \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R}))
\end{gather*}
(see \cite{B,OP}). 
 
\subsection{Second order linear equations}

The following result can be proved like Proposition \ref{BSDE}. 

\begin{proposition}\label{BSDE1} 
 If   $c \not \in \{-2,0\}$  
\[
\Delta x_{m-1} + cx_{m} = h_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
has a unique  solution   $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
  for each  
$(h_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$.
\end{proposition}

Before dealing with second order difference equations, we introduce some 
notions and results for  sequences with bounded primitive. 
The corresponding concepts for functions upon $\mathbb{R}$ were 
introduced in \cite{O}. 

\begin{definition}\label{Deltaprim} \rm
The $\Delta$-primitive  $(H^{\Delta}_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$  of 
 $(h_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$ is any sequence 
 $(H^{\Delta}_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$ such that 
 $\Delta H^{\Delta}_{m} = h_{m}$ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$.
\end{definition}

Such a $\Delta$-primitive is for example given by 
\[
H^{\Delta}_{m} = \begin{cases}
\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}h_{k} &\text{if } m \geq 1\\
0 & \text{if } m = 0\\
-\sum_{k=m}^{-1}h_{k}& \text{if } m \leq -1
\end{cases}
 \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
We define the space $BP(\mathbb{Z})$ as the set  
\[
\{(h_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} :  
(H^{\Delta}_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})\}.
\]
It is easy to check that $BP(\mathbb{Z}) \subsetneq l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. 
The situation is different in the  continuous case, where   
$BP(\mathbb{R}) \not \subset 
BC(\mathbb{R})$, and   $ BC(\mathbb{R}) \not \subset BP(\mathbb{R})$.

We have now the following result for the BIBO problem for some linear
 second order difference equations. 

\begin{proposition}\label{2NDDE1}  
If  $c \not\in \{-2,0\}$,  
\[
\Delta^{2}x_{m-1} + c \Delta x_{m} = h_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
has a solution  $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  
if and only if  $h \in BP(\mathbb{Z})$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proposition}\label{2NDDE2}  
If  $c \not\in \{0,2\}$, 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c \Delta x_{m-1} = h_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
 has a solution 
$(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  if and only if 
$h \in BP(\mathbb{Z})$. 
\end{proposition}

The corresponding results for ordinary differential equations were 
proved by Ortega 
in \cite{O}.

\begin{proposition}\label{2NDODE}
 If  $c \neq 0$, equation 
 \[
x''  + cx' = h(t)
 \]
 has a solution  $x \in AC(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$  
 if and only if  $h \in BP(\mathbb{R})$.
\end{proposition}

We now introduce concepts of generalized mean values to bounded sequences.

\begin{definition}\label{LUMV} \rm
The {\em lower (resp. upper) mean value} of 
$(p_{j})_{j \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ is the real 
number defined by 
\begin{gather*}
\widehat p := \lim_{n \to \infty}\inf_{m-k \geq n}
\Big(\frac{1}{m-k}\sum_{j=k+1}^m p_{j}\Big)\\
\Big(\text{resp.} \quad \widetilde p := \lim_{n \to \infty}\sup_{m-k \geq n}
\Big(\frac{1}{m-k}\sum_{j=k+1}^m p_{j}\Big)\Big)
\end{gather*}
\end{definition}

\begin{lemma} \label{MVL}
The following statements are equivalent : 
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] $\alpha < \widehat p \leq \widetilde p < \beta.$
\item[(ii)] there exists  $(p^*_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in BP(\mathbb{Z})$, 
 $(p^{**}_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  such that 
 $p_{m} = p^*_{m} + p^{**}_{m}$  $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$  and 
$\alpha < \inf_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}p^{**}_{k} \leq \sup_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}p^{**}_{k} < \beta$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

\begin{corollary} 
If   $\widehat p = \widetilde p = 0$, 
 then, for each  $\epsilon > 0$ 
there exists $(p^*_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in BP(\mathbb{Z})$,  $(p^{**}_{m})_{m \in 
\mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  such that 
 $p_{m} = p^*_{m} + p^{**}_{m}$  $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, 
 $\sup_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}|p_{k}^{**}| < \epsilon$.
\end{corollary}

In the continuous case those results and concepts are due to
 Ortega-Tineo \cite{OT}.


\subsection{Duffing difference equations}

We can now prove the following result for the existence of bounded solutions 
of Duffing difference equations. 

\begin{theorem}\label{BSDDE}  
Assume that the following conditions hold.
\begin{enumerate}
\item $c > 0$,  $g \in  C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$, 
 $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in  l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$
\item There exists  $r_{0} > 0$  and  $\delta_{-} < \delta_{+}$ 
 such that 
\[
g(y) \geq \delta_{+} \quad \text{ for }  y \leq -r_{0}, \quad 
g(y) \leq \delta_{-} \quad \text{ for }  y \geq r_{0}.
\]
\item  $\delta_{-} < \widehat p \leq \widetilde p < \delta_{+}$. 
\end{enumerate}
Then 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + g(x_{m}) = p_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
 has at least one solution  $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} 
\in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Write  $p_{m} = p^*_{m} + p^{**}_{m}$  $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ 
 with  $(p^*_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in BP(\mathbb{Z})$, 
 $(p^{**}_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  and 
 $\delta_{-} < \inf_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}p^{**}_{k} \leq \sup_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}p^{**}_{k} < 
\delta_{+}$. 
By Proposition \ref{2NDDE1},  
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} = p^*_{m} \quad  (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
has a  solution  $(u_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. 
Letting $x_{m} = u_{m} + z_{m} $ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$, we obtain 
 the equivalent problem 
 \begin{equation}\label{EQUIV}
\Delta^2 z_{m-1} + c\Delta z_{m} + g(u_{m} + z_{m}) - p^{**}_{m} = 0 
\quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}).
\end{equation}
Then $\alpha = -r_{0} - \sup_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}u_{k}$  is a lower 
solution and  $\beta = r_{0} - \inf_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}u_{k}$  
an upper solution for (\ref{EQUIV}), and we 
 conclude using Corollary \ref{CLUS}.
 \end{proof}

\subsection{Landesman-Lazer condition}

Theorem \ref{BSDDE} gives existence conditions of the Landesman-Lazer type. 

\begin{corollary}  
If   $ c > 0$, $g \in  C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$, 
 $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$, and 
 \begin{equation}\label{LL}
\overline{\lim}_{y \to +\infty}g(y) < \widehat p \leq \widetilde p < 
 \underline{\lim}_{y \to -\infty}g(y)
 \end{equation}
 then 
 \[
 \Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + g(x_{m}) = p_{m} \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z}) 
 \]
   has a solution  $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{remark}  \rm
If, for all  $x \in \mathbb{R}$, 
\[
- \infty < \overline{\lim}_{y \to +\infty} g(y) < g(x) < \underline{\lim}_{y \to -\infty}g(y) < +
\infty
\]
   then  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in  l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$   and (\ref{LL})  is 
 necessary for the existence of a bounded solution.
\end{remark}

Similar results hold for 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c \Delta x_{m-1} + g(x_{m}) = p_{m} \quad 
(c < 0)\quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
In the ordinary differential equation case, similar results hold for 
\[
x'' + cx' + g(x) = p(t) \quad (c \neq 0)
\] 
(see \cite{MW}). 

\begin{example} \rm
1.  If  $c > 0$,   $b > 0$, 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} - b\frac{x_{m}}{1 + |x_{m}|} = p_{m} \quad 
(m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
 has a solution  $ (x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
if and only if  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  and 
$-b < \widehat p \leq \widetilde p < b$.

2.  If  $c > 0$,   $b > 0$,  and  $0 \leq a < 1$, 
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} - b\frac{x_{m}}{1 + |x_{m}|^{a}} = p_{m} \quad 
(m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
has a solution  $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
if and only if  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in  l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. 
\end{example}
It remains an open problem to 
prove or disprove that 
 if  $c > 0$  and  $b > 0$,
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + \frac{bx_{m}}{1 + |x_{m}|} = p_{m} \quad 
(m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
has a solution 
 $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
if and only if  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$  and 
$-b < \widehat p \leq \widetilde p < b$.

Similarly it is an open problem to prove or disprove that 
 if  $c > 0$,  $b > 0$,  and  $0 \leq a < 1,$
\[
\Delta^2 x_{m-1} + c\Delta x_{m} + \frac{bx_{m}}{1 + |x_{m}|^{a}} = p_{m} \quad 
(m \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
has a solution 
$(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ 
if and only if  $(p_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in  l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$.

The corresponding results are true in the ordinary differential equation 
case \cite{A,O,OT}. 

\section{Guiding functions for bounded solutions of systems of difference 
equations}

\subsection{Guiding functions  for ordinary differential equations}

Consider the system 
\begin{equation}\label{ODES}
x' = f(t,x)
\end{equation}
where 
 $f \in C(\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R}^n)$. 

\begin{definition}\label{GFODE} \rm
A guiding function for (\ref{ODES}) is a function  $V \in C^1(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R})$ such that, for some 
$\rho_{0} > 0$,  
\[
\langle \nabla V(x),f(t,x)\rangle \leq 0
\]
 when  $\|x\| \geq \rho_{0}$.
 \end{definition}
 
The following theorem was first proved by Krasnosel'skii-Perov in 1958 
\cite{KP}. A  simpler proof 
has been given by  Alonso-Ortega in  1995 \cite{AO}. 

\begin{theorem}\label{KP} If (\ref{ODES}) 
   has a guiding function  $V$  such that 
 $\lim_{\|x\| \to \infty}V(x) = +\infty$, 
 then (\ref{ODES}) has a solution $x$  bounded over $\mathbb{R}$.
 \end{theorem}

A natural question is to know if a corresponding result holds for a  difference system
\[
x_{n+1}-x_{n} = f_{n}(x_{n}) \quad (n \in \mathbb{Z})
\]
or,  equivalently for a  discrete dynamical system
\[
x_{n+1} = g_{n}(x_{n}) \quad (n \in \mathbb{Z}).
\]

\subsection{Guiding function for difference equations}

Let us consider the system
\begin{equation}\label{DES}
x_{m+1} = g_{m}(x_{m}) \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
\end{equation}
where $g_{m} \in C(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R}^n)$ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$.

\begin{definition}\label{GFDE} \rm
A guiding function for \eqref{DES} is a function  
$V \in C(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R})$, such that, for some  $\rho_{0} > 0$,
 $V(g_{m}(x)) \leq V(x)$ 
when   $\|x\| \geq \rho_{0}$   ($m \in \mathbb{Z}$).
\end{definition}

The result corresponding to Theorem \ref{KP} would be : 
 if  $x_{m+1} = g_{m}(x_{m})$  $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ 
 has a guiding function  $V$  such that  
 $\lim_{\|x\| \to \infty}V(x) = +\infty$, 
 then it has a bounded solution.

The following example, given in \cite{BM}, shows that  this result 
is {\em false}. 
Consider the maps $g_{m} \in C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ defined by 
\[
 g_{m}(x) =  \begin{cases}
 1 & \text{if }x \leq - 2, \\
 mx + 2m+1 &\text{if } - 2 <x < -1, \\
 m+1 &\text{if }-1 \leq x \leq 1,  \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})\\
 -mx + 2m+1 &\text{if } 1 < x <2,  \\
 1 &\text{if }x \geq 2.  
 \end{cases}
\]

\begin{figure}[ht]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig3} % contrexample 
\end{center}
\caption{Graph of $g_{m}(x)$} \label{fig3}
\end{figure}

 Notice that  $g_{0}(x) = 1$ $(x \in \mathbb{R})$, and hence 
$x_{1}= g_{0}(x_{0}) = 1$, $x_{2} = g_{1}(1) = 2$, 
$x_{3} = g_{2}(3)= 1$, $x_{4} = g_{3}(1) = 4$,  \dots, $ x_{2k-1} = 1$, 
$x_{2k} = 2k$  $(k \in \mathbb{N}_{0}$, 
$x_{0} \in \mathbb{R})$. Hence, all the solutions of 
 \begin{equation}\label{CEX}
 x_{m+1} = g_{m}(x_{m}) \quad (m \in \mathbb{Z})
 \end{equation}
 are unbounded in the future, and no bounded solution exists. 
On the other hand,  $V(x) = |x|$ with  
$ \rho_{0} = 3$ is a coercive guiding function for  (\ref{CEX}). 


But the following existence theorem can be proved \cite{BM}. 
It uses another limiting 
lemma,  due, for ordinary differential equations,  to 
 Krasnosel'skii \cite{K}, and whose proof is similar to that of Lemma \ref{LLDE}.
  

\begin{lemma}\label{LL2}   
Assume that  $g_{m} \in C(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R}^n)$  $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$ 
 and that there exists  $\rho > 0$ 
such that,  for each $k \in \mathbb{N}^*$ 
\[
 x_{m+1} = g_{m}(x_{m})  \quad (-k \leq m \leq k)
\]
has a solution  $(x^k_{m})_{-k\leq m\leq k+1}$,  satisfying
 \[
\max_{-k \leq m \leq k+1}\|x^k_{m}\| \leq \rho.
 \]
 Then there exists a solution  $(\widehat x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}$  of \eqref{DES} 
  such that  $\sup_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\|\widehat x_{m}\| \leq \rho$.
\end{lemma}


\begin{theorem}\label{GFTDE} 
 Let  $g_{m}\in C(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R}^n)$   $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$. 
 If \eqref{DES} 
  has a guiding function  $V$  with constant  $\rho_{0}$ 
 such that  $\lim_{\|x\| \to \infty}V(x) = +\infty$ and such that 
\begin{equation}\label{BND}
\sup_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\max_{\|x\| \leq \rho_{0}}\|g_{m}(x)\| < \infty , 
\end{equation}
then \eqref{DES} has a solution 
$(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in 
(l^\infty(\mathbb{Z}))^n$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Take   $\rho_{1} > \max\{\rho_{0}, \sup_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\max_{\|x\| \leq \rho_{0}}\|g_{m}(x)\|\}$. 
Define 
 $$
V_{1} := \max_{\|x\| \leq \rho_{1}}V(x).
$$
Take  $\rho_{2} > \rho_{1}$ such that 
\[
B_{\rho_{0}} \subset B_{\rho_{1}} \subset S_{1} := \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : 
V(x) \leq V_{1}\} 
\subset B_{\rho_{2}}.
\]
Then it is easy to show that  $ S_{1}$  is positively invariant under 
the flow \eqref{DES}. 
For  $n \in \mathbb{N}$ fixed and  $(x^n)_{m \geq -n}$   the solution 
such that  $x^n_{-n} = 0$ is such that
\[
x^n_{m} \in S_{1} \subset B_{\rho_{2}} \quad (m \geq -n, \; n \in \mathbb{N}).
\]
Finally,  use Lemma \ref{LL2} to obtain a solution 
 $(x_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{Z}} \in (l^\infty(\mathbb{Z}))^n$.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}  \rm
Inequality (\ref{BND}) trivially holds if  $g_{m} = g$ $(m \in \mathbb{Z})$.
\end{remark}


\begin{thebibliography}{00}


\bibitem{A} S. Ahmad,
\emph{A nonstandard resonance problem for ordinary
differential equations,} Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. \textbf{323} (1991), 857-875.

\bibitem{AO} J.M. Alonso and R. Ortega, 
\emph{Global asymptotic stability of a forced 
Newtonian system with dissipation}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. \textbf{196} (1995), 965-986.

\bibitem{BM} J.B. Baillon, J. Mawhin,  
\emph{Bounded solutions of some nonlinear 
difference equations, } in preparation.
 
\bibitem{B} I. Barbalat,  
\emph{Applications du principe topologique de T.
Wazewski aux \'equations diff\'erentielles du second ordre,} Ann. Polon. Math.
\textbf{5} (1958), 303-317.

\bibitem{CMO}  J. Campos, J. Mawhin, and R. Ortega,  
\emph{Maximum principles around an 
eigenvalue with constant eigenfunctions,}  Communic. Contemporary Math., to appear.

\bibitem{CP} Ph. Cl\'ement, L.A. Peletier, 
\emph{An anti-maximum principle for second-order
elliptic operators,}  J. Differential Equations \textbf{34} (1979), 218--229.

\bibitem{K} M.A. Krasnosel'skii,  
\emph{Translation along trajectories of
differential equations,} (Russian),  Nauka, Moscow, 1966. English translation
Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1968. 

\bibitem{KP} M.A. Krasnosel'skii and A.I. Perov, 
\emph{On a certain principle
of existence of bounded, periodic and almost periodic solutions of systems of
ordinary differential equations,} (Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR \textbf{123}
(1958), 235-238.

\bibitem{M}  J. Mawhin,  
\emph{Bounded solutions of some second order difference equations,}  
Georgian Math. J.  \textbf{14} (2007), 315-324.

\bibitem{MW} J. Mawhin and J.R. Ward Jr., 
\emph{Bounded solutions of some second order 
nonlinear differential equations,}  J. London Math. Soc. (2)  \textbf{58} (1998), 733-747.

\bibitem{OP} Z. Opial, 
\emph{Sur les int\'egrales born\'ees de l'\'equation
$u'' = f(t,u,u'),$} Ann. Polon. Math. \textbf{4} (1958), 314-324.

\bibitem{O} R. Ortega,  
\emph{A boundedness result of Landesman-Lazer
type,} J. Differential Integral Equations \textbf{8} (1995), 729-734.

\bibitem{OT} R. Ortega and A. Tineo,  
\emph{Resonance and non-resonance in a
problem of boundedness,} Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. \textbf{124} (1996), 2089--2096.

\bibitem{P} O. Perron, 
\emph{Die Stabilit\"atfrage bei Differentialgleichungen}, Math. Z. 
\textbf{32} (1930), 703-728.
\end{thebibliography}


\end{document}
